Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Supervised by:
Professor Dr. Md. Mostafizur
Rahman
Presented By:
Sharmila Taluckder
Roll no:1109041
Course no:4000
OUTLINES
Introduction
General structure of patch
Feeding methods
Coupling & circular polarization
Antenna design & description
Simulation & parameter calculation
Results
Future work
Conclusions
INTRODUCTION
FEEDING METHODS
Two types of feeding methods in patch antennaContacting methods: RF power fed directly to radiating patch
using connecting element.
1. Micro-strip line feed
2. Coaxial probe feed
Non-contacting methods: Power transferred between micro-strip
line & radiating patch through electromagnetic coupling.
1. Aperture coupling feed
2. Proximity coupling feed
Advantage:
Can be etched on same substrate
Easy feeding scheme & simplicity un modeling
Disadvantage:
As thickness of dielectric substrate increases, it
hampers the bandwidth of antenna
Advantages:
Can be placed any desired location inside patch
Easy to fabricate & low spurious radiation
Disadvantages:
Narrow bandwidth & difficult to model
Input impedance become more inductive for thicker substrates
When
CONTINUE
Circular polarization: Electric field varies in two orthogonal
planes with same magnitude & 90 degree phase difference.
When phases are 0 & -90 degree ,called Right hand circular
polarization.
When phases are 0 & 90 degree ,called Left hand circular
polarization.
ANTENNA DESIGN
40mm
10mm
5mm
40mm
8mm
10mm
Single
10mm
feed
ANTENNA DESCRIPTION
In the proposed antenna design concept is something like sandwich.
have a top FR-4 substrate then Ground plane at the middle and
then Teflon at the bottom.
Teflon isolates ground plane from human body, to avoid direct
electrical contact..
Four small patches connected to small square loop with coupling.
Antenna is fed at quadrant IV.
Single Feed circular polarization is obtained from coaxial probe
feed.
Feeding arrangement:
Outer cover is metal called Cover pin & used for ground.
At middle is called Teflon pin & used for isolating ground and
main feed
At centre is Metal pin and used for main signal.
11
If S11=0 dB, all the power is reflected from antenna and nothing is radiated.
If S11=-10 dB, implies that if 3 dB of power is delivered to antenna, -7 dB is
reflected power
For ideal antenna ,S11 is less than -10 dB.
12
CONTINUE.
CONTINUE
Reflection
coefficient:.
Mismatch loss:
Amount of power is lost due to impedance mismatch
Mismatch loss in dB = 10log(1- )
Antenna efficiency:
Relates power delivered to antenna & radiated or
dissipated within antenna.
If most power is radiated ,antenna is high efficient
If most power is absorbed as losses, antenna is low
efficient.
Total efficiency
Radiation efficiency.
14
CONTINUE
Antenna Gain:
15
CONTINUE
Directivity:
Measures power density of antenna radiates in direction
of its strongest emission, versus power density radiated
by idealisotropic radiator.
Directivity of proposed antenna is 7.67 dBi.
16
CONTINUE.
Axial
ratio:
It is the ratio of orthogonal components of an E-field.
From this figure, axial ratio is 2.67 dB
Axial ratio 3dB means circular polarization
17
RESULTS
FUTURE WORK
Modify
Modify antenna
antenna configuration
configuration
Shift
Shift resonant
resonant frequency
frequency to
to medical
medical
band
band
Implement
Implement proposed
proposed antenna
antenna in
in
human
human body
body
Comparison
Comparison of
of simulated
simulated &
&
measured
measured results
results
19
CONCLUSION
20
REFERENCES
www.antenna-theory.com
Antenna theory analysis and design by
CONSTANTINE A. BALANIS
www.wikipedia.com
W. Greatbatch and C. F. Homlmes, History of implantable devices,
IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3841, Sep. 1991.
G. J. S. and N. H. Lovell, CMOS neurostimulation ASIC with
100 channels, scaleable output, and bidirectional radio- frequency
telemetry.
Z. M. Chen, K. W. Cheng, Y. J. Zheng, and M. Je, A 3.4 mW 54.24
Mbps burst-mode injection-locked CMOS FSK transmitter, in Proc.
IEEE Asian Solid State Circuits Conf., Nov. 1416, 2011, pp. 289292.
F. Merli, B. Fuchs, J. R. Rosig, and A. K. Skrivervik, The effect of
insulating layers on the performance of implanted antennas, IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 2131, Jan. 2011.
21
22