Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Workshop Objectives
Become familiar with the utility and
limitations of case study research
Become familiar with the design,
implementation, and analysis of a
case study
Practice designing a case study using
a real world example
Case Study Workshop, 2007
John C. Bliss, Oregon State University
Workshop Outline
Workshop Programme
Wednesday, June 13, Morning
8:30 Introductions, Learning objectives, course
schedule
Asking effective research questions
Matching methods to questions
What is a case study?
Case study components
10:00 Break
Case study design
Background on nursery case study exercise
Preparation for field exercise
12:00 Lunch
Case Study Workshop, 2007
John C. Bliss, Oregon State University
Workshop Programme
Wednesday, June 13, Afternoon
1:00 Transport to Inopacan, Leyte
Tour nursery
Discussion with nursery project participants
3:00
Return to campus
Meet with participants from second nursery
project
Discussion
5:00 Adjourn
Workshop Programme
Thursday, June 14, Morning
8:30 Preparation for group presentations
Groups assemble case study plans
10:30 Break
Group presentations
Discussion
12:30 Lunch
Tuesday Afternoon
1:30 Interviews and field notes
Data analysis, Coding
3:00 Break
Generalizing from case studies
Judging case study design quality
Questions, comments, discussion
5:30 Adjourn
Case Study Workshop, 2007
John C. Bliss, Oregon State University
Don
e
Generate
Hypotheses
Explain
Relationships
Depth
Primary Approach:
Qualitative
Scale of Target
Population
Rel.
Small
Ethnograp
hic
Methods
Rel.
Large
Structured
Group
Existing Data
Adequate?
No
Principle
Purpose?
Test Hypotheses
Estimate
Parameters
Breadth
Primary Approach:
Survey
Scale of Target
Population
Rel.
Small
Door-toDoor
Rel.
Large
Telephone,
Mail
Application
Limitations
Secondary Data
Historical
Census
Previous research
Availability and
relevance of existing
data
Ethnographic
Participant
observation
Case study
Oral history
Key informant
Explain experience
and values of specific
target population,
identify relationships,
understand issues in
context
Time requirement,
limited capacity to
generalize, lack of
formal analytical
procedures
Structured Group
Focus group
Nominal group
Delphi
Establish problems
boundaries and topics
for further research
Limited capacity to
generalize
Survey
Telephone
Mail
Door to door
Estimate general
parameters of large
population, rigorous
statistical analysis
A priori knowledge
required, limited
capacity to explain,
declining response
rates
Qualitative
Standardized Survey
Purpose
Describe, estimate
population parameters,
test hypotheses
Design
Inductive, flexible
Deductive, rigid
Sample
Selective
Random
Questions
Informant-driven,
Why? What? How?
Predetermined,
How many/much?
Unit of
analysis
Individual, case
Trait
Data
Multiple instruments
Single instrument
Analysis
Uncodified
Formal
Results
Depth, particulars
Breadth,
generalizations
Research Syndromes
Best Available Data
The Hammer and the Nail
The Streetlight Syndrome
Excessive Expertise
Triangulation
Key informant interviews
Literature
Census data
Content analysis of
newspapers
Household survey
GIS analysis
Historical accounts
5.
6.
7.
8.
Questions to Ponder
Whats going on here?
What is this an example of? What
does this illustrate?
Who are we hearing from?
Who arent we hearing from?
Who stands to gain?
Who stands to lose?
Case Study Workshop, 2007
John C. Bliss, Oregon State University
Data Analysis
Data management
To record or not to record
Transcribing interviews
Coding
Pattern recognition
Writing as analysis
Case Study Workshop, 2007
John C. Bliss, Oregon State University
Coding Text
Increasing Abstraction
Themes
or
Networks
Selective
Coding
Families
Axial
Coding
Open
Coding
Interview Text
Case Study Workshop, 2007
John C. Bliss, Oregon State University
Theme
Increasing abstraction
Coded text
Construct validity
Internal validity
Pattern matching
Rival explanations
Logic models
External validity
Reliability