Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PostgraduateSupervisionand
SupervisorDevelopment
DrAnneLee2008
UniversityofSurrey
June2008
a.lee@surrey.ac.uk
Some Influences on
Supervision
Disciplinary
pedagogy
Departmental
practices
Conceptual
approachof
supervisor
Codesofpractice
Employers/funders
requirements
Fullorparttime
students?
Experiencedor
inexperiencedstudents?
Internationalorhome
students?
PhD,professionalor
practitionerdoctorate?
Supervisor/co-supervisor
Initial questions
AsaPhDsupervisor:whatarethe
problemsthatyouhavefaced?Dothey
fallintoanycategories?
AsaPhDstudent:whatwerethe
problemsthatyoufaced?Dotheyfallinto
anycategories?
Literaturesearch
Functionalapproach(Wisker2005,EleyandJennings2005
TaylorandBeasley2005)
Qualitiesapproach(Wisker2003a,ZuberSkerrit&Roche2004)
Criticalthinking(Barnett1997,Wisker2005)
Enculturalisation(Leonard2001,Pearson&Brew2002,Lave&
Wenger1991)
Mentoring(Pearson&Kayrooz2004,Brew2001)
Feministapproach(Leonard2001)
Researchquestions
Whatconceptionsofsupervisiondo
supervisorshold?
Isthereanyrelationshipbetweenthe
conceptionsofsupervisionandthejobs
thatPhDgraduatessubsequently
undertake?
Whatarethecommonproblemsfaced?
Whattrainingforsupervisors,ifany,is
undertakenormightbehelpful
Whathasbeenyourexperienceofsupervising
PhDstudents?Howmany,howmanydifferent
typesofdoctoralstudents?
Whathaveyourstudentsgoneontodo?
HowwouldyoudefineanexcellentPhDstudent
orthesis?
Whateffectivewaysarethereofworkingwith
yourstudents?Wheredoyoubegin?Wheredo
yougothen?Howoftendoyouseethem?
Whatdoyoudo?Whatdotheydo?
Whatproblemshavearisenandhowhaveyou
copedwiththem?
Howwereyousupervisedwhenyoudidyour
PhD?
Whatdoyouthinkoftheconceptualmodels?
Functional
Enculturation Critical
Thinking
Emancipation
Relationship
Development
Supervisors
Activity
Rational
progression
throughtasks
Gatekeeping
Masterto
apprentice
Evaluation
Challenge
Mentoring,
supporting
constructivism
Supervising
by
experience,
developinga
relationship
Supervisors
knowledge &
skills
Directing,
project
management
Diagnosisof
deficiencies,
coaching
Argument,
analysis
Facilitation,
Reflection
Managing
conflict
Emotional
intelligence
Possible
student
reaction
Organised
Obedience
Role
modelling,
Apprenticeship
Constant
inquiry,fight
orflight
Personal
growth,
reframing
Agoodteam
member.
Emotional
intelligence
Functional approach
I have a weekly timetabled formal slot for them
and follow-up if they do not turn up
3 months: literature search
6 months: focus fixed,
12 months transfer report completed
In the 2nd year we see them monthly and they
produce 5000 words before each meeting
Regular pair or small group meetings with
supervisor to present findings
Enculturalisation
I would feel I had failed if they did not stay in the
field
My students all know their academic grandfather
I give my book to all my students
Students need to know what good enough
looks like
You need frequent meetings for international
students
The international student especially can
implement all your corrections and think that is
good enough.
Some cultures expect you to tell them what to do
Critical thinking
I avoid dependency by getting them to think
about some problems and giving them
resources
I want them to stand on their own feet and
challenge the thinking
My tutor was not confrontational, she
encouraged me to be critical of my own ideas
They need to explain to me why, what and how
I ask them to email me a question about their
project every week
I use magic words to help them identify the
thread in their argument eg arguably, conversely,
unanimously, essentially, early on, inevitably etc
Emancipation
Your job as a supervisor is to get them knowing
more than you
I try to get the students to take the initiative
My supervisor encouraged me to read widely,
thinking critically, find examples in newspapers
I try to get them to admit and confront their
problems
You get a lot of satisfaction, you have facilitated
that growth in them
Developing a relationship
Enthuse:You need to fire the imagination, it is
different for different students
Altruism:My supervisor helped me with my
writing but never pressed me to publish.
Encourage:Need to inspire and encourage them
to be brave in what they are thinking
Recogniseachievement:I wanted to call my
supervisor the moment I solved the tough maths
Pastoralsupport:this was as important as
intellectual support to get me through
AdvantagesandDisadvantages
Advantages
Functional
Enculturation
Critical
Thinking
Clarity
Consistency
Progresscan
bemonitored
Recordsare
available
Encourages
standards,
participation,
identity,
community
formation
Rational
Personal
inquiry,fallacy growth,ability
exposed
tocopewith
change
Lifelong
working
partnerships
Enhancedself
esteem
Lowtolerance
ofinternal
difference,
sexist,
ethnicised
regulation
(Cousin&
Deepwell
2005)
Denialof
creativity,can
belittleor
depersonalise
student
Potentialfor
harassment,
abandonment
orrejection
Disadvantages Rigiditywhen
confronted
withthe
creationof
original
knowledge
Emancipation
Toxic
mentoring
(Darling1985)
wheretutor
abusespower
Relationship
Development
Dependenceandindependence
Functional
Enculturation
Critical
Thinking
Emancipation
Relationship
Development
Dependence
Student
needs
explanation
ofstagesto
befollowed
anddirection
through
them
Student
needstobe
shownwhat
todo
Student
learnsthe
questionsto
ask,the
frameworks
toapply
Student
seeks
affirmationof
self-worth
Student
dependson
supervisors
approval
Independence
Studentcan
programme
ownwork,
followown
timetables
competently
Linkstoconceptionsofresearch
(Brew2001,Lee2008)
Functional
Enculturation
Critical
Thinking
Emancipation
DOMINO
TRADING
LAYER
JOURNEY
IN THE
FOREGROUND
IS:
Solving
problemsin
alinear
fashion
Publications,
grants,
social
networks
Datais
linked
together
withhidden
meanings
Personal
existential
issues,linked
tocareer
RESEARCH
IS:
Processof
problematisingor
solving
problems
Amarket
placefor
exchanging
ideas
Discovering Apersonal
hidden
transformative
meanings
journey
Relationship
Development
In small groups
Takeaproblemyoudescribed
earlier,oroneofthecasestudies.
Explorehowthesupervisorcould
reactusingeachapproachto
supervisioninturn
Bepreparedtosharethegroups
findings
Dependency
Notadmittingtoproblems
Poorprogress.Notunderstanding
therequiredstandardofworkand
showinginsufficientinitiative
Supervisornotinterestedintopic
Conceptualdifficulties
Differencesbetweensupervisors
Observations on training
supervisors
Supervisorshavelearnedmostfromhow
theyweresupervisedthemselves
Understandingarangeofapproachesis
important
Co-supervisioncanbehelpfuliftheroles
areclearlyallocated
Thosewhoneedtrainingcanbethemost
affrontedwhenthesuggestionismade
thattheyneedit
Occupationalinfluences
METHODS OF
SUPERVISION
department norms,
co-supervision,
team supervision,
group supervision
STUDENT
previous experience,
contacts, knowledge
aptitude, skills,
financial aims
SUPERVISORS
CONCEPTIONS
contacts, own PhD
experience
TOPIC
occupational
fertility
UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES
recruitment,
upgrading,
networking
financial support
References
BarnettR(1997)Higher Education: A Critical Business.Buckingham.SHRE/OU
BrewA(2001)ConceptionsofResearch:aphenomenographicstudy.Studiesin
HigherEducation.TaylorandFrancisOct2001,26(3),271-285,
CryerP(2006)3rdEdTheResearchStudentsGuidetoSuccessMaidenhead.
McGrawHill
DelamontS,AtkinsonP&ParryO(2000)The Doctoral Experience. Success and
Failure in Graduate School.London.FalmerPress
EleyA,JenningsR(2005)Effective Postgraduate Supervision.Maidenhead.OU
PressMcGraw-HillEducation
Lave&WengerE(1991) Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation
(Cambridge,CambridgeUniversityPress.
Lee,A.(2007).DevelopingEffectiveSupervisorsConceptsofResearch
Supervision.South African Journal of Higher Education,21(4)
Lee,A(2008)Howaredoctoralstudentssupervised?Conceptsofresearch
supervision.Studies in Higher Education33(4)
LeonardD(2001)A Womans Guide to Doctoral Studies.Buckingham.OUPress
PearsonMandBrewA(2002)Research Training and Supervision Development.
StudiesinHigherEducationVol27No22002
PearsonMandKayroozC.(2004) Enabling Critical Reflection on Research
Supervisory Practice.InternationalJournalforAcademicDevelopment9.(1)pp
99-116Routledge
TaylorSandBeasleyN(2005)A handbook for Doctoral Supervisors.Abingdon.
Routledge
WiskerG(2005)The Good Supervisor.Basingstoke.Macmillan
QualityAssuranceAgencywebsiteandcodeofgood
practiceat:
www.qaa.ac.uk
UKGradwebsiteandhandbookat:
www.grad.ac.uk/cms/ShowPage/Home_page/Resources/
Supervising_a_Doctorate/p!eXepfkk