Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Number of Medical Negligence cases registered in the Government Contract and Medical Negligence Unit of the Civil Division.
YEAR Case No.
2002 34
2003 36
2004 36
2005 33
2006 39
2007 46
2008 53
2009 45
2010 37
2011 56
From 2006-2011, 266 medical negligence cases have been registered with the unit.
There is clearly marked increase negligence cases from the late 1990s.
in
medical
*
* According
to the Malaysian Ministry of Health Annual Report 2010, the amount of compensation paid for court cases has risen from RM1.2 million in 2006 to RM5.6 million in 2010.
* Payment * In
for potential medico-legal cases and settled out of court has also risen from RM25,000 in 2006 to RM906,365.21 in 2010. the period of 5 years from 2005-2009, 113 negligence cases involving government healthcare providers, mainly doctors, have been settled in and out of court, of which Obstetrics and Gynaecology accounted for 42 of them (37%).
negligence cases.
*
* In
an interview, Datuk Dr NKS Tharmaseelan, President of the Medico Legal Society of Malaysia shared an opinion that doctors have gone bankrupt from paying up large awards, while some even if found innocent of negligence have given up their practice due to the stress, suffered reputation and social standing, and pressures of being in the spotlight during the course of the court case.
the top of the list is O&G where insurance premiums for specialists increased sharply from RM15,300 in 2004 toRM43,610 in 2009, rising averagely RM5000 to RM6000 annually. To date, Malaysian Obstetricians have to pay RM62,000 to protect themselves from the threat of litigation. is also observed that the liability of the costs are passed along and returned to be borne by patients as part of the price of medical service.
* It
4
From the World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 2013 by Puteri Nemie Jahn Kassim and Khadijah Mohd Najid
Dr Soo Fook Mun v Foo Fio Na and Anor [2001] 2 MLJ 193: ... if the law played too interventionist a role in the field of medical negligence, it will lead to the practice of defensive medicine and the cost of medical care for the man on the street would become prohibitive without being necessarily beneficial.
Alternative Dispute Resolution refers to the different methods of resolving disputes between parties outside the judicial structure or process, which is an alternative to the widely known or accepted formal litigation or court hearings.
ADR is a form of facilitated settlement, which is confidential and without prejudice. Consequently the contents of the process need not usually be disclosed to a court.
ADR process includes mediation, facilitation, arbitration, case evaluation, neutral fact-finding, and consensus building processes.
6
An identification of the main facts to be discussed (These are generally prioritized in cases with a lot of issues.)
Closing process whereby agreements are written up and the mediation process is ended.
Arbitration Agreement
Appointme nt of Arbitrator
Preliminary Meeting
Order of directions: Pleadings, Discovery, Exchange of Witness Statements , Hearing, Closing Submission s
Issuance of award
*
Confidentiality Active involvement of parties in resolving the dispute Time & Costs saving Matter is heard by experts in the related field
*
* Very
true in relation to ADR. There are different considerations which determines which ADR mechanism is fitting.
* Cost and complexity of the dispute are the main considerations and
next is the relationship of disputing parties.
* Where matter/ issue is simpler and where parties are looking for
effective communication, continuity in relationship and maintaining good will, it is best to resolve through mediation.
11
*
* What are the patients looking for?
* EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
* Patients want some control in the decision making process they want to
make an informed choice based on recommendations from experts.
* Most
of the times simple apology, the costs of hospitalization and treatment, or merely an explanation of what and how it had happened. and physicians alike would prefer matters to be kept off the public records and certainly not in the newspapers.
12
*
* Arbitration * Physicians * Mediation
discourages communication other than those between the parties respective lawyers. and patients communicate in the form of answers to questions, either in interrogatories, depositions or at a hearing. Instead of communicating, they testify. takes place in the shadow of law. Both parties seek to understand and persuade the other of their best estimate of what the likely result of the trial. is able to address any interest that he may have regard to the claim.
13
*
* Arbitration is also workable with the following considerations:
* When the focus is not about maintaining relationship. * Finality in the decision. * Having an expert to decide and still maintain confidentiality.
* The main concern:* Whether patient are able to bear the costs of arbitration (being a
more costly form of ADR)
* There
14
*
* Experience of the Malaysian Dental Association:
*
A study carried out in 2009 on 41 cases in the duration of 3 years where 69% of the cases were successfully mediated, 10% unresolved and 21% are in various stages of mediation.
* The Malaysian Dental Association has shown mediation with a success rate of
95% and their dental indemnity insurance premiums have remained at RM 1150/- per annum.
* In
2005, only 11 medical negligence lawsuits were reported in the Subordinate Courts. All were settled out of court.
the right education and proper direction from the relevant parties, there is a real prospect for medical negligence cases to be removed from the litigation landscape.
15
* With
*
The mediator or arbitrator would be an EXPERT in the industry. CONFIDENTIALITY of the proceedings, protects loss of reputation which is essential in this industry. PRIVACY of the dispute resolution process and greater flexibility.
Less adversarial, may be more suitable where parties are seeking closure.
Disputes would be resolved faster and inadvertently the cost would be reduced. Costs of Mediation are much lower.
16
Ad hoc
Mediation/Arbitration
KLRCA came into existence in 1978 by virtue of the Host Country Agreement between the Government of Malaysia and the Asian-African Legal Consultative Committee, formally know as AALCO.
KLRCA has been entrusted with broad functions as a coordinating agency in the AALCOs integrated disputes settlement system.
18
To coordinate and assist the activities of existing arbitral institutions, particularly among those within the two regions
To render assistance in the conduct of Ad Hoc arbitrations, particularly those held under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
To provide for arbitration under the auspices of the two centres where appropriate
19
To provide alternative options for the settlement of disputes such as mediation under the Mediation Rules of the KLRCA
20
To appoint arbitrators for disputing parties, as and when requested, under the Rules for Arbitration of KLRCA and the Malaysian Arbitration Act, 2005
*
21
*
The Act does not define a Mediator or the qualifications required. This allows room for institutions to maintain/set their own qualifications. The Government is subject to the Act.
22
KLRCA recently
2013.
* The
new set of rules provide for a simpler and practical mediation process aimed at providing a fast and cost efficient alternative dispute resolution.
* It improvises and simplifies the appointment process of the Mediator. * Further, it sets out the conduct and ethics of the Mediator as well as
the participation of Parties to the Mediation process.
*
Rules 7 to 11
Upon commencement of the Mediation process, the rules clarify on the appointment of the Mediator. Director of the KLRCA to appoint the Mediator where the parties fail to agree within 30 days of the Request for Mediation. The appointment of the Mediator under of the KLRCA Mediation Rules removes the requirement of request from parties.
Rules 10 and 11
incorporates requirements on independence, impartiality and code of conduct. provide for the disqualification of the Mediator if any party to the Mediation objects to the continued service of the Mediator.
Rules 12 to 16
Mediators role prior to the commencement of the Mediation is laid out in terms of communication with Parties as well as participation in preconferences. The Rules lay down the fundamental requirement of good faith of all Parties participating in the Mediation process.
24
*
Rules 17
requires Parties representatives involved in the mediation process to have
the necessary mandate and authorization to settle the dispute.
* This is
to ensure that parties participate in the Mediation with the intention of resolving the dispute in the most timeous manner.
Rules 27(d)
Mediation
time.
shall be deemed terminated if it is not resolved upon expiry of 3 months from request of Mediation. * Parties with interest in continuing with the Mediation may agree to extend the
Rules 19-21
A
Confidentiality Agreement and Undertaking incorporated under Schedule A of the rules.
arising out of the Mediation private and confidential.
25
has
been
All parties to the Mediation are bound to keep all matters relating to or
Regional Resolution Global Solution
Administrative Costs
250.00
500.00
Mediators Fees
26
Parties may agree to mediate under the KLRCA Rules by incorporating a model clause such as below:
Where, in the event of a dispute arising out of or relating to this contract, the parties wish to seek an amicable settlement of that dispute by mediation, the mediation shall take place in accordance with the Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration Rules for Mediation as at present force.
27
Up to date, simple and practical Rules of procedure Administrative Assistance Panel of Mediators Facilities and Support Services Cost Effective
28
*
KLRCA has its own framework, procedures and rules designed to assist parties (based on UNCITRAL Rules for Arbitration) Administrative assistance Panel of Arbitrators (listing according to nationality) Facilities and support services Cost effective:
Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach, termination or invalidity thereof shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the KLRCA Arbitration Rules
*
* Healthcare * Medical
provider should stay up todate with latest ADR processes that are available. practitioner who understands and appreciates the ADR mechanism will be able to carry out self-assessment. E.g. Carry out the test (Bolam / Whitaker) as a checklist when making the necessary decision or conduct of treating patients. ADR clauses in agreement with patients seeking healthcare (Mediation for example) dispute resolution strategy. E.g. mediate first, then
* Include
* Escalated
arbitrate.
31