ZHU DANDANS

PROMOTION
ZHU ZHU GROUP
ANKITA JAIN
KRITIKA JAIN
PRAKRITI GAUR
ANUSHTHA GUPTA
SHIKHA

PERSONALITY AND VALUE

SYSTEM OF THE
EMPLOYEES AT BEVACO

ZHU DANDAN
(Characteristics)
Ambitious
Tactful
Always on the go
Open to feedback
Opportunist
Diplomatic
Hard worker
Patient
Reflective
Bad managerial skills
Self monitoring

ZHU DANDAN
(Value System )
Terminal

Instrumental

Sense of Accomplishment
Wisdom
Social Recognition

Ambitious
Capable

Self Respect

Responsible
Intelectual

Inner Harmony

Independent
Freedom

GRACE
(Characteristics)
Good mentor
Patient
An ideal leader
Balanced
Opinionated
Satisfied

GRACE
(Value System )
Terminal

Instrumental

Social Recognition
Family Security

Broad Minded

Equality

Ambitious

Happiness

Capable

Inner Harmony

Helpful

Sense of Accomplishment

Honest

Self Respect

Independent

Comfortable Life

DAISY
(Characteristics)
Experienced
Skilful
Opinionated
Strong headed
Hard worker
Patient

DAISY
(Value System )
Terminal

Instrumental

Sense of accomplishment

Intellectual

Freedom

Logical

Self respect

Capable

Happiness

Courageous

Wisdom

Responsible

Social recognition

Ambitious

Inner harmony

REASONS FOR ZHU

DANDANS 4 PROMOTIONS
IN 5 YEARS

Ambitious and
focused on her
growth

Striving for better

work

Fearless and
willing to take
added
responsibilities

A keen learner

Open to
Feedback

Tactful with her

bosses

Knew how to
climb the ladder
towards her
growth

High on self
monitoring

High on
Machiavellianism

WHAT WERE HER

CHALLENGES IN THE LAST
PROMOTIONS?

 Lack of relevant experience

Had to win the confidence of more

superiors
Took up the position without the required
expertise for instance replaced Daisy.
It was difficult for her to manage her team
effectively because of lack of managerial
skills.

WHAT ARE THE REASONS THAT

DAISY WHO POSSESSED BETTER
EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL
SKILLS THAN DANDAN COULD NOT
MANAGE THE PROMOTION AND
HAD TO QUIT BEVACO?

Upfront, not
willing to back
down

Assertive

Unable to
manage
conflicts in a
composed
manner

Strong headed

Not very tactful

Ultimately
lost her
motivation

Ultimately, Lost
her motivation

WHAT IS YOUR EVALUATION OF

GRACES CAREER POTENTIAL?
HOW EFFECTIVELY DID GRACE LEAD
THE TEAM?

STRENGTHS

WEAKNESSES

Believes in the growth of

her team mates
Competent
Responsible
Balanced personal and
professional life
Experience

Headstrong
Unable to resolve
conflicts peacefully
Not too ambitious about
her career goals
Not assertive enough

OPPUTUNITIES

THREATS

She has been in the

organisation for long
enough to know how to
counter her threats
She has an established
base of subordinates for
her support when
required

She is not getting

younger, and young and
fresh talent is pouring in
the organisation
People like Zhu
Dandan, who are
climbing the corporate
ladder way too fast

She is capable to move upward in the corporate ladder

based on her STRENGTHS, but WEAKNESSES might
hamper her growth.
Also, she needs to capitalise on the OPPORTUNITIES
while being conscious of her THREATS.

How effectively did grace lead the team?

As seen in the SWOT analysis, Grace is a leader with a

good grip on her team.

She believes in the overall growth of the team as a whole
as well as individuals in the team.
Throughout we have seen her mentoring her subordinates
effectively leading.
We have seen from numerous events that she believes in
exposing her team members to variety of organisational
situations and motivating them to take up more
responsibilities whenever they get a chance.
Only under her guidance could new comers like Zhu could
get four promotions in five years.

THANK YOU