Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MFG 355
Design Methodology
Inspiration Concept Prototype Development Final product
Layout or Drawing
Sketch Drawing CAD Advantages and disadvantages to each
Detail Complexity Time Communication of idea Visualization of problems
Constraints
Appearance Mechanical Environmental Safety, Codes and Standards Manufacturing Method/Design Rules Economics
Material Choice
Database IDES (like in lab) or others Multiple grades
Multiple additives Multiple blends Improvements
Material Choice
Selection methodology
Define the criteria for material selection Determine the advantages and disadvantages of each polymer type Select polymers for special properties Rank the resins and make a preliminary selection
Computer-aided selection
ABS-acrylonitrile butadiene styrene FP-fluoropolymers HDPE-high density polyethylene LCP-liquid crystal polymers LDPE-low density polyethylene PA 4,6-polyamide 4,6 PA 6/6,6-polyamide 6/6,6 PAI-polyamide imide PAR-polyarylate PBT-polybutylene terephthalate PC-polycarbonate PE UHMW-ultrahigh mol. weight PE PEEK-polyetheretherketone PEI-polyether imide PES-polyethersulfome PET-polyethylene terephthalate PI-polyimide PMMA-polymethyl methacrylate POM-polyoxymethylene PP-polypropylene PPA-polyphtalamide PPC-polyphthalate carbonate PPO-polyphenylene oxide PPS-polyphenylene sulfide PPSU-polyphenylsulfone PS-polystyrene PSF-polysulfone PVC-polyvinyl chloride PVDF-polyvinylidene fluoride SAN styrene acrylonitrile SMA-styrene maleic anhydride TPI-thermoplastic polyimide
Material Choice
PI PAI PEEK TPI FP PPSU PVDF LCP PEI PPS PES PPA PSF PAR PA-4,6 PPC PC PPO SMA ABS PMMA PS SAN PP HDPE PET
PBT
POM
PA-6/6,6 PE-UHMW
Mid-Range Polymers
PVC
LDPE
Common Polymers
Amorphous
Semi-crystalline
Material Selection
Choosing material for a snow sled
Possible resins
PP
Desired properties
PP
PP
Material Selection
Impact Toughness Guide
Resin Polyurethane (x-link) Polycarbonate SMC ABS Izod (ft-lb) 25 16 7 6 3 2 2 1 1 1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 Reasoning High elongation and strength High strength Reinforced and toughened Toughened with rubber High elongation, flexible Can be toughened Can be toughened Can be alloyed Some crystallinity Low strength Pendent group Short link, large pendent group Crosslinked Crosslinked Crosslinked
Increasing Toughness
HDPE Acetal Nylon 6/6 PET PP LDPE Polystyrene Acrylic Phenolic, w/fiberglass Epoxy, unreinforced Crosslinked polyester
PP
Score = value x WF
PS PP
Total Score
PS PP
67
56 52 25 59
PP
Prototyping
Traditional
Prototyping
Rapid prototyping
3D printing
Prototyping
Rapid prototyping
Stereolithography
Prototyping
Rapid prototyping
Laminated object manufacturing (LOM)
Prototyping
Rapid prototyping
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
Prototyping
Rapid prototyping
Fused deposition modeling (FDM)
Prototyping
Rapid prototyping
Fused deposition modeling (FDM)
Process Selection
Some parts are more suited for a particular process Most parts can be modified and processed through most of the different methods Some processes are incapable of producing certain features
Injection moldinghollow features Roto-moldingdeep ribs
We will be discussing all of the major processes with their advantages, disadvantages and molding requirements
Possible processes
WF=
Processes Injection molding Thermoforming Rotomolding Casting/ Foaming Extrusion Value/ Rank Score Value /Rank
WF=
Score Value/ Rank
WF=
Score Value/ Rank
WF=
Score Total Score
Features
Thermoforming
Rotomolding Casting/ Foaming
Extrusion
66
44 58 61 41
The best
3M Comply Product
Covered with adhesive Plastic Sheet (PE)
Separated graphic product Multiply embossed sheet creating ridges and lands
Avery-Dennison EZ Film
Adhesive added Plastic Sheet (PE)
Polyurethane forms pressed into the PE sheet (thereby forming depressions and embossing the sheet) Separated graphic product PE sheet embossed with ridges and lands
Thank You