Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Scott Franke
AFRL/VSSV
1
Materials
Radiative Comparison
Long Term Exposure Degradation
Multi-Layer Insulation (Thermal Blanket / Shroud)
Orbit Considerations
GEO, LEO, Lagrange points, Inclination
Design Examples
Design for Stabilization of Oscillating Heat Flux
@ LEO
Oscillation due to orbit: sun/shadow (umbra)
Design for Specific Temperature with Constant Heat Flux
@ Sun-Earth Lagrange (L2) point:
Stationary position relative to Earth.
Summary/Questions
View factor, F12: relates fraction of thermal power leaving object 1 and reaching
object 2.
Relations:
q AB
B TB TA
= material density
= Stefan-Boltzmann
h = material thickness
c = material heat capacitance
T 1 T 2
q 12
1
2
1
2
q 12
1 T 1 T 2
F12 = 1
Solar Radiation
q = 1350 cos()
is angle between S/C normal to the sun
Largest heat source by far
Function of S/C attitude only
Earth Albedo
Materials
Radiative Comparison
Long Term Exposure Degradation
Multi-Layer Insulation (Thermal Blanket / Shroud)
Orbit Considerations
GEO, LEO, Lagrange points, Inclination
Design Examples
Design for Stabilization of Oscillating Heat Flux
@ LEO
Oscillation due to orbit: sun/shadow (umbra)
Design for Specific Temperature with Constant Heat Flux
@ Sun-Earth Lagrange (L2) point:
Stationary position relative to Earth.
Summary/Questions
Materials: Degradation
10 yrs
@ Simulated
GEO
(also, LDEF)
10
11
Materials:
Multi-Layer Insulation (MLI) / Thermal Blanket
Typically Aluminized Mylar
Hubble ST: Aluminized Teflon FEP
(fluorinated ethylene propylene)
q leak
2 leak
n1
n layers
Dacron filling
12
Materials
Radiative Comparison
Long Term Exposure Degradation
Multi-Layer Insulation (Thermal Blanket / Shroud)
Orbit Considerations
GEO, LEO, Lagrange points, Inclination
Design Examples
Design for Stabilization of Oscillating Heat Flux
@ LEO
Oscillation due to orbit: sun/shadow (umbra)
Design for Specific Temperature with Constant Heat Flux
@ Sun-Earth Lagrange (L2) point:
Stationary position relative to Earth.
Summary/Questions
13
Sunlight
Umbra boundary
Earth Surface
Orbit
14
Earth Surface
Orbit
Umbra boundary
Sunlight
Umbra boundary
15
Sunlight
0% of orbit sweeps
through Umbra
(constant sunlight
on one side)
From these cases, one can see that the zero degree case (at solstice) for LEO has the
highest dT/dt possible, and represents the worst thermal transient condition.
16
Materials
Radiative Comparison
Long Term Exposure Degradation
Multi-Layer Insulation (Thermal Blanket / Shroud)
Orbit Considerations
GEO, LEO, Lagrange points, Inclination
Design Examples
Design for Stabilization of Oscillating Heat Flux
@ LEO
Oscillation due to orbit: sun/shadow (umbra)
Design for Specific Temperature with Constant Heat Flux
@ Sun-Earth Lagrange (L2) point:
Stationary position relative to Earth.
Summary/Questions
17
Given
90 minute orbit, LEO altitude, 0 degree inclination
Find
Strategy
Assumption:
Shroud modeled as
thin circular plate.
B
A
qAB = f (T)
Required:
q leak q AB
qleak
qAB
B
MLI
19
Earth Surface
Orbit
Umbra boundary
Sunlight
Umbra boundary
20
f lu x (W /m ^ 2 )
1000
Umbra Region:
(~40% of orbit)
500
50
Total
Albedo
Solar
Earth
100
150
200
Planar Orbit (deg)
250
300
350
21
f lu x ( W /m ^ 2 )
2D plate model
1000
Umbra Region:
(~40% of orbit)
500
50
To tal
A lbed o
So lar
Earth
100
150
200
Planar Orbit (deg)
250
300
350
22
Temperature (K)
400
300
200
100
10
Time (hours)
15
20
Temperature (K)
400
To ~ 340 K
350
300
15
16
17
18
Time (hours)
19
20
21
23
3 4
s K
.04
5.67 10
Shroud, A
Truss/Interior
1 K
( 0.5 K)
B T2 T1
q AB
4 B To
4 T B To
3
24
max q external
q leak
4 T B To
2 leak
n1
2 leak
4 T B To
qAB = f (T)
Required:
q leak q AB
q AB
qleak
qAB
B
25
Emissivity
between MLI
and Interior
Emissivity
between layers of
MLI
Steady State
Temp. (K) (T
= 1 K)
Number of
MLI layers
Worst Case
367
322
Graphite Epoxy
Exterior /
0.85
0.6
0.08
340
25
0.85
0.6
0.05
340
15
0.85
0.6
0.04
340
12
0.04
0.04
0.04
163
0.08
0.08
0.04
194
Anodized Aluminum
Ext. /
0.15
0.8
0.04
290
Nickel MLI
Graphite Epoxy
Exterior /
Silver MLI
Gold MLI
Gold MLI
INPUT
OUTPUT
26
Given
Consider Solar heat flux only, since View Factor for Earth is negligible.
Maneuver time is about four hours, (angular rotation rate is very slow)
Temperature is constant once at desired rotated position
Find
Thermal blanket MLI material specification and number of layers to keep satellite
structural members at nominal temperature of 200K.
Strategy
Specify number of layers, material specs to get steady state temp. to 200K
Use simple ODE to achieve settling time within 4 hours and discover steady state
temperature
27
z
y
28
q S 405
W
2
q A 139.71
qt 658.412
W
2
q E 113.702
W
2
W
2
c h
4
d
T T
dt
400
200
5000
1 10
1.5 10
Time (s)
2 10
2.5 10
3 10
Method 1 (previous):
Using the method the same as for the fluctuating heat: q AB
Equation above is
Transformed into: q AB
Also:
So, design
parameter is:
4 T B To
q leak
q leak q AB
Shroud, A
2 leak
n1
B TA TB
B
qleak
Text
To
qAB
T
qleak
Text
This only holds if temperatures are close to the desired nominal temperature (200 K).
See Hedgepeth, pg. 9. (NASA contractor report 3800) However, as we have seen from the
steady state computation:
Text = 580 K >> 200 K !!!!
30
Method 2 ( A better
approximation?) :
Model as 2D planar surface
(contents surfaces) enclosed by
another 2D plate (shroud surface)
Equation for heat leaking across
two parallel plates with N shield
layers:
q leak
Shroud, A
B
qleak
Text
To
qleak
Text
q
N 1 12
Outside plate:
Shroud exterior, Text
q 12
qAB
4
4
T 2 T 1
T1 = To and T2 = Text
2
31
q 12
1
1
1
2
q leak
q
N 1 12
q leak q AB
q AB T 4 AB To
N 1
1
3 1
T 4 To
1
1 2
Note:
T = 1 K
To = 200 K
T1 = 200 K
T2 = 580 K
1 = 1
2 = 0.03
(Proposed sub-requirement)
(Given requirement)
(Steady state exterior temperature)
(Worst case for telescope/truss surfaces)
(Gold emissivity)
Method 1:
Small Convex Object
Enclosed in Large Cavity
External Temperature
T2 T1
2 leak
4 T B To
Method 2:
Two Parallel Plates
T 4 To
3
f (Heat Flux)
33
Shroud Exterior
Absorptivity
Emissivity between
MLI and Interior
Emissivity between
layers of MLI
Exterior Steady
State Temp. (K)
Number of MLI
layers
.035
271
(Worst case)
Method 1
0.07
Silver (Coated?)**
Method 2
(valid)*
0.07
.035
271
0.3
0.03
583
21
Silver (Coated?)
Method 1
(Gold Foil)
Method 2
(not valid)
0.3
0.03
583
107
0.15
0.06
347
21
(Gold Foil)
Method 1
(Aluminum Foil)
Method 2
(Not valid?)
0.15
0.06
347
24
(Aluminum Foil)
34
Design Issues
Materials
Modeling (geometry, assumptions)
Given requirements or desirements (delta T, etc.)
Analytical Insight (ODE, FEM)
35
4. http://www.swales.com/products/therm_blank.html
5. http://setas-www.larc.nasa.gov/LDEF/index.html
6. http://www.aero.org/publications/crosslink/summer2003/07.html
36