Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The centre of rotation is moved back from the centreline of the valve disc. The
seat and seal are designed conically and on centre.This design relies on a
frictional interference seal and so is applicable only to soft seated valves
Double Offset
The centre of rotation is moved from the centreline of the valve body. The
seat and seal are design remains conical and on centre. This design again
relies on a frictional , interference seal, but the length of rotation over which
this friction occurs Is reduced, allowing a larger of process resistant seal
materials to be used. However these materials must be relatively soft or
highly elastic to prevent "jamming
Triple Offset
The centreline of the cone is ritated away from the valve centreline resulting in an
ellipsodal profile and providing the third offset. With this geometry, seat seal
interference is completely eliminated ensuring long sealing life. The result is a
torque seated, process pressure aided FRICTIONALESS seal. The geometry
allows the body seat to be used as the closed limit stop, aiding operator
adjustment. The Triple Offset design is ideally suited to metal seated valves
providing bubble-tight performance on high temperature, high pressure and
firesafe applications
Valve type
API 598
MSS SP-80*
ASME B16.34*
ASME B16.34*
Pipeline valves
API 6D*
API 598
API 598
Cryogenic valves
Control valves
API 598, Valve Inspection and Test Widely used test specification around the
world. It covers all types of valves in sizes through NPS 24. It includes leakage rates
and testing criteria for metal-seated and resilient-seated valves.
API 527, Seat Tightness of Pressure Relief Valves Covers the seat tightness
of pressure relief valves. It also includes allowable leakage rates for testing with steam,
water and air.
ASME B16.34, Valves Flanged, Threaded and Welding End The primary
valve design document, it also contains charts for determining the working pressures of
valves to be used in conjunction with other test standards, such as API 598. B16.34
contains a test procedure, but no seat leakage acceptance criteria.
ASME PTC 25, Pressure Relief Devices Reference document for the testing of
PRVs, contains detailed procedures for testing relief valves with air/ steam.
FCI 70-2, Control Valve Seat Leakage It contains detailed test procedures and
leakage rate classes for control valves. The leakage classes are also occasionally
referenced by other documents and used as acceptance criteria.
ISA-S75, Hydrostatic Testing of Control Valves It provides a procedure for the
hydrostatic shell testing of control valves. Closure testing and acceptance criteria are
out of the scope of this document and usually are covered by referencing FCI 70-2.
ISO 5208, Industrial Valves, Pressure Testing of Valves ISOs primary
testing standard, this document covers all types of valves and has four levels of
allowable closure test leakage.
The primary goal of PRV testing is to confirm that the valve will both
lift (open) at the correct pressure and provide the prescribed rate of
flow. A control valve is normally tested to measure its rate of flow as
well. Both PRVs and control valves are also tested to confirm the
integrity of their pressure envelope.
PRVs are tested in accordance with two primary standards: ASME
PTC 25, Pressure Relief Devices and API 527, Seat Tightness of
Pressure Relief Valves.
The common testing standards for control valves are ISAthe
Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society of America ISAS75.19 and Fluid Controls Institute (FCI) FCI 70-2, Control Valve
Seat Leakage.
The upstream pipeline and petroleum valve industry also have their
own testing specification. It is located within the pages of the API 6D,
Pipeline Valves valve design document. API 6D leakage rates are
very close to those of API 598, but its holding times are longer.