Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
March 15 , 2010
•Introduction
•
•Strategic Leadership
•
•Business Model
•
•Entrepreneurial Application in a Real Case
ØCurrent Position
Ø
Ø
ØGreatest Leadership Challenge
Ø
ØBiggest Leadership Question
Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, developers of the Balanced Scorecard, found in
their research that the execution of business strategies is quite poor:
•86% of executive teams spend less than one hour per month discussing strategy
-performance scorecard
Results -key milestones achieved
-overall goals achieved
•Introduction
•
•Strategic Leadership
•
•Business Model
•
•Entrepreneurial Application in a Real Case
or Intangible Assets?
Tangible Intangible
Assets Assets
Capital Strategy Leadership
Governance
Plants
Organization
Equipment
Culture
Technology
Processes
Raw Materials
Intellectual Capital
Receivables
People Capabilities
Inventory
Results
11
Lou
Gerstner Larry Miller Late Mary Kay Ash Lee Raymond
Former IBM CEO Auto Conglomerate Mary Kay Cosmetics Former ExxonMobil CEO
12
13
14
20%
High Performers Murphy
Petro-Canada
15% Imperial
Apache
7-Year TRS CAGR (5/96 –5/03)
Total
Devon Encana
ExxonMobil ENI CNR
10% Anadarko
Talisman
BP Super-majors (for
Repsol Occidental EOG comparative purposes)
Burlington
ChevronTexaco
Marathon
ConocoPhillips Woodside Independent Oil
5%
RD Nexen
Shell
company Peer group
-5%
Husky
-10%
5-Year TRS CAGR (5/98 –5/03)
15
Source: High Performance Study of Independent Oil Companies, 2004
Copyright © 2007 Organization Performance
Proprietary & confidential Strategies All Rights Reserved
information
These key attributes stood out as differentiators in the high performers
among the top independent oil companies
Key Attributes Summary Differentiating Characteristics for Independent Oil Companies
Leadership • Hands on management, driving both the company strategy and day-to-day operations
Organization & • Small, highly networked structure for quick decision making and accountability
Governance • Highly effective teamwork that goes beyond formally assigned teams
Source: “Big Thinkers” Howes, Downie, Adams, 2004 Proprietary & confidential information
Tangible or Intangible Assets
17
Leadership
Competencies
Leadership Code
(Common) X Leadership
Differentiators
Approximately 65 % Approximately 35 %
18
18
Proprietary & confidential information
Leadership Model Drivers (Leadership Research)
This organization is known for Leaders at this organization are known for
Wal-mart Always low prices Managing costs efficiently, getting things done on time
FedEx Absolutely, positively, doing whatever it takes Managing logistics, meeting deadlines, solving problems
quickly
Lexus Pursuit of perfection Managing quality processes (lean manufacturing and
design, Six Sigma) for continuous improvement
Procter & Brands you know and trust Developing consumer insights, precisely targeted
Gamble marketing, product innovation
McKinsey CEO’s trusted adviser Leading teams that deconstruct business problems,
synthesize data, and develop solutions
Boeing People working together as a global enterprise for Solving global problems, working as teams, possessing
aerospace leadership technical excellence in aerospace
Apple Innovation and design Creating new products and services that break the industry
norms
PepsiCo Appealing to the younger generation Building the next generation of talent
19
19
Company P/E ratio of company for the past 10 P/E ratio of industry (not counting the firm) for the Market Capital
years past 10 years (in Billions)
X
Company
Performance & Safety People & Team
Execution Leadership Development
Capabilitie
s
21
X Company
Leadership
Strategic Planning & Strategic Direction & Capabilities Customer
Customer Service
Alignment Change Focus
Capability Customer
Relationship
Development & Mgt Management
Leading Change
22
23
•Introduction
•
•Strategic Leadership
•
•Business Model
•
•Entrepreneurial Application in a Real Case
24
Definitions:
Business Model: The strategic approach to create value for the shareholders and other
stakeholders across the value chain focused on the external marketplace
Operating Model: The organization approach to deliver the vision, strategy and business
model through internal roles, capabilities and infrastructure
25
Positional
Structure
This Business and Operating
Model provide the framework
for what the organization Functional Structure
(Including Design
should accomplish and the key Criteria)
roles of functions and
individuals Business and Operating Model
“EYC uses a systematic four (4) level approach to develop the operating model and organization
structure”
26
§ Develop R&D § Direct contact with customers § Some services/products are § Call Center
outsourced, while some are
§ Technology Partners (providing § Responding to RFP’s § Ongoing people to provide
delivered by STS team
selective, specific products) support
§ Account Management
§Compose teams with different skill
§ Products are customized to
§ Industry Focus sets
industry groups
§ Project Management
§ Technologies from different
partners are integrated.
27
Acquisitio
Opportunit Capability
Business n Monitor &
y Expansion &
Growth Assimilati Expansion
Identificati Acquisition
Strategy on &
on
Integration
m
M
C
A
tS
g
n
s
y
e
a rIio
,d
Business
Development Service
Project Design & Material/
& Project Extension - -
Tendering & Engineerin Resources
Sector Execution Operate &
Planning g Acquisition
Growth Maintain
Strategy
28
Value
Value Chain
Chain Components
Components
o
a n
d
tifc
”I e n
toA
&
u
q
is
c
”
“BG
roS
g
in
eu
y
a
s
”w
th “O n
rtu
iy o
p “C
E
x o
n
b
p
s
ilty
a “A
A
n
to&
u
qm
la
is
c g
Ie
r” “M
itr&
E
p
x n
o
s
a
”
1 1 1
Strategic
Strategic Planning
Planning 5 9
Market
Market Research
Research 1 4
Making
Making Acquisition
Acquisition Offer
Offer Leader
Leader Alignment
Alignment Performance
Performance Monitoring
Monitoring
6 1 1
2 .. 1
Vertical
Vertical Integration
Integration 2 Financial
Financial &
& Technical
Technical 5
Feasibility
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 0 Negotiating Terms & Value
Value Extensions
Extensions
Analysis
Analysis Negotiating Terms & Integration
Integration Planning
Conditions
Conditions Planning
1
3 7 3Organization
Opportunity
Opportunity Access
Access Organization && Cultural
Cultural
Equity
Equity &
& Financial
Financial Integration
Integration
Management
Management
8
Acquisition
Acquisition Offer
Offer
4 Development
IPO
IPO Development
Development Development
iog
ra m
C
p
In
tes
M
C
A
n
y
am
tS
,d
g
s
er
29
Value
Value Chain
Chain Components
Components
tM
in
a
ig
nP
la O
t&
ra
e
p
S
aw
thG
&
g
e
ro
y & T
rig
d
n
e n
isto
uA
cq E
n
tio
cu
xe sio
- n E
xte
ciB C
oDm
vlp
stru
ne je
ct P
ro d
a
n D
sig
e
r ril/R
so M
u
te
a
c je
ct P
ro S
e
rvic
4 1 1 1
1 9
1Subcontracting with 6Project Management 9
Facilities
Marketing
Marketing &&Sales
Sales Subcontracting with Project Management Facilities Management
Management
Estimating
Estimating and
and Design contractors (Maintenance)
(Maintenance)
Design contractors
Bidding
Bidding 1 2
1
2 7 0Facilities Operation
5 0 Engineering HS
HS Facilities Operation
Engineering
Construction
Construction business
business Upfront
Upfront Engineering
Engineering
development
development 1
2 Resource
6 Resource Management
Management
3 Project
Project Budgeting
Budgeting
Operational
Operational R&D
R&D 2
7 1 1 Technical Support
Planning
Planning and
and 8Project Coordination Technical Support
7 Scheduling
Scheduling Project Coordination
Planning
Planning and
and
Scheduling 1
Scheduling
0 Engineering
Engineering
8
Contract
ContractAdminstration
Adminstration 1
3 QA/QC
QA/QC
1
4
Cost
Cost Control
Control
1
5
Procurement,
Procurement, Warehousing
Warehousing and
and Inventory
Inventory Control
Control
30
•Introduction
•
•Strategic Leadership
•
•Business Model
•
•Entrepreneurial Application in a Real Case
31
Purpose:
Deliver __X Return…
Guiding Principles
32
33
Purpose:
Deliver 5X Return…
Vision
Guiding Principles
Best Partners
Best Practices
Best People
Technology
Business
Model/
Strategy
People/ Culture
Relationships/
Partnerships
Technology/
Organization
Operational
Operating
Excellence
External
Financial/
Data
Capital
Model
34
Cobalt Approach
§ Bias toward subsea completions
§ Initial focus on Two Areas (Deep § Accelerated integrated team based § Outsource services as preference
Water GOM and WA) analysis § Creative, repeatable solutions to
§ Small Operating Organization
§ Focused Data Acquisition § Standardized approach agreed prior maximize value
§ Focus on optimizing recovery and
to drilling of exploration well § Control exercised through third party
§ Best team of Explorationist reducing lifting cost
§ Operational control dictates timing agreements
§ ‘Coal Face’ analysis and decision § Enhance value through
§ Leased facilities/tolling agreements
making by experts § Accelerated learning's via the drillbit infrastructure optimization
whenever possible
§ Small staff, play big § Move through in weeks/months
§ Small project management teams
§ Minimize capital outlay
§ Accelerated delivery of commercial
solution.
§ Global Program
§ ‘Blank Sheet’ analysis § Large Project scale §Internal Focus, company solutions
§ Partner to diversify risk
§ Extensive staff considers all § Plan for all depletion possibilities § Large Production Organization
§ Large staff to analyze basins possible options at outset
§ Maintain large infrastructure
§ Own technology and shoot § Years negotiating with partners § Internal engineering preferred
§ Operator and non-operator issues
proprietary seismic § Unique solutions—”Serial Number § ‘3 Bids and a Buy’ Contracting
§ Large lead time of 5 – 7 years
§ Quality control through multiple 001” strategy
reviews with functions and § Years to get to sanction
management
§ Significant capital expenditure
35
R
d
y
a
e
”
“A
pP
ro
s
e
c
t” “M D
ilb
reP
p
o
tu
c
s
a
” “G tD
rile “D
ril” “D
R
u
o
fin
s eS
rc
z” “D
R
o u
fin
v
c eb
ls
ra
”
1 2
Portfolio
Portfolio Build
Build (Select for Drilling) Portfolio
Portfolio Optimization
Optimization (Select for Development)
3 4
Geology/Geophysics
Geology/Geophysics Prospecting
Prospecting &
& Maturation
Maturation Geology/Geophysics
Geology/Geophysics Operations
Operations
6 6
Petrophysical
Petrophysical Petrophysical
Petrophysical
7
Drilling
Drilling Engineering
Engineering
SANCTION
5
(Scoping) Reservoir
Reservoir Engineering
Engineering (confirming/optimization)
8
Drilling
Drilling Execution
Execution (Foreman)
(Foreman)
1
0 Project
Project Scope,
Scope, Planning
Planning &
& Management
Management
1
1 Operational
Operational Planning
Planning
9
Reservoir
Reservoir Defining,
Defining, Optimization,
Optimization, Flow
Flow Mgt
Mgt
1
2 36 HSSE
HSSE
1
3 Land/JOA/Partners
Land/JOA/Partners
Proprietary & confidential information
Creating the linkages of the Operating Model for Governance
and Execution
Monitor
Approve Progress,
Investors/ Approve
Capital
Approve
Business Ongoing Input on
Portfolio
Board Structure Plan
Decisions
Strategic
Issues
Address
Strategic Manage & Continuous
Executive Set Vision
Approve
Business Plan Business Group Track Improvement
& Operating Set Policy
Team (CEO) Model
Recommendation Issues at Cobalt of the
s Portfolio Performance Business
Level
Sanction
Develop
BG Business Coordinate, Integrate, BG Portfolio Recommendations
•When to Proceed Plan
•How to Proceed
•How Much Confirm
Access Get Drill Define Resource
Drillable Drill
Technical Prospects
Prospects Ready Size & Recoverability
Organization Capabilities
Functions Strategy/ Geological/
Engineering/
Finance/
Drilling/ Legal/ Support
Portfolio Geophysical CFO
Supply Contracts Functions
Analysis IT/Data
Chain
37
1 Server
Knowledge
Economy
Has Changed
38
39
900 90%
800 80%
700 70%
600 60%
500 50%
400 40%
300 30%
200 20%
100 10%
0 0%
Ta s
rt rc
as
ne B Da y
on
y d s
C s
S on
d a ol
E OC
ar o
y
S n
e
W e n
P
N P
M OG
A ep i
D er
en n
vr t
am d
LL l e
K e
