Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Project title:
Risk Analysis in Merchandising Ms. NUPUR CHOPRA Mr. PANKAJ SHRIVASTAVA- Divisional Merchandising Manager
Institute mentor:
Industry mentor:
Sponsor:
DUTIES OF MERCHANDISER
Coordinator
end Correspondence with buying Agencies Takes care of PD, sampling, costing, negotiations, delivery schedules, production planning, fabric and trim orders, regular follow up. Is directly responsible for the merchandise. Ensuring inspections and quality levels.
WHAT IS RISK?
The quantifiable likelihood of loss or less-than-expected returns
Fear of some harm ought to be proportional not only to the magnitude of the harm, but also to the probability of the event. - Logic, or the Art of Thinking Antoine Arnauld, 1662
Risk assessment
Identifying sources of potential harm, assessing the likelihood that harm will occur and the consequences.
Implementation of the plans of actions that are required to ensure the control the risks. Interactive dialogue between stakeholders and risk assessors and risk managers which actively informs the other processes.
Risk management
Risk communication
Capability of proactively identifying the risks and taking steps to mitigate them. Reduction in losses and rejections. Promoting continuous improvement. Enhancing communication between departments. Fewer shocks and unwelcome surprises
OBJECTIVE
To propose a Risk Management System in merchandising department of Kohls in Shahi Exports Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad.
METHODOLOGY
Selection of problem Collection of literature review Primary data collection
Project suggestion
Development
Data analysis
Documentation
TOOLS USED
HISTOGRAM PARETO CHART FISH BONE DIAGRAM FMEA
FMEA
Structured
and systematic process to identify potential design and process failures before they have a chance to occur with the ultimate objective of eliminating these failures or at least minimizing their occurrence and severity
PROCESS FMEA
Identify the potential consequences of errors and omissions in the production process Error proof the production process and develop process improvements Develop the production control plan
DETECTION A measure of probability that a failure or cause in our operation shall be detected in current operation and shall not pass on to the next operation.
FMEA BENEFITS
Improved process Cost savings Considering the possible failure modes Well-documented record of improvements Provides historical information.
Air shipment
43
83451
% air shipment
29.2517%
7%
Shipment by number
29% Air shipped Sea shipped
Shipment by volume
7% Air shipment Sea shipment
71%
93%
Delay Reasons
5% 46% 49%
REASONS OF REJECTIONS
Reasons Color Handfeel Fit embroidery Trims Finishing Pattern process/handling Smocking Fusing Print Stitching Average
Avg delay frequency 66.64 10 50.67 9 21.78 9 21.67 3 21.00 6 21.33 3 24.50 2 14.50 2 8.00 1 18.75 4 37.33 3 11.00 1 26.43
8.00
11.00
delay avg
250.00
70.2% 200.00 Delay 56.5% 63.3%
76.9%
150.00 37.0%
100.00
48.8%
Reasons
ACTIVITIES SUFFERED
reasons lab dip initial fabric bulk fabric embroidery fit sample pp sample ad sample fusing ring adjuster crochet lace smocking heat seal label stike off buttons
delay avg frequency 21.67 6 20.17 6 44.38 8 25.00 2 23.13 8 14.33 3 18.60 5 16.50 4 15.67 3 12.00 1 23.00 1 44.00 1 34 2 16 1
Activities suffered(approval)
50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00
44.38 44.00 34 21.6720.17 25.0023.13 23.00 18.6016.5015.67 14.33 12.00 16
delay avg
71.7%
65.5% 200.00 Activities 51.9% 150.00 37.3% 100.00 26.9% 50.00 44.38 44.00 13.5% 44.9% 58.9%
0.00
Delay
33.3
24.7 25.9
14.0
29.0
25.3
4.0
avg
APPROVAL DATES
Early approval for 10 styles :164 days Late approval for 10 styles: 188 days Difference for styles: 24 Difference for 1 style : 2.4 days
31%
22%
47%
NUMBER OF REDOES
Activities
lab dip initial fabric bulk fabric Embroidery fit sample pp sample ad sample Fusing ring adjuster crochet lace Smocking heat seal label stike off Buttons
Total cost
94.0 24.4 96.1 11.0 793.2 502.4 423.0 5.2 0.9 23.6 33.6 3.6 52.7 9.0 2072.7
FMEA
Style 1 Style 2 Style 3
SYSTEM DESIGN
Checkpoint
forms
Web
application
Pattern request Sample request Embellishment request Washing request Final check request
SUGGESTIONS
Checkpoints implementation. Checkpoints printout on red A-4 paper for URGENT requirement. Urgent request should be authorized by DMM. Signature of the concerned person on the checkpoint form. Highlighting of important points in the techpack. Implementation of web application.
RESULT Reduction of the resubmission from 2.68 to 1.83 Total saving per style= 2072.71597.38 = 475.32 INR
Activities lab dip initial fabric bulk fabric embroidery fit sample pp sample ad sample Fusing ring adjuster crochet lace smocking heat seal label stike off buttons
Cost/ submit (Rs.) 26.1 8.7 15.5 4.6 264.4 264.4 264.4 2.6 0.5 11.8 16 1.4 15.5 4.3
Avg 2.6 1.8 3 2.2 2.6 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.4 2 1.6
1.83
Total Cost 67.86 15.66 46.5 10.12 687.44 370.16 317.28 3.64 0.8 18.88 19.2 1.96 31 6.88
1597.38
10.0
5.0 0.0
26.43 (days)
20.9 (days)
5.53(days)
20.92%
25.3 (days)
10.56 (days)
14.74 (days)
58.26%
2.68 (submissions)
1.83 (submissions)
0.85 (submissions)
31.72%
Cost of redoes
Rs. 2072.7
Rs.1597.38
Rs.475.32
22.93%
LIMITATION
Designed for a specific team and has to be generalized. The severity, occurrence and detection rating has to be tailored as per the team. The performance evaluated is limited by the data collected. The project was stationed at the merchandising department. Manufacturing part is not covered. Due to time constraint post implementation shipment details could not be analyzed.
SCOPE Standardization of risk management system of all the teams. FMEA studies for production department. Standardization of the web application. Modification of features. Integration with the existing ERP system Movex.
CONCLUSION
Proactively identifying risks and taking measures to mitigate them > fire fighting. Proper tracking and record maintenance = save cost and time. Benefits of better decisions, fewer surprises, improved planning, performance and effectiveness and improved relationships with stakeholders.
THANK YOU