Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 16

Student perspectives of a new basic sciences

teaching approach called POGIL (Process


Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning).
9
th
GCC Medical Education Conference
November 25
th
2013
Lana Mohammed Saleh, Maryam Adam Ali and Declan Gaynor
What is POGIL (Process Oriented Guided
Inquiry Learning)

Student centered pedagogical technique
Enhances learning through collaboration


Cooperative learning has
been showed to promote higher
performance than competitive or
individualistic learning
approaches.

D. W. Johnson & R. T. Johnson
(1999): Making cooperative
learning work, Theory Into
Practice, 38:2, 67-73

POGIL learning cycle
Concept
invention
Application
Exploration
Construct
new
knowledge
Develop
process
skills
POGIL success
Farrell, J. J., Moog, R. S., and Spencer, J. N.
(1999). A guided inquiry general chemistry
course. J. Chem. Educ., 76, 570-574.
Lewis, J. E., and Lewis, S. E. (2005).

Departing from lectures: An evaluation of a
peer-led guided inquiry alternative. J. Chem.
Educ., 82(1), 135-139.

Straumanis A., and Simons E.
(2006). Assessment of student learning in
POGIL organic chemistry. Abstracts of papers
of the American Chemical Society, 26 Mar
2006, Vol. 231. 1272-CHED

S. A. Hein (2012), Positive Impacts Using
POGIL in Organic Chemistry, J Chem Educ, 89,
860-864.

FY POGIL implementation
POGIL Pilot
General
Chemistry
Post-
lecture
activities
Evaluation
feedback
POGIL
programme
Organic
Chemistry
Pre-lecture
activities
Evaluation
feedback
Performance
improvements
Compulsory
70 students / activity
Voluntary
25 students / activity
POGIL Pilot evaluation feedback
The POGIL activity tutorials compared to the small group tutorials in same module

4
4
5
4
20
14
22
18
22
20
30
13
54
62
43
65
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
encouraged me to be a more active
learner in class
were more effective in improving my
communication skills
were more effective in improving my
problem solving skills
were more effective in improving my
teamwork skills
N/A
Negative
Neutral
Positive
Participation in voluntary POGIL programme
Non-
registered
64%
Registered
but
withdrawn
15%
Active
participants
21%
n = 141
We didnt register in the POGIL programme
because...
Time and
Duration
45%
Lack of perceived
benefit
33%
Lack of interest
9%
Learning styles
13%
Why we didnt complete the POGIL
proramme?
Time and
Duration
27%
Lack of perceived
benefit
46%
Strict rules
7%
No appropriate
help provided
7%
Other reasons
13%
Why we did complete the POGIL proramme?
Improve
understanding
62%
Develop skills
17%
Social reasons
7%
Assessment
performance
14%
What we liked about the programme?
What we didnt like about the programme?
Recommendations
Less strict rules
Questions:
Fewer
More direct relevance to the lectures
Reduce difficulty
More instructor participation.


Lessons learned by the instructor
Ensure appropriate workload and duration
Provide live feedback
Provide motivation
Locate appropriate resources

Acknowledgements
Ms. Aamal Radhi
Dr Seamas Cassidy
9
th
GCC Medical Education Conference
Committee

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi