Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 53

Chapter 13

Capital
Capital Budgeting
Budgeting
Techniques
Techniques
13.1

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Project Evaluation:
Alternative Methods
Simple Method
Payback Period (PBP)
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Net Present Value (NPV)
Profitability Index (PI)
13.4

Refer to the additional PowerPoint slides and the Excel


spreadsheet VW13E-13b.xlsx for computer-based

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Proposed Project Data


Julie Miller is evaluating a new project
for her firm, Basket Wonders (BW).
She has determined that the after-tax
cash flows for the project will be
$10,000; $12,000; $15,000; $10,000;
and $7,000, respectively, for each of
the Years 1 through 5. The initial
cash outlay will be $40,000.
13.5

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Payback Period (PBP)


0
40 K

1
10 K

2
12 K

15 K

10 K

5
7K

PBP is the period of time


required for the cumulative
expected cash flows from an
investment project to equal the
initial cash outflow.
13.6

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Payback Period
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
13.7

Cash Flows Cumulative


Inflows
(40,000)
-------10,000
10,000
12,000
22,000
15,000
37,000
10,000
47,000
7,000
54,000

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Payback Period
Solution(#1)
1)

40,000 37,000 = 3,000


2) 3,000 / 10,000 = 0.3
3) 0.3 x 12 = 3.6
4) 0.6 x 30 = 18
The payback period is 3 years
and 3 monthes and 18 days
13.8

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Payback Solution (#2)


Another Method
0
40 K (-b)

Cumulative
Inflows

13.9

10 K
10 K

12 K
22 K

3 (a)
15 K
37 K(c)

4
10 K(d)
47 K

5
7K
54 K

PBP = a + ( b c ) / d
= 3 + (40 37) / 10
= 3 + (3) / 10
= 3.3
Years

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Payback Solution (#3)


0

40 K
40 K

10 K
30 K

12 K
18 K

3
15 K
3 K

10 K
7K

7K
14 K

PBP = 3 + ( 3K ) / 10K
3.3 Years

Cumulative
Cash Flows Note: Take absolute value of last

negative cumulative cash flow value.


13.10

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

PBP Acceptance Criterion


The management of Basket Wonders
has set a maximum PBP of 3.5
years for projects of this type.
Should this project be accepted?
Yes! The firm will receive back the
initial cash outlay in less than 3.5
years. [3.3 Years < 3.5 Year Max.]
13.11

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Payback Period
(Equal Cash Inflow)
If

we assume for the same


example the cash outflow is
$40,000 and the inflow will be
$15,000 each year, what is the
payback period?

13.12

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Payback Period (PBP)


(Solution)
Payback

period = Cash outflow/


Annual Cash inflow
$40,000 / 15,000 = 2.67
0.67 x 12 = 8.04
0.04 x 30 = 1.2
The (PBP) is 2 years and 8 month
13.13

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

PBP Strengths
and Weaknesses
Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Easy to use and Does not account


understand
Can be used as a
measure of
liquidity
Easier to forecast
ST than LT flows
13.14

for TVM
Does not consider
cash flows
beyond the PBP
Cutoff period is
subjective

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)


IRR is the discount rate that equates the
present value of the future net cash
flows from an investment project with
the projects initial cash outflow (ICO).
CF1

ICO = (1 + IRR)1
13.15

CF2
(1 + IRR)

+...+

CFn
(1 + IRR)n

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Solution
$10,000
$12,000
$40,000 =
+
+
(1+IRR)1 (1+IRR)2
$15,000
$10,000
$7,000
+
+
(1+IRR)3 (1+IRR)4 (1+IRR)5
Find the interest rate (IRR) that causes the
discounted cash flows to equal $40,000.
13.16

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Solution (Try 10%)


$40,000 = $10,000(PVIF10%,1) + $12,000(PVIF10%,2) +
$15,000(PVIF10%,3) + $10,000(PVIF10%,4) +
$ 7,000(PVIF10%,5)
$40,000 = $10,000(0.909) + $12,000(0.826) +
$15,000(0.751) + $10,000(0.683) +
$
7,000(0.621)
$40,000 = $9,090 + $9,912 + $11,265 +
$6,830 + $4,347
= $41,444
[Rate is too low!!]
13.17

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Solution (Try 10% )


Year

Net Cash
Flows

PVIF 10%

Present
Value

10,000

0.909

9,090

12,000

0.826

9,912

15,000

0.751

11,265

10,000

0.683

6,830

7,000

0.621

4,347

Total
Present
Value
13.18

41,444

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Solution (Try 15%)


$40,000 = $10,000(PVIF15%,1) + $12,000(PVIF15%,2) +
$15,000(PVIF15%,3) + $10,000(PVIF15%,4) +
$
7,000(PVIF15%,5)
$40,000 = $10,000(0.870) + $12,000(0.756) +
$15,000(0.658) + $10,000(0.572) +
$
7,000(0.497)
$40,000 = $8,700 + $9,072 + $9,870 +
$5,720 + $3,479
= $36,841 [Rate
is too high!!]
13.19

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Solution (Try 15%)


