0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
26 vues9 pages
BOAT TURNBACK policy EFFECT DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS BETWEEN Australia and Indonesia. Terms emerge around 1976 when numbers people from Indochina (Vietnam) embarking to Australia and Asia. 1951 UN Convention Relating the Status of Refugee & UNHCR BOAT PEOPLE POSITION & OBLIGATION SIGNATORY STATE OF 1951 UN CONV. OF REFUGEE
BOAT TURNBACK policy EFFECT DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS BETWEEN Australia and Indonesia. Terms emerge around 1976 when numbers people from Indochina (Vietnam) embarking to Australia and Asia. 1951 UN Convention Relating the Status of Refugee & UNHCR BOAT PEOPLE POSITION & OBLIGATION SIGNATORY STATE OF 1951 UN CONV. OF REFUGEE
BOAT TURNBACK policy EFFECT DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS BETWEEN Australia and Indonesia. Terms emerge around 1976 when numbers people from Indochina (Vietnam) embarking to Australia and Asia. 1951 UN Convention Relating the Status of Refugee & UNHCR BOAT PEOPLE POSITION & OBLIGATION SIGNATORY STATE OF 1951 UN CONV. OF REFUGEE
PRESENTED BY: ANDHIKA PANDU KURNIAWAN STUDENT ID: 2131283 the terms emerge around 1976 when numbers people from Indochina (Vietnam) embarking to Australia & Asia. Later, the terms applied to waves of refugee who attempted to reach United States by boat from Cuba and Haiti, and also to afghan and other middle-east refugee seeking asylum in Australia
IS number of people who arrives by boat through the sea, unannounced, without a visa and with the intention of seeking political asylum. THEY ARE people who owing well-founded fear of being persecuted for reason of race, religion, nationality, membership of particular social group, or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable to or, owing to such fear is unwilling himself of the protection of that country. ------------------------------------- 1951 UN Convention Relating the Status of Refugee & UNHCR BOAT PEOPLE POSITION & OBLIGATION SIGNATORY STATE OF 1951 UN CONV. OF REFUGEE 1982 UNCLOS 1974 CONVENTION FOR SOLAS 1979 CONVENTION ON MARITIME SAR NON SIGNATORY OF 1951 UN CONV. OF REFUGEE 1982 UNCLOS 1974 CONVENTION FOR SOLAS 1979 CONVENTION ON MARITIME SAR AUSTRALIA GOVERNMENT policy to protect Australia's sovereignty by preventing any kind of illegal entry vessel to the territorial waters.
practices an interception of any kind of illegal vessel and where safe to do so, remove it outside Australians territorial waters and beyond Australias contiguous zone.
started in December 2013 RECENT CASES
date of embark embarkation Point date of turn-back Number of people Explanation 8/ 12/ 2013 Kandaria, South Sulawesi 19/12/2013 47 Boat towed to ROTE Island while people travelled on navy ship 22/12/2013 West Java 27/12/2013 42 Escorted back by 2 navy vessel from Christmas Island to southern coast of Java 21/12/2013 Makassar 1-6/01/2014 45 Landed near Darwin, called for help, towed to Rote Island by HAMS Parramatta and HMAS Glenegl after five days --/12/2013 Medan 8/01/2014 25 Intercepted early Jan 2014 near C.I, escorted back by Navy to Southern java 5/01/2014 Java 15/01/2013 56 Intercepted mid-ocean, boat scuttled, rescued by Navy, taken to CI, place in life boat, ordered to continue to Indonesia accompanied by Navy 27/01/2014 Java 5/02/2014 34 Asylum seekers on Austalian ships Triton and HMAS Bathurst off the coast of CI, towed orange life boat after a week. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO THE INTERNATIONAL LAW Its an action that disobey the international obligation to protect refugee & give assistance to distress people at the sea (The Refugee Convention & The SOLAS Convention. Expulsion in any kind of method to refugee is not allowed. According The Refugee convention, expulsion supposed to be based on a proper legal process. In fact, those refugee was sent back to Indonesia water without any access to fair and open legal process. Australia officers has breach the refugees rights as a human such as coercion, cruel and inhuman while doing expulsion. As reported there are a refugee that has been coercion to touch hot engine and burnt their hand by inflamed match INDONESIAS REACTION Indonesia government reject and oppose the policy Indonesia defence authorities has strengthen the border protection Indonesia evaluate that by implementing turn-back boat policy and numbers of unnecessary incident by Australia Navy could categorized as sovereignty violation and harmful. Indonesia also asking Australias commitment to Human Rights and responsibility as a signatory state to 1951 Refugee Convention DIPLOMA CY is an ordered conduct of relations between one group of human beings and another group alien to themselves (in this case, group means states/ countries) It is also has a meaning as an art or practice of conducting relations, as negotiating alliances, treaties, and agreements build with good faith regarding to issues of peace-making, trade, war, economics, culture, environment, human rights, national interest, military aspect and political issue bridging the gap between countries diplomacy needs a diplomat to build communication between countries, which is represent with ambassador. Diplomacy is intended to reduce tension, prevent war as well as a forum for mediation of international conflicts CONCLUSIO N diplomatic relation is built in purpose to foster, maintain and organize a smooth relationship with the state and other government There is a similarity interest between Indonesia and Australia, that both countries is protecting their sovereignty. The gap is, Indonesia evaluate that by implementing turn-back boat policy and numbers of unnecessary incident by Australia Navy could categorized as sovereignty violation and harmful Indonesia has objection oppose Australias turn-back boat policy. It is affecting the relation between Indonesia and Australia into high tense, however in my point of view with only one issue: turn-back boat policy it is not affecting diplomatic relation between Indonesia and Australia, furthermore if there is a gap between both countries regarding this issue, it is diplomat duty to do diplomacy
United States v. Joseph Newton, Eddie Gregory Batten, Robert Moss, Jr., John Brown, Jr., Grady D'Vaughn Reddick, Sean Jackson, Robert Jivens, Willie Lee Palmer, Sr., United States of America v. Robert Moss, Jr., United States of America v. Grady D'Vaughn Reddick, 44 F.3d 913, 11th Cir. (1995)