Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Marina Cossou
Kevin Sedbon
Xiaoyou Wu
Sabrina Wee
Aljoscha Ziller
AGENDA
Case Overview
Lafarges strategy
Lafarges structure
Lafarge way
10
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
CASE OVERVIEW
Global
Footprint
Rapid
Growth
Global
Acquisition
Strategy
Cement
industry has
particular
specialties
Lafarge has been growing at a alarming rate. It has successfully achieved its vision of becoming the number
one firm in the construction industry. However, there is still a long way to go and several questions remain:
How do you manage a global company like this that used to be a small French player? How do you integrate
acquisitions? Is the growth sustainable? How can the international change process be sustained?
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
Political
Economic
In some countries
the government has
an influence in
determining the price
Government
spending affects the
amount of houses
built and hereby also
the demand for
cement
Social
A house is one of the
most important need
of a human being
It is also an
important status
symbol
Due to the higher
automation labor
cost is reduced and
people were laid of
Technological
The industry is
highly dependent on
technology
Energy consumption
is one of the major
costs in producing
Overall, the cement industry is affected by several drivers. Lafarge has to manage several stakeholders
effectively. The industry is attractive but has a high impact on the daily life of people. Lafarge should focus
on its stakeholder engagement and manage its transformation to a global leader very carefully.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
For Lafarge, globalization means to be present in every strategic market by acquiring one or more of the local
cement producers.
2. Small number of
cement firms
control the market
3. Investment in
newly
industrialized
countries
1. Profits are sensitive to the level of utilization of the production capacity. Lafarge should manage to run its plants at
a high capacity rate with high efficiency. Since competition is local, price cuts can be spotted easily. Lafarge
should focus on price rebates regarding Sales volume to gain market share
2. Competition occurs on a multi point and multi market level. Lafarge should focus on establishing key locations by
acquisitions since this is the easiest access at the lowest cost. Fewer players mean that the prices tend to rise.
3. In terms of method of growing the markets have become global (competitors follow similar strategies), however
local consumer tastes are diverse. Lafarge needs to integrate the acquired companies fast and make sure to have a
global workforce that shares the culture of the firm but I also aware of the local customs
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
GROWING BY ACQUISITION
A capital
intensive
business
Expanding current operations means creating new facilities which is capital intensive
Acquiring an existing player avoids greenfield costly procedures
Refurbishing and modernizing existing plants is less costly than creating one from
scratch
An industry
imperative
A trend
imperative
Small nationals and local family players tend to be acquired by biggest ones. To stay in
the game, one has to follow the trend
The only way to compete is by quantity and not price as price policy is uniform across
competitors and product is undifferentiated Acquisitions make good business sense
Mature markets and global economy trends makes it vital to grow in foreign countries
A move in tune
with Lafarge
actual strategy
There are three ways to grow: expansion, takeovers, or greenfield opportunities. Taking into account the
issue of competing with price and the industry specificities as well as the trend in the market and Lafarge
strategy, the best solution for the company is to grow by acquisition.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
Industry specificities and stakes make it necessary to grow (fear of being acquired, limitations of one
production sites to cater the needs of a whole region). By offering the possibility to gain from synergies, to
better products and competencies and settle in new areas, value is created via growth process.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
Cement Division
Aggregate &
Concrete Division
Operational staff
Divisional staff
8 regions
Roofing division
Gypsum division
No business
division
separation
before 1999
In 1999, Lafarge decided to implement some changes in its organizational structure in order to follow on its
global strategy. Its structural management among its business divisions and regions provided more
decentralization to support its organic growth and acquisitions.
Separation of the
4 divisions by
regions and
products
Creation of
business unit
manager
responsible for
EVA
Developing a
common
language The
Lafarge way
Necessity to acquire a professional culture to fit the growth strategy as Lafarge was
originally a family business based on personal and informal relations.
Reducing uncertainty and providing clarifications about the groups strategy and
objectives for everyone => as a group grows, clear guidelines have to be defined to have
all employees on the same page.
Overall, Lafarges new organizational structure has been successful to support its growth strategy by
acquisitions as it provided more delegation and empowerment to its managers in order to have a better
understanding of the local markets, which facilitated global integration.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
LESS TOP-DOWN
APPROACH
Although the organization
is flatter with divisional
stuff and lots of efforts
have been made, most of
the decisions are still
taken by the Direction
Gnrale.
