Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by
Aditya S. Kasar
10/01/2014
CONTENT
Introduction
Literature Review
Design
CFD Analysis
Conclusion
Future Scope
2/38
10/01/2014
CONTENT
Introduction
Literature Review
Design
CFD Analysis
Conclusion
Future Scope
3/38
10/01/2014
INTRODUCTION
What is
AIM &OBJECTIVES?
4/38
10/01/2014
INTRODUCTION
10/01/2014
WHY
?
INTRODUCTION
TYPES OF WIND TURBINE AVAILABLE
6/38
FOCUS OF
OUR STUDY
10/01/2014
INTRODUCTION
10/01/2014
CONTENT
Introduction
Literature Review
Design
CFD Analysis
Conclusion
Future Scope
8/38
10/01/2014
LITERATURE REVIEW
Sr. Author [Ref]
No
.
Findings
9/38
10/01/2014
CONTENT
Introduction
Literature Review
Design
CFD Analysis
Conclusion
Future Scope
10/38
10/01/2014
DESIGN
What are
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
And
DESIGN METHODOLOGY
11/38
10/01/2014
Critical
Parameters
Pwind
Av 3
2
OR
Focus of our
study
12/38
10/01/2014
DESIGN
DESIGN
STEPS
To analyze existing Savonius rotor design and
performance
To modify the design of Savonius rotor
To analyze modified Savonius rotor
To design parts
13/38
10/01/2014
42
0.154
0.65
Overlap ratio ()
0.15
175
52.5
657.5
1620
1
1.2
1420
5
THEORITICAL POWER:
Pwind
1
Av 3 Cp
2
P = 21.24 watt
ACTUAL POWER
OBTAINED:
P = 9 watt
14/38
10/01/2014
15/38
10/01/2014
16/38
UK Saha (4) Optimum design configuration of Savonius rotor through wind tunnel experiments, Journal of Wind
Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 96 (2008)
10/01/2014
17/38
Gupta R.(2) Comparative study of a three bucket Savonius rotor with a combined three bucket Savonius three bladed
Darrieus rotor, Renewable Energy, (2013)
10/01/2014
D = H / 0.8
D = 1620 / 0.8
D = 2000 mm
18/38
A Biswas et al. [3] International journal of renewable energy research, Vol.3, No.4, (2013)
10/01/2014
V (air velocity )
6 m/s
CD (Drag coefficient )
2.3
0.48 m2
0.567 m2
Drag Force
x V 2 x CD
Drag Force
on Blades FD = 0.5 x A x
14.9
6
(air density)
23.9
4
F net = 9.25
N
10/01/2014
120o
20/38
Md. Quamrul Islam et. al. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering 2005 (ICME2005) 2830 December 2005, Dhaka, Bangladesh
10/01/2014
Light weight
21/38
10/01/2014
TSR = Vtip / V
Vtip = 3.14 x D x N /60
(N) = 33 rpm for wind velocity (V) =
6 m/s [6]
TSR = 0.57
Cp = 0.21
22/38
JL Menet (2004), A double step Savonius rotor for the local generation of electricity: a design study, Renewable
Energy 29 (2004)
10/01/2014
of
wind
(U)
6
m/s
Rotor Speed (N) rpm
Coeffi cient
of
33
Power
0.21
(Cp)
Tip speed ratio (TSR)
Overlap ratio ()
0.57
0
2000
1620
1.2
2.3
Power
23/38
10/01/2014
Following
Bracket arm is
designed to
support the
blades
24/38
10/01/2014
CONTENT
Introduction
Literature Review
Design
CFD Analysis
Conclusion
Future Scope
25/38
10/01/2014
CFD ANALYSIS
26/38
10/01/2014
CFD ANALYSIS
SAMPLE ANALYSIS (6 m/s)
Parameter
Pressure [Pa]
Temperature [K]
Density [kg/m^3]
Velocity [m/s]
X-component of Velocity [m/s]
Y-component of Velocity [m/s]
Z-component of Velocity [m/s]
Mach Number [ ]
Heat Transfer Coefficient
[W/m^2/K]
Shear Stress [Pa]
Fluid Temperature [K]
Condensate Mass Fraction [ ]
Moisture Content [ ]
Heat Flux [W/m^2]
X-component of Heat Flux
[W/m^2]
Y-component of Heat Flux
[W/m^2]
Z-component of Heat Flux
[W/m^2]
Parameter
Heat Transfer Rate [W]
Normal Force [N]
27/38
Bul
k
Avg
Surface
area
[m^2]
0.503087
0.503087
0.503087
0.503087
0.503087
0.503087
0.503087
0.503087
Minimu
m
101295
293.216
1.19499
6
0
0
0
0
Maximu
m
101357
293.219
1.19554
6
0
0
0
0
Averag
e
101346
293.219
1.19548
6
0
0
0
0
0
1.6934E09
293.216
0
0
0
0.503637
0.423496
293.219
0
0
0
0
0.04118
91
293.219
0
0
0
0.503637
0.503637
0.503637
Surface
Zarea
component [m^2]
0
0.503637
3.64064
0.503637
0.0056483
8
0.503637
3.63499
0.503637
0.739427
0.503637
0
7.32404
Xcomponent
0
6.35504
0.006787
98
7.32448
9.02615
0.0037399
5
6.35878
-0.456129
0.503637
-0.297528
9.02499
0.001288
68
1
0.518222
-0.45663
0.0005013
44
Value
Ycomponent
0
0.0277127
0.00043045
4
0.0272823
8.98424
-3.73079E05
8.98306
0.00117918
0.503637
0.503087
0.503087
0.503087
0.503637
-0.167707
0.503637
0.73929
0.0001373
76
0.503637
0.503637
0.503087
0.518222
RPM = 33.15
P = 2 N T/ 60
P = 2 x 3.14 x 33.15 x
9.02499 / 60
P = 31.314
Watt
This Power obtained is
greater than Power for
conventional Savonius
rotor
10/01/2014
CFD ANALYSIS
Air Flow
Direction
Approx
4.6 m/s
28/38
10/01/2014
CFD ANALYSIS
RESULTS FOR POWER GENERATION FROM
Inlet air
Velocity on
CFD ANALYSIS
Sr.
RPM
29/38
Power Output
(Watt)
No.
Velocity
(m/s)
Blade
(m/s)
1.65
2.5
1.7
2.13
3.5
2.49
3.26
4.5
3.52
25.39
13.077
3.78
27.24
17.588
5.5
4.03
29.04
22.884
4.6
10
6.5
4.8
11
4.9
12
7.5
5.1
13
5.31
11.89
12.25
15.4
17.95
23.52
33.15
34.59
35.68
36.76
38.27
0.991
1.263
2.968
5.261
9.490
31.314
38.582
46.330
55.388
66.252
10/01/2014
CONTENT
Introduction
Literature Review
Design
CFD Analysis
Summary &
Conclusion
Future Scope
30/38
10/01/2014
Parameters
Conventional Savonius
wind Turbine
1620
350
350
Number of Blades
657.5
2000
Blade Material
PVC
FRP
6.5
5.5
0.154
0.21
10
0.65
0.69
11
Overlap Ratio ()
0.15
12
0.7
13
1.2
1.2
14
15
21
10
88
31
16
(Watt)
Actual Power Output (Watt)
7-8
25-28
31/38
10/01/2014
The results from CFD analysis are found nearly same as the
analytical calculations
From our theoretical analysis the power output for modified
design is observed to be four times the conventional design
The power output from CFD analysis shows that the power
output for modified design is three times the conventional
design
The actual power output for modified is nearly three times
of the conventional design
32/38
10/01/2014
33/38
10/01/2014
CONTENT
Introduction
Literature Review
Design
CFD Analysis
Summary & Conclusion
Future Scope
34/38
10/01/2014
FUTURE SCOPE
The Savonius wind turbine can be integrated with
Solar cell systems to enhance power generation
The ducted turbine concept can be implemented for
Savonius wind turbines to further increase its power
efficiency
35/38
[1] C.Chaudhari,S.Waghmare,A.kotwal,"Numerical analysis of venturi ducted horizontal axis wind turbine for efficent power
generation"ISSN:2320-6349
Volume(I),October2013
10/01/2014
36/38
10/01/2014
10/01/2014
38/38
THANK YOU