Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 179

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Practical

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Compression
Probe

00 Calibration Exercises
There are two methods of achieving calibration:

NOTES:
Time base linearity of the display is 2% of the whole time base.
This means that an echo could be one small division (or 2 mm on
the 100 mm range scale)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Multiple Back Wall Echo Method


Delaying Off Method

Multiple Back Wall Method


How to calibrate for 0 100 mm full screen of 25 mm calibration block.
Initial Pulse/Standby
echo/Big bang

Compressional Velocities
Air = 320m/s
Steel = 5960m/s

25mm
25mm
Steel

50mm 75mm 100mm

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Perspex = 2740m/s

Always use the leading edge where it just lift off


the time base.

METHOD/STEPS (Multiple BWE method)

2. Position the Range control on the required setting.i.e:


Position 10 = Allows calibration from just under 10mm full
screen to 25mm.
Position 25= Allows calibration from just under 25mm full
screen to 250mm.
Position 250 = Allows calibration from just under 250mm full
screen to infinity.
Place onto the 25mm position.

6. .

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

1. Set the probe selector switch either single/twin crystal.

BACK

METHOD/STEPS (Multiple BWE method)

4. Now, place the probe onto the 25mm thk and using the fine
range control wind in a series of back wall echos (BWEs).
Note: a series of BWEs simply means a group of echos
greater than the number required. Use the Attenuator/Gain
control to ensure the signals are of a suitable height to easily
identify the leading edge position of the signal.
5. Now, decide how many echos are required to calibrate. i.e
Screen Calibration Range/Calibration Block Thick = 100/25 = 4 BWEs
6. Check the calibration on a different thickness for accuracy.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

3. Now, using the Delay Control ONLY find the Initial Pulse and
position the signal to the left hand side of the screen.

Delaying Off Method


How to calibrate for 0 100 mm full screen of 100 mm calibration block.
Initial Pulse/Standby
echo/Big bang

Compressional Velocities
Air = 320m/s
Steel = 5960m/s
Perspex = 2740m/s

100mm
100mm
Steel

200mm

300mm

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

* When using narrow calibration blocks, the


beam is constantly spreading out. This
spreading of the beam cause spurious echos
of the sides of the block

METHOD/STEPS (Delaying Off Method)


1. Set the probe selector switch either single/twin crystal.
2. Position the Range control on the required setting.i.e: see as
previous.
3. Now, using the Delay Control ONLY find the Initial Pulse and
position the signal to the left hand side of the screen.
4. Place the probe onto the calibration block, and using the fine
range control wind in a series of BWEs

1st BWE

Initial Pulse

2nd BWE
3rd BWE

10

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

5. Using both the fine range & delay controls, position the 1 st BWE
onto zero time base position and 2nd BWE onto the ten position of
the time base (Right hand side)

6. Now using the Delay control ONLY the 1st BWE to the ten position
of the time base (Right Hand Side)

1st BWE

Initial Pulse

2nd BWE

10

100mm

7. Check the calibration on a different thickness for accuracy.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

3rd BWE

DIFFERENT MATERIALS

When testing other than steel, the velocity of the


sound wave may be different.

Actual Thickness =

Material Velocity X Time base Reading


Calibration Block Velocity

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

The following formula can be used to compensate


when the CRT is calibrated using a steel
calibration block:

Testing close to side walls

If care is not taken, these spurious echos


may be misinterpreted as BWE, if a twin
crystal probe is used, to eliminate this effect
ensure the cork separator is at 90 to the
edge of the block & not running parallel.
Cork separator between
the crystal
PLAN VIEW OF BLOCK

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

* When using narrow calibration blocks, the


beam is constantly spreading out similar to
the light from a torch, this spreading of the
beam by in turn cause spurious echos off
the sides of the block.

SIZING METHODS 0O PROBE


There are four main sizing techniques used with 0o probes:
6 dB drop
Maximum Amplitude
DGS
20 dB drop

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Equalization

SIZING TECHNIQUES
1.

6 dB DROP TECHNIQUE (SOMETIMES


CALLED HALF AMPLITUDE OR
BEAM
SPLITTING TECHNIQUE).
20 dB DROP TECHNIQUE (SOMETIMES
CALLED BEAM BOUNDARY
TECHNIQUE).
3.

MAXIMUM AMPLITUDE TECHNIQUE.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

2.

