Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 88

The Theory of Constraints

Fundamental Exam Review


TOC Thinking Processes Segment
James R. Holt, Ph.D., PE
Professor
jholt@wsu.edu
http://www.engrmgt.wsu.edu/
Engineering & Technology
Washington State University-2010
1
Management

TOCICO Segmented Fundamentals Exam


Fundamentals Certificate
Multiple Choice Exam
(Identify, Exploit, Subordinate, Elevate, Go to Step 1)
Fundamentals
Certificate of

TOC
Philosophy
Inherent
Potential
Inherent
Simplicity
Inherent WinWin
Five Focusing
Steps
Three

Fundament
als
Certificate
of
TOC

Thinking
Processes
Conflict
Cloud
Negative
Branch
Ambitious
Target

Fundamentals
Certificate of

Fundamentals
Certificate of

TOC
Applications

TOC Finance
& Measures

DBR
Project
Management

T, I, OE
PQ Type
Problem

Replenishme
nt

Washington State University-2010

Topics in TOC Thinking Process

Cause and Effect


Evaporating Cloud
Surfacing Assumptions
Invalidating Assumptions
Negative Branch Reservation
Overcoming Obstacles (PRT)
Categories of Legitimate Reservation
Layers of Resistance

Washington State University-2010

TOC Thinking Process Elements


Two types of Logic (in Natural Language)

Sufficiency Logic
If , Then .
In order to , There must be .Necessary Logic

Logical Causality Tools used to Answer the three


questions:
What to Change?
What to Change to?
How to Cause the Change?

TOC is a Systemic Thinking Process.

There are a set of rules to guide and check validity.


Could be called Visual Thinking.
Washington State University-2010

Everyone Can Think


Goal:

Minimize: Y
subject to:
(X-1)^2+(Y-8)^2<=24
(X-3)^2+(Y-8)^2<=14
(X-5)^2+(Y-8)^2<=2
(X-7)^2+(Y-8)^2<=22
(X-9)^2+(Y-8)^2<=26

Y->

Lower the Ball yet


keep it attached.

Washington State University-2010

X->

The Real World

My View of
my World

Washington State University-2010

Thinking Time
We all think! Its what we do!
Our minds are like CPUs. They keep on running

and running and running


We feel uncomfortable if we dont have thoughts in
our head.
Thats why junk TV still survives.
We feel uncomfortable if we start thinking the
wrong thoughts
Thats why there are magazines in Doctors
offices!
Washington State University-2010

Thinking Experiment
Get out a pencil and paper.
Wait for the starting signal.
Then, Work really hard at not thinking for One
Minute!

GO!
Washington State University-2010

QUICK!
Write down every thought you had in the last

minute!
Jot down a word to catch the thought you had
Capture as many as possible.

Washington State University-2010

How Many Thoughts did you


have in 1 Minute?
In the production world, we would
call recurring thoughts RE-WORK!

Probable #

How many of those


thoughts have you
had before? 40%,
60%, 80%?

12

15

18

Number of thoughts
Washington State University-2010

10

Improving our Mental Throughput


We need to increase our mental effectiveness
We need to tie together the stray pieces so we

dont have to deal with individual thoughts


We need to get the whole picture, solve it, and
move on.

Washington State University-2010

11

What is this?

Washington State University-2010

12

Jonathans Family

Washington State University-2010

13

Thinking Process Tools


The Basic Set of Thinking Process Tools Include:
Current Reality Tree
Evaporating Cloud
All of these tools
Future Reality Tree
Negative Branch Reservation are Scrutinized by
the
Pre-Requisite Tree
Categories of
Transition Tree
Legitimate
Derivatives Tools:
Reservation.
Three Cloud Approach
Chronic Conflict
Thinking Process elements included
in the Fundamentals Exam
Layers of Resistance
Washington State University-2010

14

For Fun!
In order to understand the function and power of
the Thinking Process Tools

Lets examine a Thinking Process Example.


One that is fairly well known by most people
One that is not well solved by most people

Marital Strife

Washington State University-2010

15

First the Approach: The Thinking


Process
What to Change?

UDEs
UDEs

UDEs

Find the cause of


the UnDesirable
Effects - UDEs.

Change (Remove)
the Core Problem.

UDEs
UDEs

UDEs
UDEs

UDEs
Core
Problem

Washington State University-2010

Arrows are Logical


Connections are
Tail Head:
If , Then .

16

Find Whats Blocking the Solution


What to Change To?
Necessary
Condition
Goal

Prerequisite

Arrows are Logical


Connections are
Head Tail:
In Order to ,
Must have .

Injection that invalidates


the assumption

Necessary
Condition

Prerequisite

Assumptions that
explain the necessary
Thinking Process elements included connection.
in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

17

Achieving the Solution

How to Cause the


Change?

DE

DE

DE

DE

DE
Key
Action

DE
DE

DE

Key
Action

Key
Action
Washington State University-2010

18

Marital Strife
UnDesirable Effects
Lack of
Affection

Lack of
Trust

Infidelity
Unequal Workload
Little
Support

One Carries
Excessive Load
Frequent
Disagreements

Lack of
Compassion

Difference of
Opinion

Washington State University-2010

19

Story - Trust
1. My spouse doesnt come home when I expect him (her).
This is happening more and more. The stories seem to be
weaker and weaker. I want to trust my spouse. But I dont
want to be hurt.
My spouse
feels free from
my bondage
I feel good
about my
marriage
I dont get hurt
Thinking Process elements included
in the Fundamentals Exam

I trust my
spouse at all
times

I dont trust
my spouse

Washington State University-2010

20

Story - Support
2. My spouse is deeply involved in ______. He/she expects me to support
him/her by taking care of __________ while he/she is gone. I dont mind
doing it, but it leaves me little time for my own hobbies.

We use our
time well

My spouse can
do his/her own
thing

Give lots of
support

I have time for


myself

Give little
support

Thinking Process elements included


in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

21

Story-Workload
3. My spouse is in a stressful job and at a critical point in his/her career.
It seems like this critical point is getting longer and longer. In the mean
time, I have to do my job and hold down the domestic duties too!

We both
Achieve

I survive
my Job

We balance our
domestic workload

My spouse
gets ahead

Thinking Process elements included


in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

We have unequal
workload
22

Generic Conflict
(a consolidated Evaporating Cloud)

1. Feel Good
2. Use Time Effective
3. Achieve

Happy
Marriage

1. Spouse freedom
2. Spouse does own thing
3. Spouse gets ahead

My Spouse
is Happy

I am
Happy
1. Im not hurt
2. Time for me
3. I Survive
Thinking Process elements included
in the Fundamentals Exam

1. Trust
2. Support
3. Unequal work

My spouse does
what he/she wants

My spouse doesnt get


what he/she wants

Washington State University-2010

1. Lack of Trust
2. Lack of Support
3. Balanced work
23

What to Change?

Core Conflict
Core Problem

Often, my spouse
takes second
place

I am often slighted
We have
different goals
There is pressure to
give my spouse does
what he/she wants
The things my
spouse wants
are important
to our
marriage

There is pressure not to


give what he/she wants
Our wants
are different

My Spouse needs
to be happy

I not happy unless


my spouse is happy

I need to be
happy

We want
a Happy
Marriage

Washington State University-2010

I have real
needs

My personal
feelings are
important
24

The Current Reality Tree


Results of the Core Conflict
Infidelity
Loss of trust

Lack of Affection
Lack of Compassion
Time
Excessive burdens
continues
Unequal workload
Things need to be
done
Different people have
different levels of
importance

Lack of support
Frequent
arguments
Different Opinions

We have different
goals
Washington State University-2010

25

A Potential Future
Desirale Effects (DEs)
We have a close We have complete
confidence
relationship
We share the
workload
We support
each other

Committed to
each other
Caring
Relationship

Washington State University-2010

We share our
burdens
We rarely disagree
on important
matters
We really
understand
each other

26

Starting Injection
My spouse and I share
common goals, objectives
and direction in the important
aspects of our lives.

