Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Team : xxxx
Dec 30, 2015
Content
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Background
Project Objective
Project Scope
Project Study & Data Collection
Project Cost Estimation
Return on Investment
Project Schedule
Content
Person In
Charge
Target
Completio
n Date
%
Completio
n
Background
By Oct 31,
15
100%
Project Objective
By Oct 31,
15
100%
Project Scope
By Oct 31,
15
100%
By Nov 30,
15
Project Cost
Estimation
By Dec 15,
15
Return on
Investment
By Dec 15,
15
Plan Project
Schedule
By Dec 15,
15
Remarks
1. Background
As part of company green vision to meet the Environmental
Objective other than the cost reduction and with
environmental responsibility at company core mission, the
company is looking into how to reduce the waste.
1. Background
Total disposal activated sludge record for past 3 years
Year
Weight
(MT)
Average
(MT/Day)
Disposal
Price/MT
(RM)
Total Price
(RM)
2012
160
0.438
2500
400,000
2013
158
0.4328
2500
395,000
2014
165
0.4520
2500
412,500
2. Project Objectives
3. Project Scope
To install a 0.6 t/day capacity Sludge Reduction System
which operates for 12 hrs per day.
Consist of few major equipments in the system which are:
1.Process chamber the chamber where ashing and
cracking take place
2.Bag Filters & Deodorizer for effective of removal
dust/particles and decompose of organic fumes
3.Wet scrubber for final polishing to effective control of
dust and fumes
10
Process:
- Gas/Air enter the baghouse through the hoppers.
- The gas is drawn through the bag filter, either on
the inside or the outside (depend on the cleaning
method) and the layer of dust accumulates on the
filter media surface until air cannot longer flow pass
through it (reach pressure drop limit).
11
12
14
15
Before
After
Type
Paste/semi
solid
Carbon/Char
Density (kg/m3)
0.85 ~ 1.1
>1
30~35
Unknown
65~70 %
>90 %
Unknown
<5 %
Composition (wt
%)
Organic solid
Inorganic solid
Moisture/Water
16
Before
After
Paste/semi
solid
Carbon/Char
1.12 Kg
0.19Kg
Paste/semi
solid
Carbon/Char
1.02 Kg
0.18Kg
Weight
Reduction (%)
1 st Sample
Characteristic
Weight (Kg)
83%
2nd Sample
Characteristic
Weight (Kg)
82%
3rd Sample
Characteristic
Carbon/Char
This
will reduce thePaste/semi
quantity of WWTPs
sludge volume and
solid the disposal cost
at the same time reduce
Weight (Kg)
Kg
0.21Kg
80%
Further
step is to do1.06
complete
Toxicity
Characteristics
Leached Procedure (TCLP) testing to get permission from
DOE for dispose at normal landfill
17
: RM 580k
: RM
: RM 45k
Piping
: RM 65k
Civil works
: RM 50k
18
6. Return on Investment
Description
Cost
775,000
400,000
166,042
30,660
19,440
3,942
Negligible
No
additional
manpower
40,000
72,000
Maintenance service
Waste disposal
Cost saving per year
(RM)
Return on Investment
(yrs)
233,958
3.3
19
Durati
on
Apr May
(Week)
Items
Management
Approval
Detail design &
engineering
ITB & Procurement
Fabrication
Jul
Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
8
12
Field installation,
testing &
commissioning
Jun
2017
Total : 40 Weeks
20
THANK YOU