6 dB Drop

100% to 50%
80% to 40%
70% to 35%
20% to 10%

Centre of probe marked representing the edge of


defect.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

For sizing large planar reflectors only


Signal / echo reduced to half the height
Example:

6 dB Drop
BWE

The back wall echo reduced as some part


of the beam now striking the defect

Plan View

The echo of the defect has NOT yet


maximise as the whole beam Not yet
striking the defect

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Defect

6 dB Drop

Now the whole beam is on the defect


Back wall echo is now may be
reduced or disappeared

Plan View

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Defect

6 dB Drop
BWE

The probe is moved back until the echo


is reduced by half of its original height
At this point the probe centre beam is
directly on the edge of the defect
Plan View

The probe is then removed and the


centre is marked, and repeat to size the
whole defect

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Defect

Maximum Amplitude Technique

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

For sizing multifaceted defect eg. crack


Not very accurate
Small probe movement

Multifaceted defect : crack

The whole probe beam is on the defect

At this point, multipoint of the defect


reflect the sound to the probe
The echo (signal) show as a few peaks

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Maximum Amplitude

Multifaceted defect : crack


The probe is moved out of the
defect, the signal disappeared
If the edge of the beam strike
the edge of the defect, a very
small echo appears

If the probe is moved into the defect,


the signals height increase
One of the peak maximised
At this point the MAIN BEAM is
directly at the edge of the defect

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Maximum Amplitude

Maximum Amplitude
Remember: The peak which maximized does
not have to be the tallest or the first one

The probe is to be moved to the other


end of the defect
The signals will flactuate as the beam hits
the different faces of the defects
The probe is moved back into the defect
and to observe a peak of the signal
maximises

Mark the point under


the centre of the probe
which indicates the
edge of the defect
The length of the defect is
measured

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Length

Equalization Technique

At this point the whole beam is on


the back wall
At this point the whole beam is
on the defect
At the edge of the defect, half of
the beam is on the defect, and
another half is on the back wall

BWE

The BWE is at it maximum


The Defect echo is at it
maximum
The defect echo is at equal
height as the back wall
The point is marked as the edge of defect

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

The equalization technique can ONLY be used


Defect
if the defect is halfway the thickness

1.

THE DIMENSION OF THE REFLECTOR


WHICH IS BEING MEASURED MAY BE
EITHER LARGER OR SMALLER THAN THE
BEAM WIDTH.

2.

THE ULTRASONIC BEAM NEED NOT BE


SYMMETRICAL IN THE DIRECTION OF
PROBE MOVEMENT.

3.

THE BEAM SPREAD PARALLEL TO THE


DIRECTION OF PROBE MOVEMENT MUST BE
KNOWN.

4.
WORKS BEST ON UNIFORM REFLECTORS
WITH
RELATIVELY STRAIGHT EDGES.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

20 dB DROP

20 dB Drop
20 dB Beam profile

Defect

BWE

When the main beam is on the defect the defect signal is at it maximum
If the probe is moved and the signal is observed until it is reduced to
10% (20dB Drop), the edge of the beam is on the edge of the defect
Repeat the above at the other side of the defect
Using the pre-constructed Beam profile and a plotting card, the
defect maybe sized

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

10%

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

20 dB DROP

LENGTH

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Shear Probe

Checking for Index Point


A2 / V1 / IIW BLOCK / DUTCH BLOCK
There is no need to calibrate for the
following exercise.
INDEX
POINT

Initial Pulse/Standby
echo/Big bang
1st echo (MAX)

Place the probe on the A2 block and


move backwards/forwards over the
milled slot until first echo the R100 is
fully maximized
Now mark the index point onto the
probe.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

R100

Calibration of Angle Probes with


A4

A4 / V2 / DIN 54/122 / KIDNEY BLOCK


R25

Initial Pulse/Standby
echo/Big bang

450

R25

R50

25mm

100mm

175mm 250mm

The 1st echo always represents the radius the probe faces, after the
1st echo all the remaining echos are separated with 75mm beam path.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

EXIT POINT

Calibration of Angle Probes with


A4

A4 / V2 / DIN 54/122 / KIDNEY BLOCK

Initial Pulse/Standby
echo/Big bang

R50
450

R25

R50

50mm

125mm

200mm

The 1st echo always represents the radius the probe faces, after the
1st echo all the remaining echos are separated with 75mm beam path.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

EXIT POINT

When looking towards the


R25, the first echo is said to
represent 25mm but actual
distance traveled is 50mm.
When the sound leaves the probe,
hits the R25 returns to the probe the
12% of the energy passing through
the interfaces gives the response on
the time base, the remaining 88% of
the energy reflects down towards the
R50 & back again. Some of this
energy enters the probe but instead
of exciting the crystal the energy
absorbed by the damping medium,
the remaining energy has now been
deflected towards the R25 & back. At
this point the energy passing through
the interface may stimulate the
crystal and give response as 2nd
echo. The total journey traveled is
50+50+25+25=150mm

CRYSTAL

Initial Pulse/Standby
echo/Big bang

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

R25

PERSPEX SHOE SHAPED


TO DISPERSE / ABSORB
INTERNAL REFLECTIONS

25mm

100mm

Calibration of Angle Probes with


A2
A2 / V1 / IIW BLOCK / DUTCH BLOCK

R100

Initial Pulse/Standby
echo/Big bang
1st BWE
2nd BWE
3rd BWE

100mm

200mm

300mm

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

The V1 block has a 100mm


radius to reflect the sound and a
slot cut at the centre to capture
repeat signals. Signals occur
every 100mm a part.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Beam Angle

BEAM ANGLE
A quick check of beam angle can be performed
using the BS EN 12223 or 27963 block
Neither of these quick checks affords sufficient
accuracy if the probe is to be used for weld
testing
A much more accurate method is to use the 1.5
mm side drilled holes in the IOW block

