Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
Obseravational and analytical studies Longitudinal studies We start knowing the effect (the disease) and we look for the risk factor/factors, in general, in a retrospective manner Case-control study types: prospective retrospective
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
The design of the case-control study
exposed Sample with disease unexposed Target population exposed Sample without disease unexposed
Time
Study direction
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
Selecting the control group: hospitalized patients suffering from another disease general population from the same town specific groups (family, friends)
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
The data is organised into a 2x2 contingency table
With disease
Without disease
TOTAL
a
c a+c
b
d b+d
a+b
c+d a+b+c+d
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
DATA ANALYSIS
Exposure odds calculation for both case and control groups: - exposure odds for cases =
a c
a c ad b bc d
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
INTERPRETATION
OR > 1
OR = 1
there is NO association between exposure and disease OR < 1
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR CASE-CONTROL STUDIES
If the obtained p value is smaller than 0,05 (p<0.05) then we have a statistically significant result CI must not contain the value 1 (lower limit should be greater than 2)
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
OR interpretation depending on CI:
If OR>1 and CI limits are close to OR, but without including the value 1, then we can state that there is a positive association between the risk factor and the disease
If OR>1 and CI includes the value 1 we can say that is NO association between exposure and disease
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
ADVANTAGES:
Fast Cheap Easy to perform Requires a relatively small number of subjects It looks into more than one risk factor (more than one exposure)
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
DISADVANTAGES:
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
EXAMPLE: In an obstetrics clinic there was performed a study on the newborns between 1960 and 2000, in order to establish a possible connection between drinking alcohol during pregnancy and the apparition of the lip and maxillary cleft. During this study there were devised two groups, one of 43 newborns with lip clefs or labio-maxillo-palatine clefs and a control group with newborns without the malformation. There are no differences between the two groups (except the presence of the malformation in the cases group). There were excluded from the sample lot the patients with other malformations besides lip clefs or labio-maxillo-palatine clefs.