Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Kinetics is
Concentration versus Time
Dissolution half-life
Half-life
Concentration
pH
Light
Temperature
Organics
Catalysts
Surface area
Diffusion
Biogeochemistry
And more
6
General Concepts
Transport vs. Reaction Control
Elementary vs. Overall Reactions
Detailed Balancing
Microscopic Reversibility
Temperature Dependence
Surface Area
Silicate mineral dissolution kinetics & weathering
7
a) Transport control
b) Surface reaction control
c) Mixed Transport and surface-reaction control
8
Transport limitations:
diffusion in solution
solid-state diffusion
Reaction limitations:
surface reaction control
surface characteristics
crystal defects
impurities
crystal morphology
10
_____________
2 O3 3 O 2
Overall reaction:
12
RT
Rate A exp
or log Rate
1
T
13
Endothermic reaction
EA
14
from http://www.ucdsb.on.ca/tiss/stretton/chem2/rate03
15
Surface Area
Critical to rate calculations and predictions
Geometric area estimation (often requires
averaging or stochastic theory)
BET measurements, usually w/ N2 (4
compared to 3 for H2O)
16
17
18
19
20
Silicate weathering
reaction rates
21
22
23
24
25
Solute
accumulation
26
Rate Laws
Mathematically describes the change in
concentration with time (derivative)
Simple if constant rate (zero order linear)
Complex if rate constant changes with
time due to multiple factors (i.e.,
concentration, temperature, pH, etc.),
thus higher order, non-linear
Remember that experimental data may
not represent real world conditions
29
30
Oxidation of Fe2+
Look at example on p. 156 of Appelo
and Postma, 2005
With multiple species (iron, pH, and
oxygen), we can have different rate
orders
Note pH to OH- calculation and second
order rate dependence
31
Explore in PHREEQC
34
35
Explore in PHREEQC
Find the kinetics icon (K) and open
What do these three screens do for us?
Note Runge-Kutta (faster) and CVODE
(more robust for multiple interacting rates)
for ordinary differential equations
36
37
Would have to
add parms
#######
#Pyrite
#######
#
# Williamson, M.A. and Rimstidt, J.D., 1994,
# Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 58, p. 5443-5454.
#
# Example of KINETICS data block for pyrite rate:
#
KINETICS 1
#
Pyrite
#
-tol 1e-8
#
-m0 5.e-4
#
-m
5.e-4
#
-parms 2.0 0.67 .5
-0.11
Pyrite
-start
1 rem
Williamson and Rimstidt, 1994
2 rem
parm(1) = log10(A/V, 1/dm)
parm(2) = exp for (m/m0)
3 rem
parm(3) = exp for O2
parm(4) = exp for H+
10 if (m <= 0) then goto 200
20 if (si("Pyrite") >= 0) then goto 200
25 rate = -10.19 + parm(1) + parm(3)*lm("O2") + parm(4)*lm("H+") + parm(2)*log10(m/m0)
30 moles = 10^rate * time
40 if (moles > m) then moles = m
38
200 save moles
-end
Book Example
Work through Example 4.15 together on
page 164 in Appelo and Postma, 2005.
Start with understanding the rate
expression equation 4.66 and go from
there.
39
40
density
porosity
41
m = calculated
m0 is given as 103 mol/L
IAP/K = SR(Quartz) = calculated in PHREEQC
42
Example 4.15
Appelo and
Postma, 2005
43
Exercise KA
1) Using the rate and kinetic blocks for pyrite dissolution in
the phreeqc.dat file, write out and explain the rate laws and
equations used.
2) Simulate the reaction of pyrite (use 2% pyrite and the
phreeqc.dat rate expression) with an oxygen-equilibrated
water such as the Oklahoma recharge water (used in
sorption exercise S3). How long does it take to react away
the oxygen dissolved in one unit volume of water? Given
the initial concentration of pyrite specified, how many
volumes of recharge water would it take to consume all the
pyrite?
44
Exercise KB
1) Enter the two Sierra Spring waters from Garrels & Christ into a
PHREEQC input file. Assume a temperature of 25 C for both.
Units are mmol/L.
Description
Ephemeral Spring
Perennial Spring
Number
Temp
pH
6.2
6.8
Ca
0.078
0.26
Mg
0.029
0.071
Na
0.134
0.259
K
0.028
0.04
Alk.
0.328
0.895
Cl
0.014
0.03
S(6)
0.01
0.025
Si
0.273
0.41
2) Using the most dilute water, add the RATE laws and suggested
KINETICS blocks that are present in the phreeqc.dat file to
simulate the kinetic reaction of the water with albite and K-spar.
3) Ignoring other possible reactions, how long would it take to
obtain a water with Si, Na and K concentrations similar to
those in the Perennial Spring?
45
Exercise KB (part 2)
4) Using the rate and kinetic blocks for K-spar and albite
dissolution. Write out and explain the rate laws and equations
used.
46
pH
MLSNPD -6 7.01
MLS38-6
6.78
Ca
Mg
166 52.6
514 232
Na
91.8
606
Alk.
as HCO3
2.5
626
14.4
2642
Cl
S(6)
181 113.6
1027
0.1
Br
Si
Fe(2)
Mn
Sr
Ba
1.06 0.14
9.87 7.12
2) (Ulrich et al., 2003) used field and lab techniques to identify the
biogeochemical factors affecting the rate of sulfate reduction in
the leachate contaminated water. They obtained a MichaelisMenten type relationship with KM & Vmax values of 80 M SO4
47
and 0.83 M SO4/day, resp.
Michaelis-Menten kinetics
1) Based on enzyme kinetics
k1
k2
E + S ES EP E + P
k1
V Vmax
(S )
KM (S )
49
50
Norman landfill
51
Norman landfill
52
Exercise K1 (cont)
3) Enter the RATES keyword in PHREEQC to describe the
Michaelis-Menten type rate law for SO4 reduction using the
constants determined by Ulrich et al. (2003). Note that
PHREEQC uses seconds and moles and adjust the KM & Vmax
constants accordingly. Call the rate law Sulfate_reduction.
4) Sulfate will be the limiting substrate. Notice that KM is high
compared to the initial SO4 concentrations. Nevertheless, as
a first step, assume a zero-order reaction where the rate is
simply equal to VMAX.
53
Exercise K1 (cont)
5) Your RATE block (for the 0-order case) should look something
like this, where you have substituted the correct value for
Vmax:
RATES
Sulfate_reduction
-start
10 if (m <= 0) then goto 100
30 rate = Vmax
40 moles = rate * time
50 if (moles > m) then moles = m
100 save moles
-end
54
Exercise K1 (cont)
6) The sulfate reduction is simulated as a kinetic reaction adding
organic matter (formula is CH2O) to the solution. The
reduction of sulfate takes place as a consequence of the
addition of CH2O. The amount of CH2O is not a limiting factor.
To properly define the kinetics block you will need to
determine how many moles n of CH2O get oxidized per mole
of SO4 reduced. The number of moles of CH2O available (i.e.
the DOC value) will define the current concentration available
m. Your kinetics block should start like this, with numerical
values substituted:
KINETICS 1
Sulfate_reduction
-formula CH2O n
-m
DOC value in moles/kgw
55
Exercise K1 (cont)
7) Use the SELECTED_OUTPUT keyword to have PHREEQC
output total concentrations on S(6), S(-2), S, C(4), and
information on the kinetics of Sulfate_reduction.
8) Specify output steps at 0 seconds, and 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8,
1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 20 years.
9) Graph the decay of SO4, the increase in S(-2), and the
decrease in the number of moles of reactant available (CH2O)
w/ time.
56
Exercise K1 (cont)
10) What happens to TDIC?
11) Calculate or estimate how long it would takes to oxidize all the
dissolved organic carbon?
12) What are the final concentrations of SO4, S(-2), and DOC after
20 years?
57
Exercise K1 (cont)
13) Examine the SO4 concentration (the limiting substrate) in the
initial water and compare it to the Michaelis-Menten constant,
Km. Which one is significantly smaller? What is the actual
limiting rate law?
14) Re-run the exercise with the full Michaelis-Menten expression
described in the RATES block, with SO4 as the limiting
substrate. Add some additional time steps to carry out the
simulation to 200 years.
58
59
Exercise K1 (part 2)
15) Ulrich et al. claim that barite dissolution provides the source of
most of the S(6) in the Norman waters. In a new simulation,
use the background water from near the Norman landfill.
Maintain equilibrium with barite. Use the rate law and the
kinetics keywords previously defined in part 1.
16)Specify output steps at 0 second, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1, 2, 4,
6, 8, 10 and 20 years.
17) Graph the decay of SO4, and the increase in S(-2) and Ba
with time.
18) How do the values compare with those observed in the
leachate-contaminated water?
60
61