0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
47 vues11 pages
The origins of architecture, although lost in the mists of antiquity, must have been connected intimately with the endeavours of man to provide for his physical wants. According to vitruvius, man in his primitive savage state began to imitate the nests of birds and the lairs of beasts. Structures of the prehistoric period have little or no architectural value, and will only be lightly touched upon.
The origins of architecture, although lost in the mists of antiquity, must have been connected intimately with the endeavours of man to provide for his physical wants. According to vitruvius, man in his primitive savage state began to imitate the nests of birds and the lairs of beasts. Structures of the prehistoric period have little or no architectural value, and will only be lightly touched upon.
The origins of architecture, although lost in the mists of antiquity, must have been connected intimately with the endeavours of man to provide for his physical wants. According to vitruvius, man in his primitive savage state began to imitate the nests of birds and the lairs of beasts. Structures of the prehistoric period have little or no architectural value, and will only be lightly touched upon.
The origins of architecture, although lost in the mists of antiquity,
must have been connected intimately with the endeavours of man
to provide for his physical wants. Protection from the inclemency of the seasons was the mother of architecture. According to Vitruvius, man in his primitive savage state began to imitate the nests of birds and the lairs of beasts, commencing with arbours of twigs covered with mud, then huts formed of branches of trees and covered with turf.
Three types of primitive dwellings: the caves or rocks or those occupied in hunting or fishing, the hut for the agriculturist, and the tent for those such as shepherds leading a pastoral or nomadic life. Structures of the prehistoric period, although interesting for archaeological reasons, have little or no architectural value, and will only be lightly touched upon.
The remains may be classified under : 1. Monoliths, or single upright stones, also known as menhirs, a well-known example 63 feet high, 14 feet in diameter, and weighing 260 tons, being at Carnac, Brittany. Another example is at Locmariaker, also in Brittany (No. 2 b). 2. Dolmens (Daul, a table, and maen, a stone), consisting of one large flat stone supported by upright stones. Examples are to be found near Maidstone and other places in England, also in Ireland, Northern France, the Channel Islands, Italy (No. 2 f) and India.
3. Cromlechs, or circles of stone, as at Stonehenge,(No. 2 g), Avebury (Wilts), and elsewhere, consisting of a series of upright stones arranged in a circle and supporting horizontal slabs. 4. Tumuli, or burial mounds, were probably prototypes of the Pyramids of Egypt and the beehive huts found in Wales, Cornwall, Ireland and elsewhere. That at New Grange (Ireland) resembles somewhat the Treasury of Atreus at Mycenae 5. Lake Dwellings, as discovered in the lakes of Switzerland, Italy and Ireland consisted of wooden huts supported on piles, and were so placed for protection against hostile attacks of all kinds. These foregoing primitive or prehistoric remains have little constructive sequence, and are merely mentioned here to show from what simple beginnings the noble art of architecture was evolved, although unfortunately the stages of the evolution cannot be traced, owing to the fact that the oldest existing monuments of any pretension, as in Egypt, belong to a high state of civilization Located in Africa on the northern edge of the Sahara The Nile bisects through the land from the south to the north The Nile is a seasonal river that overflows its bank yearly to create a fertile valley The Ancient Egyptians lived in the fertile valley and grew their crops They buried their dead in the desert The history of ancient Egypt started with the land divided into upper and lower Egypt
The two regions were frequently at war with each other Around 3000 BC, King Menes united the two into a single nation Unification brought about peace that led to the development of ancient Egyptian Civilization
The history of ancient Egypt is divided into periods based on ruling dynasties Seven periods can be identified: 4500 to 2000 BC- Early Dynastic 2350 2200 BC Old Kingdom 2000-1600 BC First Intermediate period 1600 1717 BC Middle Kingdom 1350 612 BC Second Intermediate Period 612 539 BC New Kingdom 539 330 BC Greek-Roman Period Geographical conditions: The civilization of every country has been, largely determined by its geographical conditions, for the characteristic features of the land in which any race dwells shape their mode of life and thus influence their intellectual culture.
Egypt consists of a sandy desert with a strip of fertile country on the banks of the Nile; Egypt was the only nation of the ancient world which had at once easy access to' the Northern, or "Mediterranean Sea, as well as to the Eastern or Arabian sea; for by way of the Red Sea.
