Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 13

TOWN PLANNING

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOOD
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

SANMAN KOLI
BERNARDSEAN CHETTIAR
VAIBHAV MORE
PRIYANKA YADAV
YASHVI CHAWDA
ARTI NAGOTKAR

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

TOWN PLANNING PROJECT 1


ANALYSIS OF HOUSING TYPOLOGIES AND NEIGHBOURHOOD
PLANNING IN THE CONTEXT OF CHRONOLOGICAL LAYERING.
CASE STUDY : ARTIST VILLAGE , BELAPUR

OBJECTIVE :
TO ANALYSE THE VARIOUS TYPOLOGIES OF HOUSING
FOUND IN BELAPUR SECTOR 18AREA BY DOING A
DETAILED CASE STUDY INTO THEIR EVOLUTION( PERIOD
OF PLANNING, PARTICULAR PATTER
N IN WHICH THEY
WERE BUILT.)

INTRODUCTION

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLLEGE O

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8
RAILWAY STATION
IN PROXIMITY
HIGHWAY IN
EXPRESSWAY
PROXIMITY
1KM)
BUS STOP IN
SECTOR8
PROXIMITY

: C.B.D. BELAPUR
( 1.8 KM)
: SION PANVEL
(APPROX
: ARTIST COLONY
( BUS DEPOT )

FIRE STATION
IN PROXIMITY
POLICE STATION
IN PROXIMITY
1)
RELATIONSHIP
AWAY
OF SITE

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

:
: BELAPUR POLICE
STATION ( SECTOR

SITE IS PLACED

FROM THE RUSH AND


THUS CREATES A

NATURAL AMBIENCE

ACCESSIBILITY

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLLEGE

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

SHOP AND OTHER AMENITEIS ARE


PLACEC ALONG SIDE THE
BOUNDARY OF SITE

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

RESIDENTS PARK THEIR CARS IN


PCOKETS PROIVDED IN THE
VILLAGE

LANDUSE
AMENITIES; 1%
ROAD; 7%
MIXED; 1%

RESIDENTIAL; 50%

OPEN; 41%

RESIDENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED


WITH A CENTRAL OPEN
COURTYARD

RESIDENTIAL
AMENITIES
ROAD

OPEN
MIXED

N
A LARGE PART OF ARTIST VILLAGE COMPRISES OF
ARTISANS WHO MAKE USAGE OF THE SPACES
PROVIDE TO THEM

LANDUSE

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLLEGE O

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

PRIMARY ROAD

SECONDARY ROAD

BLOWN UP OF BLOCK NO 7
PRIMARY ROAD
SECONDARY ROAD
INTERNAL ROAD

8 m wide Secondary road

INTERNAL ROAD
OPEN SPACE
COMMUNITY
SPACE
COURTYARD
HOUSES

OPEN SPACE

ROAD HIERARCHY

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLLEGE

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

THE PATHWAYS ARE ARRANGED IN A


DIAGONAL MANNER. THIS
MAINTAINS AN EQUIDISTANT
ACCESS TO THE PRIMARY AND
SECONDARY ROADS BORDERING THE
SITE

PATHWAYS ARE CONNECTED TO


WIDE OPEN SPACES

HOUSE-COURTYARD-THRESHOLD

DIAGONAL PATHS AND


ARRANGEMETN OF HOUSES

WALKABILITY

IN ITS EARLIER YEARS , THE


DIAGONAL PATH ALSO HOUSED
PEOPLE WORKING ON SMALL SCALE
INDUSTRIES AND ALSO ACTED LIKE
A MARKET
THE SPATIAL HIERARCHY
(HOUSE COURTYARD
THRESHOLD etc. ) CONTINUES UNTIL
ONE REACHES HE LARGEST
NEIGHNOURHOOD SPACES WHERE
SCHOOL AND OTHER SIMILAR
FACILITIES ARE LOCATED
SYSTEM IS ARRANGED IN SUCH
MANNER THAT THE SPINE OF
COMMUNITY SPACES OPEN TO HILS
BEHIND
AT KEY POINTS ARE LOCATED
SHOPPING , SCHOOLD AND
PLAYFEILDS

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLLEGE O

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

THE PROJECT USES OE OVERRIDING PRINCIPLE :


EACH UNIT HAS ITS OWN INDIVIDUAL SITE TO ALLOW FOR EXPANSION. THE SCHEME CATERED TO A WIDE RANGE OF
INCOME GROUPS AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION WITH THE LOWEST (WITH BUDGET OF AROUND
20,000) TO MIDDLE INCOME GROUP (UNIT COSTS OF RS.30-50,000) UPTO UPPER INCOME LEVELS (WITH UNIT COSTS OF
RS.1,80,000)

ALTHOUGH THE RANGE


OF INCOME GROUPS IS
LARGE
A RATIO OF 1:5- THE
VARIATION OF PLOT
SIZES IS MUCH SMALLER,
FROM 45 TO 75 SQUARE
METRES A RATIO OF LESS THAN
1:2 (ORIGINALLY THE
ARCHITECT WANTED ONE
STANDARD PLOT SIZE OF
50 SQUARE METERS,
BUT THIS WAS AMENDED
DUE TO AFFORDABILITY
AND THE RULES AND
PROCEDURES OF THE
LENDING AGENCIES )

Living area
Services
Private courtyard
Access roads

HOUSING TYPOLOGY

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLL

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

AS EACH UNIT HAS ITS OWN PLOT AND DOES


NOT
SHARE ANY COMMON WALLS WITH NEIGHBOURS,
IT ALSO HAS ITS OWN OPEN TO SKY SPACES
WHICH AUGMENTS THE BUILT UP AREA. THIS
INDEPENDENCE, WELL RECOGNIZED IN THE
CONTEMPORARY PLANNING ALLOWS EACH
HOUSE OWNER TO EXTEND OR CHANGE HIS
DWELLING IN WHATEVER WAY THE FAMILY SEES
FIT AND AT A PACE IN KEEPING WITH THE FAMILY
ECONOMIC WELL BEING.

THIS LOW RISE HIGH DENSITY SCHEME UTILIZES A


CLUSTER ARRANGEMENT AROUND SMALL
COMMUNITY SPACES. AT SMALLER SCALE,EVEN
UNITS ARE GROUPED AROUND AN INTIMATE
COURTYARD OF ABOUT 8X8 METERS THREE OF THE
CLUSTERS COMBINE TO FORM A LARGER MODULE
OF 21 HOUSES SURROUNDING AN OPEN SPACE OF
12X12 METERS. THREE SUCH MODULES INTERLOCK
TO DEFINE THE NEXT SCALE OF COMMUNITY
SPACE APPROXIMATELY 20X20 METERS THE
SPATIAL HIERARCHY CONTINUE S UNTIL THE
NEIGHBOURHOOD SPACES ARE FORMED WHERE
SCHOOLS AND PUBLIC SPACES ARE LOCATED

( 1 X 7)

TYPICAL VIEW OF A
CLUSTER

3 X (1 X 7)

HOUSING TYPOLOGY

3 X (3 X (1 X 7))

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLL

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

TYPE A

TYPE B

Sr Type built up
No.
area
(in sq.m.)

plot
area
(in
sq.m.)

35

A1

25

HOUSING TYPOLOGY

Sr Type built up
No.
area
(in sq.m.)

plot
area
(in
sq.m.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

51.03
46.25
46.62
41.33
49.44
42.68
48.69
37.71

B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8

26.19
26.55
26.55
26.55
27.63
27.63
28.21
26.73

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLL

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

TYPE C

Sr Type built up
No.
area
(in sq.m.)

plot
area
(in
sq.m.)

2
3
4

C1

33.17

71.28

C1

33.17

72.90

C1

33.17

76.35

C2
C3
C4

33.44
34.18
34.49

65.59
56.25
48.81

HOUSING TYPOLOGY

TYPE D

Sr Type built up
No.
area
(in sq.m.)

plot
area
(in
sq.m.)

1
2
3

37.71
48.42
63.28

D1
D2
D3

42.75
42.75
45.55

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLL

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

Sr Type built up
No.
area
(in sq.m.)

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS
TYPE E

plot
area
(in
sq.m.)

HOUSING TYPOLOGY

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLL

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

THE RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED


RCC BUNGALOWS

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

THE DILAPIDATED STRUCTURES WHICH


DATE BACK TO THE 1970S

ONE OF THE FEW ORIGINAL


BUILDINGS

MULTI-STOREY CONSTRUCTION AS OPPOSED


THE ORIGINAL ARCHITECTURAL GRAMMAR

PHOTOS

FREEDOM OF MODIFICATION

COURTYARD SPACES
A Type-A house

PARKS AND SPACES

4TH YEAR 2014 15

COURTYARD SPACES

IES COLLEGE

TOWN PLANNING
BELAPUR SECTOR 8

STUDY OF NEIGHBOURHOODS

THE SHORTCOMINGS

ON SPEAKING TO SOME OF THE RESIDENTS, THERE WERE SOME DRAWBACKS THAT WERE BROUGHT TO LIGHT
ONE RESIDENT WE TALKED TO COMPLAINED THAT NO PROVISIONS WERE MADE FOR THE COMMON SPACES IN THE
CENTER OF EACH CLUSTER OF HOUSES. NO ONE WAS IN CHARGE OF MAINTAINING THEM.
THESE SPACES DO NOT FALL UNDER ANY JURISDICTION; NOT PRIVATE NOR PUBLIC.MOST OF THE HOUSES HAVE BEEN
REMODELED OR DESTROYED AND REBUILT AS SOME INHABITANTS SAID THEY WERE IMPRACTICAL (WHAT WAS THE
ARCHITECT THINKING WHEN HE PUT TOILETS OUTSIDE THE HOUSE?).
SOME CLUSTERS OF HOUSES BECAME MODEL MINI-GATED-COMMUNITIES WHILE OTHERS BECAME MINI-SLUMS.THE
CONCRETE HOUSES AROSE AS A RESULT OF THE CHANGING ASPIRATIONS OF THE RESIDENTS.
THEY NO LONGER WANTED A VILLAGE OR A RURAL BACKDROP. MODERN MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES
HAVE THUS BEEN EMPLOYED TO A GREAT EXTENT.

CONCLUSION
THIS HOUSING PROJECT OFFERS THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF A VILLAGE WITH THE SOPHISTICATION
OF A CITY.
EACH CLUSTER PERMITS THE EMERGENCE OF A LOCAL COMMUNITY FEELING, WHILE INTEGRATING
EACH HOUSE TO THE WHOLE SETTLEMENT AT DIFFERENT LEVELS. THE HIERARCHY ITSELF IS VERY
ORGANIC.
THE COMPLEX ALLOWED PEOPLE TO MODIFY THEIR HOUSES FREELY, WHETHER WITH A
PAINTBRUSH OR MORTAR - SOMETHING THAT IS NEVER ALLOWED IN THE TYPE OF MASS HOUSING
DEVASTATING THE URBAN AND PSYCHOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE OF CITIES AROUND THE WORLD.

CONCLUSION

4TH YEAR 2014 15

IES COLLEGE O

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi