Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Acute Heart
Failure
Objectives
Definitions
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
Diagnosis
Management
Summary of Guidelines
Recommended Reading
Definitions
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
Diagnosis
Management
Summary of Guidelines
Recommended Reading
3.
DEFINITION
Rapid onset of symptoms and signs secondary to
abnormal cardiac
function. It may occur with or without
previous cardiac disease.
The cardiac dysfunction can be related to
systolic or diastolic dysfunction,abnormalities in
cardiac rhythm or to pre-load and after load
mismatch
PULMONARY
EDEMA
Acute
Decompensated
CHF
Cardiogenic
shock
Hypertensive HF
Filippatos 2005
2 types:
left ventricular systolic
dysfunction (LVSD)
Heart failure with preserved
ejection fraction
(HFPEF/HFNEF/Diastolic
dys.)
Commonest cause(s):
IHD, Hypertension, alcohol,
cytotoxics
Definitions
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
Diagnosis
Management
Summary of Guidelines
Recommended Reading
1.
2.
The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
Definitions
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
Diagnosis
Management
Summary of Guidelines
Recommended Reading
Pathophysiology
LV dysfunction:
Accumulation of fluid.
Decrease in CO
Hypoperfusion.
Reciprocal Activation of (RAAS)
Na, water retention.
AGII
ET1 + Vasopressin.
Reflex activation of SNS: Epi, NE.
A Vicious Circle
Initial
myocardial
injury
Heart Viability
Death
Initial phase
Last year
Gheorghiade M. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(suppl 6A):1-4G.
Ventricular function
Acute event
Time
Gheorghiade M, Fonarow G, Filippatos G et al. Am J Cardiology 2005
Clinical CLASIFICATION
Killip Classification
Stage I:
No clinical signs of decompensation.
Stage II:
Heart failure. Rales, S3, PVH.
Stage III:
Severe heart failure. Pulmonary edema with rales
throughout the lung fields.
Stage IV:
Cardiogenic Shock: Hypotension, peripheral
vasoconstriction, oliguria, cyanosis and diaphoresis.
Forrester Classification
Cardiac Index
(L/min/m2)
5
4
18 mmHg
Subset I
(Normal)
Warm and Dry
Subset II
(Congestion)
Warm and Wet
Subset III
(Hypoperfusion)
Cold and Dry
Subset IV
(Congestion and
hypoperfusion)
Cold and Wet
3
2.2L/min/m2
2
1
10
20
30
Class II:
wet and cold,
Class III:
cold and dry and
Class IV:
cold and wet).
Nohria A et al: JACC 2003;41:1797-1804.
No
No
Yes
PCWP*
normal
CI normal
PCWP
elevated
CI normal
(compensated)
Low perfusion
at rest
Yes
PCWP
low/normal
CI decreased
PCWP
elevated
CI decreased
Normal SVR
Vasodilators,
diuretics
High SVR
More than 90% of patients hospitalized with heart failure have congestion (wet)
and show elevated PCWP1,2
References: 1. Stevenson LW. Tailored therapy to hemodynamic goals for advanced heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 1999;1:251-257.
Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13889842. 2. Fonarow GC. The treatment targets in acute decompensated
Mor:2.2%
Normal
Normal
2.2
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
Pulmonary
edema
Mor:22.4%
Hypovolaemic
shock
Cardiogenic
shock
Mor:55.5%
10
15
18
20 25
30
35
40
Acute decompensated heart failure (de novo or as decompensation of CHF) : With mild signs and
symptoms of AHF and do not fulfil criteria for cardio-genic shock, pulmonary oedema or
hypertensive crisis.
Hypertensive acute heart failure: Signs and symptoms of HF + high BP + preserved LVF + chest
radiograph findings APO
.
Pulmonary oedema: Verified by chest X-ray, severe respiratory distress, or-thopnoea with SaO 2
<90%.
Cardiogenic shock: Reduced BP (SBP<90mmHg or drop of mean AP >30mmHg) and/or low urine
output (<0.5 ml/kg/h), with pulse rate >60 bpm with or without evidence of organ congestion.
High output failure: High CO + HR, pulmonary congestion, sometimes low BP (arrhythmias,
thyrotoxicosis, anaemia, Paget disease, iatrogenic etc)
Right heart failure: Low CO + increased jugular venous pressure + increased liver size + hypotension.
Peri-operative
AHF
myocardial ischaemia)
(usually
due
to
Medication non-adherence.
Dietary indiscretion.
Infection (pneumonia, UTI, etc.)
Renal failure.
Cardiotoxic/nephrotoxic
medication.