Year

Net Cash
Flows

PVIF 15%

Present
Value

1
2

10,000
12,000

0.870
0.756

8,700
9,072

15,000

0.658

9,870

10,000

0.572

5,720

7,000

0.497

3,479

Total Present
Value
13.20

36,841

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Solution (Interpolate)


0.10 $41,444
0.05 X IRR $40,000
0.15 $36,841
X

$1,444

$1,444
$4,603

0.05

$4,603

13.21

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Solution (Interpolate)


0.10 $41,444
0.05 X IRR $40,000
0.15 $36,841
X

$1,444

$1,444
$4,603

0.05

$4,603

13.22

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Solution (Interpolate)


0.10 $41,444
0.05 X IRR $40,000
0.15 $36,841
($1,444)(0.05)
X=

$1,444
$4,603

$4,603
X = 0.0157

IRR = 0.10 + 0.0157 = 0.1157 or 11.57%


13.23

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Acceptance Criterion


The management of Basket Wonders
has determined that the required rate
is 13% for projects of this type.
Should this project be accepted?
No! The firm will receive 11.57% for
each dollar invested in this project at
a cost of 13%. [ IRR < required Rate ]
13.24

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

IRR Strengths
and Weaknesses
Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Accounts for Assumes all cash


TVM
flows reinvested
Considers all at the IRR
cash flows Difficulties with
project rankings and
Less
Multiple IRRs
subjectivity
13.28

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Net Present Value (NPV)


NPV is the present value of an
investment projects net cash
flows minus the projects initial
cash outflow (ICO).
CF1
NPV =
(1+k)1
13.29

CF2
(1+k)2

CFn
ICO
+...+
(1+k)n

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

NPV Solution
Basket Wonders has determined that the
appropriate discount rate (k) for this
project is 13%.
NPV = $10,000 +$12,000 +$15,000 +
(1.13)1 (1.13)2 (1.13)3
$10,000 $7,000
4 +
5 - $40,000
(1.13)
(1.13)
13.30

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

NPV Solution
NPV = $10,000(PVIF13%,1) + $12,000(PVIF13%,2) +
$15,000(PVIF13%,3) + $10,000(PVIF13%,4) + $
7,000(PVIF13%,5) $40,000
NPV = $10,000(0.885) + $12,000(0.783) +
$15,000(0.693) + $10,000(0.613) +
$
7,000(0.543) $40,000
NPV = $8,850 + $9,396 + $10,395 +
$6,130 + $3,801 $40,000
= - $1,428
13.31

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

NPV Solution (Another


Method)

13.32

Year

Cash Flows

PVIF 13%

Present
Value

10,000

0.885

8,850

2
3
4

12,000
15,000
10,000

0.783
0.693
0.613

9,396
10,396
6,130

5
Total PV
Cash outflow
Net PV

7,000

0.543

3,801
38,573
40,000
(1,427)

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

NPV Acceptance Criterion


The management of Basket Wonders
has determined that the required
rate is 13% for projects of this type.
Should this project be accepted?
No! The NPV is negative. This means
that the project is reducing shareholder
wealth. [Reject as NPV < 0 ]
13.33

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

NPV Strengths
and Weaknesses
Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Cash flows
May not include
assumed to be
managerial
reinvested at the options embedded
required rate.
in the project. See
Chapter 14.
Accounts for TVM.
Considers all
cash flows.
13.37

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Profitability Index (PI)


PI is the ratio of the present value of
a projects future net cash flows to
the projects initial cash outflow.
Method #1:

CF1
PI =
(1+k)1

13.40

CF2
CFn
+...+
(1+k)2
(1+k)n

ICO

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

PI Acceptance Criterion
PI

= $38,573 / $40,000
= .9643 (Method #1, previous slide)

Should this project be accepted?


No! The PI is less than 1.00. This
means that the project is not profitable.
[Reject as PI < 1.00 ]
13.41

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

PI Strengths
and Weaknesses

13.42

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Same as NPV
Allows
comparison of
different scale
projects

Same as NPV
Provides only
relative profitability
Potential Ranking
Problems

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Evaluation Summary
Basket Wonders Independent Project

Method Project Comparison Decision

13.43

PBP

3.3

3.5

Accept

IRR

11.47%

13%

Reject

NPV

-$1,424

$0

Reject

PI

.96

1.00

Reject

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Independent Project
For this project, assume that it is
independent of any other potential
projects that Basket Wonders may
undertake.
Independent A project whose
acceptance (or rejection) does not
prevent the acceptance of other
projects under consideration.
13.45

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Other Project
Relationships
Dependent A project whose
acceptance depends on the
acceptance of one or more other
projects.
Mutually Exclusive A project whose
acceptance precludes the acceptance
of one or more alternative projects.
13.46

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Potential Problems
Under Mutual Exclusivity
Ranking of project proposals may
create contradictory results.
A. Scale of Investment
B. Cash-flow Pattern
C. Project Life

13.47

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

A. Scale Differences
Compare a small (S) and a
large (L) project.
END OF YEAR

13.48

NET CASH FLOWS


Project S
Project L

-$100

-$100,000

$400

$156,250

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

A. Scale Differences
Calculate the PBP, IRR, NPV@10%,
and PI@10%.
Which project is preferred? Why?

13.49

Project

IRR

S
L

100%
25%

NPV

$ 231
$29,132

PI

3.31
1.29

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Remember to refer to Excel spreadsheet


VW13E-13b.xlsx and the Scale tab.

