Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Preparation
RolaShadid,BDS,MSc,AssociateFellowAAID
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Reductionofaxialwallswithmaximalthicknessof
remainingdentinsurroundedthepulp
Preparationoftoothwithminimalpractical
convergenceangle(Taper)betweenaxialwalls
Preparationofocclusalsurfacefollowingthe
anatomicalcontourtogiveuniformreduction
Selectionofmarginalgeometrywhichisconservative
andcompatiblewithotherprinciples
Avoidanceofunnecessaryapicalextensionofthe
preparation
Over
reduction
Alsoyoushouldbecarefulabout:
1Adjacenttooth
byusingmatrixbandoftheadjacenttooth
cuttingintheenamelofpreparedtoothwith
finetaperedstone
2Softtissues
byusingmirrorortheflangeofsalivaejector
Retention&
Resistance
RETENTIONFORM
Thefeatureofatoothpreparation
thatresistsdislodgementofacrown
inaverticaldirectionoralongthe
pathofplacement.
RESISTANCEFORM
Thefeaturesofatoothpreparationthat
enhancethestabilityofrestorationand
resistdislodgementalonganaxisother
thanthepathofplacement
Itpreventsdislodgementofarestoration
byforcesdirectedinanapical,obliqueor
horizontaldirection.
Ataperortotal
convergenceof16
degreeshasbeen
proposedasbeing
achievableclinically
whilestillaffording
adequateretention.It
canbeaslowas10
degreeson
preparationsanterior
teethandashighas22
degreesonmolars
SURFACEAREAVS.RETENTION
Providedtherestorationhaslimitedpath
ofwithdrawal,thegreaterthesurfacearea
ofapreparation,thegreaterisits
retention.
Length..Crownswithlongaxialwalls
aremoreretentive
Molarcrownsaremoreretentivethan
premolarcrownsofsametaper
Thelongertheoccluso
gingivalheight,themorethe
surfacearea.
Themorediameterofprepared
teeth,themorethesurfacearea.
Widthofprep.vsresistance
Anarrowtoothcanhavegreater
resistancetotipping.
Thepreparationonthesmallertoothwill
haveashortrotationalradiusforthearc
ofdisplacement,andtheincisalportionof
theaxialwallwillresistdisplacement.
Thelongerrotationalradiusonthelarger
preparationallowsforamoregradualarcof
displacement,andtheaxialwalldoesnot
resistremoval
Parkeretalfoundthatapproximately
95%ofanteriorpreparationsanalyzed
hadresistanceform,whileonly46%of
thoseonmolarsdid.
Resistancetodisplacementforashort
walledpreparationonalargetoothcanbe
improvedbyplacinggroovesintheaxial
walls.
Ineffect,thisreducestherotationalradius,
andthatportionofthewallsofthegrooves
neartheocclusalsurfaceofthepreparation
willinterferewithdisplacement
Ratio of occlusocervical to
faciolingual dimension
The longer the faciolingual dimension of
prepared molars compared with other
teeth and shorter occlusogingival
dimension compared with anterior teeth
produce a lower ratio and lower resistance
to dislodgment of molar crown
STRESSCONCENTRATION
Iflineanglebetweenaxialandocclusal
surfaceissharp,itleadstoconcentration
ofstressesaroundthatjunction
Inducedstressesexceedsthestrengthof
thecement
Leadstocohesivefailureofcement
TYPEOFRESTORATIONVSRETENTION
Fullveneercrownhasexcellentretention
whencomparedtopartialveneercrown
becausereducingthepathofinsertionto
anarrowrange.
TYPEOFRESTORATIONVSRESISTANCE
Partialcoveragerestorationmayhave
lessresistancethanacompletecrown
becauseithasnobuccalresistancearea
SurfaceRoughness
Adhesionofdentalcementsdepends
primarilyonprojectionsofthecement
intomicroscopicirregularities.
Jorgensenfoundretentionofcastings
cementedwithZnPO4cementontest
dieswitha10tapertobetwiceasgreat
onpreparationswith40mscratches
than10m.
Retentionincreaseswhenrestorationis
roughenedorgrooved
Materialsbeingcementedvs
retention
Retentionisaffectedbyboththecasting
alloyandthecorematerial.
Morereactivethealloyismoreadhesion.
Basemetalalloysarebetterretained
thanlessreactivehighgoldcontent
metals.
Typeoflutingagent:Studiesshowthat
adhesiveresincementsaremore
retentivethanconventionalZnPO4and
GICcements
PHYSICALPROPERTIESOFLUTING
AGENTVSRESISTANCE
Resistancetodeformationisaffectedby
physicalpropertiesofthelutingagent,
suchascompressivestrengthand
modulusofelasticity
Adhesiveresin>GIC>ZnPO4>
Polycarboxylate>ZOE
Secondaryretentivefeaturesdoesnot
significantlyaffecttheretentionbecause
thesurfaceareaisnotincreased
significantly.
Butwherethesefeatureslimitsthepath
ofwithdrawal,retentionisincreased
Kentetalreportedamarkeddifference
betweenthedegreeoftaperoffullcrown
preparations(18.4to22.2degrees)andthat
ofboxesandgroovesintheaxialsurfaces
ofthosepreparations(7.3degrees).
Circumferential morphology
Pyramidal tooth preparations
provided increased resistance
because they had corners
when compared with conical
preparation. So it is
important to preserve
facioproximal and
linguoproximal corners of
tooth preparation
Prepared mandibular molars
are rectangular while
maxillary molars are
rhomboidal and premolars and
anterior teeth possess an oval
form
PathofInsertion
Itisanimaginarylinealongwhichthe
restorationwillbeplacedontoor
removedfromthepreparation.
Itisofspecialimportancewhen
preparingteethtobefixedpartial
dentureabutments,sincethepathsofall
theabutmentpreparationsmustparallel
eachother.
Pathofinsertion
Paralleltothelongaxisofthe
tooth
Paralleltotheincisal2/3ofthe
tooth
Thepathofinsertionmustbeconsideredin
twodimensions:
Faciolingually:thefaciolingual
orientationofthepathcanaffectthe
estheticsofmetalceramicorpartial
veneercrowns.
Mesiodistally
Structural durability
Arestorationmusthavesufficient
strengthtopreventpermanent
deformationduringfunction
Theabilityofarestorationtowithstand
destructionduetoexternalforces
Structural durability
Adequatetoothreductionocclusal
reductionfunctionalcuspbevelaxial
reduction
Alloyselection
Metalceramicframeworkdesign
Margindesign
Occlusal reduction
Zurcherman has shown that the placement of
inclined planes on occlusal surfaces of a crown
preparation rather than flat surface increases
resistance form
Axial reduction
MarginPlacement
Biologicwidth
Itisthedimensionofspacethatthehealthy
gingivaltissuesoccupyabovethealveolar
bone.Itreferstothecombinedconnective
tissueepithelialattachmentfromthecrest
ofthealveolarbonetothebaseofthe
sulcus(2mm;connectivetissue1.07mmand
epithelium0.97mm).
Evaluationofthebiologicalwidthby
radiographs,probing,andsoundingof
bone
Locationofrestorativemargins
Supragingival
Equigingival
Subgingival
Wheretoplacesubgingival
margin?
Wearhang reported that a
conventional tooth brush could
remove plaque only to a point
0.5mm subgingivally, so it is
important to ensure that
restorations are placed no deeper
than 0.5mm into sulcus when this is
possible
Wheretoplacesubgingival
margin?
Itisgenerallytaughtthatthegingival
marginshouldneverenterthesulcusby
morethanhalfthedepthofthesulcus.In
theaveragecasethisequalsadepthof1.0
mmorless,withlessbeingfavored
Wheretoplacesubgingival
margin?
No margin should be placed nearer than 0.5
to 1.0 mm from the attachment area in
healthy sulcus
Some authors suggested that restorative
margins should end 3-4 mm coronal to the
alveolar crest, they assumed the biologic
width is 2mm and additional 1mm will keep
the margin 1mm above the coronal extent
of junctional epithelium
Gingival attachment is more reliable
reference point than marginal gingiva
Technique
Packingasmalllengthofretractioncordinthe
areaofthesulcustoreceivethesubgingival
marginworksverywell.
Makeamentalnoteoftherelativerelationship
ofthefreegingivalmarginandroughedin
finishlinepriortopackingthecord.Even
smallcordsoftenachieveremarkablegingival
retraction.Youmaynotneedtoplacethe
marginasfarapicallyasthelevelofthecord.
Technique
Thelingualandapproximatelyhalfofthe
interproximalmarginsshouldremainsupragingival
(ifpossible).
Thelabialandlabialonehalfoftheinterproximal
marginsarebroughtdowntoornearthelevelofthe
retractioncord.
Bespecificallyawareofkeepingtheinterproximal
marginsubgingivaluntilitwillnolongerbevisible
whenviewedatanangle.Thisisafrequentareaof
marginvisibility,especiallyforporcelainveneers.
MARGINAL GEOMETRY OR
FINISH LINE
CONFIGURATION
Themargindesigndependson:
typeofrestoration,
toothmorphology,
positionandalignmentoftheteeth
inthearch,
esthetics
Guidelinesformargindesign
Easeofpreparationwithoutoverextensionor
unsupportedenamel
Easeofidentificationintheimpressionandonthedie
Adistinctboundarytowhichwaxpatterncanbefinished
Conservationoftoothstructure
Sufficientbulkofmaterialforestheticandstrengthofthe
restoration.
Themostimportantconsiderationinselectingacervical
margindesignisitsabilitytoconsistentlyandpredictably
provideexcellentmarginalintegrity.
Featheredge
Chisel
Chamfer Bevel
Shoulder
Sloped
Shoulder
Beveled
Shoulder
Theradialshoulder
Amodifiedformofshoulderfinishline
Asmallradiusroundedinternalangleis
instrumentedbyanendcuttingparallel
sidedcarbidefinishingbur,andfinishingis
completedwithaspeciallymodifiedbin
anglechisel.
Thecavosurfaceangleis90degrees,and
shoulderwidthisonlylessenedbythe
roundedinternalangle.
The shoulder-bevel
It is obtained by preparing
shoulder at the height of healthy
gingival margin, then adding 0.51.25 mm bevel.
It has the same advantages of
straight shoulder with optimum
opportunity of marginal fit
provided by the bevel
Chamfer
Conservative type
when compared with
shoulder finish line.
control over
reduction of cervical
tooth structure,
control in placem.of
subgingival margin
Chamfer
Margin of prep.is distinct
Degree of marginal
distortion during firing of
porcelain directly related
to the thickness of metal
at the margin
Chamfer
Chamfer
Heavychamafer
Aheavychamferisusedtoprovidea90degree
cavosurfaceanglewithalargeradiusrounded
internalangle
Itiscreatedwitharoundendtapered
diamond.
Inthehandsofanunskilledoperator,this
instrumentcancreateanundesirablefragile
"lip"ofenamelatthecavosurface.
Theheavychamferprovidesbettersupportfor
aceramiccrownthandoesaconventional
chamfer,butitisnotasgoodasashoulder.
Metal collar
Advantages :
1. good marginal seal
2. preservation of periodontal health
3. rigidity during cementation
4. wide facial metal collar (.8mm) gives
sufficient rigidity against distortion
caused by porcelain shrinkage in
comparison of the feather edge collar
5. can be used with any of the finish
lines described previously
Disadvantages :
1. difficult to conceal in a shallow
crevice or with a thin translucent
gingival margin
2. they display in case of gingival
recession
3. display of metal becomes very clear
with high lip line
Disadvantages :
1. the design is technique sensitive and
difficult to achieve without overcontouring
the cervical aspect or exposing opaque
layer
2. difficult finishing and polishing ,
microscopically the surface remains rough
3. marginal adaptation after porcelain firing is
subject to some distortion ,
Porcelain margin
Advantages:
1. esthetic improvement because of :
a. facial metal collar elimination
b. depth in cervical translucency
c. possibility of light transmission
through the root area
2. less plaque accumulation than metal
because of low adhesive forces
between plaque and ceramics
Porcelain construction :
various techniques of porcelain margin
construction have been described using :
platinum matrix , refractory dies , separating
varnish , wax, or resin binders
with conventional porcelain margin materials
rounded edges with rough and
heterogeneous surfaces were more likely to
occur using direct lift off technique than
platinum matrix substrates
Standardmetalceramiccrowninvolving
onlytheanatomicalcrownandwhere
aestheticsisofprimaryimportance
LabialFlatshoulder(90)
LingualDeepchamferwithmetalcollar
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNS
AUNIFORM
REDUCTIONOF
APPROXIMATELY
1.2MMISNEEDED
OVERTHEENTIRE
FACIALSURFACE.
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNS
TOACHIEVEADEQUATE
REDUCTIONWITHOUT
ENCROACHINGUPONTHE
PULPFACIALSURFACE
PREPAREDINTWO
PLANESTHAT
CORRESPONDROUGHLY
TOTHETWOGEOMETRIC
PLANESPRESENTONTHE
FACIALSURFACEOFAN
UNCUTTOOTH
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNS
FACIALSURFACE
PREPAREDINONE
PLANETHATHAS
ADEQUATEFACIAL
REDUCTIONINTHE
GINGIVALASPECT:
Inadequatespacefora
sufficientthicknessof
ceramicmaterialPoorly
contouredrestorationaffecting
bothesthetic&healthofthe
surroundinggingiva.
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNS
FACIALSURFACE
PREPAREDINONE
PLANETHATHAS
ADEQUATEFACIAL
REDUCTIONINTHE
INCISALASPECTFACIAL
SURFACEOVERTAPERED
ANDTOOCLOSETOTHE
PULP.
ARMAMENTARIUM
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNS
SILICONEINDEX
MADEBEFORE
TOOTH
PREPARATION
TOOTHBADLY
BROKENDOWN,
INDEXMADEONWAXED
UPDIAGNOSTICCAST.
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
PLACEMENTOFDEPTH
ORIENTATION
GROOVES(1.2MM)
THELABIALGROOVES
CUTINTWOSETS
1. ONESETPARALLEL
WITHTHEGINGIVAL
HALFOFLABIAL
SURFACE
2. ONESETPARALLEL
WITHTHEINCISAL
HALFOFLABIAL
SURFACE
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
INCISAL
REDUCTION
(2MM)
ROUNDEND
TAPEREDDAIMOND.
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
LABIALREDUCTION
(INCISALHALF)
ROUNDEND
TAPEREDDAIMOND.
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
LABIALREDUCTION
(GINGIVALHALF)
ROUNDEND
TAPEREDDAIMOND
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
LINGUAL
REDUCTION
(0.71MM)
SMALLWHEEL
DAIMOND.
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
SMOOTHENING
THESHARPANGLES
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
RADIALSHOULDER
MODIFIEDFORMOF
SHOULDER
SMALLRADIUS
INTERNALANGLE
WITH90DEGREE
CAVOSURFACE
ANTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNPREPARATION
POSTERIORMETAL
CERAMICCROWNS
POSTERIORMETAL
CERAMICCROWNS
STEPNO:1
OCCLUSALREDUCTION
FOLLOWEDBY
FUNCTIONALCUSP
BEVEL
POSTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNS
STEPNO:2
DEPTH
ORIENTATION
GROOVES
POSTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWNS
STEPNO:3
FACIALREDUCTION
OCCLUSALHALF
POSTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWN
STEPNO:4
FACIALREDUCTION
GINGIVALHALF
POSTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWN
STEPNO:5
PROXIMAL
AXIAL
REDUCTION
POSTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWN
STEPNO:6
LINGUALAXIAL
REDUCTION
POSTERIORMETALCERAMIC
CROWN
STEPNO:7
AXIALFINISHING
POSTERIORMETAL
CERAMICCROWN
POSTERIORMETAL
CERAMICCROWN
POSTERIORMETAL
CERAMICCROWN
Removeanyunsupportedenamel
Avoidtraumatizinggingivaduring
subgingivalpreparation
CommonFaultsinPreparation
Insufficientremovalofbuccalorlabialenamel
particularlyatthelabioincisalonethirdofthe
preparation
Insufficientremovalofocclusalenamelin
posteriorteethparticularlyatthecusptips
Insufficientremovaloflingualenamelwhich
mayforcetheceramisttowidenhisocclusal
tableorreducethegoldcopingthicknesswhich
canincreasetheriskofmetaldeformation.
CommonFaultsinPreparation
Failuretoroundoffallinternallineandpoint
angles,therebycreatingstressconcentration
areaswhichmaycausepopoffofthe
porcelainveneer.
Flatteningocclusaltablesinthepreparation
insteadoffollowingthelineofthecuspangles.
Inadequateremovalofapproximalenamel,
particularlyonthefrontteeth,leaving
insufficientspaceformetalandporcelainatthe
cervicalthirdofthetooth.
References
PrinciplesofToothPreparations;
PreparationsforFullCoverageCrowns,
FundamentalsofFixedprosthodontics,4th
Ed.Shillingburg,Quintessencepublishing.