Uncontrolled hypertension
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Myocardial ishemia
Valvular disease
Pulmonary embolus
COPD
Anemia
Thyroid disorders
Nondihydropyridine CCB
Sodium retaining medications
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical Presentation
Volume Overload
Dyspnea/Fatigue
Rales/Wheezing
JVD/HJR/AJR
Pulmonary/Pitting Edema
Reduced oxygen saturation
S3 or S4
Electrolyte disturbance
Increased serum creatinine
Acute coronary
syndrom
Arterial hypertension,
diabetes mellitus
ALARM-HF
Diagnosis
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
Definition
Management
Summary of Guidelines
Recommended Reading
Diagnosic
ECG
CXR
ABG
Laboratory Tests
A small elevation
in cardiac
troponin may be
seen in patients
with AHF without
ACS.
Echo
Diagnosis
Low-Intermediate clinical suspicion of ADHF
BNP (A)
BNP 100-500pg/ml
Likely, but
consider other causes
Natriuretic
peptides
Negative
predictive value
There is no
consensus
regarding BNP or
NT-proBNP
reference values
in AHF.
Important
prognostic
information.
Cardiac Biomarkers
Troponin/BNP/CRP
Diagnosis-Raised in LVSD/AF/LVH/VHD/ACS
Screening for asymptomatic LVSD
Risk stratification & Prognosis in established HF
Therapy monitoring
Treatment of HF
Definitions
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
Summary of Guidelines
Management
Summary of Guidelines
Recommended Reading
AHA/ACC Guideline
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular
Heart Disease
A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association
Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Rick A. Nishimura, MD, MACC, FAHA,
EVIDENCE
40 pages
Australia/New Zealand
Heart Failure Guidelines
AHF
Definitions
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
Management
(Nonpharmacological
treatment
.Summary of Guidelines
Recommended Reading
Noninvasive PPV
Fig. 68-7
CPAP
Non-invasive
Easily discontinued
Easily adjusted
Use by EMT-B
Minimal complications
Does not require
sedation
Comfortable
Intubation
Invasive
Intubated stays intubated
Requires highly trained
personnel
Significant complications
Can require sedation or
RSI
Potential for infection
Ultrafiltration
RAPID-CHF Trial
40 patients
ADHF and Renal
Insufficiency (Cr >1.5)
Ultrafiltration had
significant increase in
fluid removal after 24
hours
4650 L vs 2838L
UNLOAD Trial
200 patients
Renal insufficiency was
not a criteria for inclusion
Standard care vs ultra
filtration
48 Hours 4.6 L vs 3.3L
90 Days fewer
rehospitalizations .22 vs .
46 and fewer unscheduled
clinic visits 21 vs 44
IABP
ECMO
Severe respiratory
failure Cardiac Failure
with inability to wean off
Bypass Bridge to
Cardiac Transplant
Scoring
0-5: Low risk
Mortality 8%
5-7: Intermediate Risk
Mortality 32%
8-10: High Risk
Mortality 49%
A brief
discussion of
the works of
this thing...
Questions
AFLEN
Triflusal
THE END
New Strategies
for ANTIPLATELET
TRETMENT
Indications
End-point inhibition
Antifibrinolytic drugs
Modulation of neutrophil-mediated injury
Surface Modifications
Methods of modification
Physical modification
Chemical modification by grafting
a hydrophilic component
Surface modification by inclusion
of bioactive components
Biomembrane mimicry
Cellular seeding and lining
2)
Biventricular failure
3)
Pulmonary failure
Disadvantages
Bleeding complication
Potential pulmonary dysfunction necessitating
conversion to ECMO
Potential for infection
Require a median sternotomy for direct access
Clinical Evaluation
Diagnostic Tests
Noninvasive Cardiac
Imaging
Nonpharmacological
Interventions
Mechanical Circulatory
Support
Guideline for HF
Surgical/Percutaneous/
Transcatheter
Interventional
Treatments of AHF
Conclusions
Evidence-based guideline directed diagnosis, evaluation and
therapy should be the mainstay for all patients with HF.
Effective implementation of guideline-directed best quality
care reduces mortality, improves QOL and preserves health
care resources.
Ongoing research is needed to answer the remaining questions
including: prevention, nonpharmacological therapy of HF
including dietary adjustments, treatment of HFpEF,
management of hospitalized HF, effective reduction in HF
readmissions, more precise use of device-based therapy,
smaller MCS platforms and cell-based regenerative therapy.
Non-invasive ventilation
Inotropes
Nesiritide
Cardiac Devices
Objectives
Review the pathophysiology of ADHF.
Describe the clinical presentation of ADHF.
Apply effective therapeutic strategies using consensus
guidelines from the (HFSA) and the (ESC).
Examine the clinical evidence of milrinone and
niseritide in the treatment of ADHF.
Evaluate the appropriateness of treatment.
ADHF
Rapid onset of signs and symptoms secondary to abnormal cardiac
function due to systolic, diastolic dysfunction, abnormalities in
cardiac rhythm or to pre-load and after-load mismatch.
De novo or acute decompensation of CHF.
~50% of patients have a systolic blood pressure >140mmHg.
~46% of patients have a preserved (LVEF).
Patients often present with multiple co-morbidities.
Killip Classification.
Forrester Classification.
Clinical Severity Classification.
Pathophysiology
LV dysfunction:
Accumulation of fluid.
Decrease in CO
Hypoperfusion.
Reciprocal Activation of (RAAS)
Na, water retention.
AGII
ET1 + Vasopressin.
Reflex activation of SNS: Epi, NE.
3.
Mor:2.2%
Normal
Normal
2.2
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
Pulmonary
edema
Mor:22.4%
Hypovolaemic
shock
Cardiogenic
shock
Mor:55.5%
10
15
18
20 25
30
35
40
based on observation of the peripheral cir-culation and on auscultation of the lungs for
congestion
(Class I: dry and warm, Class II: wet and cold, Class III: cold and dry and Class IV: cold and
wet).
Nohria A et al: JACC 2003;41:1797-1804.
The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
SBP
CI
PCWP
Congestion
Killip/
Forrester
Diuresis
Hypoperfusion
End organ
hypoperfusion
+/-
Low
Normal
/
High
Low
normal /
High
Mild
elevation
K II / F II
+/-
II Acute heart
failure with
hypertension/
hypertensive crisis
Usually
increased
High
+/-
>18
+/-
+/-
+, with CNS
symptoms
Low
normal
Low
Eleva
ted
KIII/ FII
+/-
Cardiogenic
shock*:
IVa. Low output
syndrome
Low
normal
Low, <2.2
>16
K III-IV /
F I-III
low
IVb Cardiogenic
shock
>90
<90
<1.8
>18
K IV/ F IV
Very low
++
+/-
+/-
KII/FI-II
Usually
low
Low
Low
Low
FI
+/-
+/-, acute
onset
+/-
I. Acute
decompensated
congestive heart
failure*
V. High output
failure
VI. Right sided
acute heart failure
Peri-operative
AHF
myocardial ischaemia)
(usually
due
to
Laboratory examinations
Haemodynamic
pulmonary wedge pressure to < 18 mm Hg
cardiac output and/or stroke volume
The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
Ventricular function
Acute event
Time
Gheorghiade M, Fonarow G, Filippatos G et al. Am J Cardiology 2005
Killip Classification
Stage I: No clinical signs of decompensation.
Stage II: Heart failure. Rales, S3, PVH.
Stage III: Severe heart failure. Pulmonary edema with
rales throughout the lung fields.
Stage IV: Cardiogenic Shock: Hypotension, peripheral
vasoconstriction, oliguria, cyanosis and diaphoresis.
Forrester Classification
Cardiac Index
(L/min/m2)
5
4
18 mmHg
Subset I
(Normal)
Warm and Dry
Subset II
(Congestion)
Warm and Wet
Subset III
(Hypoperfusion)
Cold and Dry
Subset IV
(Congestion and
hypoperfusion)
Cold and Wet
3
2.2L/min/m2
2
1
10
20
30
Medication non-adherence.
Dietary indiscretion.
Infection (pneumonia, UTI, etc.)
Renal failure.
Cardiotoxic/nephrotoxic
medication.
Uncontrolled hypertension
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Myocardial ishemia
Valvular disease
Pulmonary embolus
COPD
Anemia
Thyroid disorders
Nondihydropyridine CCB
Sodium retaining medications
Clinical Presentation
Volume Overload
Dyspnea/Fatigue
Rales/Wheezing
JVD/HJR/AJR
Pulmonary/Pitting Edema
Reduced oxygen saturation
S3 or S4
Electrolyte disturbance
Increased serum creatinine
Differential Diagnosis
Pneumonia
Reactive airway disease
Pulmonary embolus
Diagnosis
Diagnosis of ADHF should be primarily
based on signs and symptoms. (C)
Diagnosis
Low-Intermediate clinical suspicion of ADHF
BNP (A)
BNP 100-500pg/ml
Likely, but
consider other causes
Predictors of Mortality
BUN > 43 mg/dl
SBP < 115 mmHg
sCr >2.75 mg/dl
Highest risk
of mortality
Natriuretic
peptides
Negative
predictive value
There is no
consensus
regarding BNP or
NT-proBNP
reference values
in AHF.
Important
prognostic
information.
Cardiac Biomarkers
Troponin/BNP/CRP
Type 2
Troponinitis
Acute MI
Type 3
Type 4
Type 4a
Type 5
Type 4b
Diagnosis-Raised in LVSD/AF/LVH/VHD/ACS
Screening for asymptomatic LVSD
Risk stratification & Prognosis in established HF
Therapy monitoring
Treatment of HF
Non-invasive ventilation
Inotropes
Nesiritide
Cardiac Devices
Deadly
15-20% in-hospital
mortality
Costly
6.5 million hospital days
per annum in USA
Initial Treatment
The evidence in
favour of morphine
use for AHF is
limited.
Multiple agents are used
to manage AHF, but
there is a paucity of
clinical trials data and
their use is largely
empiric.
Most agents improve
haemodynamics but no
agent has been shown
to reduce mortality.
3CPO
Trial summary
Background
Aims
Hypothesis:
Intervention
Randomised (1:1:1)
Standard oxygen
therapy (by facial mask)
CPAP (5 cmH2O up
titrated to a maximum
of 15 cmH2O)
NIPPV (8/4 cmH2O up
titrated to a maximum
of 20/10 cmH2O)
Inhaled oxygen of 60%
Attending physicians were
encouraged to use
vasodilator (nitrate) and
diuretic therapy
Opiate therapy was
administered at the
discretion of the treating
physician
3CPO
NonInvasive
Ventilation
Odds Ratio
95%
Confidence
Intervals
P Value
7-Day
9.8%
9.5%
0.97
0.63 to 1.48
0.869
30-Day
16.7%
15.4%
0.93
0.65 to 1.32
0.685
3CPO
CPAP
NIPPV
P-value
Admitted to intensive
Care
8.8%
9.1%
6.6%
0.411
7.7%
10.3%
10.9%
0.301
Admitted to coronary
Care
38.1%
43.7%
40.9%
0.337
9 (5-16)
9 (5-16)
0.313
3CPO
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary
oedema non-invasive ventilation (1069 patients)
Produces more rapid resolution of metabolic abnormalities
and respiratory distress
Has no major effect on 7-day or 30-day mortality
Is beneficial irrespective of the mode (CPAP or NIPPV) of
delivery
Non-invasive ventilation
Inotropes
Nesiritide
Cardiac Devices
Treatment related to BP
Levosimendan infusion
increases cardiac output
and stroke volume and
reduces pulmonary wedge
pressure, systemic vascular
resistance, and pulmonary
vascular resistance.
Vasopressors
(norepinephrine) are not
recommended as first-line
agents
Non-invasive ventilation
Inotropes
Nesiritide
Cardiac Devices
NYHA III
12%
24%
64%
Pump failure
Other
Sudden death
26%
NYHA IV
33%
59%
15%
56%
11%
I
No Limitation
II
SOB on severe
exertion
III
SOB on mild
exertion
Pre-implant counselling
How do you want to die?
Heart failure death
Sudden death
Device X Rays
ICD Lead
ICD Myths
Myths
ICDs prevent syncope
Contacts can be electrocuted by
ICD discharge
Not safe to use mobile phone,
mircowave, playstation etc.
Will stop you dying from VF
Inappropriate shocks
The Future?
The Reality
Drier
lungs
means
the
intrathor
Less
Fluid
Wetter
lungs
means
the
intrathor
More
Fluid
Epidemiology
~ 5 million
Dx in
US
Objectives
Review the pathophysiology of ADHF.
Describe the clinical presentation of ADHF.
Apply effective therapeutic strategies using consensus
guidelines from the (HFSA) and the (ESC).
Examine the clinical evidence of milrinone and
niseritide in the treatment of ADHF.
Evaluate the appropriateness of treatment.
ADHF
Rapid onset of signs and symptoms secondary to abnormal cardiac
function due to systolic, diastolic dysfunction, abnormalities in
cardiac rhythm or to pre-load and after-load mismatch.
De novo or acute decompensation of CHF.
~50% of patients have a systolic blood pressure >140mmHg.
~46% of patients have a preserved (LVEF).
Patients often present with multiple co-morbidities.
Killip Classification.
Forrester Classification.
Clinical Severity Classification.
Pathophysiology
LV dysfunction:
Accumulation of fluid.
Decrease in CO
Hypoperfusion.
Reciprocal Activation of (RAAS)
Na, water retention.
AGII
ET1 + Vasopressin.
Reflex activation of SNS: Epi, NE.
Killip Classification
Stage I: No clinical signs of decompensation.
Stage II: Heart failure. Rales, S3, PVH.
Stage III: Severe heart failure. Pulmonary edema with
rales throughout the lung fields.
Stage IV: Cardiogenic Shock: Hypotension, peripheral
vasoconstriction, oliguria, cyanosis and diaphoresis.
Forrester Classification
Cardiac Index
(L/min/m2)
5
Subset I
4
18 mmHg
(Normal)
Warm and Dry
Subset II
(Congestion)
Warm and Wet
3
2.2L/min/m2
2
1
Subset III
(Hypoperfusion)
Cold and Dry
10
Subset IV
(Congestion and
hypoperfusion)
Cold and Wet
20
30
Medication non-adherence.
Dietary indiscretion.
Infection (pneumonia, UTI, etc.)
Renal failure.
Cardiotoxic/nephrotoxic
medication.
Uncontrolled hypertension
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Myocardial ishemia
Valvular disease
Pulmonary embolus
COPD
Anemia
Thyroid disorders
Nondihydropyridine CCB
Sodium retaining medications
Clinical Presentation
Volume Overload
Dyspnea/Fatigue
Rales/Wheezing
JVD/HJR/AJR
Pulmonary/Pitting Edema
Reduced oxygen saturation
S3 or S4
Electrolyte disturbance
Increased serum creatinine
Differential Diagnosis
Pneumonia
Reactive airway disease
Pulmonary embolus
Diagnosis
Diagnosis of ADHF should be primarily
based on signs and symptoms. (C)
Diagnosis
Low-Intermediate clinical suspicion of ADHF
BNP (A)
BNP 100-500pg/ml
Likely, but
consider other causes
Predictors of Mortality
BUN > 43 mg/dl
SBP < 115 mmHg
sCr >2.75 mg/dl
Highest risk
of mortality
Goals of Therapy
Improve symptoms and signs of congestion and/or
hypoperfusion.
Reverse hemodynamic abnormalities.
Identify the etiology.
Minimize side effects.
Optimize therapy.
Length of stay, mortality, time to hospital
readmission.*
Educate patients on medications and self assessment
of HF.
Treatment Strategy
Establish a Diagnosis
Oxygen and Ventilatory Assistance
Symptom Relief
Anticoagulation
Hemodynamic Support:
Diuresis/Fluids
Vasodilators
Inotropes
Vasopressors
The Principle
Diuretics
Inotropes
Increase Contractility
Increase CO, EF, Perfusion
Vasodilators
Reduce Preload
Reduce Afterload
Assess Signs/Symptoms/Determine
Hemodynamic Status
EC Interventions:
Cardiac panel: (CBC w/diff & platelets, SMA-7
CK-MB, Glucose), TSH,
Pox, ECG, BNP, X-ray
Abnormal
Evaluate cardiac function by 2DE
Characterize type and severity
Is patient hypoxic?
Yes
No but difficult breathing
Oxygen C
CPAP
NIPPV
Normal
Consider
alternative diagnosis
Does Patient presents with
Distress or pain ?
yes
Morphine 3 mg IVPB IIbB
Does patient present with ischemic chest
pain resistant to opiates or tachycardia?
Metoprolol 5 mg IV* IIbC
Volume Overloaded
(A) Moderate Volume Overload
IV Diuretics
Furosmide 20-40 mg
Bumetanide 0.5-1.0 mg
Torasemide 10-20 mg
IB/B
Inadequate Response
< 250-500 ml within 2 hours
Na/fluid restriction
Add HCTZ 25-50 mg bid, or
Metolazone 2.5-10 mg qd, or
Spironolactone 25-50 mg qd
IIbC/C
Vasodilator
(NTG, Nitroprusside)C
On a B-blocker chronically?
Volume repletion
Inotrope IIaC/C
Yes/No
No or D/C
And/or
Dobutamine IIaCC
Consider D/C or reducing
Dopamine
2-3 ug/kg/min inf.
dose if sign of excessive
>5ug/kg/min
-20ug/kg/min inf.
dose are suspected
No
(D)
Epinephrine
0.05-0.5 ug/kg/min inf. Norepinephrine 0.2-1ug/kg/min
+/- dobutamine
0.05-0.5 ug/kg/min inf.
Monitoring Parameters
Oxygen Saturation
CBC
BP
ECG
BNP
Signs:
Edema, Rales, Ascites, Hepatomegaly, JVD
Symptoms:
Orthopnea, PND, Dyspnea, Fatigue, Cough
Negative/positive balance
Electrolytes
Urinalysis
BUN/Scr
ABG
(OPTIME-CHF)
Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of
Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of
Chronic Heart Failure
JAMA, March 27 2002: 287(12);1541-1547
Study Design
Prospective randomized double-blind placebocontrolled trial.
ITTA.
Similar baseline characteristics.
Randomization to a 48 hour infusion of either
milrinone (n = 477) or placebo ( 472).
Milrinone treatment arm: Started with an initial
infusion of 0.5ug/kg/min for 48hrs. (Rate adjusted to
0.375 ug/kg/min)
Outcome Measures
Primary Efficacy Outcome:
The total number of days hospitalized for cardiovascular causes or
days decreased within the 60 days after randomization.
Secondary endpoints:
Patient Selection
Inclusion Criteria
18 yoa
Demonstrated LVEF < 40%
Exclusion Criteria
-If physician judged that
inotropic therapy was
essential.
-Active myocardial ischemia
within past 3 months.
-Atrial fibrillation with poor
ventricular rate control.
-Sustained VT/Vf.
Results
Treatment with milrinone did not reduce the primary
endpoint of days hospitalized for cardiovascular causes
within 60 days compared with placebo.
Results (cont)
Placebo
(n=472)
Treatment failure cause at 48 hours:
Adverse event
Events during hospitalization:
MI
New atrial fibrillation/flutter
Ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation
Sustained hypotension
Milrinone
(n = 477)
P value
2.1%
12.6%
<0.001
0.4%
1.5%
1.5%
3.2%
1.5%
4.6%
3.4%
10.7%
<0.18
<0.04
<0.06
<0.001
Limitations
Study did not directly address patients with
acutely decompensated chronic heart failure for
whom inotropic therapy is essential.
Non-formal therapeutic protocol.*
Confounding variables.
Conclusions
Results do not support the routine use of
milrinone in patients hospitalized with an
exacerbation of chronic heart failure.
(VMAC)
Intravenous Nesiritide vs Nitroglycerin
for Treatment of Decompensated
Congestive Heart Failure
Study Design
Randomized double-blind, double dummy trial.
Patients were stratified to catheterized (n=246) and
non-catheterized (n= 243)
Patients were then randomized to fixed dose nesiritide,
adjustable dose niseritide, nitroglycerin or placbo for
the first 3 hours.
After 3 hours patients were in the double dummy
design of nesiritide and nitroglycerin treatment arms.
Outcome Measures
Primary Endpoint: Change in PCWP and patients
self-evaluation of dyspnea from baseline at 3hours.
Secondary Endpoints:
Inclusion
Inclusion Criteria
Dyspnea at rest
Cardiac etiology of dyspnea
Exclusion Criteria
SBP<90
Volume depletion
CI to IV vasodilators
Mechanical ventillation
Survival less than 35 days
Results
Reduction in PCWP was greater in the
nesiritide group with the first measurement.
Beyond 24hr the difference in PCWP between
nesiritide and nitroglycerin was insignificant.
Improvement in dyspnea and global clinical
status scores in the nesiritide and nitroglycerin
were not significantly different at any time.
HA was more common in the Nitroglycerin
group.
Limitations
Heterogenous patient population*
Therapeutic protocol.
Assessment of mortality/morbidity
Conclusion
When added to standard care in hospitalized
patients with ADHF, nesiritied improves
hemodynamic function and some selfreported symptoms more effectively than
intravenous nitroglycerin.
Physicians assessment/plan:
1. Congestive Heart Failure: Patient will receive IV
diuretics and monitor for electrolytes.
2. UTI: Continue Cipro until the completion of the course.
3. Abnormal cardiac enzymes: Represent myocardial
injury. Cardiology consulted.
4. Acute Renal insufficiency: Monitor creatinine, diuresis
and BP.
AHA/ACC Guideline
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular
Heart Disease
A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association
Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Rick A. Nishimura, MD, MACC, FAHA,
Evaluation and Management of CAD in Patients Undergoing Valve Surgery CABG indicates
coronary artery bypass graft; CAD, coronary artery disease; CT, computed tomography; IE,
infective endocarditis; LV, left ventricular; and PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Diagnosis and Treatment of IE. *Early surgery defined as during initial hospitalization before
completion of a full therapeutic course of antibiotics.
Drug
Usual
Dose
Vaso
dilati
on
Vasocon
strixn
Inotro
pic
Chronot
ropic
HR
MAP
PAP
PWP
CVP
SVR
SV
CO
Epinephrine
(Adrenaline)
0.01-0.1
g/kg/min
0.1-0.5
g/kg/min
(1-4
g/min)
+++
++
++
+++
++
+++
++
++
+++
++
++
Norepinephrine
(Levophed)
0.03-1.5
g/kg/min
(2-80
g/min)
++++
++
++++
+*
O/
Dopamine
(Dobutrex)
1-3
g/kg/min
3-8
g/kg/min
8-20
g/kg/min
O/
O/
O/
O/
O/
O/
++
++
++
++
+++
++
+++
++
++
Drug
Usual Dose
Vas
odi
lati
on
Vasoc
onstri
xn
Inotr
opic
Chro
notro
pic
H
R
MA
P
PAP
PW
P
CV
P
SV
R
S
V
C
O
Dobutami
ne
(Dobutre
x)
2-30
g/kg/min
+++
++
++
+++
O/
O/
O/
O/
O/
O/
Milrinone
(Primacor
)
LD 50 g/kg
over 10 min.,
then 0.3750.75
g/kg/min
++
+
+++
O/
O/
Gilman AG, Rall TW., et al. Goodman and Gilmans The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 8th ed. 1993.
