Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Background
Rationale
Methods Used
Methods Used
(continued)
www.sws.org.ph/
www.pulseasia.com.ph/
www.ibon.org/
www.mbc.com.ph/
www.asiarisk.com/
ww1.transparency.org/
www.transparency.ph/
Methods Used
(continued)
Mr. Edward Gacusana, MBC Sr. Research Associate & CAC Proj. Coordinator
Mr. Michael Mundo, MBC Sr. Research Associate & Chief Economist
Mr. Jay Sandoval, SWS Director of Sampling, Processing & Data Archiving Group
Methods Used
(continued)
PERC reports
Caveat
SURVEYS ON CORRUPTION
IN THE PHILIPPINES WITH
VOTING-AGE ADULTS
AS RESPONDENTS
Social Weather
Stations (SWS)
Name of
Surveys
Sponsor
Social Weather
Surveys
SWSsponsored for
regular items;
TAG Project
for some
Rider items
Survey
schedul
e
Level of
Analysis
Quarterl
y
Total Philippines
& Major areas:
NCR, Balance
Luzon; Visayas;
Mindanao
Pulse Asia
(Pulse)
Ulat ng Bayan
Pulsesponsored for
regular items
Quarterl
y
Total Philippines
& Major areas:
NCR, Balance
Luzon; Visayas;
Mindanao
Ibon Foundation,
Inc. (IBON)
Peoples
Political &
Economic
Perception
Quarterl
y
Total Philippines
only
Transparency Intl
(TI) [implemented in
Global
Corruption
Barometer
Every
last
quarter
of the
year
Total Philippines
only
[Survey rider in
ARO Voice of the
People Surveys]
Sampling
Method
Selection of Provinces
SWS
Multi-stage
probability
sampling
10 in Luzon, 5 in Visayas,
6 in Mindanao; with
Regional allocations per
major area & non-quotas
for Luz & Vis= selected
with probability
proportional to size (PPS)
PULSE
Multi-stage
probability
sampling
No pre-selection of
provinces [Can have 10-12
in Luzon; 10 in Visayas;
10-15 in Mindanao]
Multi-stage
sampling
1,200 to 1,400 RP
[Allocated per Reg based
on % of COMELEC
Registered Voters per
Reg] / No MOEs
12 in Luzon, 6 in Visayas,
12 in Mindanao = selected
randomly
Multi-stage
probability
sampling
3 in North Luzon, 2 in
South Luzon, 2 in Visayas,
2 in Mindanao = selected
with probability
proportional to size (PPS)
IBON
TI - ARO
Selection of
Cities/Municipalities
Selection of Barangays
PULSE
IBON
TI - ARO
SWS
Selection of
Respondents
SWS
PULSE
IBON
TI - ARO
Substitution Rules
Quality controls
SWS
PULSE
IBON
No substitution rules;
Replacements are taken by
continually applying the interval
until quota is reached
TI - ARO
SWS
Questionnaires
Drafted in Tagalog; Translated
in English, Ilocano, Bicolano
Cebuano, Ilonggo; pre-tested
Training of
personnel
Field Personnel
Done in 10
central
locations
1 Field Manager; 14
Field Anchors; 65-70
Field Interviewers
(Anchors also act as
Auditors)
PULSE
Done in four
central
locations
IBON
No formal
interviewers
training
TI - ARO
Done in 3
central
locations
Data Processing
Weighting scheme
SWS
PULSE
IBON
TI - ARO
SWS
(regular item)
Agencies perceived to be corrupt; perceived to be doing something to
curb corruption
Opinion on extent of corruption in the country
Awareness of private sector anti-corruption groups
Perceived extent of corruption in specific institutions; govt units;
sectors
Comparing extent of corruption among different administrations
Degree of effectiveness of government anti-corruption efforts and
policies
Degree of effectiveness of specific steps to curb corruption
Accuracy of media coverage on corruption
Personal experience on corruption
Who should be blamed for corruption: govt officials vs. businessmen
PULSE
TI - ARO
SWS
PULSE
IBON
TI - ARO
Instituti
on
SWS
ranks low
BIR, DPWH, BoC, LTO = perceived to be corrupt; Few can mention
agencies which are reputable
Most opine that corruption in the country is widespread
Low awareness of private sector anti-corruption groups and even
for Coalition Against Corruption (CAC)
Most perceive corruption in the national govt and the AFP to be
significant
Current administration perceived to be have higher incidence of
corruption than previous one and there are fears incidence is
increasing (previous data had reversed results)
Government anti-corruption efforts and policies are perceived to be
not as effective
Most suggested steps to curb corruption are perceived to be
effective (some more than others)
Media coverage on corruption is perceived to be quite accurate
Few mention personal experience on corruption
Government officials and businessmen are equally to be blamed for
corruption
Highlights of Findings
Instituti
on
PULSE
than improving
Approval rating of the national admin in fighting corruption is low
The Office of the Ombudsman & the Sandiganbayan get fairly
positive approval ratings
Personalities who have served as Ombudsman get negative to low
positive trust ratings
High awareness for Pork Barrel funds; Majority perceive most of the
funds go to corruption
In the 2004 elections, corruption is one of the top issues the next
Pres. should focus on
About 1 in 8 had a personal experience in corruption; mostly in NCR
and urban Visayas
High awareness and credibility of news on corruption in the military
as well as perceived incidence
Corruption in any form is viewed by majority as never justifiable
DPWH, BoC, BIR, PNP, DepED = most corrupt; Majority cant mention
agencies which are not so corrupt
Institutio
n
IBON
Highlights of Findings
66% in Jan 2005, 82% in Oct 2005, and 77% in Jan 2006
