Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Index
> CTg Troubleshooting Analysis
Accessibilty
Mobility
Retainability
Quality
Traffic
Congestion/Load
Example 1 (1/4)
RRC Failure cause 3 - Unspecified
> Problem description
One operator has experienced sometimes a high number of
RRC.FailConnEstab.3 (cause: unspecified). Below you can see in
example the results coming from on RNC during one week.
These failures were localized in some FddCells, on which we have
activated a CTg on the 9th of August.
Example UA4.1
(Other operator)
5
Example 1 (2/4)
RRC Failure cause 3 - Unspecified
Call Flow:
From DRF we have seen that one of the sites involved is:
Example UA4.1
(Other operator)
Example 1 (3/4)
RRC Failure cause 3 - Unspecified
Call Flow:
Example UA4.1
(Other operator)
Historical Fault Browser:
Example 1 (4/4)
RRC Failure cause 3 - Unspecified
>Conclusions
The counter RRC.FailConnEstab.3 (cause:
unspecified) is incremented when an RRC
Connection Reject (cause: unspecified) is sent
from the RNC to the UE. This happens when the
RNC receives no answer, from the NodeB, to a
Radio Link Setup Request.
A possible root cause of this can be an
hardware issue, as a link not stable.
Example 2 (1/7)
PS RRC Burst of failures
> Problem description
Usually the number of failures is very low, but sometimes happens a cell is affected by a
burst of failures. The cell is almost randomly every time, so this suggests a UE issue.
Sometimes this problem cause a lot of failures (>100 in a 15 minutes period) on the cells
X, but also is present, with less percentage, in the neighbours of cell X.
> Detection
> Investigation
Once time the alarm appears on the Alarm Monitoring, the following is a needed:
Activate an OTCell Trace in the cell identified by the alarm (1 hour)
Possibility also to activate Iub trace in this cell to find the IMSI
Example 2 (2/7)
Alarm
Example 2 (3/7)
CTg Analysis
Example UA4.1
(Other operator)
CTg Results:
C all_ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
11
O utput
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Normal T raffic Release
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Access Fail ure
Normal T raffic Release
Normal T raffic Release
Normal T raffic Release
Normal T raffic Release
TimeInt
Durati on
14:01:20.002
6.045
14:04:21.806
4.08
14:05:13.617
4.08
14:05:51.725
4.06
14:06:36.845
4.06
14:09:28.694
4.06
14:10:16.566
4.06
14:10:54.386
1.26
14:11:31.413
4.06
14:12:50.583
4.06
14:14:44
4.08
14:15:28.252
4.08
14:16:14.112
4.08
14:17:17.702
4.08
14:25:37.898
4.38
14:34:58.866
4.18
14:45:57.723
3.92
14:56:15.017
4.2
T_MSI
P_TMSI
18 00 6e 95
UNK
18 00 6e 95
UNK
18 00 6e 95
UNK
18 00 6e 95
UNK
18 00 6e 95
UNK
18 00 6e 95
UNK
18 00 6e 95
UNK
26 00 c7 b0
UNK
18 00 6e 95
UNK
18 00 6e 95
UNK
UNK
0b 13 39 3f
UNK
0b 13 39 3f
UNK
0b 13 39 3f
10 01 9e e2
UNK
30 00 c3 40
UNK
0e 02 48 de
UNK
56 00 6d c3
UNK
4c 00 35 2f
UNK
Channel
SnapshotCNode
SnapshotCNode
Nbap
Nbap
Rrc
Nbap
Nbap
Message
SnapRrcStart
SnapRLinkStart
NbapRadLinkSetupReq
NbapRadLinkSetupResp
RrcConSetup
NbapRadLinkDelReq
NbapRadLinkDelResp
Example 2 (4/7)
Counter Analysis
Example UA4.1
(Other operator)
12
Example 2 (5/7)
First comments
Example UA4.1
(Other operator)
> The Call Flow its the normal one you have in cases of
RRC Repetitions. Note that the CTg considers each RRC
Repetition as a new call, with a different TK.
> Despite the fact we have had 112 failures during the
quarter 14:00 14:15, the CTg has been able to capture
just 10 AF.
> The agreed procedure was to purge immediately the
SGSN, in order to get the IMSI from the P-TMSI. But in
reality the UE is giving its TMSI. Indeed the spec confirms
that, also in case of PS Calls (in this case Originating
Interactive Calls), the TMSI is passed (see backup slide).
13
Example 2 (6/7)
USGSN Collected Database
> Collect the data from the SGSN
> P-TMSI: 0b13393f
> IMSI: 234159026600909
Example UA4.1
(Other operator)
14
Example 2 (7/7)
Backup Selection of initial UE identity
> The purpose of the IE "Initial UE identity" is to provide a unique UE
identification at the establishment of an RRC connection. The type of
identity shall be selected by the UE according to the following.
> Upper layers shall set the variable SELECTED_PLMN. If the variable
SELECTED_PLMN in the UE indicates "GSM-MAP", the UE shall
choose "UE id type" in the IE "Initial UE identity" with the following
priority:
1. TMSI (GSM-MAP): The TMSI (GSM-MAP) shall be chosen if available.
The IE "LAI" in the IE "Initial UE identity" shall also be present when TMSI
(GSM-MAP) is used, for making it unique.
2. P-TMSI (GSM-MAP): The P-TMSI (GSM-MAP) shall be chosen if
available and no TMSI (GSM-MAP) is available. The IE "RAI" in the IE "Initial
UE identity" shall in this case also be present when P-TMSI (GSM-MAP) is
used, for making it unique.
3. IMSI (GSM-MAP): The IMSI (GSM-MAP) shall be chosen if available and
no TMSI (GSM-MAP) or P-TMSI is available.
4. IMEI: The IMEI shall be chosen when none of the above three conditions
are fulfilled.
15
Example 3
PS RRC burst due to mobile issue
> A single user can create more than 3000 PS RRC failures in 1 hour
( number depends on the user that may switch off the data card or
force it to camp in GSM)
> Traces confirm that what was captured with PrOptima refers to a
single user. P-TMSI were tracked down, the UE turned out to be a the
same data card in both cases. IMEI TAC for this (351969) shows it is
an Option colt 3G card which are actually old products
> When an old Data card comes to UMTS ( from 2G), it will create
hundreds of RRC failures that creates a huge degradation on the
serving cell RRC PS metric and even affects the RNC RRC PS metric
during a short time (usually less than 1 hour)
> Old data cards not supporting SCCPCHclassid = 1 was the final
reason of these failures
PSStreamingFail_Ca
ll_FlowCompa...
16
Example UA4.2
(Other operator)
Retainability troubleshooting
Astelia Trace Analyzer based
Example 2 (1/4)
The Blackberry (RIM) behaviour
UE
SGSN
RNC
Service Request (Data)
Security & Authentication Function
RRC: Signaling
Connection Release
Indication
RRC: Release
RRC: Release Complete
18
Iu Release Request: UE
Generated Signaling
Connection Release
Iu Release Command
Iu Release Complete
Example UA4.2
(Other operator)
Periodically, the blackberry reestablish the
connection to the Network for small data
transfer (about 3.5sec).
When the data transfer is finished, the UE
originates a RRC Release with the
message RRC: Signaling Connection
Release Indication (as explained in 3GPP
TS 25.331 8.1.14
When receiving this message, the RNC
initiates a Iu Release Request, with cause:
UE Generated Signaling Connection
Release
This is considered by Nortel as an
abnormal release and thus, the following
counters are pegged:
VS.IuAbnormRelReq (#547) at Cell level
VS.IuAbnormalReleaseRequest (#534) at
RNC level
According to previous formulas, this
behavior is considered as a drop PS !
There is a wrong information is NTP 4118111-822, Table 51: the cause is included
in abnormal release, whereas NTP says
the opposite
Example 1 (2/4)
Impact of the Blackberry behaviour on the 24th
>60% of the
drops on the 24th
are generated by
only 9 UEs.
>8 UEs have the
blackberry
behavior
Example UA4.2
(Other operator)
The cause UE Generated
Signaling Connection Release is
responsible of 57% of the
abnormal releases
19
1 is a Motorola
UE (by IMEI)
not supporting
the granted
RAB (capability
check feature
was not
activated on
this RNC)
Example 1 (3/4)
The IMSI 206105100465005 behavior
UE
SGSN
RNC
Attach Request (Follow-On pending)
Security & Authentication Function
Attach Accept
Attach Complete
Activate PDP Context Request
RAB Assignment
Response: Failure in Radio
Interface Procedure
Iu Release Request:
Failure in Radio
Interface Procedure
Iu Release Command
Iu Release Complete
Example UA4.2
(Other operator)
Example 1 (4/4)
The Blackberry (RIM) behaviour
> In order to remove the Release99 PS Drops "invented" by Black Berry 8707 mobiles
> mbk_42_Iu008_Fcell&RNC_PS R99DL%Iu Abnormal Release Request
061024 BRL
reduced by
'VS.IuReleaseRequestPs.UeGeneratedSignallingConnectionRelease'[FddCell,Time]
because of RIM 8707
>
> mbk_42_Iu008_Fcell&RNC_PS%Iu Abnormal Release Request
061024 BRL
reduced by
'VS.IuReleaseRequestPs.UeGeneratedSignallingConnectionRelease'[FddCell,Time]
because of RIM 8707
>
MBK metrics
21
3G 2G Mobility troubleshooting
CT based
95.00%
90.00%
85.00%
80.00%
75.00%
27/02/06 28/02/06 1/03/06
2/03/06
3/03/06
4/03/06
5/03/06
24
6/03/06
7/03/06
8/03/06
Example UA4.2
(Other operator)
Example 1 (2/6)
CTG on RNC before changing MSC timer
25
time
17:47:20.096
17:47:20.570
17:47:20.930
17:47:21.410
17:47:21.930
17:47:22.410
17:47:22.930
17:47:23.410
17:47:23.930
17:47:23.931
17:47:23.932
17:47:24.414
17:47:24.414
17:47:24.682
17:47:24.683
17:47:25.856
17:47:25.857
17:47:25.919
17:47:26.611
17:47:26.611
17:47:26.612
17:47:26.663
17:47:27.135
17:47:27.614
17:47:27.615
17:47:27.666
17:47:28.089
17:47:28.611
17:47:28.612
17:47:28.669
17:47:29.130
17:47:29.614
17:47:29.620
17:47:29.620
17:47:30.135
17:47:30.377
17:47:30.615
17:47:31.091
17:47:31.570
17:47:31.570
17:47:32.091
17:47:32.091
17:47:32.569
17:47:32.570
17:47:33.090
17:47:33.091
17:47:33.092
17:47:33.573
17:47:33.574
17:47:33.780
17:47:33.781
17:47:33.781
17:47:33.781
message
NbapCompressedModeCommand
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
GSMMeas
RanapRelocReq
RrcMeasReport
GSMMeas
RanapRelocCmd
RrcHoFromUtranCmd
RrcHoFromUtranFail
RanapRelocCancel
RanapRelocCancelAck
RrcMeasReport
GSMMeas
RanapRelocReq
RanapRelocPrepFail
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RanapRelocReq
RanapRelocPrepFail
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RanapRelocReq
RanapRelocPrepFail
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasCont
NbapCompressedModeCommand
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasCont
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
GSMMeas
RrcMeasReport
GSMMeas
RrcMeasReport
GSMMeas
RrcMeasReport
GSMMeas
RanapRelocReq
RrcMeasReport
GSMMeas
RanapRelocCmd
Change Value
Change State
RrcHoFromUtranCmd
comment
New pattern
New pattern
Success
95.00%
90.00%
85.00%
80.00%
75.00%
70.00%
65.00%
60.00%
17 Apr 06 18 Apr 06 19 Apr 06 20 Apr 06 21 Apr 06 22 Apr 06 23 Apr 06 24 Apr 06 25 Apr 06 26 Apr 06 27 Apr 06 28 Apr 06 29 Apr 06 30 Apr 06
41_HHO 3G2G CS Execution Success Ratio
26
27
RrcUL-DCCH
Ranap
Ranap
RrcUL-DCCH
Rrc
Rrc
Ranap
Ranap
RrcUL-DCCH
Rrc
Rrc
RrcUL-DCCH
Rrc
Rrc
Ranap
RrcUL-DCCH
Rrc
Rrc
Ranap
Internal
Internal
RrcDL-DCCH
RrcUL-DCCH
Rrc
Rrc
Ranap
RrcHoFromUtranFail
RanapRelocCancel
RanapRelocCancelAck
RrcMeasReport
intraFrequencyMeas
GSMMeas
RanapRelocReq
RanapRelocPrepFail
RrcMeasReport
intraFrequencyMeas
GSMMeas
RrcMeasReport
intraFrequencyMeas
GSMMeas
RanapRelocReq
RrcMeasReport
intraFrequencyMeas
GSMMeas
RanapRelocCmd
Change Value
Change State
RrcHoFromUtranCmd
RrcMeasReport
intraFrequencyMeas
GSMMeas
RanapIuRelCmd
[503 CI: 9722] [ 72:-8 dB -110dBm 1:33791] [ 88:-10 dB -112dBm 1:33023] {IRAT 12
PRIMARY: 72, ACTIVE: 88,
[503 CI: 9722] [ 72:-8 dB -111dBm 1:33791] [ 88:-11 dB -114dBm 1:33024] {IRAT 12
PRIMARY: 72, ACTIVE: 88,
[503 CI: 9722] [ 72:-8 dB -111dBm 1:33791] [ 88:-12 dB -114dBm 1:33022] {IRAT 12
PRIMARY: 72, ACTIVE: 88,
[503 CI: 9722] [ 72:-8 dB -111dBm 1:33791] [ 88:-11 dB -114dBm 1:33024] {IRAT 12
MSC timer has expired
PRIMARY: 72, ACTIVE: 88,
message
RrcMeasCont
RrcMeasCont
RrcMeasCont
NbapCompressedModeCommand
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RrcMeasReport
RanapRelocReq
RrcMeasReport
RanapRelocCmd
RrcHoFromUtranCmd
RrcHoFromUtranFail
RanapRelocCancel
RanapRelocCancelAck
RrcWrongPdu
RrcMeasReport
RanapRelocReq
RrcMeasReport
RanapRelocCmd
RrcHoFromUtranCmd
RrcMeasReport
RrcHoFromUtranFail
Comment
[503 CI: 9722] S3[InterRAT]: compres mode activation cellid=12 is sent with bcch=101
HHO to BCCH=104 ( CoreNAS data encapsulated) but this frequency is not the one measured by the UE
cause physical channel failure that is logical
28
29
Example UA4.0
(Other operator)
V1.01
Content
> HHO Metrics-General Status
> HHO Preparation Analysis and Results
> CTG Analysis and Results
Relocation Preparation Failures
Physical Synchronization GSM Channel Failures
31
32
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Cell level
Counters
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Selected Cells
CTG Odinium
33
34
35
36
3gto2gHoDetectionFromFddcell
ALL
35000
100%
95%
90%
85%
80%
75%
70%
65%
60%
55%
50%
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
04/06/2005
03/06/2005
02/06/2005
01/06/2005
31/05/2005
30/05/2005
29/05/2005
28/05/2005
27/05/2005
26/05/2005
25/05/2005
24/05/2005
23/05/2005
22/05/2005
21/05/2005
20/05/2005
19/05/2005
18/05/2005
17/05/2005
16/05/2005
All the metrics indicate a constant behavior of the 3G2G HHO events
Average HHO 3G2G Cs Success Rate is 76.86% 1.41 (too low mainly cause by low execution
success rate ).
Average HHO 3G2G Cs Preparation Success Rate is 94.35% 0.64. Can be Improved!
Average HHO 3G2G Cs Execution Success Rate is 81.82% 1.24. Network has good Execution
Success rate in 3G, averaging 96.16% 0.35, but is bad for the Execution Success Rate in 2G
85.09 1.07
37
38
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Cell level
Counters
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Selected Cells
CTG Odinium
39
40
41
42
43
Preparation part
44
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Cell level
Counters
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Selected Cells
CTG Odinium
45
Relocation time-out
Relocation already in progress
Relocation failure in target system
Relocation unable to establish
Other Relocation failure
Comments:
No Screening for Relocation Command Failures, Only Other Relocation Failures
Low Avg HHO Detection 3G2G counted for All Cells: Max[22.16] and Min[0.05]
Only 1 cell over 19 of HHO Detect with Good HHO Prep Success Rate.
No Problematic cell were founded.
Notes:
PDF: Probabilistic Distribution Function
CDF: Cumulative Distribution Function)
Prep Suc Rate (Avg): 3G2G Cs HHO Preparation Success Rate Fdd Cell Level
46
Comments:
No Screening for Relocation Command Failures, Only Other Relocation Failures
Low Avg HHO Detection 3G2G counted for All Cells: Max[23.74] and Min[0.05]
5 cells over 19 of HHO Detect with Good HHO Prep Success Rate.
1 Cell was considered for evaluation
Notes:
PDF: Probabilistic Distribution Function
CDF: Cumulative Distribution Function)
Prep Suc Rate (Avg): 3G2G Cs HHO Preparation Success Rate Fdd Cell Level
47
Comments:
Attempts are not constant during this period but some days de rate fall down
48
Comments:
No Screening for Relocation Command Failures, Only Other Relocation Failures
Avg HHO Detection 3G2G counted for All Cells: Max[198.4] and Min[0.05]
35 cells over 19 of HHO Detect with Good HHO Prep Success Rate
between [91-100%]
One FDD Cells was consider for further analysis (0%).
Notes:
PDF: Probabilistic Distribution Function
CDF: Cumulative Distribution Function)
49Prep Suc Rate (Avg): 3G2G Cs HHO Preparation Success Rate Fdd Cell Level
Comments:
No HHO relocation Commands for this cell even there were HHO Detection
50
Comments:
No Screening for Relocation Command Failures, Only Other Relocation Failures
Avg HHO Detection 3G2G counted for All Cells: Max[47] and Min[0.05]
8 cells over 19 of HHO Detect with Good HHO Prep Success Rate
between [95-100%] and 1 cell with 79%
Notes:
PDF: Probabilistic Distribution Function
CDF: Cumulative Distribution Function)
51Prep Suc Rate (Avg): 3G2G Cs HHO Preparation Success Rate Fdd Cell Level
52
Comments:
No Screening for Relocation Command Failures, Only Other Relocation Failures
Avg HHO Detection 3G2G counted for All Cells: Max[446.05] and Min[0.05]
12 cells over 19 of HHO Detect with Good HHO Prep Success Rate
between [95-99%]
No Problematic cell were founded.
Notes:
PDF: Probabilistic Distribution Function
CDF: Cumulative Distribution Function)
53Prep Suc Rate (Avg): 3G2G Cs HHO Preparation Success Rate Fdd Cell Level
Comments:
No Screening for Relocation Command Failures, Only Other Relocation Failures
Avg HHO Detection 3G2G counted for All Cells: Max[428.8] and Min[0.05]
26 cells over 19 of HHO Detect with Good HHO Prep Success Rate
between [91-98%] and 2 cells with 83% and 90%
4 Problematic cell were founded.
Notes:
PDF: Probabilistic Distribution Function
CDF: Cumulative Distribution Function)
54Prep Suc Rate (Avg): 3G2G Cs HHO Preparation Success Rate Fdd Cell Level
Comments:
3G2G preparation success rate is constant trend line is following the main value (83%), need further investigation
55
56
57
Comments:
No Screening for Relocation Command Failures, Only Other Relocation Failures
Avg HHO Detection 3G2G counted for All Cells: Max[441.63] and Min[0.05]
29 cells over 19 of HHO Detect with Good HHO Prep Success Rate
between [92-98%] and 6 cells problematic cells with {61,63,73,77,78,81}
Respectively.
Notes:
PDF: Probabilistic Distribution Function
CDF: Cumulative Distribution Function)
58Prep Suc Rate (Avg): 3G2G Cs HHO Preparation Success Rate Fdd Cell Level
59
60
Comments:
No Screening for Relocation Command Failures, Only Other Relocation Failures
Avg HHO Detection 3G2G counted for All Cells: Max[423.85] and Min[0.05]
58 cells over 19 of HHO Detect with Good HHO Prep Success Rate
between [91-100%] and 2 cells problematic cells with {90%}
Respectively.
3 problematic cells were found
Notes:
PDF: Probabilistic Distribution Function
CDF: Cumulative Distribution Function)
61Prep Suc Rate (Avg): 3G2G Cs HHO Preparation Success Rate Fdd Cell Level
62
63
Preparation part
65
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Cell level
Counters
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Selected Cells
CTG Odinium
66
Notes:
-.Hhoff (Multiservice): CS12V+SBR
(LAU, RAU or Both).
-.There were 26 FddCell with success
HHO not displayed but included in the
total account. Because they were not
included in the List for CTG
67
68
Notes:
-.DifGSM ch: Different GSM Target Channel
-.SameGSMch: Same GSM Target Channel
69
Notes:
-.Only cells with HHO prep failure were
displayed
70
71
72
Preparation part
73
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Cell level
Counters
Action
CS 3G2GPreparation
Analysis Selected Cells
CTG Odinium
74
> All Failures (any Cause) happened during the Synchronization of the
GSM Channel: Ue return to Utran with rrcUtranCommandFailure
Cause: Physical Channel Failure
75
76
77
Caus e Analys is
RNC6 HHOAnalys i...
Action Points
> Troubleshoot on 2G the Physical Channel Failure:
Evaluate drive test data on 2G during the Handover
detection process for the mobiles currently used on the
network
> Evaluate or Verified the Configuration and Parameter for
the GSM cells detected.
> Get counter o data of HHO activity from the 2G side
(Access7, Counters, other) in order to detect were is failing
the Relocation when finally success in the same GSM cell.
78
79