The discipline of change management deals primarily with the human aspect of change, and is therefore related to pure and industrial psychology. Objective: To maximize the collective benefits for all people involved in the change and minimize the risk of failure of implementing the change. Change management is the process of developing a planned approach to change in an organization. Change implies making an essential difference, often amounting to a loss of original identity or a substitution of one thing for another. Time compression: information and communication. Interdependence: one economic world. Technology advances: shorter product cycles. Turbulence: political and social.
The manager has not communicated well the detailed aspects of the change. People may only understand the change in broad terms and not in practical terms. Lack of communication Staff do not know how they should go about for change & they may lack the knowledge, skills and experience to implement the proposed change. Procedure Staff may not be convinced about the purpose of the change or they may not see the benefits of the change. Goal oriented Too many parties involved in the change without a clear definition of their roles will bring confusion and frustration. Involvement of parties Commitment to change from the top is critical. Many well-planned change programmes have failed as leaders who plan the change do not follow up with the necessary support. Proper support Change programmes often fail not because of lack of skills but because of absence of courage to implement the change. Lack of courage A clear and outright declaration on how people are going to be rewarded if they achieve successful results from change would go a long way. Poor motivation Why People resist change..??? Education and communication
Participation and involvement
Facilitation and support
Negotiation and agreement
Organization parts are sets of functional parts. Management shifts, eliminates, changes the parts. Driven from the top down Examples: mergers, acquisitions, divestiture Structural change (e.g., a machine model of organization) Elimination of non-essential activities; squeezing cost from operations Cost cutting Focus on how things are done Process change (e.g., Business Process Reengineering) People-sided From command-and -control toward participative management From product-push to customer-orientation Cultural change Types of Organizational Change Programs Change drivers Near-term economic improvement (or turn around) Improvement in organizational capabilities Termed Theory E or Theory O (HBS Michael Beer and Nitin Nohria) Theory E: Economic
Dramatically and quickly improve shareholder value Measured by improved cash flow or share price All implicit contracts between company and employees are suspended; produce or you are gone; failure is NOT an option All organizational elements are like chess pieces on a chessboard Non value-add elements are especially valuable Top-management and inner-circle driven Examples: GE under J. Welsh; IBM under L. Gerstner Goal is to change Organizational culture to one supporting learning and high performance Committed, capable, relatively autonomous employee is best asset. Implicit contract can never be broken May be incompatible with top-down direction Highly participative from within the ranks Examples: Schwab, Merck, 3 M, Intel, Microsoft Theory E may lead to short-term gains but hurts long term Look at the IBM example And may backfire 1990s downsizing did not guarantee higher performance
Theory O is a huge, multi-year project Hybrid approaches generally preferred 1. Mobilize energy and commitment through joint identification of problems and solutions 2. Develop a shared vision 3. Identify the leadership 4. Focus on results, not on activities 5. Start at the periphery, then let it spread 6. Institutionalize success through policies and structures 7. Monitor and adjust as you go
People will quit, elements will fail, the setting may change
Create a project team dedicated to change Communicate the vision and goals of this team Monitor people/organizational issues Determine change management processes/practices Reorganize to support processes and practices Implement processes and practices Monitor completion of the plan; tasks and milestones Communication feedback, revise processes and practices as required. Further the buy-in with continuous training/skills updating
While change Repeat Getting started Planning Implementing Sustaining Establish role & governance Understand vision & benefits
Manage stakeholder s Implement change plan Realize benefits Embed system & new ways of working Review & improve change plans Quantify the impacts Go live Review Readiness Identify stakeholders Assess risks Build change plans Understand implementation schedule Define communication strategy Change Management Process Form Relationships Innovate Who Cares? Keep Pace Market Differentiating Mission Critical Low High Low High Learn the basics, Pareto Principle states that 20% of the things being done actually yield 80% of the total payoff. 1. EFFECTIVENESS - DOING THE RIGHT THINGS Thorough understanding of all the aspects & adjusting to new standards of the new job or business activity. 2. EFFICIENCY - DOING THINGS RIGHT Level 3 change makes more effective, more efficient, more productive & more value-adding - frequently with customer input.
3. IMPROVING - DOING THINGS BETTER Involves analysis of core functions & applies the Pareto Principle to focus on stopping doing things - cutting out the 80% of things that only yield 20% of the value. 4. CUTTING - DOING AWAY WITH THINGS Marks the transition from incremental to fundamental change. Copying, learning from, and "reverse engineering" can dramatically boost innovation at significantly lower costs than starting from scratch. 5. COPYING - DOING THINGS OTHER PEOPLE ARE DOING Transitions into degrees of novelty which not only move an organization "out-of-the-box", they move the organization into areas where nobody else is doing it. 6. DIFFERENT - DOING THINGS NO ONE ELSE IS DOING "What is today impossible, but if it were possible it would fundamentally change the way you do business?" Joel Barker's famous question reframes thinking extremely well for Level 7. 7. IMPOSSIBLE - DOING THINGS THAT CAN'T BE DONE The 7 Levels of Change: A STRATEGY FOR CREATIVITY, INNOVATION & CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
ICICI Bank merger with Bank of Madura (December 2000)
What does it reveal ?
It reveals the importance of change management for the Bank of Madura and how effective management of change could bring out best results from the employees in the Bank of Madura.
ICICI Bank Ltd. Bank of Madura (BoM) ICICI was established by the Government of India in 1955. Established in 1943, in Madurai, Tamilnadu. By 2000, it became the no. 1 in Tamilnadu. Three times to that of Bank of Madura One third the size of ICICI. Staff strength was only 1,400. Staff strength was 2,500. Departments into individual profit centers. Management concentrated on the profitability of the overall bank. There were large differences in profiles, grades, designations and salaries of personnel There was uneasiness among the staff of BoM as they felt that ICICI would push up the productivity per employee, to match the levels of ICICI BoM employees feared that their positions would come in for a closer scrutiny. They were not sure whether the rural branches would continue or not as ICICI's business was largely urban- oriented.
PERI OD EMPLOYEE BEHAVI OR Day 1 Denial, fear, no improvement After a month Sadness, slight improvement After a Year Acceptance, significant improvement After 2 Years Relief, liking, enjoyment, business development activities Established clear communication channels throughout.
Training programs were conducted which emphasized on knowledge, skill, attitude and technology to upgrade skills of the employees.
Direct dialogue with the employee unions of the BoM to maintain good employee relations.
ICICI transferred around 450 BoM employees to ICICI Bank, while 300 ICICI employees were shifted to BoM branches.
Promotion schemes for BoM employees were initiated and around 800 BoM officers were found to be eligible for the promotions.
End of the year, ICICI seemed to have successfully handled the HR aspects of the BoM merger.
The win-win situation created
We do put people under stress by raising the bar constantly. That is the only way to ensure that performers lead the change process. K. V. Kamath, Ex- MD & CEO, ICICI
Noticing Small Changes early helps You Adapt To The Bigger Changes That Are To Come
Change Happens, Anticipate Change, Monitor Change, Adapt To Change Quickly.
Enjoy Change! Be Ready To Change Quickly And Enjoy It Again
To IMPROVE is to change, to be PERFECT is to change often.