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

EQUIPMENT CHECKS

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

IOW Block
I OW block 1.5 mm SDH positions
Hole #
From
From
From
top
btm
end
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
1
13
62
50
2
19
56
48
3
25
50
83
4
43
32
35
All holes drilled 22 mm deep

EQUIPMENT CHECKS

Method
Choose three 1.5 mm holes which will plot outside
the near zone of the probe
Try to avoid holes that will plot at a range greater
than 100 mm
Maximise the echo from each of the 3 holes and
carefully measure the position of the probe index
relative to the hole
Plot results on graph paper and draw the best fit
straight line through zero and the 3 points marked
Measure the beam angle using a protractor

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BEAM ANGLE ON THE IOW BLOCK

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

e.g. : Beam Angle Check For A 60 Probe

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

e.g. : Beam Angle Check For A 60 Probe

USUALLY THE BEAM SHOULD BE


WITHIN 2 OF NOMINAL
THE BEAM ANGLE VARIES AS THE
PROBE SHOE WEARS, SO IT IS
IMPORTANT TO CHECK REGULARLY
IN WELD TESTING AN ERROR OF AS
LITTLE AS 1 CAN BE SIGNIFICANT

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BEAM ANGLE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

20 dB BEAM
PROFILE Shear
Probe

One of the sizing methods used to measure the


throughwall dimension of a weld defect requires a 20
dB beam profile.
Method:
Choose three 1.5 mm holes which will plot outside
the near zone of the probe
Try to avoid holes that will plot at a range greater
than 100 mm

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

20 dB BEAM PROFILE

For each hole in turn:


Maximise the echo & measure the probe index
position relative to the hole. Using the gain control
set the echo to 100% FSH.
DO NOT RE-ADJUST THE GAIN CONTROL
Move the probe forward until the echo falls to 10%
FSH; measure the probe index position relative to
the hole.
Move the probe backward until the echo again falls
to 10% FSH; measure the probe index position
relative to the hole.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

20 dB BEAM PROFILE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

e.g. : 20 dB Beam Profile For A 60 Probe

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

e.g. : 20 dB Beam Profile For A 60 Probe

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

e.g. : 20 dB Beam Profile For A 60 Probe

Construction of a 20 dB Beam
Spread
IOW BLOCK BEAM PROFILE BLOCK A5

Trailing
Main Beam
Edge
10%FSH

Step 1 : Place the probe and find out the max position, then increase the gain
until the signal reaches full screen height (FSH) and mark the index point onto
the side of the block.
Step 2 : Move the probe forwards until the signal fall by 20dB (90%) & remark
the index point onto the side of the block

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Main Beam
There is no need to calibrate, however it does make the exercise easier
(suggest to calibrate for 0~100mm full screen)

Construction of a 20 dB Beam
Spread
IOW BLOCK BEAM PROFILE BLOCK A5

Main Beam
Leading Edge
10%FSH

Step 3 : Repeat the whole exercise (step 2) but pulling the probe backwards.
Step 4 : Now, repeat the whole exercise for a min. of 3 different depth holes.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Main Beam
There is no need to calibrate, however it does make the exercise easier
(suggest to calibrate for 0~100mm full screen)

Construction of a 20 dB Beam
Spread
LE
MB
TE

Surface Distance (mm)

Depth
CL
Remark:

Depth
of hole
(mm)

MB = Main Beam
TE = Trailing Edge
Now repeat the whole exercise for a min 3 different depth holes

1:1 scale

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

LE = Leading Edge

Construction of a 20 dB Beam
Spread
Depth of the hole

Surface Distance (mm)


Hole no.1
Hole no.2
Hole no.3
LE
MB
TE

Draw in the best lines through the holes. Note the MB starts from the
corner whilst the LE & TE are just in front & behind.
The other options are using tracing paper.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

1:1 scale

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

SENSITIVITY

Sensitivity

Depends upon:
Probe and flaw detector combination
Material properties
Probe frequency
Signal to noise ratio

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

The ability of an ultrasonic system to find the


smallest specified defect at the maximum
testing range

Smallest defect at maximum test range


Back wall echo
Disc (flat-bottom hole) equivalent
Grass levels
Side Drilled Holes, DAC Curves

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Methods of Setting Sensitivity

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

ULTRASONIC SENSITIVITY

DISTANCE AMPLITUDE
CORRECTION
VARIOUS STANDARD REFLECTORS ARE USED IN

1.

BACKWALL REFLECTIONS

2.

GRAIN RESPONSE (GRASS)

3.

SIDE DRILLED HOLES

4.

FLAT BOTTOMED HOLES

5.

SURFACE NOTCHES

6.