Washington State University-2010

27

Start of the Future


We are working towards our
common goals/direction
Spouse is
working to our
common goals

My spouse
works
towards
spouses
goals

Im working to
our common
goals

We have common
goals, objectives
and direction in the
important aspects
My Spouse
of our lives.
needs to
I need to
be Happy
be Happy

I not happy unless my


spouse is happy

We want
a Happy
Marriage
Washington State University-2010

I work
toward
my
goals

My personal
feelings are
important
28

More Actions Needed


We have complete
confidence
We share our
burdens
We rarely
disagree

We share the
workload

We have a close
relationship
We support
each other

We really understand
each other

We have a Caring
Relationship

We are working towards our


common goals/direction
Washington State University-2010

29

A Possible Nice
Future Reality Tree
What to
Change to?

We have complete
confidence in each other
We share a
common set of
moral virtues

We have a close
relationship
We share our burdens
We rarely disagree
We have good
communication

We make it a point
to communicate
(good & bad)

We share the
workload
We really
understand each
other

We support each other


Caring Relationship

We are working towards


our common
goals/direction
Washington State University-2010

We realize we need
each other to reach
our common goals

30

Negative Branch Reservation


The Good Side

The Bad Side

My spouses
goals are
achieved.

Most of my
spouses goals are
our common goals
Im working to
our common
goals

My spouse
works
towards
spouses
goals

I cant achieve
my goals
Im not working
on my goals

My goals
take a lot
I am very of time
We have common goals,
objectives and direction in the busy
important aspects of our lives.

Thinking Process elements included


in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

31

Negative Branch Reservation


The Good Side

The Bad Side

My spouses
goals are
achieved.

Most of my
spouses goals are
our common goals
Im working to
our common
goals

I feel
goodachieve
about
I cant
my
myprogress
goals
I work on our
Im not working
goals AND my
on my goals
goals

My goals
My spouse
take a lot
works
am very
We have common goals,
IIwork
on of time
towards
objectives and direction in the busy
things I
spouses
I finally
important aspects of our lives. value
goals
prioritize
Thinking Process elements included
my life
in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

32

OK, Injections, But HOW?


How to Cause the Change?
We realize we need
each other to reach
our common goals
We make it a point
to communicate
(good & bad)

My spouse
works
towards
spouses
goals

Create the PreRequisite Tree


(Ambitious Target Tree).
Practice on this Injection
We share a
common set of
moral virtues

We have common
goals, objectives
and direction in the
important aspects
of our lives.
Washington State University-2010

I work
toward
my
goals
I finally
prioritize
my life
33

We share a common
set of moral virtues
Obstacles
Preventing

Intermediate
Objectives

Its a gray world out there.


(I cant tell right from wrong)
We dont want to change.
Values change according to
the circumstances.
We have different
backgrounds.
Our desires differ.
Thinking Process elements included
We both enjoy some moral
in the Fundamentals Exam
indiscretions.
34
Washington State University-2010

We share a common set


of moral virtues
Obstacles
Preventing

Intermediate
Objectives

Its a gray world (cant tell right


from wrong)

We agree on common virtues

We dont want to change

We are willing to work on this

Values change according to the


circumstances

We agree on a common virtues

We have different backgrounds

We really know each other

Our desires differ

We share a set of common goals

We both enjoy some moral


indiscretions

We live our set of virtues in all


cases Thinking Process elements included
in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

35

Sequencing the solution


Thinking Process elements included
(Structure of the PRT)
in the Fundamentals Exam

We share a common set of moral virtues

Its hard to tell right


from wrong

We live our set of


virtues in all cases

We agree on a common virtues


We are
different

We enjoy our
indiscretions

Our desires differ

We share a set of common goals

We really know each other

We dont know
each other

We really communicate
We dont
We dont want to
talk much
admit error
We subordinate
We recognize our
ourselves to each other
own frailties
Washington State University-2010

36

Putting the Intermediate Objectives Into Place

The PreRequisite Tree exposed the Intermediate

Objectives (Milestones) needed for


How to Cause the Change?
But, How to We actually Get there?
How will, We Really Communicate?
For this, the Transition Tree gives the Step-by-Step
Approach to getting there.
We really communicate
We dont
We dont want to
talk much
admit error
We subordinate
We recognize our
ourselves to each other
own frailties
Washington State University-2010

37

Working Upwards on a
TransitionWeTree
recognize (more
Spouses can be a
significant help and support
for dealing with problems

and more of) our


own frailties

We generally know about each


others mistakes that we try to hide
There are (and
should be) few
secrets between
spouses
We dont
talk much

We really
communicate

We recognize our
own frailties

<feed back loop


from up above>

We want to
improve

We, each, admit


(confidentially) to
some of our
problems that we
wish to eliminate

We, each of us, try to


hide our mistakes

We dont want
to admit error

We want
others to
We subordinate
ourselves to each respect us

other
Washington State University-2010

Mistakes are
inevitable

We are
mortal

People rarely respect


people who make a lot
of mistakes

38

Working UpwardsWeon
a
subordinate
ourselves (more and
Transition Tree
more) to each other

Real love comes from


sacrificing self for the
benefit of others.

We are willing to do
some things that show
love to our spouse
We dont
talk much
We

We really
communicate

Loved
each other
We recognize our
in the past
own frailties

We need cooperation
(give and and take)
from both sides
We want to
improve
It is easier
to love
when
loved.

<feed back loop


from up above>
We, each, accept
we will do more
things for each
other than we are
currently doing

We need to resolve some


problems on both sides

Mistakes are
inevitable

Our marriage has


some strife caused
by each of us.
We dont
We desire
to want
love each other
to admit error
even more than we do now
We both have
made some
We subordinate
mistakes
ourselves to each other
Washington State University-2010

39

Working Upwards on a Transition Tree


We are very
patient and
listen without
judgment.

We really
communicate
(more and more)

Neither of us
dominates the
discussion (for
too long)

We need to
talk more

We dont
talk much

We talk frequently
about our
successes together

We each mention
three good things
that are happening
in our lives

We really
communicate

Werecognize
want to our
We
own
frailties
improve

<feed back loop


from up above>
We subordinate
ourselves (more
and more) to
each other

We talk
frequently about
our challenges

We dedicate
time to spend
with each
other
We each mention
three problems that
we want to improve.

We dont want
to admit error

We recognize
We subordinate more and
more) of our
We dont talkourselves
much to each
other
own frailties

Washington State University-2010

We both have
topics of interest
to each other
40

Working Upwards on a Transition Tree


We really
communicate
(more and more)

We each mention
three good things
that are happening
in our lives

We each mention
three problems that
we want to improve.

We, each, admit (confidentially)


to some of our problems that we
wish to eliminate

We dont
talk
much
We recognize
our own
frailties

We really
communicate

We dont want
to admit error
We subordinate
ourselves to each
other
Washington State University-2010

We are very
patient and
listen without
judgment.

We dedicate
time to spend
with each
other

41

The Strategic/Tactic Plan for Marriage


S. Marital
Bliss
T. Love Each
Other
S. Focus on
the Other
T. Have
Common
Goals

S. Get
Along
T. Accept
Each Other

Communication
Forgiveness

S. Trust
Each Other

S. Spouse
Loves Me

T. Share
Moral Code

T. Take
Actions to
cause Spouse
to love me

Fidelity

Shared
Responsibility

Washington State University-2010

Work at Marriage
42

The Evaporating Cloud

B. My
Need

D. What I
Want

C. Others
Need

D. What
the
Others
Want

A. The
Goal

Thinking Process elements included


in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

43

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


1. What is it that I Want (that
Im having trouble getting)?

D. What I
Want

Washington State University-2010

44

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


1. What is it that I Want (that
Im having trouble getting)?

D. What I
Want

D. What
the
Others
Want
2. What is it that the Others Want
(that I dont want them to have)?
Washington State University-2010

45

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


3. Why do I want what I want?
What Need am I trying to fulfill?

1. What is it that I Want (that


Im having trouble getting)?

B. My
Need

D. What I
Want

D. What
the
Others
Want
2. What is it that the Others Want
(that I dont want them to have)?
Washington State University-2010

46

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


3. Why do I want what I want?
What Need am I trying to fulfill?

1. What is it that I Want (that


Im having trouble getting)?

B. My
Need

D. What I
Want

C. Others
Need

D. What
the
Others
Want

4. Why do the Others want what


they want? What Need do they
have?

2. What is it that the Others Want


(that I dont want them to have)?

Washington State University-2010

47

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


3. Why do I want what I want?
What Need am I trying to fulfill?
5. What Goal do we
mutually share? Why
are we still arguing?

1. What is it that I Want (that


Im having trouble getting)?

B. My
Need

D. What I
Want

C. Others
Need

D. What
the
Others
Want

A. The
Goal
Reading the Cloud:
In order to <point> I must
have <tail>.

4. Why do the Others want what


they want? What Need do they
have?

2. What is it that the Others Want


(that I dont want them to have)?

Washington State University-2010

48

Communicating the
Evaporating Cloud
4. Point out that you also have a
significant Need.
1. Start the Mutual Goal.
It is common ground.
Both interested.

5. And you WANT to meet


your Need as well.

B. My
Need

D. What I
Want

C. Others
Need

D. What
the
Others
Want

A. The
Goal
Reading the Cloud:
In order to <point> I must
have <tail>.

2. Recognize you understand the


Others Need must be meet to
reach the Goal.

3. Acknowledge the Other side


Wants to act on meeting their
Need.
49

Washington State University-2010

Lets Do Some Examples

B. Why I
Want It

D. What I
Want (to do)

C. Why the
Other Side
Wants What
They Want

D. What the
Other Side
Wants

A. The Goal

Thinking Process elements included


in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

50

Lets Do Some Examples


STUDENT
EXAMPLE

A. Get the
Customer
order

B. Make the
offer
attractive to
the
customer

D. Supplier
makes the
mold

C. Insure
the quality
of the
product

D.
Customer
makes the
Mold

Thinking Process elements included


in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

51

Lets Do Some Examples


STUDENT
EXAMPLE

Because: Money is
the ONLY motivator

Because: Motivated
employees deliver
more profit

B. Motivate
better
Performance

A. Make
more Profit
C. Control
Expenses

Because: Expenses
subtract from profit

D. Pay High
Salaries
Because: This will
create conflict with
the team.
Salaries are fixed.
D. Dont
pay High
Salaries

Because: Salaries are


a significant part of
Thinking Process elements included
expenses
in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

52

Evaporating the
Evaporating Cloud
Assumption: All machines must
be keep busy all the time.
Assumption: We are
measured upon our
Production Level

A. Manage
Production
Effectively

Assumption: Our profits


are not high. Customers
demand on-time delivery.

B.
Produce a
Lot

D. Increase
the Work-InProcess
Assumption:

C. Keep
Costs and
Delivery
in Control

D.
Decrease
the Work-InProcess

We cant
increase WIP
and Decrease
WIP at the
same time.

Assumption: WIP is expensive.


High WIP delays flow time.
Washington State University-2010

53

There is an Injection for Every Conflict

Arrow
AB
AC
BD
CD
D/D

Assumption
Productive
Cost Effective
Busy Machines
Expensive WIP
Cant do Both

Injection
Deliver Max Capacity
Price on Value
Keep Constraint 100%
Throughput Focus
Buffer Constraint only

Chosen Injection:
Focus on the Capacity Constrained Resource.
Release work to the system at the rate of the
Capacity Constrained Resource a Buffer Time in
Advance (no sooner, no later).
Use Buffer Management to improve the system.
Washington State University-2010

54

Sometimes TOC Solutions Are Counter


Intuitive

DBR: To get more out, put less in.


CCPM: To finish project sooner, delay the Start.
CCPM: To be safer, remove the safety.
Replenishment: To get your products quicker to the
customer, store them farther away.
To Solve the Conflict, Ignore the conflict.
To Make More Money, Sell at below Cost.
If you cant find an injection, then just do what is
opposite of what everyone else is doing (and
then do whatever it takes to make it work).
Washington State University-2010

55

Negative Branch Reservation Practice


Story Line.

Thinking Process elements included


in the Fundamentals Exam

I just had an exposure to the Negative Branch


Reservation Tool of the TOC Thinking Process.
I can remember parts of it (the Good Side, the
Bad Side part sticks out).
The class instructor now tells us to make a
Negative Branch Reservations as an in class
quiz.
Assignment.
Draw the Negative Branch Reservation and the
results of the trimming Injection.
Washington State University-2010

56

Negative Branch Reservation


The Good Side

The Bad Side

I draw a NBR Tree


Thinking Process elements included
in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

57

We might
Miss it.

I Wont be
alone

We might
learn from
Each other

Negative Branch Reservation


The Good Side

I Could look
The Bad Side
bad.

Two idiots
are better
than one
I learn better
how to do
the NBR

Get Help from


Each other

My NBR tree
may not look
good

Practice

I draw a NBR Tree


Thinking Process elements included
in the Fundamentals Exam

I will look
good!

Washington State University-2010

I might be
called to
present

Im not too
good at the
NBR

58

PreRequisite Tree Practice


The AMBITIOUS TARGET:
To Learn the Evaporating Cloud, the Negative
Branch Reservation and PRT (Ambitious Target)
Tree in the next half hour.
What are the Obstacles?
What are the Injections?

Washington State University-2010

59

Learn EC, NBR, PRT in


30 Mins
Obstacles
Preventing

Intermediate
Objectives

Thinking Process elements included


in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

60

Learn EC, NBR, PRT in


30 Mins
Obstacles
Preventing
We are
preoccupied.

Intermediate
Objectives
Full
Time Call Concentration

We are sleepy (after lunch)

Coffee

Too many calls

Switch off (no distractions)

Details unknown to us

We Know the Details

Not enough time

Plenty of time

No writing materials

Write on White Board

Not willing to accept learning

We paid for this class!

Not motivated.

I really want to do this

Difficult, complex, hard

With the right materials, this is easy!

Thinking Process elements included


in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

61

Sequencing the solution


Thinking Process elements included
(Structure of the PRT)
in the Fundamentals Exam
I learn the EC, NBR, PRT in 30 Mins

.
.

.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.

.
.

Washington State University-2010

62

Categories of Legitimate Reservation


Used to Scrutinize All Logic Trees
First:

Clarity

Second: Entity Existence

The Effect

Third

The Cause

Causality

Cause
Insufficiency
Additional Cause
Cause Reversal
Predicted Effect
Tautology

This simple set of rules, which compiles all the key elements necessary and
sufficient for anyone to validate or invalidate logic, is one of Eliyhau M.
Goldratts significant contribution
thinking.
Washingtonto
State
University-2010

63

Resistance to Change
Why dont People Change?
Resistance to change is a good thing. It prevents
most un-needed changes.
People resist because they dont understand the
value of the change and / or see significant
negative branches without a way to deal with
them.
There are six basic layers of resistance and six
methods to overcome them.

Washington State University-2010

64

Layers of Resistance

Layer 1. Disagree on the problem


Solution: Agree on the problem (CRT)
Layer 2. Disagree on the direction of the solution
Solution: Agree on the direction of the solution (EC)
Layer 3. Disagree that the solution solves the problem.
Solution: Agree that the solution solves the problem (FRT)
Layer 4. Yes, But, there are potential Negative consequences.
Solution: Agree that the solution will not lead to any significant
negative effects (NBR)
Layer 5. Yes. But, there are obstacles to implementing the solution.
Solution: Agree on the way to overcome any obstacles that might
block or distort implementation of the solution (PRT)
Layer 6. Unverbalized fears
Solution: Overcome Unverbalized fears (TT)
Washington State University-2010

65

Categories of Legitimate
Reservation: CLR Clarity
Expressing logic visually gives the opportunity
for scrutiny often missed when voiced only.

This is a pretty
little girls school

This is a small
school for girls

A School only for Pretty Girls?


Or, is it a Pretty School for young girls?
Or, just a very Little School?
Could it be a school for one particularly
Pretty Girl (you missed the apostrophe)?
Are there boys there too?
Does the building look particularly nice?
What is the enrollment?

Washington State University-2010

66

CLR Entity Existence


A brand new
Lexus costs
$15,000
Operating costs
of the car are of
little concern

The exterior
appearance of the
car doesnt matter
There is free
maintenance for
100,000 miles
Entity Existence Reservation:
Do these things really exist in
your world?
Washington State University-2010

67

CLR Causality
The Effect
I receive
20%
interest

I open a
Savings
Account
The Cause

Causality: Show me how the parts in the


Effect (at the point of the arrow) come from
the Cause (from the tail).
I need pants
like Joes

I need
a car

I become a
millionaire

I want to be
different

My roommate
has a car

I buy stock

There are problems with each one.


Washington State University-2010

68

CLR Cause Insufficiency


Insufficiency Reservation: You
Need to do your Project well.
I get excellent
grades in Class

I turn-in
good
homework

Insufficiency Reservation: Your


Group needs to complete a
good Group Project too.

My Project
goes well

My Group
Project
goes well

Washington State University-2010

69

CLR (More on Insufficiency)


Is it sufficient?

Not without the


Triangle!

Washington State University-2010

70

CLR Additional Cause


Additional Cause Reservation:
I dont get
good Gas
Mileage

Additional Cause Reservation:

I drive too fast


My Truck is
large

I carry heavy
loads

Ah-Ha! We see an
area were
improvement is
possible.

Washington State University-2010

71

CLR Cause Reversal


My Garage is
full of stuff.
My Garage is
too small.
My Garage is
too small.

The Garage didnt


create all the extra
things.

My Garage is
full of stuff

Washington State University-2010

I cant get my
car in the
Garage.

72

CLR Predicted Effect


We dont
have enough
money
to pay our
bills

Our Income
is too
low

Others with the


same income
would not be
able to pay their
bills
We have too
many bills

The Most Difficult


CLR to use (you
have to think).

Predicted Effect Reservation:


If our income is too low, I
would expect to see most
people with the same income
unable to pay their bills.
And yet, I see lots of people
with the same or less income
paying their bills just fine.

Many others
with same or
less income do
pay their bills
Washington State University-2010

We buy too
many things
we really dont
need
Discovery Happens!
73

CLR-Tautology Reservation
A Too Tight a Logical Loop

Too Tight
a Logic
Loop

10. There
is a
Chicken

A Longer Logical
Loop
Resolves the Age
Old Question

20. There
is an Egg

14. There is a
Male Chicken

16. There is a
Female Chicken

OR

Most Frequent
Logical Error!

11. A Male and


Female Chicken
can produce a
fertile Egg

20. There is a
fertile Egg

But, maybe
there were two eggs first!
Washington State University-2010

74

CLR Tautology
The Cause is the Excuse
The Beavers
lost the game

The Effect

The Beavers are


a lousy team.

The Cause

Most Frequent
Logical Error!

The Circular Logic


of the Cause is
accepted because
of the Effect.

How do you know the Beavers are a lousy Team?


Because, they lost the game didnt they!
Whenever you hear, a BECAUSE,
that is the same as the Effect you have
a Tautology (bad logic).
Washington State University-2010

75

CLR Tautology

Most Frequent
Logical Error!

The Cause is Hard to Define


The Circular Logic of the Tautology
The Beavers
comes from a Cause which is abstract;
lost the game
difficult to determine, define or quantify.
The Beavers are
So, too often the Cause is not
a lousy team.
challenged.
And, it seems the undefined Cause is
accepted because of the Effect.
To resolve the Tautology, the Cause needs to be something
that can be determined and challenged;
Not an Abstract Concept.
In this case, the abstract word is lousy. What does that
mean? We need another substantial meaning.
When the BECAUSE is ABSTRACT,
we need to dig further.
76
Washington State University-2010

CLR Tautology: Searching


For An Alternate Connection

The Beavers are


depressed by their
mistakes

The Beavers
lost the game
The Beavers
face an easy
team

The Beavers may


are
a
not
lousy
be so
team.
bad.
The Beavers play
a lousy game

The Beavers
dont execute
well

Most Frequent
Logical Error!

The Beavers are


perceived as a
lousy team.

The Beavers
dont prepare
well for games
Washington State University-2010

People feel
bad when
they make
dumb
mistakes

The Beavers are


in a slump
They are not
thinking clearly
77

How Do Tautologies
Happen?
They are
obstinate

They are
obstinate

They still
dont do it

I push them
hard

I push them
harder

I push them

I tell them
what to do

Most Frequent
Logical Error!

Cause for Tautology is


unanswered questions.
They dont
Do we every stop to
do it
think why they are not
answered?
Why dont people do
what they are told?
78
Hum?
Washington State University-2010

Cause for the Tautology


Pre-Conceived Notion

Most Frequent
Logical Error!

In General, the most common error in Jumping to


Conclusions is the Tautology!
He wont
help us
He is a
jerk

They are Muslims


He is Black
They are Poor
Hes Indian

Sometimes a
Tautology is a
single statement.
Shes a Woman
Men!
They are Part of
Management!

Hum?
What is the underlying reason for these crude remarks?
Washington State University-2010

79

Tautology is often a Knee Jerk


When we hear, BECAUSE (same as Effect)
When the BECAUSE is ABSTRACT
When the ABSTRACT is DEROGITORY
It is probably a Tautology Logic Problem
Basic Assumptions of the Theory of Constraints:
All People
Think
All People are
Good
Emotion is evidence of
passionate, logical thinking!

Every action is logical


(within the environment and in
accordance with the individuals
understanding of their ability to
change the environment)

Washington State University-2010

80

Practice Correcting a Knee Jerk


They are Part of
Management!

=>

Why Should they?


Im important
I do a good job
Management must
be dealing with
some very serious
needs
Im glad its not me!

Management is
Incompetent

Management
Ignores me

I dont get
what I need

Management
Doesnt
Respond

I am not the
systems
problem

Management
Doesnt
Listen

Managements Role is to
oversee systemic
performance

Washington State University-2010

81

An Additional TOC Insight


Systems are Inherently Simple

System A

System B
E=MC2
In free markets, economic stability is
controlled by the Interest Rate.
Washington State University-2010

82

Look for a Simple Solution!


I cant do
my
homework
The
homework
is too hard
Did you ask
anyone for
clarity?
No.

I dont know what the words mean


I dont understand the problems
I dont understand the book
Its too complicated
Lecture doesnt make sense
I cant see the connections
There are too many concepts
Washington State University-2010

83

Thinking Processes
The Goal: Improve Systems (Remove UDEs)
The Measure: Number, Scope and Severity of Problems
The Constraint: Core Conflict
UDE
UDE
UDE
UDE
UDE
There once was an old System
UDE
That lived in a shoe.
UDE
That had so many UDEs
UDE
UDE
UDE
It didnt know what to do
UDE
UDE
UDE

UDE
UDE
UDE

Washington State University-2010

UDE

UDE

UDE
84

Thinking Processes
The Analysis:
The Paradigm Shift: Cause the
Erroneous Assumption to Go Away
(Fix Rules, Measures)
Let the System Behave Correctly!

Washington State University-2010

85

Thinking Process Results


Problems Go AwayAre Replaced By Desirable Entities!
Conflicts can be Resolved.
Negative Branches should be Trimmed.
Be James Bond -- A Few, Rightly
Placed Injections can Make Dramatic
Improvement!
We can achieve Ambitious Targets

What do we learn
here to apply to
Daily Lives?

Communication is Greatly Improved!


Buy-In Happens!
Washington State University-2010

86

Thinking Processes
Lessons Learned
There are Answers -- Dont Despair
Look for Cause-->Effect Relationships
Think Clearly
Clarity, Causality, Insufficiency, Additional Cause,
Predicted Effect, Cause Reversal

Dont Accept Compromise (No Win-Lose or


Lose-Lose)

Learn to find Breakthrough Injections


A Cloud-A-Day keeps the Conflict Away

Become Justifiably Self-Confident


Enter a Complex World, Find the One Spot that
Needs Fixing, Fix it.
Then, Look for Washington
the Next
Spot to Fix
State University-2010

87

Next Topics
TOC Thinking Processes
TOC Applications
Operations
Project Management
Replenishment
TOC Finances and Measures

Some TOC Philosophy will be blended into these


additional topics.

Washington State University-2010

88

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi