Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared By
Academic Group 5
Renjith Raj
Swapna Yaski
Datta Patil
Mridul Paharia
Manu Pant
Road Map
1) Introduction
2) Project Methodology
3) Data Analysis
4) Target & Improvement
Opportunities
5) Conclusion
6) Future Scope
1. Introduction
1.1 Snapshot of the Telecom growth in India
Second largest telecom network after China
Overall tele density of 73%, Urban 149.55%,
rural 39%
Internet mobile devices 176.50 Million
New paradigm in many industries
10%
GDP/capita
0.81%
GDP/
capita Source: World Bank
3
Tele-Density
Overall
Urban
Rural
180.00%
169.17%
156.94%
160.00%
144.55%
140.00%
119.45%
120.00%
100.00%
88.84%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
70.89%
66.39%
73.34%
52.74%
48.10%
18.22%
5.89%
78.66%
26.22%
9.46%
36.98%
15.11%
24.31%
33.83%
39.26%
39.90%
2012
December
'12
0.00%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2. Project Methodology
2. Data Envelopment Analysis
1. Kano Model
Calculate Relative
Identification of
relevant I/p and o/p
variables
Methodology
Input 1
Network Service
Input Variables
Selection through
Kano Model
Parameters
Input 2
Customer Service
Parameters
Output
Data
Envelopment
Analysis
Subscriber Base
Revenue/ Quarter
Subscriber Base
Input Variables
The selection of the input variables is based on the results of a survey which is evaluated by using Kano model.
PGPM1013, Operations Management Academic Group 5
Kano Model
Didnt know I
wanted it but I
like it.
Satisfaction
Satisfier
One Dimensional
Desired Quality
Delighters
Excited Quality
Service
Performance
Service
Performance
Dissatisfier
Must-be
Expected Quality
Cannot increase
my satisfaction, but
can decrease.
Selected
set of input
variables
for Network
Service
and
Customer
Service
Dissatisfaction
TOTAL
GRADE
60
NETWORK PARAMETERS
Acc.Down Time
40
11
35
12
60
TCH Congestion
35
10
60
50
60
10
60
60
30
20
CUSTOMER CARE
Metering & Billing Credibility
35
10
3. Data Analysis
Operators serving Across India
Input & Output Variables
Network Parameters (Input
Variable)
Sample Data
Output Variables
Subscriber Base
Revenue Per Quarter
PGPM1013, Operations Management Academic Group 5
Data Analysis
The above Zones along with operators
that excels in both customer service
and network Parameters
Performance on Network
Parameters
10
Data Analysis
11
STATE
EFFICIENCY
Andhra Pradesh
1.00000
Assam
0.19979
Bihar
1.00000
Delhi
0.55354
Gujarat
0.46887
Haryana
1.00000
Himachal Pradesh
0.10600
Jammu & Kashmir
0.12742
Kolkata
0.22183
Kerala
1.00000
Karnataka
0.80995
Mumbai
1.00000
Maharashtra
1.00000
Madhya Pradesh
0.98117
North East
0.13159
Orissa
0.35320
Punjab
0.41218
Rajasthan
0.67970
Tamil Nadu (incl.Chennai)
1.00000
UP(E)
0.76094
UP(W)
0.51654
West Bengal
0.49147
1.000
0.200
1.000
0.553
0.470
1.000
0.106
0.128
0.222
1.000
0.804
1.000
1.000
0.985
0.132
0.351
0.414
0.682
1.000
0.756
0.518
0.490
Constant
Increasing
Constant
Increasing
Increasing
Constant
Increasing
Increasing
Increasing
Constant
Increasing
Constant
Constant
Increasing
Increasing
Increasing
Increasing
Increasing
Constant
Increasing
Increasing
Increasing
1.000
0.157
1.000
0.450
0.062
1.000
0.066
0.076
0.102
1.000
0.016
1.000
1.000
0.067
0.034
0.007
0.261
0.682
1.000
0.027
0.018
0.189
BENCHMARKS
AP2
BH10
0.043
BH10
AP2
0.034
AP2
0.250
HP22
AP2
0.037
AP2
0.039
AP2
0.065
KR38
AP2
0.720
MBI46
MH50
KTK44
0.842
BH10
0.098
AP2
0.295
AP2
0.096
TN76
TN74
AP2
0.503
AP4
0.363
AP2
0.256
TN76
MBI46
MH50
0.069
0.157
TN74
TN76
BH10
BH10
GUJ17
0.002
0.013
0.055
TN76
TN76
TN74
BH10
0.068
TN76
MH50
TN76
BH10
MH50
0.077
TN76
0.048
0.058
TN76
TN76
BH10
MH50
BH10
0.227
0.136
0.044
TN76
TN76
GUJ17
CODE
Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Delhi
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Kolkata
Kerala
Karnataka
Mumbai
Maharashtra
Madhya Pradesh
North East
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu (incl.Chennai)
UP(E)
UP(W)
West Bengal
STATE
0.857996837
0.20675019
1
0.435809467
0.448286247
0.17599705
0.094314148
0.109204268
0.171035935
0.622751407
0.757643078
0.179220682
0.964552911
1
0.143069781
0.353105072
0.320798325
0.681927174
0.63247506
0.717972022
0.501594987
0.436296983
EFFICIENCY
0.857996837 Increasing
0.202303949 Increasing
1 Constant
0.435809467 Increasing
0.45281439 Increasing
0.177774798 Increasing
0.094314148 Increasing
0.114592479 Increasing
0.171035935 Increasing
0.622751407 Increasing
0.757643078 Increasing
0.179220682 Increasing
0.964552911 Increasing
1 Constant
0.138503724 Increasing
0.353105072 Increasing
0.325883319 Increasing
0.681927174 Increasing
0.63247506 Increasing
0.721675247 Increasing
0.501594987 Increasing
0.436296983 Increasing
BENCHMARKS
0.857996837 TN76
0.202303949 BH10
1 BH10
0.435809467 TN76
0.004528144 BH10 0.448286247 TN76
0.03519941 AP4 0.033421662 MP54 0.109153726 TN76
0.094314148 TN76
0.114592479 TN76
0.171035935 TN76
0.155687852 AP4 0.467063555 TN76
0.757643078 TN76
0.179220682 TN76
0.192910582 AP4 0.192910582 MP54 0.578731746 TN76
1 MP54
0.138503724 BH10
0.353105072 BH10
0.325883319 TN76
0.681927174 TN76
0.63247506 TN76
0.721675247 TN76
0.100318997 AP4 0.195620799 MP54 0.20565519 TN76
0.436296983 TN76
12
Managerial Implications
Need to substantially increase subscriber base & Revenue
Need 14% improvement in Call drop rate
Need 17% improvement in account down time (See TN)
Need Avg 10.8% improvement in metering credibility (Prepaid)
Clear leader in customer service parameters & congestion free
Need 12% improvement in call drop rate
Need 21% improvement in account down time
Company excels in call center access & call answering speed
Need 51% improvement in account down time
Need 22% improvement in congestion in network
Should also improve billing credibility
Fairly good on customer service parameters
Need 28% improvement in account down time
Need 12% improvement in congestion in network
PGPM1013, Operations Management Academic Group 5
13
Conclusion
88 DMUs considered for the analysis on the data from TRAI
Vodafone has highly efficient stores across India
Airtel has most consistent performance on both network & customer
parameters
Potential areas of improvements & targets identified
Can use for decisions such as target setting, new project initiation,
expansion, staffing, budget allocation, infrastructure setup
14
Future scope
Can include more regional players in a further wider study
Performance analysis + sensitivity analysis could give clear priorities
for targeting
15