0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
43 vues58 pages
Pyogenic liver abscess has been recognized since the time of Hippocrates (400 BC) today, it remains a surgical problem with considerable morbidity and mortality. Traditional open surgical intervention is the definitive treatment.
Pyogenic liver abscess has been recognized since the time of Hippocrates (400 BC) today, it remains a surgical problem with considerable morbidity and mortality. Traditional open surgical intervention is the definitive treatment.
Pyogenic liver abscess has been recognized since the time of Hippocrates (400 BC) today, it remains a surgical problem with considerable morbidity and mortality. Traditional open surgical intervention is the definitive treatment.
once daily 2. Page 20 : Cross sectional study retrospective study PYOGENIC LIVER ABSCESS DELFICAN English Case Presentation Introduction Recognised since the time of Hippocrates (400 BC) Today, it remains a surgical problem with considerable morbidity and mortality Frequently encountered disease in children from developing countries Liver abscess An important clinical entity for which prompt recognition and treatment are essential to favorable outcome It is critical to promptly recognize these patients, for whom traditional open surgical intervention is the definitive treatment Pyogenic liver abscess Report a boy with pyogenic liver abscess This case Case Illustration TMP, a 4 year and 4 month old boy was hospitalized in pediatric ward of Dr. M. Djamil hospital Was referred from pediatric out patient Chief complain : swelling in the upper right abdomen since 1 month before hospitalization Present illness history Fever since 2 months before admission Swelling and pain in the upper right abdomen Decreased appetite and body weight No cough, breathlessness, nausea, vomiting, oedema and also no history of jaundice or active tuberculosis close contact No history of direct trauma to stomach Urination and defecation were normal Massage by a traditional healer in their village A general practitioner (4 kinds of tablet) Painan district hospital for 13 days (ceftriaxone 375 mg twice a day) suspected liver abscess Surgery out patient of Dr. M. Djamil hospital (anemia and suspected liver abscess from abdominal USG) Consult to pediatric out patient hospitalized
Held upper right abdomen while walking
Past illness history Never had similar disease before Family illness history None of the family ever experienced such disease Born by vaginal delivery after a fullterm second pregnancy, birth weight of 2000 gram, forgotten birth length, vigorous and healthy Growth and development were normal Basic immunization was complete Lived in a permanent house with poor hygiene and sanitation General appearance : moderately ill, conscious, cooperative Blood pressure : 90/60 mmHg Pulse rate : 96 times/minute Respiratory rate : 26 times/minute Body temperature : 36,9 0 C Physical examination Nutritional status Body weight : 15 kg Body height :104 cm Weight for age : 88,2% Height for age : 99% Weight for height : 88,2% Nutritional status : undernourished Skin was`warm and there was no enlargement of lymph nodes Conjunctivas were anemic, scleras were not icteric The chest was symmetric, normochest without any retraction Heart sound was regular with no murmur. Breath sound was vesicular without rales or wheezing The abdominal was tender, no distension and the right side was more prominent than the left side. The liver was palpable 1/3 1/3, flat, sharp edge and tenderness. The spleen was not palpable and there was no ascites There was no abnormality on extremity Laboratory findings Hemoglobin : 9,1 gr% Leucocyte : 20.900/mm 3 ESR : 80 mm Differential count : 0/2/5/47/42/4 Hematocrit : 28% Platelet : 679.000/mm 3 Erythrocyte : 4,55 millions/mm 3 Reticulocyte : 18 MCH : 20 pg MCV : 61,5 fl MCHC : 23,9%
Microcytic hypochrome anemia Blood Normal Urine Normal Stool Suspected pyogenic liver abscess with differential diagnosis of amoebemic liver abscess Undernourished Microcytic hypochrome anemia caused by suspected iron defficiency List if problems = working diagnosis Management Suspected pyogenic liver abscess with differential diagnosis of amoebemic liver abscess
Diagnostic Liver function test Blood cultures Fecal analysis Amoeba serology test
Chest X-ray Plain photo of abdomen CT scan Manage the patient together with pediatric surgery Open laparatomy to drain the abscess Paracetamol 150 mg if the body temperature was more than 38,5 0 C Therapy Diagnosis, management, monitoring, complication and prognosis Education Anthropometry Clinical assessment Diagnostic High calorie foods and protein 1400 kcal Nutritional consultation Therapy Education : diet compliance Undernourished
.... Management Serum iron (SI) and total iron binding capacity (TIBC) Diagnostic Microcytic hypochrome anemia caused by suspected iron defficiency
.... Management The result of liver function test Hypoalbuminemia Total protein 7,3 g/dl Albumin 2,8 g/dl Globulin 4,5 g/dl
Normal Elevated PT : 14,8 seconds APTT : 43,1 seconds Elevated On the 2 nd day of admission The condition was still the same as the day before The vital signs were normal. The abdominal findings were still the same Laboratory findings : SI : 11,2 mg/dl TIBC : 223 mg/dl Iron defficiency Chest X ray and plain photo of abdomen : no abnormality A mass in the right lobus of liver, hypoechoic, homogen, clear border, thick walled with size of 10 x 9 cm Suspected liver abscess The abdominal USG (had been done in surgery out patient) The liver was enlarged with a hypodense mass, rounded shape, clear border, thick walled and the edge was regular. Liver abscess Contrast CT-scan We then treated him with intravenous metronidazole 3 x 250 mg On the 3 rd hospital day On the 4 th hospital day Blood culture : sterile On the 5 th hospital day Planned to do laparatomy to drain the abscess Prepare for the operation such as informed consent to his parent and gave blood transfusion due to anemic condition Surgery department Due to fever Repeated blood culture Transfusion of PRC 200 cc Hemoglobin : 8,6 g/dl Leucocyte : 15.600/mm 3 Thrombocyte : 603.000/mm 3
The repeated hemoglobin of 12,1 g/dl Laparatomy in general anaesthesia The abscess was located in the posterior right lobus of the liver 250 cc of cloudy and sligthly yellow fluid was successfully evacuated The surgeon then put the tube to drain the residu of the pus Sent for culture, isolating amoebae and biopsy of the liver tissue On the 8 th hospital day Amoeba serological test was negative and metronidazol was discontinued Treated with ceftriaxon 1 x 750 mg
The laboratory of post laparatomy Hemoglobin 10,9 g/dl Leucocyte 16.100/mm 3
Thrombocyte 412.000/mm 3
Anemic and leucocytosis Sodium 134 mg/dl Potassium 3,5 mg/dl
Normal Albumin 2,9 g/dl Globulin 3,1 g/dl Protein 6 g/dl
Hypoalbuminemia
No trophozoit form of Entamoeba histolytica from the pus Repeated blood culture : Klebsiella sp in which sensitive to ciprofloxacine, ceftazidime, netilmicine and meropenem and also resistant to ceftriaxone Substituted the antibiotics with netilmicine 125 mg once daily On the 10 th hospital day Pus culture revealed no aerobic and anaerobic microorganism Biopsy of liver tissue : aspecific chronic inflammation The next day, since there was no more pus came out from the drainage tube, it was getting off On the 12 th hospital day On the 14 th -23 rd hospital day The condition was getting better No fever, nausea, vomit and abdominal pain Discharge on day 23 and oral antibiotic was continued for 2 more weeks LITERATURE REVIEW Pyogenic abscess, accounts for 80% of hepatic abscess cases in the US Amoebic abscess due to Entamoeba histolytica accounts for 10% of cases. Fungal abscess, most often due to Candida species, accounts for less than 10% Liver abscess Three-quarters of liver abscesses in industrialized countries A bacterial pathogen may be identified in two-thirds of liver abscesses cases Pyogenic abscesses A pus-filled lesion as the result of bacterial infection of the liver parenchyma, with subsequent infiltration by inflammatory cells and formation of a collection of pus Opinions vary on the proper duration of intravenous and oral antibiotics for pediatric pyogenic liver abscess therapy Pyogenic liver abscess Incidence The global reported incidence for pyogenic liver abscess is variable, ranging from 3 to 25 per 100,000 pediatric hospital admissions The incidence of hepatic abscess in children is on the rise The mortality rate was as high as 40% until the 1980s More potent antibiotics, improvement in imaging techniques and appropriate use of surgical intervention have reduced the mortality rate to less than 15%. Predisposing factors 2. Genetic Disorders 1. Parasitic infestations 4. Abdominal infections 3. Skin infections 6. Cryptogenic 5. Post trauma Causative organism The most common pathogen isolated from liver abscess in children is Staphylococcus aureus 1 E. Coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Pseudomonas and Enterobacter 2 Anaerobes such as Bacteroides and Clostridium consti 3 May also be sterile because the patient has received prior antibiotic therapy. 4 Multiple liver abscesses constitute 20-25 % of all cases Left lobe abscesses should be treated with caution associated with complications like rupture into peritoneum and pericardium and cause pericardial effusions life threatening Majority are solitary Most of liver abscesses occur in the right lobe of liver Location and number of liver abscesses Pathophysiology Bacteria enter the liver through various routes including the biliary tract, portal vein and hepatic artery Infections in the portal bed can also result in localized septic thrombophlebitis, releasing septic emboli into circulation which are trapped by hepatic sinusoids and become the nidus for hepatic abscess formation Penetrating hepatic trauma can inoculate organisms directly into the liver parenchyma, resulting in pyogenic liver abscess Non-penetrating can also cause localized hepatic necrosis, intrahepatic hemorrhage and bile leakage, thus providing a suitable environment for bacterial growth Clinical Features Symptoms Nonspecific Acute, with rapid onset of severe symptoms, or chronic, with a more insidious onset over weeks to months
Common complaints Fever often with chills Abdominal pain specially in right upper quadrant and tender hepatomegaly Nausea, vomiting, anorexia, malaise, weakness, weight loss, unexplained anemia, jaundice and cough with breathing difficulty Some children present only with fever of unknown origin Physical Examination Fever and tender hepatomegaly are the most common signs
May present with complications like fulminant sepsis or an acute abdomen either due to rupture of the liver abscess or due to infection of ascitic fluid transmigration of infection
