Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 78

Chapter 4

Financial
Analysis
Sizing up Firm
Performance

Slide Contents
PRINCIPLES APPLIED IN THIS
CHAPTER
1.Why Do We Analyze Financial Statements
2.Common Size Statements Standardizing
Financial Information
3.Using Financial Ratios
4.Selecting a Performance Benchmark
5.Limitations of Ratio Analysis

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-2

4.1 WHY DO WE ANALYZE


FINANCIAL STATEMENTS?

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-3

Why Do We Analyze Financial


Statements?
An internal financial analysis might be done:

To evaluate the performance of employees


To compare the performance of different divisions
To prepare financial projections
To evaluate the firms financial performance in
light of its competitors performance

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-4

Why Do We Analyze Financial


Statements? (cont.)
External financial analysis is done by:

Banks and other lenders


Suppliers
Credit-rating agencies
Professional analysts
Individual investors

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-5

4.2 COMMON SIZE


STATEMENTS:
STANDARDIZING FINANCIAL
INFORMATION

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-6

Common Size Statements:


Standardizing Financial
Information

A common size financial statement is a


standardized version of a financial statement
in which all entries are presented in
percentages.
It helps to compare a firms financial
statements with those of other firms, even if
the other firms are not of equal size.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-7

Common Size Statements:


Standardizing Financial
Information (cont.)
How to prepare a common size financial
statement?
For a common size income statement, divide
each entry in the income statement by sales.
For a common size balance sheet, divide each
entry in the balance sheet by total assets.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-8

Table 4.1 H. J. Boswell, Inc.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-9

Table 4.2
H. J.
Boswell,
Inc.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-10

4.3 USING FINANCIAL


RATIOS

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-11

Using Financial Ratios


Financial ratios provide a second method
for standardizing the financial information on
the income statement and balance sheet.
A ratio by itself may have no meaning.
Hence, a given ratio is generally compared
to: (a) ratios from previous years; or (b)
ratios of other firms in the same industry.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-12

Using Financial Ratios (cont.)

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-13

LIQUIDITY RATIOS

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-14

Liquidity Ratios
Liquidity ratios address a basic question:
How liquid is the firm?
A firm is financially liquid if it is able to pay
its bills on time. We can analyze a firms
liquidity from two perspectives (see next
slide).

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-15

Liquidity Ratios (cont.)


1. Overall liquidity - analyzed by comparing
the firms current assets to the firms
current liabilities.
2. Liquidity of specific assets - analyzed by
examining the timeliness in which the firms
liquid assets (accounts receivable and
inventories) are converted into cash.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-16

Liquidity Ratios: Current Ratio


The overall liquidity of a firm is analyzed by
computing the current ratio and acid-test
ratio. Current Ratio: Current Ratio
compares a firms current (liquid) assets to
its current (short-term) liabilities.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-17

Liquidity Ratios: Current Ratio


(cont.)
What is the current ratio for 2012 for
Boswell?
Current Ratio = $477 292.5 = 1.63 times
The firm had $1.63 in current assets for
every $1 it owed in current liability.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-18

Liquidity Ratios: Quick Ratio


Acid-Test (Quick) Ratio excludes the
inventory from current assets as inventory
may not be very liquid.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-19

Liquidity Ratios: Quick Ratio


(cont.)
What is the quick ratio for Boswell for 2012?
Quick Ratio
= ($477-$229.50) ($292.50) = 0.84 times

The firm has only $0.84 in current assets


(less inventory) to cover $1 in current
liabilities.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-20

Liquidity Ratios:
Individual Asset Categories
We can also measure the liquidity of the firm
by examining the liquidity of accounts
receivable and inventories to see how long
it takes the firm to convert its accounts
receivables and inventories into cash.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-21

Liquidity Ratios: Accounts


Receivable
Average Collection Period measures the
number of days it takes the firm to collects its
receivables.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-22