67% says there is truth to the accusations that PGMA is corrupt and
cheated in the last elections
Institution
Highlights of Findings
The most corrupt sectors mentioned in Asian countries are: political
TI - ARO
Press releases
IBON
TI - ARO
SWS
PULSE
Reg 1
Reg 6
Reg 9
CAR/Reg2
Reg 7
Reg 10
Reg 3
Reg 8
Caraga
Reg 4
Non-quota
Reg 11
Reg 5
Reg 12
Non-quota
ARMM
PROVINCES
10
Sample bias is for urban areas given that population sizes here
IBONsurveyscannotbeclaimedtorepresentopinionsofFilipino
adults
perceptions
Youngeradultsaremoresusceptibletonegativeperceptionsoncorruption
Theupperandmiddleclasstendtobemostaffectedandmostpessimisticabout
abilitytoresolvecorruption
SURVEYS ON CORRUPTION
IN THE PHILIPPINES WITH
BUSINESS LEADERS
AS RESPONDENTS
Name of Surveys
Type of Respondents
Survey of Enterprises
(SE)
Executive Outlook
Surveys (EOS)
Trends in corruption in
the Philippines
Corruption Perception
Index (CPI)
RP data = 12 surveys of
business people and
assessments by country
analysts from 8 independent
institutions (see next pages)
Transparency International
[CPI=independent institutions
conduct their surveys]
[BPI=implemented in the
Phils. by Asia Research
Organization ARO, a Gallup
Intl affiliate]
Sponsors
Survey Schedule
Level of
Analysis
SWS-SE
Transparent Accountable
Governance (TAG)
project
NCR, Cebu,
Davao,
Cavite/Laguna/Ba
tangas;
CDO/Iligan
MBC-EOS
MBC members
Refers to
Philippines as a
country
Usually January to
February
Refers to
Philippines as a
country
Varies by independent
institutions
Refers to
Philippines as a
country
NCR
PERC
Corruptio
n in Asia
PERC
Trends in
corruptio
n
TI CPI
TI BPIARO
Government institutions;
Foundations; Funding
Agencies; Business
Groups
Methodology
Sample Sizes/MOE
SWS-SE
MBC-EOS
Selection of
respondents
Simple Random Sampling
for first survey; Panel
design for succeeding
surveys
All MBC members are sent
qres & response rates are
about 9% to 13%
Methodology
PERC
Corruptio
n in Asia
Face-to-face
interviews for some;
mail survey for
others
PERC
Trends in
corruptio
n
Sample Sizes/MOE
Selection of
respondents
TI CPI
Independent
agencies have their
own methods
(usually mail or
telephone surveys)
TI BPIARO
Face-to-face
interviews
Substitution
rules
SWS-SE
Replacements
in cases of
refusals
MBC-EOS
No sub rules;
Dependent on
response rates
Quality controls
Questionnaires
10% Field
observations; 20%
Spot-checking of
unsupervised
interviews
Face-to-face interviews;
FGDs conducted to finalize
survey agenda; Translated
in Tagalog & Cebuano
Minimal follow-ups
Self-administered by
respondents and mailed or
sent via fax to MBC
Substitution
rules
Quality controls
Questionnaires
PERC
Corruption in
Asia
Replacements
in cases of
refusals
Minimal spot-checking
Face-to-face interviews;
Some mailed responses;
Only answers questions on
the Phils. if they have
business interests here
PERC Trends
in corruption
No sub rules;
Dependent on
response rates
Minimal follow-ups
Self-administered and
mailed back to PERC
TI CPI
May vary
among different
agencies
TI BPI-ARO
Replacements
in cases of
refusals
Minimal follow-ups
Face-to-face interviews;
Taglish may sometimes be
used
Data processing
Weighting
scheme
SWS-SE
SPSS; Done-in-house
In every study
area 1/3 large
companies & 2/3
SMEs; None when
data across areas
are aggregated
MBC-EOS
None
Future plans
Data processing
Weighting
scheme
PERC
Corruption
in Asia
None
PERC
Trends in
corruption
None
TI CPI
Independent research
agencies do their own
data processing and
submit reports to TI-Berlin
Usually none
TI BPIARO
None
Future plans
To expand the base &
samples by major
industry; Add more
demographics
including media
access; Will wait for
more feedback from
clients re: suggestions
To include more
demographics
SWS-SE
MBC-EOS
PERC
Corrupti
on in
Asia
PERC
Trends
in
corrupti
on
Institutio
n
TI CPI
TI BPIARO
SWS-SE
MBC-EOS
Frequencies,
PERC Corruption in
Asia
Simple
average
PERC Trends in
corruption
Simple
average
TI CPI
Simple
average
TI BPI-ARO
Mean, Median
on
SWS-SE
MBC-EOS
on
PERC
Corrupti
on in
Asia
PERC
Trends in
corruptio
n
Two main problems of the Phils with corruption are: 1) every level of
govt & private sector is affected by corruption and 2) public
relations dimension (rampant rumour-mongering & political
mudslinging)
Publics extreme tolerance for corruption and widespread feeling of
helplessness
Perceptions of worsening levels of corruption makes companies say
they approach the Phils with caution
Problem may not be as bad as it looks but touches many parts of
the system that it will be extremely difficult to root out
Country is doing well despite political problems (May 2006 release)
and it helps that the Philippines has stayed out of the news
Foreign exchange remittances from OFWs greatly helping the
economy
Systemic risks (which includes the ff. variables: corruption,
nationalism & cultural risks, institutional weakness) always garners
the lowest in rating; this pulls the risk index higher
Highlights of Findings
TI CPI
In the 2004 survey round, the Philippines ranks as the fifth most
corrupt (together with Papua New Guinea and Vietnam) in the Asia
Pacific. This has deteriorated compared to 2003 results.
For the 2005 survey round, the Philippines ranks 117th in the world
[lowest is ranked 158th]
TI BPIARO (No
specific
report on
RP only)
SWS-SE
MBC-EOS
PERC
Corruption
in Asia
PERC
Trends in
corruption
TI CPI
TI BPIARO
Varying cultural contexts across countries may have its effects on how
incidences of corruption are reported
Background
The concept of the National Integrity System (NIS) has been developed
and promoted by TI as part of its holistic approach to countering
corruption.
The NIS consists of the key institutions, laws and practices that contribute
to integrity, transparency and accountability in a society. When it functions
properly, the NIS combats corruption as part of the larger struggle against
abuse of power, malfeasance, and misappropriation in all its forms.
The NIS approach provides a framework with which to analyze both the
extent and causes of corruption in a given national context, as well as the
adequacy and effectiveness of national anti-corruption efforts.
Background
(continued)
Executive
Ombudsman
Legislature
Anti-corruption agencies
Political Parties
Media
Electoral Commissions
Civil Society
Private Sector
Judiciary
Public Sector
International Institutions
Public Procurement
TIs National Integrity System (NIS) country studies are qualitative reports
that provide a detailed and nuanced assessment of anti-corruption systems
at country level.
Media presentation
In a recent interview via phone (to Australia) she says she would not yet be
in a position to disclose details on methodology and results until the project
is completely finished and TI gives the go signal
A focus group discussion was held in late June 2006 to present the initial
results to various stakeholders but this did not prove to be productive
enough for concrete validation of results
The report has not been finalized and a summary of findings is the only
available release on the study
A second draft of the report is being prepared and more FGDs for validation
of results will be conducted among stakeholders in the coming months
SUGGESTIONS
Suggestions TO GOVERNMENT
Govt agencies have to have a clear, comprehensive and inter-linked plan for
combating corruption and disseminate to the public in simple laymans terms
Govt institutions should aggressively & unceasingly trumpet gains in anticorruption efforts in the tri-media
A regular TV, radio, newspaper blitz or peryodikit in barangays on anticorruption programs & updates should be sustained
Hotlines for reporting cases of corruption should be propagated and
popularized
School curricula should incorporate values which would foster a society
intolerable to corruption
Linkages and joint efforts of religious and civic organizations with govt should
be popularly disseminated
Strong grassroots (barangay level) support to create a continuing momentum
for anti-corruption efforts
Broadcast or publish names of people with cases of graft and resolution
(updates) reached on these cases
Suggestions TO GOVERNMENT
Actively encourage business to participate in anti-corruption activities (sit in
bidding and awards committees, contribute to anti-graft funds, etc.) and
acknowledge their anti-corruption efforts
Follow through the corruption fund they are willing to put up in order to strengthen
anti-corruption efforts and plan with them who, how and where it should be
disbursed
Transactions to watch out for: local & national govt permits and licensing,
Make business groups & networks realize the importance of promoting strong
private sector (business) ethics to help prevent corruption
questionnaire design to data processing and analysis) so that credibility and integrity
will be protected
Be meticulous in applying error margins and confidence intervals when interpreting
survey data results [Note: Standard error margins and confidence intervals used are
applicable only to methods using simple random sampling (SRS) and therefore
allowances should be made for multi-stage methods]
Exercise caution in reporting survey findings and making generalizations and
Suggestions to MEDIA
Take pains to report properly survey methods used and survey
results; being wary of sound bites which may be misleading
END OF PRESENTATION
Maraming Salamat
po!