ro il
at P
C ell
na
d n
r
R En
he a l
r
es
rg is vi
ph
ew d
M rk
so
ne
o
et t o
C xo
H
Pa 'A
S fiel
O
oo e
ar B
na s
tu
ob
in
br
h
N si
ev
C ob
to
h
x
B
N
H
P ta
ur
x
S
o
M
40
E
* Source MMS. “Sale Statistics”, October 3rd , 2007 and “Sale Statistics”, March 19th , 2008.
Proprietary & confidential information
Winners of Deepwater Blocks with Four or More Bids –
Central Sale 205 and 206 Combined*
25 500
20 19 375 400
18
350
14 14 290
15 300
13
230 11 250
10 200
150
95
5 100
22 21 30 22 50
16 9
0 0
s
n
n
lt
ra
l
o
ro
el
s
a
th
b
b
e
v
ro
o
ra
e
S
C
et
a
C
P
Blocks Won Total Spent ($MM) Dollars per Block ($MM)
41
* Source: Outer Continental Shelf BBS Data Proprietary & confidential information
Web Page Explanation of Results
It is not just the number of blocks won, but also the prospectively of those blocks that is
important. In analyzing the Gulf of Mexico lease sale, J.P. Morgan noted that historically
there is a strong correlation between how many companies bid on a block, the chance of
success and the size of discoveries. Looking at blocks where there were four or more
bidders, the research analysts concluded that Cobalt had won the highest number of
competitive blocks in the sale at the second lowest average cost per block.
When these 53 newly acquired leases are added to Cobalt's current lease inventory, the
company will hold 107 leases, consisting of over 600,000 acres at a cost of
US$263,000,000. While successfully partnering on certain prospects with major North
American and International energy companies (Nexen Inc., Anadarko, and BHP Billiton),
Cobalt has steadfastly retained a significant equity position in all its prospects (usually
50-100 percent), so we are in a better position to control our own destiny.
42
HOUSTON, Jan 07, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Cobalt International Energy, Inc. (NYSE: CIE)
announced that it closed the sale of an additional 7,978,000 shares of its common stock at
the public offering price of $13.50 per share pursuant to the over-allotment option exercised
by the underwriters of its recently completed initial public offering. The exercise of the over-
allotment option brings the total number of common shares sold by Cobalt in the public
offering to 70,978,000 shares. Including proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment
option, gross proceeds from Cobalt's initial public offering and a simultaneous 3,125,000
share offering at $13.50 per share exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Regulation S were $1.0 billion. Cobalt intends to use the
net proceeds from the offering and other resources available to it to fund its capital
expenditures, and in particular Cobalt's drilling and exploration program through 2011, and
its related operating expenses, and for general corporate purposes.
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
acted as joint book-running managers of the public offering.
43
April 2006 - Houstonian: First start-up discussion of executive team on integrating business model
April 2007 – Galveston: Clarifying the Strategy and building the business plan
Spring 2008 – Lost Pines: Getting Aligned to strategic imperatives from lease sale results
44
45
By the way, Cobalt was the Largest North American E&P IPO in
history. It took 4 years to go from a blank sheet of paper to a 5 billion
market cap company. That has never happened before.”
Joe
46
47
48
49