DISTANCE GAIN SIZE (THEORETICAL METHOD)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

ULTRASONIC TESTING IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE


DISTANCE AMPLITUDE CORRECTION. THESE COULD
BE:

NATIONAL CODES AND


STANDARDS SUCH AS BS EN
1714, ASME V OR AWS D1.1
SPECIFY STANDARD METHODS
OF ACHIEVING DISTANCE
AMPLITUDE CORRECTION.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

DISTANCE AMPLITUDE
CORRECTION

BS EN 1714 specifies three alternatives for


setting sensitivity for weld inspection:
Option 1: A 3 mm Side drilled hole DAC
Option 2: DGS method, reference reflector
defined as a disc shaped reflector of between
1 & 3 mm diameter dependent on weld
thickness and search unit frequency
Option 3: A 1 mm Surface notch DAC

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Option 1: Typical 3 mm SDH


calibration
blocks

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

BS EN 583-2:
Minimum Hole Depth & Cal Block Width For 4 MHz
10 mm Diameter Shear Wave Probes
Minimum
Minimum
Block
Minimum
Block
Block
Thickness Hole Length
Width
Length
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
10
12
20
150
15
18
25
200
20
22
30
250
30
31
38
280
40
33
40
300
50
33
40
300
60
33
40
300
70
33
40
300
80
33
40
300
Hole length, block width & block length based on a
scanning range of 1st hole beyond full skip with 70
probe or 200 mm whichever is greater.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

Therefore The Efficiency With Which


Ultrasound Is Transmitted Into And Through
The Material May Differ Between The
Calibration Block And The Component.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Bs En 583-2 Does Not Require The


Calibration Block Surface Finish And Material
To Be Exactly Similar To The Component
Which Is Being Tested.

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

The Amount Of Energy Lost For The Same


Material Will Be Less If The Surface Is
Perfectly Smooth And Flat And More If It Is
Not.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

As Ultrasound Passes From The Probe


Into The Material There Is Always A Loss
Of Energy.

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

If The Surface Of The Calibration Block


Differs From That Of The Component Then
The Difference In Transfer Efficiency Has
To Be Compensated For.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Ut Of Welds Is Often Carried Out From As


Rolled, Curved Or Corroded Surfaces.

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

In The Ultrasonic Testing Of Typical


Engineering Alloys The Primary Cause Of
Attenuation Is Scattering.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

As Ultrasound Passes Through Any Material


Energy Will Be Lost Due To Scattering And
Absorption Of The Sound Energy. This Loss
Of Energy Is Termed Attenuation.

BS EN 583-2 Paragraph 6.5 describes two


methods that can be used in ultrasonic testing
to obtain sensible values for transfer and
attenuation correction
Fixed path length technique - this will work
provided that any attenuation difference is
close to zero
Comparative technique - this should be used if
significant attenuation differences exist

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

BS EN 1714 / BS EN 583-2

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

TRANSFER CORRECTION: Fixed Path


Length Technique, SHEAR WAVES
This method requires 2 identical 45 search
units and a DGS diagram

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss
Correction 1

Transfer Loss Correction (1)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

1 Calibrate the screen for 100 or 200 mm


2 Place the two probes on the calibration block,
maximise the pitch-catch response, set to say 80%
FSH & note the equipment gain setting Vt,t
3 Note the range

Transfer Loss Correction (1)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

4 Repeat this procedure on the scanning surface


5 Note the gain setting, Vt,r
6 Note the range

7 Now use the DGS chart to obtain V, the


difference in dB on the backwall echo line at
the 2 ranges determined:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (1)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (1)

Transfer Loss Correction (1)

Vt = Vt,t - Vt,r - V

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Now calculate the transfer correction, Vt


using:

Transfer Loss Correction (1)

only 1 zero degree probe is needed

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

For zero degree scans a similar


procedure can be performed utilising
backwall echoes on the calibration
block and test piece -

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss
Correction 2

Transfer Loss Correction (2)


TRANSFER & ATTENUATION LOSS
CORRECTION COMPARATIVE TECHNIQUE

This method requires the use of 2 identical


45 shear wave probes:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

(for shear waves)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (2)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (2)

Using one of the two probes & with the


flawdetector set to single calibrate for an
appropriate range - in this case
0-100 mm
Now connect the second of the two probes &
without altering the range or delay controls
set the flawdetector to double

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (2)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (2)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (2)

Now repeat this procedure on the testpiece:


The single vee path echo was obtained at a
range of 33 mm
The gain setting required to raise this echo to
80% FSH was 26 dB
The double vee path echo was obtained at a
range of 66 mm
The gain setting required to raise this echo to
80% FSH was 34 dB

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (2)

Transfer Loss Correction (2)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Now plot the results on a sheet of Log-Linear


graph paper:

The required transfer and attenuation correction


is then the difference between the 2 lines at the
range of detection
NOTE THAT NEGATIVE TRANSFER AND
ATTENUATION LOSS CORRECTION IS NOT
PERMITTED
No correction is necessary if the difference
between the two lines is less than 2 dB
The maximum transfer and attenuation loss
correction permitted is 12 dB

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (2)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Transfer Loss Correction (2)

Minimum scanning sensitivity = 3mm SDH


DAC + 14 dB + Transfer correction
All indications reaching DAC at the minimum
scanning sensitivity must be investigated
All indications reaching DAC at the minimum
scanning sensitivity and found to be sizeable
by probe movement must be recorded

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

SENSITIVITY FOR PCN & CSWIP WELD UT


EXAMINATIONS

Option 2 : BS EN 1714 specifies DGS


Distance Gain Size (DGS)
This technique is based on theoretical flat bottom
hole(FBH) reflectors
All Krautkramer probes are supplied with a DGS
diagram
Most DGS diagrams are specific to a particular
type of probe, but a general diagram is given by
BS EN 583-2 (figure 11)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1714 - DGS Method

Some digital flawdetectors are set up to


perform DGS automatically
For analogue flawdetectors screen inserts
with pre-plotted DGS diagrams are
available

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1714 - DGS Method

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

EXAMPLE DGS DIAGRAM

For a 0 probe BS EN 1714 specifies a 2 mm FBH


reference level for weld thickness 15 to 40 mm
For thicknesses of 40 mm and above the reference
reflector for a 0 probe is specified as a 3 mm FBH
In order to use the DGS diagram (assuming
attenuation = 0) a backwall reflector is required
If attenuation 0 at least two repeat backwall
reflectors are required

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

USING THE DGS CHART

EXAMPLE:
Lets Suppose that we have to examine a full
penetration T joint in 25 mm thick plate
Lets assume that the plate is good quality and has
negligible attenuation
This is a cross section of the weld:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

USING THE DGS CHART

USING THE DGS CHART

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

EXAMPLE:
Place the probe upon the testpiece & obtain a
backwall echo
Set the backwall echo to (say) 80% FSH
Note the range (R) and gain setting (G)

USING THE DGS CHART

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

EXAMPLE:
Now use the DGS diagram to obtain G0 dB, the
calculated backwall echo at range R

USING THE DGS CHART

EXAMPLE:
G = G - G0 = 18 - 2 = 16 dB
G is basically the transfer correction
needed to get on to the diagram

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Now calculate G

USING THE DGS CHART

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

EXAMPLE:
Lets suppose that a slag inclusion is detected as
shown below
Maximise the echo, then use the gain control to set
it to 80% FSH
Note the range (R) and gain setting (G)

USING THE DGS CHART

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

EXAMPLE:
Now use the DGS diagram to find the flat bottom
hole equivalent:

If using an angle probe a backwall echo


will in general not be available directly
from the testpiece
Krautkramer have developed a method
where the echo from the 100 mm
quadrant of the IIW V1 block is used as
a substitute

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

USING DGS WITH ANGLE PROBES

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Resolution

BS EN 12668-3 does not specify any requirements


for resolution, but a check on resolution is still a
useful way of monitoring the performance of an
ultrasonic test system
Resolution is primarily affected by pulse length
As a piezo electric probe ages pulse length tends
to increase.
This is because the bonding efficiency of the
damping material to the crystal tends to decrease

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

RESOLUTION

RESOLUTION

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

The resolution of both shear wave and zero


degree compression probes can be checked
using the BS 2704 A7 block:

RESOLUTION

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

A good 4 MHz shear


wave probe should be
capable of resolving the
2 mm step

RESOLUTION

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

A good 5 MHz
compression wave
probe should be capable
of resolving the 3 mm
step

RESOLUTION

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

An alternative check for shear wave probes is


provided by the BS 2704 A5 (IOW) block:

RESOLUTION

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

A crude check for zero degree compression


probes can be performed using the 85, 91 &
100 mm steps in the BS EN 12223 calibration
block:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Scanning
Using Plotting
Card - Weld

DEFECT LOCATION IN ULTRASONIC TESTING


IS BASED UPON THE PREMISE THAT A
MAXIMISED ECHO RESPONSE CAN ONLY
COME FROM A REFLECTOR WHICH IS LYING
ON THE BEAM AXIS.
THIS PREMISE CAN BE ASSUMED BECAUSE
THE GREATEST SOUND INTENSITY OR
PRESSURE IS CONCENTRATED IN A SMALL
VOLUME AROUND THE BEAM AXIS.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

DEFECT LOCATION

MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE ECHO IS


MAXIMISED!!
Measure the stand-off distance (s) with
your ruler
Measure the range (R) using the A-scan
display

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

DEFECT LOCATION

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

USING A FLAW LOCATION SLIDE

USING A FLAW LOCATION SLIDE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

PLOT THE BEAM SPREAD FOR THE SEARCH PROBE ON A BEAM


PLOTTING CHART:

USING A FLAW LOCATION SLIDE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Slide your weld sketch over the chart to plot your indications:

USING A FLAW LOCATION SLIDE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Use the mirror image to plot indications beyond


half-skip:

USING A FLAW LOCATION SLIDE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Project skip indications onto the main weld sketch:

When locating a defect always try to confirm


its position from more than one scanning
direction
If this is not possible try to confirm with more
than one probe angle
In single sided welds any defect, close to
the root, plotting far-side of centreline may
not be a defect at all!!!
BE CAREFUL!

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

DEFECT LOCATION

DEFECT LOCATION
TO ACCURATELY LOCATE DEFECTS IN A BUTT WELD THE
FOLLOWING CRITERIA MUST BE MET:

1.
THE PROBE EXIT POINT MUST BE ACCURATELY
KNOWN.
2.

THE BEAM ANGLE MUST BE ACCURATELY KNOWN.

4.

THE MATERIAL THICKNESS MUST BE ACCURATELY


KNOWN.

5.

THE FLAWDETECTOR MUST BE ACCURATELY


CALIBRATED.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

3.
THE WELD CENTRELINE MUST BE ACCURATELY
KNOWN.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Defect location
Using Calculation

Defect Location Using Calculation

Adjacent

Sine function: Sin() = opposite / Hypotenuse


Cosine function: Cos () = adjacent/ Hypotenuse
Tangent function: Tan() = opposite/ adjacent
Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Opposite

Hy
po

te
n

us
e

Trigonometry

Calculation

Depth

Depth = Cos x Beam Path Length


Stand-off = Sin x Beam Path Length

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Beam Path
Length

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Sizing
Defect

DEFECT SIZING
TECHNIQUES

2. 20 dB DROP TECHNIQUE (SOMETIMES


CALLED BEAM BOUNDARY TECHNIQUE).
3.

MAXIMUM AMPLITUDE TECHNIQUE.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

1. 6 dB DROP TECHNIQUE (SOMETIMES


CALLED HALF AMPLITUDE OR BEAM
SPLITTING TECHNIQUE).

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

6 dB Drop Technique

6 dB DROP

2. WORKS BEST ON UNIFORM


REFLECTORS HAVING
RELATIVELY STRAIGHT EDGES.
3. FOR DEFECTS DISPLAYING ECHO
HEIGHT VARIATION ALONG THE
LENGTH USE THE LAST MAXIMUM.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

1. THE DIMENSION OF THE REFLECTOR


WHICH IS BEING MEASURED MUST
EXCEED THE BEAM WIDTH.

20 dB Drop Technique: Step 1

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Maximise the echo, set it to 100% FSH, note


the stand-off distance (s) and the range (R).

20 dB Drop Technique: Step 1.1

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

PLOT THE MAXIMISED ECHO:

20 dB Drop Technique: Step 2

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Move the probe back from the weld until the echo
falls to 10% FSH. Note the stand-off (s) and the
range (R)

20 dB Drop Technique: Step 3.1

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

PLOT THE TOP EDGE OF THE REFLECTOR:

20 dB Drop Technique: Step 3

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Move the probe forward (towards the weld) until


the echo falls to 10% FSH. Note the stand-off
(s) and the range (R)

20 dB Drop Technique: Step 2.1

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

PLOT THE BOTTOM EDGE OF THE REFLECTOR:

20 dB Drop Technique: Step 4

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Sketch the defect:

20 dB Drop Technique

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

LENGTH

20 dB DROP

THE

THE DIMENSION OF THE REFLECTOR


WHICH IS BEING MEASURED MAY BE
EITHER LARGER OR SMALLER THAN
BEAM WIDTH.

2.

THE BEAM SPREAD PARALLEL TO THE


DIRECTION OF PROBE MOVEMENT
MUST BE
KNOWN.
3. WORKS BEST ON UNIFORM
REFLECTORS
WITH RELATIVELY
STRAIGHT EDGES.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

1.

MAXIMUM AMPLITUDE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Many weld defects have multiple facets


Such defects are difficult to size using 20dB drop

Sound pressure is at a maximum on the axis


of a beam of ultrasound
For high frequency (4 or 5 MHz) ultrasound
sound pressure falls very steeply away from
the beam axis
If a signal can be maximised by moving the
probe then the reflector must be on the beam
axis at the point where the echo maximises

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

MAXIMUM AMPLITUDE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

CENTRELINE CRACK 70 PROBE AT SKIP

Carefully maximise
each signal within the
echo envelope, noting
range & stand-off in
each case
Plot in the usual way
Repeat using
alternative scan
directions & beam
angles

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

CENTRELINE CRACK 70 PROBE AT


SKIP

The maximum amplitude technique is less


effective if the defect is smooth planar (e.g.: lack
of side fusion)
The echo-dynamic pattern for such defects
sometimes includes tip maxima
Where this is the case the maximum amplitude
technique can be effective for throughwall sizing

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

MAXIMUM AMPLITUDE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Type 2 Echo-Dynamic With Tip Maxima

Most smooth planar defects have no tip-maxima


In such cases a reasonable estimate of
throughwall size can be made as follows:
Maximise the echo, set to 100% FSH move the
probe forward, the echo drops to 80% FSH - the
edge of the defect is now very close to the axis of
the beam
Repeat moving the probe backward

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

MAXIMUM AMPLITUDE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Type 2 Echo-Dynamic No Tip Maxima

Can measure any defect dimension


Very effective for rough planar and
volumetric reflectors
Less effective, but still possible, for
smooth planar reflectors

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

MAXIMUM AMPLITUDE

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Step by Step
For Scanning

Testing a Weld: OBJECTIVES


1.

Scan all fusion faces with an angle of


incidence within 20 of 0

2.

3.

Scan the entire weld volume for


longitudinal imperfections using at least
2 beam angles
Scan the entire weld volume for
transverse imperfections using at
least 1 beam angle

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

(within 10 of 0 for ultra-critical examinations)

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

Equipment checking
Sensitivity setting
Parent material scan
Weld scan
Sizing of indications
Evaluation of indications
Reporting

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

STAGES OF INSPECTION:

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

1. Linearity of timebase (weekly)


2. Linearity of equipment gain (weekly)
3. Probe index (daily)
4. Probe angle (daily)
5. Pulse length (weekly)
6. Signal to noise ratio (weekly)
7. General condition of equipment (weekly)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

EQUIPMENT CHECKING
(BS EN 12668-3)

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld


Sensitivity setting - FOLLOW THE
APPLICABLE PROCEDURE

BS EN 1714 examination level A, B & C


specifies a 3 mm SDH DAC + 10 dB +
transfer & attenuation correction or DGS

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

e.g. PCN & CSWIP examinations: 3 mm


SDH DAC + 14 dB + transfer &
attenuation correction

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

Parent material through which shear waves will


pass during weld examination must be scanned,
using a 0 probe, for laminar imperfections and to
accurately confirm thickness
A sensible sensitivity setting for this examination
is 2nd BWE to FSH
Alternatively 3 mm SDH DAC + 10 or 14 dB can
be used

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

PARENT MATERIAL EXAMINATION

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

1.
2.
3.
4.

Weld root inspection


Fusion face & HAZ inspection
Weld volume
Scan for transverse imperfections

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

WELD SCAN - 4 stages:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

1. For this scan a 45 or 70 probe should


be used
2. In most cases the 70 is best
3. Owing to its poor sensitivity for corner
reflectors the 60 probe should not be used
4. A screen width of 100 mm should be used
(in some cases a delayed screen maybe
necessary)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

FIXED ROOT SCAN (single sided welds only):

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

But it is not ideal, because the probe shoe fouls


the weld-cap

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

The 45 probe could be used in this case:

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

The ideal stand-off position can be calculated: = t


(Tan 70) + half the root gap (where t is the
thickness)
Or it can be determined using a flaw location slide

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

The 70 probe is therefore preferred:

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Put a magnetic straight edge behind the probe, so that it


can be moved along the weld length at a fixed stand-off:
Use a screen calibration of 0-100 mm

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld


FUSION FACE + HAZ SCAN:

ideal angle = 90 - (the bevel angle)


2. Alternatively it can be determined using
the flaw location slide

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

1. The ideal beam angle can be calculated


as follows:

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

In this case the bevel angle is 30:

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

The maximum stand-off distance required


= 2t(Tan 60) + 10 + half the weld cap width
= 2 x 20 x 1.73 + 10 + 14 = 93.2
Range calibration 0-100 mm

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Fusion face, HAZ & weld volume scan using the 60


probe

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

The maximum stand-off distance required


= 2t(Tan 70) + half the weld cap width
= 2 x 20 x 2.75 + 14 = 124
Range calibration 0-200 mm

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Weld volume scan using the 70 probe

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

1. Overlap between adjacent scans should


be at least 10% of the transducer width
2. The rate of probe movement should not
exceed 150 mm/s
3. A slight swivelling motion (10) should
be applied to the probe during scanning
4. 2 MHz shear waves are preferred for
search scans, but 4 MHz may also be used

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

General notes on fusion face, HAZ & weld


volume scans:

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

1. In cases of high criticality the weld cap


should be ground flush to permit
scanning for transverse imperfections
directly from the weld-cap
2. Under most other circumstances a
satisfactory scan can be performed
from the parent material

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

SCANNING FOR TRANSVERSE


IMPERFECTIONS:

Ultrasonic Inspection of a Weld

Range
calibration: 0200 mm

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Scan in both
directions from
both sides of
the weld

In many circumstances the ultrasonic operator


will be called upon to identify defect type
In order that he or she can do this he or she must
have in depth knowledge of the product that he
or she is testing
In particular he or she needs to be familiar with
the types of defect that may be present
Many defects occur only at certain locations
within any given product

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Evaluation of Ultrasonic
Indications

Once a recordable condition has been identified


and plotted the defect type can often be identified
by considering:
1. The types of defect that are likely to be
present
2. The defect position
3. The defect size
4. Echo dynamic behaviour
5. Signal amplitude & shape with various
probe angles

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Evaluation of Weld Indications

BS EN 1713 identifies 5 basic types of echo


dynamic behaviour typically seen when
performing ultrasonic testing of welds:
Pattern 1: point or threadlike reflector
Pattern 2: smooth planar reflector
Pattern 3a: rough reflector at near normal
incidence
Pattern 3b: rough reflector at oblique
incidence
Pattern 4: multiple (point) reflector

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Echo Dynamic Behaviour

BS EN 1713 Pattern 1

Point-like reflector response. At any probe


position the A-scan shows a single sharp echo.
As the probe is moved this rises in amplitude
smoothly to a single maximum before falling
smoothly to noise level.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Definition:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1713 Pattern 1

BS EN 1713 Pattern 2

Extended smooth reflector response. At any


probe position the A-scan shows a single sharp
echo. When the ultrasonic beam is moved over
the reflector the echo rises smoothly to a
plateau and is maintained, with minor variations
in amplitude of up to 4 dB, until the beam
moves off the reflector, when the echo will fall
smoothly to noise level.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Definition:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1713 Pattern 2

BS EN 1713 Pattern 3a

Extended rough reflector at near normal incidence.


At any probe position, the A-scan shows a single but
ragged echo. As the probe is moved this may
undergo large (> 6 dB) random fluctuations in
amplitude. The fluctuations are caused by reflection
from different facets of the reflector, and by random
interference of waves scattered from groups of
facets.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Definition:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1713 Pattern 3a

BS EN 1713 Pattern 3b

Extended rough reflector at oblique incidence. At any


probe position, the A-scan shows an extended train of
signals (subsidiary peaks) within a bell-shaped pulse
envelope. As the probe is moved each subsidiary
peak travels through the pulse envelope, rising to its
own maximum towards the centre of the envelope,
and then falling. The overall signal may show large (>
6 dB) random fluctuations in amplitude.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Definition:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1713 Pattern 3b

BS EN 1713 Pattern 4

Multiple reflector response. At any probe


position the A-scan shows a cluster of signals
which may or may not be well resolved in range.
As the probe is moved the signals rise and fall at
random but the signal from each separate
reflector element, if resolved, shows pattern 1
response.

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Definition:

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1713 Pattern 4

A typical weld defect will show different types


of echo dynamic behaviour for different types
of probe movement
Echo dynamic behaviour may also change
when the beam angle is changed
Careful consideration of such echo dynamic
behaviour gives many clues as to the shape
and nature of a reflector

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1713 Probe Movement

BS EN 1713 Probe Movement

1. LATERAL: the probe is moved parallel to


the weld axis
2. TRANSVERSE: the probe is moved at
90 to the weld axis
3. ORBITAL: the probe is moved along
a circular path with the
reflector at its centre
4. SWIVEL: the probe is rotated about its
own axis

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Types of probe movement

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

BS EN 1713 Probe Movement

Typical echo dynamic behaviour; butt-weld 60 included angle


Defect type:
Lack of sidewall fusion
Type of Probe Movement
Probe
Comments
L
T
O
S
2
1/ 2
1
1
45
Low amplitude, or no response
2
1/ 2
1
1
Very high amplitude
60
2
1/ 2
1
1
Fairly high amplitude
70
Abbreviations: L = Lateral; T = Transverse; O = Orbital; S = Swivel

Plots at the fusion face


May cause mode conversion (all probes may
be affected)

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Typical Echo Dynamic Behaviour

Typical Echo Dynamic Behaviour

Plots probe side of the weld at the root face


May cause mode conversion, especially with
60 probe

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Typical echo dynamic behaviour; butt-weld 60 included angle


Defect type:
Lack of root fusion
Type of Probe Movement
Probe
Comments
L
T
O
S
2
1
1
1
45
Usually the highest amplitude
2
1
1
1
Sometimes very low amplitude
60
2
1
1
1
Usually high amplitude
70
Abbreviations: L = Lateral; T = Transverse; O = Orbital; S = Swivel

Typical echo dynamic behaviour; butt-weld 60 included angle


Defect type:
Slag inclusion
Type of Probe Movement
Probe
Comments
L
T
O
S
1
45 2/ 3a 1/ 3a 1/ 3a
Echo height similar for all probe
1
60 2/ 3a 1/ 3a 1/ 3a
angles
1
70 2/ 3a 1/ 3a 1/ 3a
Abbreviations: L = Lateral; T = Transverse; O = Orbital; S = Swivel

Amplitude highly variable


Often with associated LOSWF
Can plot anywhere within the weld volume

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Typical Echo Dynamic Behaviour

Typical echo dynamic behaviour; butt-weld 60 included angle


Defect type:
Centreline crack
Type of Probe Movement
Probe
Comments
L
T
O
S
3b
3b
3b
3b
45
Echo height similar for all probe
3b
3b
3b
3b
60
angles
3b
3b
3b
3b
70
Abbreviations: L = Lateral; T = Transverse; O = Orbital; S = Swivel

Plots at or near weld centreline


Usually surface breaking
Strong response with all beam angles

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Typical Echo Dynamic Behaviour

Typical echo dynamic behaviour; butt-weld 60 included angle


Defect type:
Heat affected zone crack
Type of Probe Movement
Probe
Comments
L
T
O
S
3a
3b
3a
3b Amplitude lower than other probes
45
3a
3a
3a
3b Very high amplitude
60
3a
3a
3a
3b High amplitude
70
Abbreviations: L = Lateral; T = Transverse; O = Orbital; S = Swivel

Plots at the fusion face or just within the


parent material
Usually reaches the surface at the weld toe

Copyright TWI Ltd 2008

Typical Echo Dynamic Behaviour

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi