Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
THEORIES
Others
Democracy )
action
• Tries to maximize the well being of
group of people
• This method is fundamental to many
DRAWBACKS
• Sometimes what is best for the
community as a whole is bad for
certain individual in the
community
• It is often impossible to know in
advance which decision will lead
to the most good
P R O B L E M S
• Difficult to quantify benefits for
all those affected
• “Greatest Good” difficult to
apply to an all – inclusive
population
• Some gets “Shafted” –
approach justifies perpetrating
3 APPROACHES
• Cost Benefit
• Act Utilitarian
• Rule
1) COST BENEFIT
• In a APPROACH
Project, Costs & Benefits are
assessed
• Projects with highest ration of
Benefits to Costs will be implemented
• Easy to estimate the cost but difficult
to predict the Benefit in tangible
terms
• It is important to ensure that those
2) A C T U T I L I T A R I A N I S
M
• It focuses on individual actions rather
than Rules
• Well known proponent was “John
Stuart Mill”
• Mill felt that individual actions should
be judged based on whether the most
Good was produced in a given
situation and rules shall be broken if
doing so will lead to the most Good
RULE UTILITARIANIS
• It differs from M
Act utilitarianism as
it holds that Moral Rules are most
important
• It contends that adhering to rules
might not always maximize good in
a particular situation. Overall
adhering to moral rules will
ultimately lead to the most Good
DUTY ETHICS (KAN
• Contends that Tcertain
) acts ( or
duties ) shall be performed because
they are inherently ethical
These actions can be listed
( Honesty, fairness )
• Concludes that individuals who
recognize their ethical duties will
choose ethically correct moral
actions
• May not always lead to Maximization
EXAMPLES OF
DUTY ETHICS
1 Be Honest
2 Be Fair
3 Do not hurt Others
4 Keep your promises
5 Obey the Law
This leads to “ R e s p e c t
for H u m a n i t y ”
RIGHTS ETHICS -
• FormulatedLOCKE
by John Locke
• It holds that people have
fundamental rights that other
people have a duty to respect
• Any act that violates an
individual’s moral rights is ethically
unacceptable
• Duty Ethics & Rights Ethics are just
RIGHTS ETHICS
Ex:
• Charter of Human Rights and
Freedom
• Rights to a Harassment Free
Discrimination - Free Environment
Drawback
• How to prioritize the rights of
different individuals ?
• It often promotes rights of
PROBLEMS WITH DUTY
& RIGHTS ETHICS
• Basic right of one person ( group )
may conflict with that of others
• Ex. Dam construction project
Individuals objection is overlooked
as per utilitarianism & not by
Rights Ethics
Rights Ethics can result in project
termination although it is Good to
society
ie Rights Ethics favour
individual while
Utilitarianism favours
society as a whole
Right Ethics :
ramifications of alternative
course of actions
balanced judgments
Further Ethical Theories are
obligations of Professionals
( Engineers )
society’s code
(a) N o r m a t i v e
Inquiry
(b) C o n c e p t u a l
a) N O R M A T I V E I N Q U I R
Y
It aims at identifying & justifying
the morally desirable norms or
standards that ought to guide
individuals or groups
Ex :
(i) When whistle blowing shall be
resorted to
(ii) Judgment in Acceptable Risks
b) C O N C E P T U A L
INQUIRIES
• Directed towards clarifying the
meaning of concepts, principles
and issues in Engineering Ethics
Ex : What does “ S a f e t y ” mean
and how is it related to
Risk ?
What is Bribe ?
What is a profession & a
c) F A C T U A L I N Q U I R I E
• Also known asS“ D e s c r i p t i
v e I n q u i r i e s ” seek to
uncover information bearing
upon value issues
• Where possible, researchers
attempt to conduct factual
enquiries using proven Scientific
Techniques
• Factual inquiries involve
what is actually known about a
case ie what the facts are ?
• Ofcourse, Facts can be
controversial
Ex : Global Warming process is
only barely / partly understood and
the need to curtail emission of
these has become a controversial
MORAL
DEVELOPMENT
2 Theories
Exist
1. Kohlberg’s
KOHLBERG’S
THEORY
Six stages of Moral
Development that
could be classified into
3 identifiable level
Level 1 : Pre conventional (Self
Centric)
Orientation :
Stage 1 : Obedience /
Punishment
Society Centric )
• Religions fundamentalist
STUDY THE FOLLOWING
ALSO
1 Moral Pluralion
2 Moral Disagreement
3 Ethical Egoism
4 Universalizability
5 Caring
6 Compassion
7 Value Based Ethics