Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Engagement
Working Together on a Shared Goal of Making
6, Education
2015
State Leadership
Retreat
October
Michigan a June
Top
10
State14, 2015
2015 THE EDUCATION TRUST-MIDWEST
50
150
250
350
450
550
650
United S tates
United S tates (Public)
Michigan
-10
-5
National public
Michigan
Sourc NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238; Basic Scale Score = 208)
e:
10
15
Average
240Scale Score
230
220
210
200
196
190
180
170
160
Sourc
e:
NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238; Basic Scale Score = 208)
2014
2015 THE EDUCATION TRUST-MIDWEST
270
260
250
240
Maryland
230
National Public
220
49th
210
200
190
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029
Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238; Basic Scale
Score = 208)
Average
Scale Score
230
220
Detro
it
210
200
190
180
170
160
Average Scale Score Change, NAEP Grade 4 - Reading - All Students (2011-13)
Tennessee
Minnesota
Indiana
Washington
Colorado
National Public
Michigan
-2
-1
Panelists
Amber Arellano, Executive Director, The Education TrustMidwest
Marc Hill,
Commerce
JOURNEY TOWARD
EQUITY AND
EXCELLENCE
THE
MASSACHUSETTS
EXPERIENCE
PAUL REVILLE
Fr a n c i s Ke p p e l Pro f e s s o r o f Pr a c t i c e a n d E d u c a t i o n a l Po l i c y a n d Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n
ACHIEVEMENTS - MCAS
ACHIEVEMENTS - NAEP
ACHIEVEMENTS - INTERNATIONAL
TIMMS 2011
Eighth-graders ranked 2 nd in Science
6 th in Mathematics
PISA 2012 Results
Average
Mathemati
cs
Science
Reading
Massachuse
tts
514
527
527
U.S.
481
497
498
OECD
494
501
496
GAPS - MCAS
MCAS 2010 Results
GAPS - MCAS
MCAS 2013 Results
Proficient or
Higher
Grade 3
Grade 5
Grade 8
English Language
Arts
White: 65%
Low-Income: 34%
English Language
Learners: 19%
White: 72%
Low-Income:
46%
White: 84%
Low-Income:
61%
Mathematics
White: 73%
Low-Income: 49%
English Language
Learners: 39%
White: 67%
Low-Income:
41%
White: 61%
Low-Income:
34%
White: 59%
Low-Income:
30%
White: 46%
Low-Income:
19%
Science
GAPS
Drop-out Rates
Black Males: 5.4%
White Males: 1.8%
Hispanic Males: 6.8%
IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESS
Leadership - Deep, Non-Partisan, Persistent
Clear, Powerful Equity and Excellence
Rationale
High Expectations, Standards, and Stakes
Signifi cant Investment in Capacity and Equity
Inclusive Implementation Approach
Long-term Commitment
KEY STRATEGIES
Shared Ownership in Building Standards
High Quality Assessments
Focus on Building Educator
Accountability
Strengthening Districts
Central Role of Data
High Quality Charters and Other
Innovations
Strengthened Accountability
Expanded Turn-arounds
Limited Attention to Time and Wraparound
Balance on Teacher Evaluation
Race to the Top
MAJOR CHALLENGES
Gap Closing, Sub Groups
Early Literacy
Turn-arounds
Career Readiness (STEM Inspiration
Gap)
Inadequate Time
Problems Associated with Poverty
LOOKING AHEAD
Need for a New Engine
Schools Alone Cannot Do It
Limits of School Reform and
Standards Paradigm
NEW ENGINE
Drives Achievement of All Means All
Braided Systems
Schools - Expanded, Extended and
Diff erentiated
Health and Human Services
Integrated
Out of School Learning Accessible
Panelists
2
5
Marc Hill,
Commerce
2
6