Business unit managers
should be more
empowered to take
decision as the taste is
different across countries.
ADDING MORE
INDICATORS TO
MEASURE
PERFORMANCE AND
EFFICIENCY
This indicator forces
business unit managers to
only focus on their
performance to get
bonuses, whereas Lafarge
operates LT investments.
Its an absolute measure
and cannot be compared
between between business
units.
EVA should not be the
sole indicator => balance
scorecard are good
indicators and measure
more than performance
A TEAM DEDICATED TO
THE INTERNAL CHANGE
This organizational
change has been quite
violent for employees as it
changed the groups
mindset from a family to a
global business.
A team should be
dedicated to help
employees to face this
change of culture and to
respond to their problems
or misunderstanding on
the ongoing process.
Although a new organizational structure has been implemented and seems to be successful, the Group still
has to make some efforts to realize the full benefits: having less power concentration at the top, adding
more indicators and supporting its employees with this change of culture.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
10
Aspects of both the Principle of Action and The Lafarge Way affect directly and indirectly the goals set by
Lafarge. In achieving these goals, Lafarge ultimately keeps to its strategy, hence both the POA and the
Lafarge Way is in line with Lafarges overall business strategy.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
11
Administrative Heritage
how things ought to be done
Definition: The key routines developed by the
firm since its inception. Administrative Heritage
can also be influenced by national culture.
Four archetypes of administrative heritage
that is associated with a specific routine of
international firm specific advantage (FSA)
transfer: Centralized exporter, international
projector, International Coordinator, multicentered MNE. By identifying its natural or
desired archetype, the global corporation can be
more aware of the possible pitfalls when
transferring FSA.
For a successful transfer of knowledge for a
global corporation: The global corporation
requires a historical emphasis on knowledge
creation, minimal differences of values and
practices of founders and senior managers, and
proper processes, systems and support
infrastructure to facilitate creation of
knowledge.
Lafarges archetype of administrative heritage is the multi-centered MNE. Given the nature of the cement
industry, the archetype makes sense for Lafarge, allowing Lafarge to encourage the exchange of best
practices while giving its operating units a high degree of autonomy.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
12
Benefits
Challenges
Although LafargeHolcim had painted a rosy picture of their merger and had backed it with figures and a
brief roll-out strategy for their merger, there is still the question of how well the organizational fit would be
between the two companies, an important factor that has caused many mergers to fail. Additionally,
another sources of concern would be that the realization of cost synergies might not necessarily materialize
without the right implementation.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
13
Organizational restructure:
Differentiate and
manage local
business units
Organizational
decentralization:
changing of a
hierarchical
structure to a flatter
one
Gathering and
forecasting of
market information
Delegation of
authority
Participating
industry activities
and interact with
key players
Decentralized
network of applicant
laboratories
Monitoring of
internal activities
Synergize
Central
laboratory:
pool together
scientific
knowledge and
develops
synergies
between
materials
To support its global strategy of growth, Lafarge carried out a new structure in organization, mainly
consisting of decentralization, integration, avoidance of uncertainty and synergies among divisions.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
14
Best practices
Optimize
management and
production
process,
minimize
uncertainty
Plays as a
benchmark for
decentralized
management
divisions
Assess and
maintain quality
of the Groups
worldwide cement
units
Standardize and
simplify internal
functions, reduce
management cost
Internationalization Process
Lafarge is considered a storehouse of best practices in the industry and its best practices strongly support
its internationalization process, by providing a standardized benchmark and optimized measure for
management and quality control of its different units worldwide.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
15
Geographical condition:
natural resources for raw material,
transportation convenience, etc.
Market size:
regional economy size, potential
demands, construction potential, etc.
Local policies:
taxation, acquisition policies,
construction regulation, etc.
Lafarge pursues growth in emerging markets through expansion, takeovers and setting up Greenfield
projects. Yet since emerging markets are not mature and equilibrated, there is diversity inside the markets.
Hence when entering the markets, Lafarge needs to take the specialty of markets into account and seek the
best path of growth.
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
16
..
30/11/2014
Lafarge Case
17