LOGO

CRYOGENIC TURNING OF THE

TI6AL4V ALLOY WITH
MODIFIED CUTTING TOOL
INSERTS


ABHIJEET SETHI
REGD NO-0811018012

I INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL CONDITION
METHODOLOGY
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
CONTENTS
Introduction
EXPERIMENTAL CONDITION


1
2
3
4
CONCLUSION 5
REFERENCES 6





Composition-
Al-6.11%
Fe-0.1-0.7%
Sn-0.4%
V -3.63%
Ti-89.6%
Characteristics-
High strength,
Low weight ratio,
High corrosion
resistance






Ti 6Al-4V


Application-
Direct Manufacturing of
parts and prototypes for
racing and aerospace industry
Biomechanical applications,
such as implants and
prosthesis
Marine applications
Chemical industry
Gas turbines




INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
CRYOGENIC MACHINING:

EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS
TOOL USED:
Ti-6Al-4V alloy bar( 40300mm)
TOOL INSERTS:
PVD TiAIN coated tungsten carbide tool inserts of ISO CNMG 120408 MP1-
KC5010(Kennametal) under wet and cryogenic conditions.

TOOL HOLDER:
ISO PCLNR 2020 K12(Kennametal)

CUTTING PARAMETERS:
Depth of cut- 1mm
Feed rate- 0.159mm/rev
Cutting velocities- 27,40,63 and 97 m/min
CUTTING FLUID PARAMETERS:
Cryogenic coolant- liquid Nitrogen
Conventional coolant- 1:20

CRYOGENIC COOLING METHODOLOGY
Modification of cutting tool insert by EDM
Rake surface hole dimension- 2mm2.5mm
Flank surface hole dimension- 1mm2mm

CRYOGENIC COOLING METHODOLOGY
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
Effect of cryogenic cooling on cutting
temperature
www.themegallery.com
Title
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
Effect of cryogenic cooling on main
cutting force
www.themegallery.com
Text 2 Text 4
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
Effect of cryogenic cooling on feed
force
www.themegallery.com
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
Effect of cryogenic cooling on
surface roughness
www.themegallery.com
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
Effect of cryogenic cooling on tool
wear
www.themegallery.com
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
SEM view of the used tools after 5
min of machining
TEXT
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
SEM view of the used tools after 5
min of machining

www.themegallery.com
CONCLUSIONS
1. Reduced cutting temperature by 61-66%

2. Decreased cutting force by 35-42%

3. Reduced surface roughness and tool wear to a
maximum of 35% and 39% respectively
REFERENCES
[1] Evans C. Cryogenic diamond turning of stainless steel. Ann CIRP
1991;40:5715.
[2] Hong SY, Zhao Z. Thermal aspects, material considerations and
coolingstrategies in cryogenic machining. Clean Prod Processes 1999;1:107
16.
[3] Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP, Murugappan M. Cryogenic PCBN turning of
ceramics[Si3N4]. Wear 1996;195:16.
[4] Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP. Cryogenic machining of hard-to-cut materials.
Wear2000;239:16875.
[5] Paul S, Dhar NR, Chattopadhyay AB. Beneficial effects of cryogenic
cooling overdry and wet machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning
AISI 1060steel. J Mater Process Technol 2001;116:448.
LOGO