Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Link between the external and the internal Area Specialist IR theorist Public Intellectual
Chris Hill (2004: 3): Is the focus to be reduced to the rump of what diplomats say to each other, which would leave out many of the most interesting aspects of international politics, or should it be widened to include almost everything that emanates from every actor on the world scene?
Definition 1: the sum of external relations conducted by an independent actor (usually a state) in international relations.
Definition 2: the pursuit of a foreign policy is about the effort to carry through some generally conceived strategy, usually on the basis of a degree of rationality, in the sense that objectives, time-frames and instruments are at least brought into focus. Thus foreign policy must always be seen as a way of trying to hold together or make sense of the various activities which the state or even the wider community is engaged in internationally.
Realism
What are the basic tenants of realism? What problems can we see in realisms ability to explain foreign policy? Can we make a distinction between foreign policy and international relations?
What is rationality in this context? What are the problems of the rational/public choice approach?
Post-Modernism
What is post-modernism? Where does discourse theory come into it? Can we see any problems with a postmodernist approach to foreign policy?
What is FPA? Where does the focus lie? How does it differ from other approaches? Can we see any problems with FPA?
the collapse of certain international institutions, changed the balance of power, but also represented the destruction of a major trans-national ideology Do we have a new ideology to replace international socialism? If so, what are its effects on international relations and foreign policy?
Globalisation
Has it made foreign policy redundant? Does the state still matter?
No Yes
World system qualified state sovereignty Is this a part of globalization? Has the Iraq conflict been a set-back for humanitarian intervention?
Do the changes in the international system change the way we must think about foreign policy?
Where does agency lie? Can we distinguish between foreign and domestic policies? How do we observe the external? Does this mean that everything which has a system that projects outwards is foreign policy?
Do the changes in the international system change the way we must think about foreign policy?
Finally, FPA must face the normative issues which its positivist roots have tended to obscure.
For example, is how we think about foreign policy dominated by how we think foreign policy should happen (e.g. democratically)? How far should foreign policy be accountable to its citizens?
Does this allow us talk about good and bad foreign policy in both a normative and positive context?
In Conclusion
What is foreign policy? What role does FPA play in explaining it? Has the nature of foreign policy changed? Where does this leave us?