The consequence was that Egypt had outlets for her own productions and inlets for those of foreign nations.
The possession of the Nile, moreover, was of immense advantage, not only on account of its value as a trade route, and as a means of communication, but also because its waters were the fertilizing agents that made desert sands into fruitful fields.
It was on the banks of this ancient river that from time immemorial the Egyptians were naturally placed ; here, therefore, are found the chief remains of the Tombs, Temples, and Pyramids. GEOLOGICAL: The natural products of a country such as wood, brick, or stone, determine to a large extent its style of art.
In Egypt there existed an abundance of limestone in the north, of sandstone in the central region, and of granite in the south. Largely influenced the architecture of the country, and to its durable qualities is due the fact that there are so many remains.
Bricks were also employed, but were generally faced with some harder material.
Wood of a kind suitable for building was not available, only small forests of palm and acacia existing. Climate: The climate is equable and of warm temperature, snow and frost being wholly unknown. Egypt has been said to have but two seasons, spring and summer. The climate was thus of importance in developing the qualities of the architecture, admitting of simplicity in construction, for though it demanded some protection against heat there was no necessity to provide against inclement weather. Religion: A close connection between religion and architecture is everywhere manifest at this epoch. The priesthood was powerful, possessed of almost unlimited authority, and equipped with all the learning of the age. The religious rites were traditional, unchangeable, and mysterious. A tinge of mystery is one of the great characteristics of the Egyptian architecture as well in its tombs as in its temples. The Egyptians attained to a very high degree of learning in astronomy, mathematics, and philosophy ; the remains of their literature have been preserved to us in the papyri, or MSS. written on paper made from the pith of the papyrus. The Egyptians were strong believers in a future, state ;- hence their care in the preservation of their dead, and the erection-^f such everlasting monuments as the Pyramids. The dwelling-house was looked upon by them as a mere temporary lodging, the tomb being the permanent abode. Social and Political: A vast population was available for employment on public works, the workmen probably receiving no other pay than their food. Thus a state of cheap labour existed which was eminently favourable to the execution of important structures.
vi. Historical.Egyptian civilization is the most ancient of any of which there is a clear knowledge ; its history is partly derived from Holy Scripture and from Greek and Roman authors, but more particularly from the Egyptian buildings, by which it can be traced back for more than 4,000 years b.c. The Pyramids are thought to be a thousand years older than any building which has yet been discovered in Western Asia, the subject of the next division. The Kings or Pharaohs (from the title " Peraa " = " great house ") have been arranged in thirty dynasties, extending down to B.C. 332. These have been based on the list of Manetho, an Egyptian priest who lived about b.c 300, and compiled a history of Egypt in the Greek language, and may be divided into the following periods : 1. Prehistoric Period, B.C. 23000 2. The Ancient Empire (Dynasties I.-X.), e.g. 4777-2821. The capital being at Memphis, the tombs of this period are at Abydos, Nak&.deh, Memphis, Sakkara, Gizeh and Abusir. 3. The Middle Empire (Dynasties XI.-XVL), b.c 2821-1738; A prosperous period in which much building was carried out. This period includes the dynasties of the " Hyskos " or shepherd kings. 4. The New Empire (Dynasties XVII.-XX.), b.c. 1738-950. This period had Thebes as the capital, and many imposing buildings were erected at Karnac, Luxor, and elsewhere Egyptian system of decoration consisted in not contravening the form adopted, but in clothing it with a kind of drapery more or less rich, which never presented a projecting outline, contenting itself with enveloping the geometric form as would an embroidered stuff, or a diapered covering. The principal remains of ancient Egyptian architecture are the Pyramids, or royal tombs of the kings, and the temples, a contrast in this respect with Assyria, where the palaces of the kings are the chief remains.
The Egyptian wall-paintings, sculptures, jewellery, bronze implements and utensils, which have been unearthed from their temples or tombs, show that the race had attained to a high degree in art. As regards the architecture, the impression given to the mind of the spectator is that these buildings were erected for eternity, all the remains having a character of immense solidity, and usually of grand uniformity.
The Pyramids are the most extravagant of all ancient buildings in many ways. The relative return in irripressiveness and the higher beauties of the art is small when compared with the amount of labour, expense, and material used in their erection.