Liquidity Ratios: Accounts


Receivable (cont.)
What will be the average collection period
for Boswell, Inc. for 2012 if we assume that
the annual credit sales were $2,500 million?
Daily Credit Sales
= $2,500 365 days = $6.85 million

Average Collection Period


= $139.5m $6.85m = 20.37 days

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-23

Liquidity Ratios: Accounts


Receivable Turnover Ratio
Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio
measures how many times receivables are
rolled over during a year.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-24

Liquidity Ratios: Accounts


Receivable Turnover Ratio
(cont.)
What will be the accounts receivable
turnover ratio for Boswell, Inc. for 2012 if
we assume that the annual credit sales were
$2,500 million?
Accounts Receivable Turnover
= $2,500 million $139.50 = 17.92 times
The firms accounts receivable were turning over
at 17.92 times per year.
Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-25

Liquidity Ratios:
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Inventory turnover ratio measures how many
times the company turns over its inventory during the
year. Shorter inventory cycles lead to greater liquidity
since the items in inventory are converted to cash
more quickly.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-26

Liquidity Ratios:
Inventory Turnover Ratio
(cont.)

What will be the inventory turnover ratio for


2012 for Boswell, Inc. if we assume that the
cost of goods sold were $1,980 million in
2012?
Inventory Turnover Ratio
= $1,980 $229.50 = 8.63 times
The firm turned over its inventory 8.63 times per
year.
Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-27

Liquidity Ratios:
Days Sales in Inventory
Days Sales in Inventory
= 365 inventory turnover ratio
= 365 8.63 = 42.29 days
The firm, on average, holds it inventory for
about 42 days.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-28

Can a Firm Have Too Much


Liquidity?
A high investment in liquid assets will enable
the firm to repay its current liabilities in a
timely manner.
However, an excessive investments in liquid
assets can prove to be costly as liquid assets
(such as cash) generate minimal return.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-29

CAPITAL STRUCTURE RATIOS

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-30

Capital Structure Ratios


Capital structure refers to the way a firm
finances its assets. Capital structure ratios
address the important question: How has the
firm financed the purchase of its assets?

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-31

Capital Structure Ratios


(cont.)
Debt ratio measures the proportion of the
firms assets that are financed by borrowing or
debt financing.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-32

Capital Structure Ratios


(cont.)
What is the debt ratio for H.J. Boswell, Inc.
for 2012?
Debt Ratio
= $1,012.50 million $1,764 million = 57.40%
The firm financed 57.39% of its assets with debt.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-33

Capital Structure Ratios


(cont.)
Times Interest Earned Ratio measures
the ability of the firm to service its debt or
repay the interest on debt.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-34

Capital Structure Ratios


(cont.)
What will be the times interest earned ratio
for Boswell for 2012 if we assume interest
expense of $65 million and EBIT of $350
million?
Times Interest Earned
= $350m $65m = 5.38 times
The firm can pay its interest expense 5.38 times
or interest used 1/5.38th or 18.58% of its EBIT.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-35

ASSET MANAGEMENT
EFFICIENCY RATIOS

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-36

Asset Management
Efficiency Ratios
Asset management efficiency ratios
measure a firms effectiveness in utilizing its
assets to generate sales.
They are commonly referred to as turnover
ratios as they reflect the number of times a
particular asset account balance turns over
during a year.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-37

Asset Management Efficiency


Ratios (cont.)
Total Asset Turnover Ratio represents the
amount of sales generated per dollar
invested in firms assets.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-38

Asset Management Efficiency


Ratios (cont.)
What will be the total asset turnover ratio for
Boswell, Inc. for 2012 if we assume total sales
to be $2,500 million?
Total Asset Turnover
= $2,500 million $1,764 million = 1.42 times
The firm generated $1.42 in sales per dollar of
assets in 2012.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-39

Asset Management Efficiency


Ratios (cont.)
Fixed asset turnover ratio measures
firms efficiency in utilizing its fixed assets
(such as property, plant and equipment).

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-40

Asset Management Efficiency


Ratios (cont.)
What will be the fixed asset turnover ratio for
Boswell for 2012 if we assume sales of $2,500
million for 2012?
Fixed Asset Turnover
= $2,500 million $1,287 million = 1.94 times
The firm generated $1.94 in sales per dollar
invested in plant and equipment.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-41

Asset Management Efficiency


Ratios (cont.)
The following grid summarizes the efficiency
of Boswells management in utilizing its assets
to generate sales in 2013.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-42

PROFITABILITY RATIOS

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-43

Profitability Ratios
Profitability ratios address a very
fundamental question: Has the firm earned
adequate returns on its investments?

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-44

Profitability Ratios (cont.)


Two fundamental determinants of firms
profitability and returns on investments:
Cost Control How well has the firm
controlled its costs relative to each dollar of
firm sales?
Efficiency of asset utilization How
effective is the firm in using the assets to
generate sales?
Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-45

Cost Control: Is the Firm


Earning Reasonable Profit
Margins?
Gross profit margin shows how well the
firms management controls its expenses to
generate profits.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-46

Cost Control: Is the Firm


Earning Reasonable Profit
Margins? (cont.)
What will be the gross profit margin ratio for
2012 for Boswell if we assume sales of $2,500
million and gross profit of $650 million?
Gross Profit Margin
= $650 million $2,500 million = 26%
The firm spent $0.74 for cost of goods sold and
thus $0.26 out of each dollar of sales went
towards gross profits.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-47

Cost Control: Is the Firm


Earning Reasonable Profit
Margins? (cont.)

Operating Profit Margin measures how


much profit is generated from each dollar of
sales after accounting for both costs of goods
sold and operating expenses. It also indicates
how well the firm is managing its income
statement.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-48

Cost Control: Is the Firm


Earning Reasonable Profit
Margins? (cont.)

What will be the operating profit margin ratio


for Boswell for 2012 if we assume sales of
$2,500 million and net operating income of
$350 million?
Operating Profit Margin
= $350 million $2,500 million = 14%
The firm generates $0.14 in operating profit for
each dollar of sales.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-49

Cost Control: Is the Firm


Earning Reasonable Profit
Margins? (cont.)
Net Profit Margin measures how much
income is generated from each dollar of sales
after adjusting for all expenses (including
income taxes).

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-50

Cost Control: Is the Firm


Earning Reasonable Profit
Margins? (cont.)

What will be the net profit margin ratio for


2012 if we assume sales of $2,500 million and
net income of $217.75 million?
Net Profit Margin
= $217.75 million $2,500 million = 8.71%
The firm generated $0.087 for each dollar of
sales after all expenses were accounted for.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-51

Return on Invested Capital


Operating Return on Assets ratio is the
summary measure of operating profitability. It
takes into account the managements success
in controlling expenses and its efficient use of
assets.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-52

Profitability Ratios (cont.)


What will be the operating return on assets
ratio for Boswell for 2012 if we assume EBIT
or net operating income of $350 million for
2012?
Operating Return on Assets
= $350 million $1,764 million = 19.84%
The firm generated $0.1984 of operating profits
for every $1 of its invested assets.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-53

Decomposing the
Operating Return on
Assets Ratio

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-54

Figure 4.1 Analyzing H. J. Boswell,


Inc.s Operating Return on Assets
(OROA)

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-55

Figure 4-1 Observations


Firms OROA (operating return on assets) is
better than its peers.
Firms OPM (operating profit margin) is
lower than its peers.
Firms TATO (total asset turnover ratio) is
higher than that of its peers.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-56

Figure 4-1 Recommendations


1. Reduce costs - The firm must investigate
the cost of goods sold and operating
expenses to see if there are opportunities
to reduce costs.
2. Reduce inventories The firm must
investigate if it can reduce the size of its
inventories.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-57

Is the Firm Providing a


Reasonable Return on the
Owners Investment?
Return on Equity (ROE) ratio measures the
accounting return on the common
stockholders investment.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-58

Is the Firm Providing a


Reasonable Return on the Owners
Investment (cont.)
What will be the ROE ratio for Boswell for 2012
if we assume net income of $217.75 million?
ROE = $217.75m $751.50 mi = 28.98%
Thus the shareholders earned 28.97% on their
investments.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-59

Using the DuPont Method for


Decomposing the ROE ratio
DuPont method analyzes the firms ROE by
decomposing it into three parts.
ROE = Profitability Efficiency Equity Multiplier

Equity multiplier captures the effect of the


firms use of debt financing on its return on
equity. The equity multiplier increases in
value as the firm uses more debt.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-60

Using the DuPont Method for


Decomposing the ROE ratio
(cont.)
ROE = Profitability Efficiency Equity
Multiplier

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-61

Using the DuPont Method for


Decomposing the ROE ratio
(cont.)
The following table shows why Boswells
return on equity was higher than its peers.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-62

Using the DuPont


Method for
Decomposing the
ROE ratio (cont.)

Figure 4.2

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-63

MARKET VALUE RATIOS

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-64

Market Value Ratios


Market value ratios address the question,
how are the firms shares valued in the stock
market?

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-65

Price-Earnings Ratio
Price-Earnings (PE) Ratio indicates how
much investors are currently willing to pay for
$1 of reported earnings.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-66

Price-Earnings Ratio (cont.)


What will be the PE ratio for 2012 for Boswell,
Inc. if we assume the firms stock was selling
for $22 per share at a time when the firm
reported a net income of $217.75 million, and
the total number of common shares
outstanding are 90 million?

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-67

Market Value Ratios (cont.)


Earnings per share
= $217.75 million 90 million = $2.42

PE ratio =

$22 $2.42 = 9.09

The investors were willing to pay $9.09 for


every dollar of earnings per share that the
firm generated.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-68

Market Value Ratios (cont.)


Market-to-Book Ratio measures the
relationship between the market value and the
accumulated investment in the firms equity.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-69

Market Value Ratios (cont.)


What will be the market-to-book ratio for
2012 for Boswell if the market price of the
stock is $22 and the firm has 90 million shares
outstanding?

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-70

Market Value Ratios (cont.)


Book Value per Share
= 751.50 million 90 million = $8.35 per share

Market-to-Book Ratio
= Market price per share Book value per
share
= $22 $8.35
= 2.63 times

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-71

4.4 SELECTING A
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-72

Selecting a Performance
Benchmark
There are two types of benchmarks that are
commonly used:
Trend Analysis compares a firms financial
statements over time (time-series comparisons).
Peer Group Comparisons compares the subject
firms financial statements with peer firms.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-73

Trend Analysis
Comparing a firms recent financial ratios
with the past financial ratios provides insight
into whether the firm is improving or
deteriorating over time. This type of
financial analysis is referred to as trend
analysis.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-74

Peer Firm Comparisons


Peer groups often consist of firms from the
same industry. Industry average financial
ratios can be obtained from a number of
financial databases and internet sources (such
as yahoo finance and google finance).

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-75

4.5 LIMITATIONS OF RATIO


ANALYSIS

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-76

The Limitations of Ratio


Analysis
1. Picking an industry benchmark can
sometimes be difficult.
2. Published peer-group or industry averages
are not always representative of the firm
being analyzed.
3. An industry average is not necessarily a
desirable target or norm.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-77

The Limitations of Ratio


Analysis (cont.)
4. Accounting practices differ widely among
firms.
5. Many firms experience seasonal changes in
their operations.
6. Financial ratios offer only clues.
7. The results of financial analysis are no
better than the quality of the financial
statements.

Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

4-78

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi