PRESENTATION ON

A Comparative Study of
Static and Response Spectrum
Analysis
of a RC Building

PRESENTED BY
TAMEEM SAMDANEE

10.01.03.127

JOHINUL ALAM

10.01.03.036

MD. ZAHIDUL ISLAM

10.01.03.142

ABU SYED MD. TARIN

10.01.03.020

UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF

ZASIAH TAFHEEM
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, AUST

Objectives

To determine the natural period of vibrations for different mode

shapes of the comprehensive 3D using modal analysis
techniques.

To determine the storey-displacements and storey-drifts for each

storey of a six storied building.

To determine the base shears of the building under seismic

loading.

To determine the column shear forces and bending moments

following the Equivalent Static Force Method (BNBC93) and
Response Spectrum Analysis (Dynamic) using a comprehensive
3D finite element software package ETABS v13.0

To make a comparative study of the results obtained from the

static and dynamic analysis.

Methodology
In this study, a 3D symmetric model of a
six-storied building has been created
using ETABS V-13.0
The structure has a constant stiffness and
a linear behavior of all material
properties.
Equivalent Static Force Method (BNBC93)
has been used for static analysis.
Response Spectrum Method has been
used for dynamic analysis.

Earthquake
Earthquake is a series of vibrations
induced in the earths crust by the
abrupt rupture and rebound of rocks in
which elastic strain has been slowly
accumulating.
The release of the energy results in
vibratory waves propagating through
the surface in all directions.

Earthquake
Factors affecting the earthquake performance
of reinforced concrete structure:

Ductility Capacity
Effects of Drifts
P-Delta effect
Effects of strong Beams and
weak Columns

Earthquake Analysis
Techniques
Static
Analysis
Response
Spectrum
Analysis
Time History
Method

Earthquake Analysis Techniques

Static Analysis
It assumes that the building responds
in its fundamental mode.
The building must be low-rise and
must not twist significantly when the
ground moves.
Generally determines the shear acting
due to an earthquake as equivalent
static base shear.

Earthquake Analysis Techniques

Response Spectrum Analysis

The basic mode superposition method.
Restricted to linearly elastic analysis.
Produces the complete time history
response of joint displacements and
member forces.
Involves the calculation of only the
maximum values of the displacements
and member forces.

Earthquake Analysis Techniques

Time History Method

It is an analysis of the dynamic
response of the structure at each
increment of time, when its base is
subjected to a specific ground
motion time history.

Material Properties
Material Name

Concrete

Parameter

Values

Unit

Mass per unit volume

4.662

lb-s2/ft4

Weight per unit

150

lb/ft3

volume
Modulus of Elasticity

3604996.

psi

Poissons ratio

5
0.2

Concrete

3500

psi

60000

psi

compressive

Steel

strength,
Steel yield strength,

Section Properties
Section ID

Section Size (inin)

Corner Column

1212

Ext. Column

1414

Int. Column

1717

Beam

1612

Grade Beam, GB

1612

Slab Properties
Section name

Thickness

Type

Membrane: 5"
Slab

Bending: 5"

Shell

3D View of the building

Beam Layout

Column Layout

Deformed Shape (Static)

Due to EQX Load

Deformed Shape (Dynamic)

Due to Response Spectrum

Mode Shapes
Mode Name

Time Period

Frequencies

Mode 1

2.436

0.41

Mode 2

2.34

0.42

Mode 3

2.29

0.43

Mode 4

0.704

1.42

Mode 5

0.679

1.47

Mode 6

0.657

1.52

Mode 7

0.374

2.67

Mode 8

0.359

2.78

Mode 9

0.351

2.84

Mode 10

0.245

4.08

Mode 11

0.233

4.29

Mode 12

0.231

4.32

Mode Shapes
Mode- 1

Mode- 2

Mode Shapes
Mode- 3

Mode- 4

Mode Shapes
Mode- 5

Mode- 6

Mode Shapes
Mode- 7

Mode- 8

Mode Shapes
Mode- 9

Mode- 10

Mode Shapes
Mode- 11

Mode- 12

Comparative Study
Storey Displacements

Comparative Study
Storey Drifts

Comparative Study
Maximum Storey Displacement

Comparative Study
Base Shears

Comparative Study
Shear Forces (Corner Columns)

Comparative Study
Shear Forces (Exterior Columns)

Comparative Study
Shear Forces (Interior Columns)

Comparative Study
Maximum Shear Forces

Comparative Study
Total Shear Forces

Comparative Study
Bending Moments (Corner Columns)

Comparative Study
Bending Moments (Exterior Columns)

Comparative Study
Bending Moments (Interior Columns)

Comparative Study
Maximum Column Bending Moments

Conclusion
In the study of Maximum displacement of storey

comparison between static and dynamic, we find

dynamic is 276 percent of static analysis.
In the study of Storey drift comparison between static

and dynamic, we find dynamic is 301 percent of static

analysis.
In the study of Maximum Bending moment of column,

the percentage of dynamic is 204% for corner, 239%

for exterior, 210% for interior of Static analysis.
In the study of Maximum shear forces of columns,

dynamic is almost 286 percent of static analysis for

all columns.

Recommendation
Dynamic analysis may be done by other

methods.
Structures of nonlinear materials may be

introduced for further analysis and design.

Irregular shaped structure may be introduced

for further analysis and design.

Dynamic analysis may be introduced for further

analysis and design.

Commercial buildings may be introduced for

further analysis and design.

THANK YOU