A. Scale Differences

Refer to VW13E-13b.xlsx on the Scale tab.


13.50

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

B. Cash Flow Pattern


Let us compare a decreasing cash-flow (D)
project and an increasing cash-flow (I) project.
END OF YEAR
0
1
2
3
13.51

NET CASH FLOWS


Project D
Project I
-$1,200
-$1,200
1,000
100
500
600
100
1,080

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Cash Flow Pattern


Calculate the IRR, NPV@10%,
and PI@10%.
Which project is preferred?
Project
D
I
13.52

IRR

NPV

PI

23%
17%

$198
?
$198

1.17
1.17

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

13.53

600

Plot NPV for each


project at various
discount rates.

400

Project I

200

NPV@10%
IRR
Project D

0
-200

Net Present Value ($)

Examine NPV Profiles

10
15
20
Discount Rate (%)

25

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Net Present Value ($)


-200 0 200 400
600

Fishers Rate of Intersection

13.54

At k<10%, I is best!

Fishers Rate of
Intersection
At k>10%, D is best!

10
15
20
Discount Rate ($)

25

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

C. Project Life Differences


Let us compare a long life (X) project
and a short life (Y) project.
END OF YEAR
0
1
2
3
13.56

NET CASH FLOWS


Project X
Project Y
-$1,000
-$1,000
0
2,000
0
0
3,375
0

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Project Life Differences


Calculate the PBP, IRR, NPV@10%,
and PI@10%.
Which project is preferred? Why?
Project
X
Y
13.57

IRR
50%
100%

NPV

PI

$1,536
$ 818

2.54
1.82

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Capital Rationing
Capital Rationing occurs when a
constraint (or budget ceiling) is placed
on the total size of capital expenditures
during a particular period.
Example: Julie Miller must determine what
investment opportunities to undertake for
Basket Wonders (BW). She is limited to a
maximum expenditure of $32,500 only for
this capital budgeting period.
13.62

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Available Projects for BW


Project ICO
IRR
NPV
PI
A $ 500
18% $
50 1.10 B
5,000 25
6,500 2.30 C 5,000
37
5,500 2.10 D 7,500 20
5,000
1.67 E 12,500 26
500 1.04 F
15,000 28
21,000 2.40 G 17,500
19
7,500 1.43 H 25,000 15
6,000
1.24

13.63

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Choosing by IRRs for BW


Project

ICO

IRR

NPV

PI

C $ 5,000 37%
$ 5,500 2.10 F
15,000 28
21,000 2.40 E 12,500
26
500 1.04 B 5,000 25
6,500 2.30
Projects C, F, and E have the
three largest IRRs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth
is $27,000 with a $32,500 outlay.
13.64

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Choosing by NPVs for BW


Project

ICO

IRR

F $15,000 28%
17,500 19
7,500
25
6,500 2.30

NPV
$21,000
1.43 B

Projects F and G have the


largest NPVs.

PI

2.40 G
5,000

two

The resulting increase in shareholder wealth


is $28,500 with a $32,500 outlay.
13.65

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Choosing by PIs for BW


Project

ICO

IRR

NPV

PI

F $15,000
28% $21,000 2.40
B
5,000 25
6,500 2.30
C
5,000
37
5,500 2.10
D
7,500
20
5,000 1.67
G 17,500
19
7,500
1.43
Projects F, B, C, and D have the four largest PIs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth is
$38,000 with a $32,500 outlay.
13.66

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Summary of Comparison
Method Projects Accepted Value Added
PI
F, B, C, and D
$38,000
NPV
F and G
$28,500
IRR
C, F, and E
$27,000
PI generates the greatest increase in
shareholder wealth when a limited capital
budget exists for a single period.
13.67

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Single-Point
Single-Point Estimate
Estimate
and
and Sensitivity
Sensitivity Analysis
Analysis
Sensitivity Analysis: A type of what-if
uncertainty analysis in which variables or
assumptions are changed from a base case in
order to determine their impact on a projects
measured results (such as NPV or IRR).
Allows us to change from single-point (i.e.,
revenue, installation cost, salvage, etc.) estimates
to a what if analysis
Utilize a base-case to compare the impact of
individual variable changes
E.g., Change forecasted sales units to see
impact on the projects NPV
13.68

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Post-Completion Audit
Post-completion Audit
A formal comparison of the actual costs and
benefits of a project with original estimates.
Identify any project weaknesses
Develop a possible set of corrective actions
Provide appropriate feedback

Result: Making better future decisions!


13.69

Van Horne and Wachowicz, Fundamentals of Financial Management, 13th edition. Pearson Education Limited 2009. Created by Gregory Kuhlemeyer.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi