Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Whats discussed?
Ethical issues that surface on Internet. The tensions between radical empowerment of Internet and impulse to tame this technology through laws and other mechanisms. Basic concepts that will enrich our moral assessment of these issues. Concise overview of traditional ethical frameworks that can guide our analysis of moral dilemmas and social problems that arise in cyberspace. Assumptions :
The directive and architectonic role of moral ideals and principles in determining responsible behavior in cyberspace. The capacity of free and responsible human beings to exercise control over forces of technology
What Is Cyberspace?
Cyberspace refers to a wide range of computing and communications devices from standalone computers, to "connected" or networked computing and communications technologies, to the Internet itself. The electronic medium of computer networks, in which online communication takes place.(Dictionary meaning)
Cyberethics is a more accurate label than computer ethics, which might suggest the study of ethical issues limited to computing machines, or to computing professionals. It is more accurate than Internet ethics, which is limited only to ethical issues affecting computer networks.
Four constraints that regulate our behavior in real space: laws, norms, the market and code / architecture Laws rules imposed by the government which are enforced by ex post (after the fact) sanctions
The
complicated IRS tax code is a set of laws that dictates how much we owe. If we break these laws we are subject to fines / penalties.
Social Norms expressions of the community. Most have well defined sense of normalcy in norms, standards and behavior.
A room without windows imposes certain constraints because no one can see outside.
James Moor
9
pleasure and absence of pain Autonomy goods that we need to complete our projects (ability, security, knowledge, freedom, opportunity, reason)
Happiness
John Finnis
10
Life Knowledge Play (and skillful work) Aesthetic experience Sociability Religion Practical reasonableness (includes autonomy)
Ultimate good, human flourishing of ourselves and others should be our guidepost of value, serving as a basis for crafting laws, developing social institutions and regulating the Internet. Golden Rule (Matthew 7:12)
So whatever
The fundamental responsibility is to respect each of these human goods in each person whose well being we choose to affect.
Blocking Software
12
Those who write programs or create laws should rely on ethics as their guide. Code writers need to write in such a way that preserves basic moral values such as autonomy and privacy. Many feel technology is just a tool and it is up to us whether this powerful tool is used for good or ill purposes.
Jacques Ellul says technique is beyond our control, it has become autonomous and fashioned an omnivorous world which follows its own laws Max weber coined the term iron cage Martin Heidegger saw technology not merely as a tool we can manipulate but as a way of being in world Technology is neutral force, completely dependent on human aims and objectives(utopianism) Taylors assessment :We are not,indeed,locked in.But there is a slope, an incline in things that is
14
By conscientiously adopt moral point of view as we evaluate technological capabilities and make decisions about ground rules of digital frontier. Ethical reasoning gives us basic principles that serve as yardstick or compass that can assist us in making normative judgments. Kant embraces that we must respect humanity in all our choices and actions Rights based theories discuss core human goods in terms of protection of human rights such as right to life,liberty,pursuit of happiness Utalitarian emphasizes happiness
15
Teleological rightness or wrongness of an action depends on whether the goal or desired end is achieved (look at the consequences maybe OK to lie). Sometimes called consequentialism Deontological is an action right or wrong. Act out of obligation or duty. Prohibition against harming the innocent.
Utilitarianism
16
Teleological Most popular version of consequentialism Developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill (British Philosophers) Right course of action is to promote the most general good Utility refers to the net benefits created by an action. The action is good if it produces the greatest net benefits or lowest net cost Primary problem of this theory is that it lacks proper sensitivity to vital ideals of justice and
17
Deontologic Rights-based Right is an entitlement or a claim to something Looks at moral issues from viewpoint of the human rights that may be at stake
Negative right implies one is free from external interference in ones affairs (state cant tap phones) Positive right implies a requirement that the holder of this right be provided with whatever one needs to pursue legitimate interests (rights to medical care and education)
Problem : Do not provide adequate criteria for resolving practical disputes when rights are in
Deontologic Duty-based by Immanuel Kant (1724 -1804) Actions only have moral worth when they are done for the sake of duty
Ex. If everyone would break promises there would be no such thing as a promise.
Consider this when looking at intellectual property Ask the question What if everybody did what you are doing? Respect for other human beings Problem with this model is its rigidity
Ex Situation where telling lie is reasonable and proper course of action.law to tell truth and law to save a life in jeopardy.
7 Moral Duties
19
1.
2.
3. 4.
5.
6. 7.
Keep promises and tell truth (fidelity) Right the wrongs you inflicted (reparation) Distribute goods justly (justice) Improve the lot of others with respect to virtue, intelligence and happiness (beneficence) Improve oneself with respect to virtue, intelligence and happiness (self-improvement) Exhibit gratitude when appropriate (gratitude) Avoid injury to others (noninjury)
Developed by John Finnis and Germain Grisez Good should be done and evil avoided First Principle of Morality Keep ones choices open to integral human fulfillment,the fulfillment of all persons and communities This principle is too general.
None are without flaws or contradictions 4 frameworks converge on same solutions but suggest different solutions One must decide which framework they will follow and trump the others
Consequenialism/Utilita Which action or policy generates the best overall rianism consequences or the greatest net expectable
utility for all affected parties?
Duty-based Morality
Can the maxim underlying the course of action bieng considered be universalized? Is the principle of fair play being violated?If there appears to be conflicting duties which is the stronger duty? Which action or policy best protects the human and legal rights of the individuals involved? Does the proposed action or policy promote the basic requirements of human flourishing? Does it impede,damage, or destroy any of the basic human goods?
Floridis Macroethics
23
Luciano Floridi finds fault with traditional ethical theories He proposes Information Ethics (IE) 3 major characterstics
Ontocentric
Ecological Patient
oriented objects with intrinsic value qualify as moral patient He says theory is not substitute for traditional ethics but a supplement
Principlism
24
Popularized by Beauchamp and Childress At first glance one principle should be given more weight than others but 4 principles are: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice
Autonomy
25
Is a necessary condition of moral responsibility Individuals shape their destiny according to their notion of the best sort of life worth living If deprived of their autonomy, someone is not treated with the respect they deserve.
Nonmaleficence
26
Beneficence
27
This is a positive duty We should act in such a way that we advance the welfare of other people when we are able to do so We have a duty to help others under following conditions
The
need is serious or urgent We have knowledge or awareness of situation We have the capability to provide assistance
Justice
28