Marino P. The ICU Book. 2nd ed. 1998. Young L., Koda-Kimble M. Applied Therapeutics. 6th ed. 1995.
Kirby R., Taylor R., et. al. Handbook of Critical Care. 2nd ed. 1997.
Darovic G., Franklin C. Handbook of Hemodynamic Monitoring. 1999.
Michele Emdin,
Fondazione Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa
EBM in AHFS?
Publication Committee for the VMAC Investigators. Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: a
randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002; 287: 15311540
Improve symptoms
Restore oxygenation
Improve organ perfusion and haemodynamics
Limit cardiac/renal damage
Minimize ICU length of stay
Low
Perfusion
at Rest Yes
Yes
Inotropic Drugs
Dobutamine
Milrinone
Calcium Sensitizers
Stevenson LW. Eur J Heart Fail. 1999;1:251.
High
SVR
Natriuretic
Peptide
Nesiritide
or
Vasodilators
Nitroprusside
Nitroglycerin
Non-Potassium-Sparing Diuretics
Intravenous loop diuretics may improve symptoms and fluid loss initially but also
may contribute to renal function decline. This may be related not only to
intravascular volume depletion but also to further neurohormonal activation
resulting in a vasomotor nephropathy.
Intravenous loop diuretics may be associated with worse outcomes in AHFS patients.
Inotropic Therapy
Intravenous inotropes increase myocardial oxygen consumption, causing myocardial
damage in the setting of hibernating myocardium. Use of inotropes has consistently
been associated with increased mortality.
Vasodilators
Excessive vasodilatation in AHFS may lead to blood pressure decrease, potentially
exacerbating myocardial ischemia and renal hypoperfusion.
Contractility
Diastole
Vasomotion
CONCLUSION
...of note, every large published clinical trial
conducted in patients with AHFs has been negative
in terms of efficacy, safety, or both.
However, most international multicenter clinical
trials completed to date were conducted on fairly
undifferentiated populations of patients with AHFs.
.homogeneous pathophysiological disease states
within the heterogeneity of aHFs is of paramount
importance to clinical trial design and aHFs therapy.
Future trials conducted in aHFs must abandon
the one-sizefits- all approach in favor of an
approach that takes into account the varied and
distinct pathophysiologies of aHFs.
Box 2.
Box 1.
Fig. 1: Approximation of cardiac systolic function and cardiac filling pressures in various
acute illnesses.30.
Box 3.
3.
based on observation of the peripheral cir-culation and on auscultation of the lungs for
congestion
(Class I: dry and warm, Class II: wet and cold, Class III: cold and dry and Class IV: cold and
wet).
Nohria A et al: JACC 2003;41:1797-1804.
The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
SBP
CI
PCWP
Congestion
Killip/
Forrester
Diuresis
Hypoperfusion
End organ
hypoperfusion
+/-
Low
Normal
/
High
Low
normal /
High
Mild
elevation
K II / F II
+/-
II Acute heart
failure with
hypertension/
hypertensive crisis
Usually
increased
High
+/-
>18
+/-
+/-
+, with CNS
symptoms
Low
normal
Low
Eleva
ted
KIII/ FII
+/-
Cardiogenic
shock*:
IVa. Low output
syndrome
Low
normal
Low, <2.2
>16
K III-IV /
F I-III
low
IVb Cardiogenic
shock
>90
<90
<1.8
>18
K IV/ F IV
Very low
++
+/-
+/-
KII/FI-II
Usually
low
Low
Low
Low
FI
+/-
+/-, acute
onset
+/-
I. Acute
decompensated
congestive heart
failure*
V. High output
failure
VI. Right sided
acute heart failure
Peri-operative
AHF
myocardial ischaemia)
(usually
due
to
Laboratory examinations
Haemodynamic
pulmonary wedge pressure to < 18 mm Hg
cardiac output and/or stroke volume
The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
Class I, LOE-C
a) Intervention
b) Only if acute respiratory failure does not
respond to vasodilators, O2
and/or CPAP or
NIPPV
The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
pulmo-nary
pathology
or
ongoing
Non-pharmacologic Management
Surgical treatment in
acute heart failure
IABP Machine
Enhanced External
Counterpulsation-EECP
The Cardiology Group, P.A
.
