Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Competition
PREPARED BY:
chapte
r
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
PERFECT COMPETITION
perfectly competitive market
A market with many sellers and
buyers of a homogeneous product
and no barriers to entry.
price taker
A buyer or seller that takes the
market price as given.
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
PERFECT COMPETITION
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
Extra Application 6
COFFEE WARS
Starbucks, the current heavyweight of the upscale coffee world with 8,600 stores, is being
challenged by Dunkin Donuts. The doughnut chain currently maintains 4,400 stores but
plans to open 10,000 more outlets by 2020.
Many of the upscale coffee houses, and their patrons, do not view Dunkin Donuts as
competition.
Others indicated they prefer Dunkin Donuts coffee over Starbucks.
The new Dunkin Donuts outlets have a new imagemore urban and upscale.
Can this market accommodate a new entrant?
It is my belief that consumers buy the coffee and the
atmosphere of the coffee house. Starbucks will view
Dunkin Donuts as a competitive threat if the company
believes they appeal to the same market. New entrants will
push the supply curve to the right and result in a lower
price. However, I believe Starbucks will attempt to reinforce
its image as the upscale coffee house where higher income
individuals should be seen. If this is the case, then the
market is actually for coffee houses, and not coffee.
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.1
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.1
FIGURE 6.1
Monopoly Versus Perfect Competition
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.1
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.2
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.2
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.2
marginal revenue
The change in total revenue from
selling one more unit of output.
marginal revenue = price
To maximize profit, produce the quantity where price = marginal cost
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.2
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.2
break-even price
The price at which economic profit is
zero; price equals average total cost.
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.3
chapte
r
6.3
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.3
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.3
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.4
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.4
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.4
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.4
Market Equilibrium
FIGURE 6.6
Market Equilibrium
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.4
Market Equilibrium
For a short-run equilibrium, two conditions are satisfied:
1 At the market level, the quantity of the product supplied equals the
quantity demanded. The demand curve intersects the short-run market
supply curve at a price of $7 and a quantity of 600 shirts per minute
(Panel A).
2 The typical firm in the market maximizes its profit, given the market
price. Given the market price of $7, each of the 100 firms maximizes
profit by producing 6 shirts per minute (Panel B).
The market reaches a long-run equilibrium when the two conditions for
short-run equilibrium are met, and a third long-run condition holds as well.
3 Each firm in the market earns zero economic profit, so there is no
incentive for existing firms to leave the market and no incentive for other
firms to enter the market.
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
APPLYING THE CONCEPTS #2: How do entry costs affect the number
of firms in a market?
The market for phone service has the features of a perfectly competitive market, with
easy entry, a standardized good, and a large enough number of suppliers that each
takes the market price as given.
In contrast, to enter the phone business in the United States, your initial investment
would be millions, or perhaps billions, of dollars, so the market for phone service is
not perfectly competitive.
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.5
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
Extra Application 7
ORACLES QUEST FOR GREATER EFFICIENCY
Oracle Corporations recent takeover of rival Siebel Systems Inc. has spurred substantial
job cuts. Oracle is expected to cut between 1,000 and 2,000 jobs that are primarily in
functional areas that represent duplication of efforts. Oracle currently employs 51,000
original Oracle employees and the additional 4,700 Siebel employees.
The reduction in work force could cost some Oracle employees their jobs as the
company attempts to boost profits via the downsizing.
The companys cost-cutting moves are an attempt to compete with rival SAP in
business application software.
Shareholders are not overly impressed with Oracle stock closing only 20 cents a
share higher after the announcement.
Oracle Corporations acquisition of Siebel has allowed the
software firm to reduce average total costs via reduction in
labor force. Many jobs in the now-merged company had
substantial overlap and Oracle can reduce costs by
eliminating duplicate positions. Oracles total output will be
higher but the long-run average cost per unit should
decline. Oracle will benefit from additional economies of
scale as production and costs move from point a to point b.
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.5
The average cost increases as the industry grows for two reasons:
1
Less productive inputs. A small industry will use only the most
productive inputs, but as the industry grows, firms may be forced to
use less productive inputs.
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.5
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.5
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
Consider the market for wolfram during World War II. Wolfram is an ore of tungsten,
an alloy required to make heat-resistant steel for armor plate and armor-piercing
shells. During World War II, the United States and its European allies bought up all
the wolfram produced in Spain, thus denying the Axis powersGermany and Italy
this vital military input. However, the wolfram-buying program was very costly to
the Allied powers for two reasons:
The Allied powers had to outbid the Axis powers for the wolfram, so the price
increased from $1,144 per ton to $20,000 per ton.
Spanish firms responded to the higher prices by supplying more wolfram.
Workers poured into the Galatia area in Spain, where they used simple tools to
gather wolfram from the widely scattered outcroppings of ore. Because of this
market entry, the quantity of wolfram supplied increased tenfold. Because
wolfram miners obeyed the law of supply, the Allied powers were forced to buy
a huge amount of wolfram, much more than they had expected.
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
chapte
r
6.6
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.6
FIGURE 6.9
Short-Run and Long-Run Effects
of an Increase in Demand
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
chapte
r
6.7
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.7
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
6.7
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez
chapte
r
break-even price
constant-cost industry
price taker
increasing-cost industry
shut-down price
marginal revenue
sunk cost
2007 Pearson/Prentice Hall, Survey of Economics: Principles, Applications & Tools, 3e, OSullivan Sheffrin Perez