0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
50 vues10 pages
The process of Collective Bargaining is bipartite in nature, i.e. The negotiations are between employers and the employees without a third party intervention. It is a 'group' process, wherein one group representing the employers and the other group representing the employees sit together to negotiate terms of employment. Collective Bargaining process usually starts with a charter of demands being presented to the management by the unions on behalf of their constituent members.
The process of Collective Bargaining is bipartite in nature, i.e. The negotiations are between employers and the employees without a third party intervention. It is a 'group' process, wherein one group representing the employers and the other group representing the employees sit together to negotiate terms of employment. Collective Bargaining process usually starts with a charter of demands being presented to the management by the unions on behalf of their constituent members.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PPT, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
The process of Collective Bargaining is bipartite in nature, i.e. The negotiations are between employers and the employees without a third party intervention. It is a 'group' process, wherein one group representing the employers and the other group representing the employees sit together to negotiate terms of employment. Collective Bargaining process usually starts with a charter of demands being presented to the management by the unions on behalf of their constituent members.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PPT, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
about working conditions and terms of employment between an employer or one or more employers’ organizations, on one hand and one or more representative workers organizations, with a view to reaching an agreement. The process is ‘collective’ because issues relating to terms and conditions of employment are solved by representatives of employees and employers in groups rather than as individuals. The term ‘bargaining’ refers to evolving an agreement using methods like negotiation, discussion, exchange of facts and ideas, rather than confrontation. The process of collective bargaining is bipartite in nature, i.e. the negotiations are between employers and the employees without a third party intervention. The process of collective bargaining is that divergent viewpoints are put forth by parties concerned, and through negotiations, a settlement is arrived at. Some of the salient features of collective bargaining are:
1. It is a ‘group’ process, wherein one group representing the
employers and the other group representing the employees sit together to negotiate terms of employment.
2. It is a process in the sense that it consists of a number of
steps. The starting point is the presentation of charter of demands and the last stage is reaching an agreement or a contract which will serve as the basic law governing labor management relations over a period of time. 3. Negotiations form an important aspect of the process of collective bargaining i.e. there is considerable scope for discussion, compromise or mutual give and take in collective bargaining deliberations rather than confrontations. 4. It is a bipartite process. The employers and the employees are the only parties involved in the bargaining process. There is no third party intervention. The conditions of employment are regulated by those directly concerned. Collective Bargaining Process Collective Bargaining process usually starts with a charter of demands being presented to the management by the unions on behalf of their constituent members. A fresh charter is submitted on expiry of the earlier agreement. Before the actual negotiations begin management and the union go through several intra organizational bargains. Management has to prepare a set of intra-organizational policy issues, relating to the concessions they would make, the wages they would pay and the concessions that they are willing to make. While doing this the organization’s expected profits, expected future costs and environmental conditions, the shareholders expectations etc, need to be reconciled.
Similarly, the union team having gone through an intra-
organizational exercise and assessment, decide upon their strategy and priorities so as to present a united front at the negotiating table. They gather data to formulate their charter of demands. The various groups of workers would like to enhance wages and salaries, benefits and welfare measures. Employee grievances and matters such as promotion policies are also taken up. At the Bargaining Table Generally, the union’s charter of demands ranging from wage increase to personnel policies, are discussed at the bargaining table. 1. Item by item the various demands are taken up, each side presenting its case to the best of its ability.
2. The management gives its prognosis of the state of the
industry, the environment, the firm’s capacity to pay and its constraints.
3. The union demands wage increases, to meet the increasing
cost of living, changes in the expectations of the workers in the changed socio economic context, including increases in wages of the of workers of other firms. Result of Negotiations: The following situations may be created – 1. Total rejection of all demands as unreasonable and therefore deadlock. 2. Rejection of some (perhaps major demands like% increase in wages) and offer to consider some others. 3. Management may work out cost and other implications of demands and then re-start the negotiations. 4. While agreeing to consider union demands, management puts forth counter demands. Depending upon the strategy adopted a variety of sequential actions may follow: 1. If there is a deadlock, and no further easing of ‘stands’ takes place, industrial action may follow to force the issue towards a settlement. Alternatively both the parties may be forced into conciliation and attempt at a compromise settlement. 2. The second course of action could also lead to deadlock if the more significant demands are not met but in that case the possibility of conciliation still exists.
3. It is in the last two options that free play of collective
bargaining process operates. In this the channel of communication are open, to the greatest extent possible
4. There can also be situation where the management puts
forth counter demands. In which case demands placement becomes a two way process and there is a two way communication and the agreement process becomes more complex, at the same time it leads to a situation of greater give and take between the two parties. Individual Bargaining History: To start with, bargaining was an individual process between the employer and individual employee in the USA, form where the concept of industrial bargaining really developed along with countries in Western Europe.
During the Great Depression however, individual
bargaining started failing and could not meet the needs of the workers. Accordingly, in 1935 the US congress passed the Wagner Act, commonly known as National Labor Relations Act, to promote “equity in bargaining power” between the labor and the management.
The idea was that although workers might not be able to
individually bargain with the employers to achieve higher wages and benefits they could bind together to fulfill their needs through collective bargaining agreements. In 50s Americans realized that Labor Unions were becoming too strong under Wagner Act as many industries became rifle with labor strikes and unrest. As a result Landrum-Griffin Act was passed in 1959 to uphold “right of the employees NOT to organize” and to limit the union power. As a result of this, role of unions began a long and steady decline in the industrial relations in USA. Among the three primary means of addressing the needs of the workers – individual bargaining, collective bargaining and protective legislations – each has its own advantages and disadvantage. Individual bargaining – looks after individual needs, it is cost effective but during recession it leaves the individual vulnerable to improvised solutions. Collective Bargaining – allows individuals to benefit from the workers union bargaining power, but most workers in the unorganized sector are deprived of any benefit from bargaining. Protective legislations – does not cater for individual needs, it is also costly. But it provides some automatic relief to workers.