Ventricular
Assist
Devices
Ventricular
Assist
Devices
(VADs)
(VADs)
Copyright 2007, 2004, 2000, Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
HeartMate II
The HeartMate II -one of several new LVAD devices- designed to last longer with simplicity
of only one moving part; also much lighter and quieter than its predecessors; major
differences is rotary action which creates a constant flow of blood, not pumping action.
Surgical
treatment in
AHF:
mechanical
assist
devices and
heart
transplantat
ion
(algorithm)
Jennifer Kumar
February 2014
Objectives
Learn to identify the signs and symptoms of
ADHF
Learn to interpret pertinent laboratory data
and imaging
Learn the inpatient management of ADHF
Transition to Outpatient
Summary
Relevant imaging
EKG, CXR, echocardiography
Treatment
Diuresis, BB, ACEI/ARB, Spironolactone, Digoxin,
Isosorbide dinitrate/Hydralazine
Transition to outpatient
Strict instructions, close-follow-up
A brief
discussion of
the works of
this thing...
PREload
AFTERload Contractility
Diuretics
LASIX
High
Afterload
Poor
Contractility
Vasodilate
Augment
Contractility
VasodilatorsN
itroglycerin
Inotropes
-reduce
afterload-
Lasix
Decrease
Preload
And
Afterload
Lasix
Ntg: sl, top, iv
MSO4
ACEi
Vasodilate
Augment
Contractility
ACE inhibitor
Nitroglycerin
BiPAP or CPAP??
Multiple small case reports of Noninvasive
Ventilatory Support (NVS) in patients with
varying diagnoses of respiratory failure.
No assessment of hemodynamic findings in
a controlled fashion.
No assessment of neurohormonal effects of
NVS.
BiPAP vs CPAP??
Mehta. Crit Care Med 1997;25:620-628.
One small study raising concern for BiPAP-associated
AMI in pulmonary edema patients, compared to CPAP. 27
pts randomized with more rapid improvements in dyspnea
and oxygenation associated with BiPAP: BiPAP and CPAP
good, BiPAP = MI
Kosowsky. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:91-95. Good review
of literature to date on Noninvasive Ventilatory Support
(NVS).
Effects of Nesiritide
Venous, arterial, coronary
VASODILATION
HEMODYNAMIC
NATRIURESIS
DIURESIS
CARDIAC
INDEX
rhBNP
R I SS
D
S
M
S
K
G
R
L
G
H
G
F
R
C
R
S
S
C
K V L
G
S P K MV
QGS
Preload
Afterload
PCWP
Dyspnea
RENAL
Fluid volume
Preload
Diuretic
usage
Aldosterone
Endothelin
Norepinephrine
CARDIAC
No increase in HR
Not proarrhythmic
SYMPATHETIC AND
NEUROHORMONAL SYSTEMS
Clinical Evaluation
Ejection
Fraction
Description
40%
50%
a. HFpEF, Borderline
41% to 49%
b. HFpEF, Improved
>40%
ACCF/AHA Stages of HF
At high risk for HF but without structural
heart disease or symptoms of HF.
Structural heart disease but without signs
or symptoms of HF.
Structural heart disease with prior or
current symptoms of HF.
II
III
IV
Diagnostic Tests
I IIaIIbIII
I IIaIIbIII
Diagnostic Tests
Initial laboratory evaluation of patients presenting with HF
should include complete blood count, urinalysis, serum
electrolytes (including calcium and magnesium), blood urea
nitrogen, serum creatinine, glucose, fasting lipid profile, liver
function tests, and thyroid-stimulating hormone.
I IIaIIbIII
I IIaIIbIII
I IIaIIbIII
Biomarkers
Ambulatory/Outpatient
Ambulatory/Outpatient
I IIaIIbIII
I IIaIIbIII
Ambulatory/Outpatient
I IIaIIbIII
I IIaIIbIII
I IIaIIbIII
(cont.)
BNP- or NT-proBNP guided HF therapy can be useful to
achieve optimal dosing of GDMT in select clinically euvolemic
patients followed in a well-structured HF disease management
program.
The usefulness of serial measurement of BNP or NT-proBNP to
reduce hospitalization or mortality in patients with HF is not
well established.
Measurement of other clinically available tests such as
biomarkers of myocardial injury or fibrosis may be considered
for additive risk stratification in patients with chronic HF.
Biomarkers
Hospitalized/Acute
Hospitalized/Acute
I IIaIIbIII
I IIaIIbIII
Hospitalized/Acute
(cont.)
I IIaIIbIII
I IIaIIbIII
Treatment of Stages A to D
Mechanical Circulatory
Support
I IIaIIbIII
I IIaIIbIII
AHA/ACC Guideline
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular
Heart Disease
A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association
Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Rick A. Nishimura, MD, MACC, FAHA,
A brief
discussion of
the works of
this thing...