Mid epigastric tenderness, with or without a palpable mass, is suggestive of left hepatic lobe involvement Decreased breath sounds in the right basilar lung zones, with signs of atelectasis and effusion on examination or radiologically Investigations Laboratory Anemia Leucocytosis Raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate Altered liver enzyme Do not differentiate amoebic from pyogenic Have lower sensitivity than pus aspirate in identification of organism in pyogenic abscesses Culture of abscess fluid should be the goal in establishing microbiologic diagnosis Blood cultures Negative amoebic serology points strongly to a pyogenic source of infection The low level of positive blood culture could be due to prior antibiotic therapy Imaging Studies Elevation of the right hemidiaphragm with decreased mobility or a right pleural effusion Air fluid level could also be found from the abscess cavity Findings are abnormal in approximately half the patients 1. Chest roentgenographs The imaging of first choice Quick, safe, cheap and accurate May be a rounded or an oval lesion with hypo echoic and heterogenous echotexture The abscess have a well defined wall which may be thin or irregular 2. Ultrasound More sensitive in detecting small abscesses Inconvenient and expensive with risk of contrast nephropathy A hypodense lesion with low attenuation areas and an enhancing rim 3. Computed tomography scanning Treatment Traditionally : treated by open surgical drainage and antibiotic therapy Treatment Accurate imaging and percutaneous drainage (nonsurgical methods)
Treatment includes : Drainage of the abscess Combined with appropriate antibiotics Elimination of the underlying source of infection Untreated liver abscess is almost always fatal Medical treatment Antibiotic therapy as a sole treatment modality has been successful It is a common adjunct to percutaneous or open surgical drainage Duration of treatment has always been debated 4-6 weeks of antimicrobial therapy is recommended Surgical treatment A paradigm shift from the traditional open surgery to the minimally invasive percutaneous drainage However, whether this has lowered the mortality rate is debatable The treatment of choice remains controversial The spectrum of treatment options ranges from sole medical therapy to the more complex liver resection 3. Enlarged abscess with impending rupture 2. Lack of clinical response after 48-72 hours of medical therapy 1. The abscess is large and there is risk of spontaneous rupture 4. Liver failure Indications for percutaneous drainage 5. As a temporal measure to improve patient conditions before surgery Left lobe abscess Multiple abscesses Abscess with thick pus Multiloculated abscess Ruptured abscess Indication of open surgical drainage Failure of percutaneous drainage Algorithm for the treatment of pyogenic liver abscess Poor prognosis : jaundice, liver failure, acute abdomen, bilirubin levels >3.5 mg/dl, encephalopathy, large volume of abscess, multiple abscesses, increased of amino serum transferase and hypoalbuminemia (<2 mg/dl) Prognosis Case Analysis Pyogenic liver abscess Confirm Initial laboratory Physical Examination Symptoms Altered liver function The chest X-ray and plain photo of abdomen The abdominal USG Contrast CT-scan Blood cultures Amoeba serology test At first he was treated with metronidazol Difficult to differentiate between pyogenic liver abscess and amoebic liver abscess We didt give antibiotic because he had received ceftriaxone for 13 days before Negative amoebic serology test, metronidazol was discontinued The result from blood and pus culture revealed no microorganism It didnt rule out the diagnosis of pyogenic liver abscess It could be due to prior antibiotic therapy before admission Besides that, there was no trophozoites found from aspirates of pus Complication and recurrent were not observed in this patient Treated traditionally by antibiotic therapy and open surgical drainage He was still 4 year and 4 month years old which will be lack of cooperation Help the surgeon to create a large opening and adequate drainage of the contents of the abscess The cavity could also be cleaned by this method The prognosis was good since there was no jaundice, liver failure, acute abdomen, encephalophathy and multiple abscesses Serum bilirubin 0,3 mg/dl, albumin 2,8 g/dl and normal amino serum transferase also pointed out to good prognosis PICO THERAPEUTIC ANALYSIS Percutaneous aspiration versus open drainage of liver abscess in children Title Shamsul Bari, Khurshid Ahmad Sheikh, Ajaz A. Malik, Rauf A. Wani dan S. H. Naqash Authors Pediatr Surg Int 2007;23:69-74 Published in Children suffering from liver abscess Patient and problems Percutaneous aspiration of liver abscess Intervention Open drainage of liver abscess Comparison Open method was found still to be the best modality of management Outcome In children with liver abscess, would percutaneous aspiration compare with open drainage method result in a better treatment Formulated clinical questions Retrospective study What is the design of this study ? Treatment What area are being studied ? Critical appraisal Was the assignment of patients to treatment randomized and was randomization concealed? No Was follow-up of patients sufficiently long and complete? Yes Were patients and clinicians kept blind? No 1. Are the results valid? Were the groups treated equally, except for the experimental therapy? No Were the groups similar at the start of the trial? Yes Were all patients analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized? No
Are the valid results important? Is our patient so different from those in the study that its results cannot apply? No Is the treatment feasible in our setting? Yes Are the results applicable to my patient? Yes