Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Gross-1850
“Rude unhinging of machinery
of life”
Hardway - 1990
“Inadequate capillary perfusion”
SHOCK has a haemodynamic
component, which is the initial focus
of resuscitation
BUT
SHOCK also has systemic
inflammatory component, that leads
to multiple organ failure.
Container Concept
2L
5L
3L
3L
2L
7L
5L
Capillary Cellular
Relationship in Shock
Stage I - Volume loss 15%
• Vasoconstriction
Decreased O2, Substrate delivery
Anaerobic metabolism
Lactic acidosis, ↑H ions
July 1 2002
“Shock is recognized at the
bedside when haemodynamic
instability leads to hypoperfusion
of several organ systems.
SHOCK IS A CLINICAL
DIAGNOSIS”
Holmes, Walley. Clinics in chestmedicine, Dec. 2003
Diagnosis
Recognized by hypoperfusion of
several organ systems.
• Altered level of consciousness
• Decreased urine output
• Mottled skin
• Haemodynamic instability
Hypovolaemic
Shock
Inadequate venous return due
to haemorrhage or
dehydration.
Vasodilatory Shock
Inadequate venous return due to
vasoplegia, or lack of vascular
tone.
pulm.embolism, tamponade
Working diagnosis for cause of
Shock
High output Cardiogenic
Vasodilatory Hypovolaemic
Cardiac output ? Raised Reduced
Pulse pressure Wide Narrow
Diastolic Very low Low
Extremities Warm Cool
Capillary Rapid Slow
Heart soundCrisp Muffled
Temperature High/low Normal
WBC High/low Normal
Infection Present Absent
Contd...
Cardiogenic Hypovolaemic
Clinical Angina, Abnormal Blood loss,
ECG Vol.loss
X’Ray Cardiomegally,
• Evaluate Breathing
• Vasodilatory Shock
• Adrenaline - 2 µ g/kg/min
• Nor Ad - 1 µ g/kg/min
stabilization - Plan
Definitive Management
Definitive Management
Haemorrhagic Shock
Goals-
• To restore oxygen perfusion to the
tissues
• To stop haemorrhage - surgical
etc.
Definitive Management
Haemorrhagic Shock
Aggressive Resuscitation ?
• Classic Approach - Am.Col.Surg ATLS
programme 93
• Current animal model - Bickel et al ‘91
• Kawaseki et al ‘91 - Aggressive fluid before
control of bleeding does not improve outcome
• Bicket et al ‘94 - Group with delayed fluid
resuscitation had better survival
• Seigell et al ‘98, Orlinsky 2001, Smail ‘98
Definitive Therapy
Cardiogenic Shock
Mortality 50-80%
Initial approach - Fluids if no
Pulm.Oedema, Vasoactive Therapy, Urgent
Echo., Thrombolytics,
Consider urgent revascularization -
Lower mortality than Thrombolytic with
IABP
Septic Shock
Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines
Crit.Care Med -2004
Early resuscitation goals -
• Drainage of abscess
• Removal of a device
Septic Shock
Fluid and Vasopressor
• Colloids/Crystalloid - no evidence base
• Fluid Challenge - Crystalloid 500-1000
• Colloid 300-500 ml over 30 mins
• Input output ratio is of no Utility
• Norepinephrine or Dopamin is the first choice
• NO LOW DOSE DOPAMIN
Septic Shock
Ionotropic Therapy
vasopressor
Septic Shock
• Steroid
• Vasopressin
• Sodium bicarbonate
• DVT prophylaxis