Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 36

Radiative Heat Trade-Offs for

Spacecraft Thermal Protection


A Practical Guide to
Thermal Blanket/Multi-Layer
Insulation Design

Scott Franke
AFRL/VSSV
1

Thermal Radiation Trade-offs Overview

Thermal Radiation Basics


Properties and Relations: View Factor, absorptivity, emissivity, Stefan-Boltzmann, thin-plate ODE
Radiation Geometries: Parallel Plates, Convex Object in Large Cavity
Sources: Solar Radiation, Earth Radiation, Albedo

Materials
Radiative Comparison
Long Term Exposure Degradation
Multi-Layer Insulation (Thermal Blanket / Shroud)

Orbit Considerations
GEO, LEO, Lagrange points, Inclination

Design Examples
Design for Stabilization of Oscillating Heat Flux
@ LEO
Oscillation due to orbit: sun/shadow (umbra)
Design for Specific Temperature with Constant Heat Flux
@ Sun-Earth Lagrange (L2) point:
Stationary position relative to Earth.

Summary/Questions

Thermal Radiation Basics: Properties and Relations

No medium required, only optical transmission

Only effective heat transfer method in empty space


unless very low earth orbit (drag convection conduction)

Properties for transmission:

Absorptivity, : ability for the surface to absorb radiation.


Emissivity, : ability for the surface to emit radiation.

View factor, F12: relates fraction of thermal power leaving object 1 and reaching
object 2.

Surface finish dependent;


want low values for both

Used when a sink can see more than one source

Relations:

Blackbody vs. Greybody radiation

Blackbody is ideal emitter (max case): 1


Greybody is anything less than blackbody, 0 < < 1

Stefan-Boltzmann relation (any greybody):

q AB

B TB TA

Note: q is really area-normalized q-dot (W/m2)


= Stefan-Boltzmann Constant

Thermal Radiation Basics: Properties and Relations

Simple time ODE for radiantly heated thin plate:


4
d
c h T T
dt

= material density
= Stefan-Boltzmann
h = material thickness
c = material heat capacitance

In order to use such a simple equation: Assumptions.


1) Our thermal blanket/MLI behaves as a thin plate
2) Density is uniform
3) Temperature is same everywhere on blanket (big assumption)

Why bother then?


Because it gives us a good rough approximation without using a FEM model
Hard to model with FEM thermal blanket irregular/unpredictable geometry
Reliably vague (ballpark reliability)
4

Thermal Radiation Basics: Radiation Geometries

Heat flux (W/m2) between:

T 1 T 2

q 12

Two large (infinite) plates

1
2

1
2

F12 = 1 (View Factor)

Small Convex Object in a


Large Cavity

q 12

1 T 1 T 2

F12 = 1

Thermal Radiation Basics: Sources


Flux (W/m2)

Solar Radiation

Sun radiates at blackbody temperature of


~5000K Solar Constant: ~1350 W/m2

q = 1350 cos()
is angle between S/C normal to the sun
Largest heat source by far
Function of S/C attitude only

Earth Blackbody Radiation

View factor specific (how close you are to


earth compared to sun)

T (Earth blackbody) = 289 K


q = T4 F
Function of S/C attitude AND orbit

Earth Albedo

Reflected light from sun


q = 1350 AF F cos()
Function of S/C attitude, orbit, AND
season/latitude/longitude

AF = Albedo Factor ~ 0.36 on average


AF is a measure of reflectivity of Earths surface.
= Angle between S/C surface and sun
( is 90 degrees out of phase with )
6

Thermal Radiation Trade-offs Overview

Thermal Radiation Basics


Properties and Relations: View Factor, absorptivity, emissivity, Stefan-Boltzmann, thin-plate ODE
Radiation Geometries: Parallel Plates, Convex Object in Large Cavity
Sources: Solar Radiation, Earth Radiation, Albedo

Materials
Radiative Comparison
Long Term Exposure Degradation
Multi-Layer Insulation (Thermal Blanket / Shroud)

Orbit Considerations
GEO, LEO, Lagrange points, Inclination

Design Examples
Design for Stabilization of Oscillating Heat Flux
@ LEO
Oscillation due to orbit: sun/shadow (umbra)
Design for Specific Temperature with Constant Heat Flux
@ Sun-Earth Lagrange (L2) point:
Stationary position relative to Earth.

Summary/Questions

Materials: Radiative Property Comparison

Material absorptivity () varies with


temperature of source.

Anodized Aluminum (13)


Polished Aluminum (15)
8

Materials: Radiative Property Comparison

Not easily found via web

www.matweb.com some data on certain materials, emissivity is searchable

Materials: Degradation

10 yrs

@ Simulated
GEO
(also, LDEF)

Cosmic Rays, Solar Storms, etc. deteriorate paint over time.


Thin films used in for Multi-Layer Insulation (MLI) can also degrade over long term:

Tedlar thin film exposed


To 3 yrs simulated GEO

10

Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF) MLI Test Blanket

11

Materials:
Multi-Layer Insulation (MLI) / Thermal Blanket
Typically Aluminized Mylar
Hubble ST: Aluminized Teflon FEP
(fluorinated ethylene propylene)

Dacron Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)


deposited between each sheet
Layers expand like a balloon due to lack of
pressure on orbit negates conductivity
Protects against orbital debris / micrometeoroids

q leak

2 leak
n1

Heat leaking through layers.


= maximum heat flux encountered

n layers

Dacron filling

12

Thermal Radiation Trade-offs Overview

Thermal Radiation Basics


Properties and Relations: View Factor, absorptivity, emissivity, Stefan-Boltzmann, thin-plate ODE
Radiation Geometries: Parallel Plates, Convex Object in Large Cavity
Sources: Solar Radiation, Earth Radiation, Albedo

Materials
Radiative Comparison
Long Term Exposure Degradation
Multi-Layer Insulation (Thermal Blanket / Shroud)

Orbit Considerations
GEO, LEO, Lagrange points, Inclination

Design Examples
Design for Stabilization of Oscillating Heat Flux
@ LEO
Oscillation due to orbit: sun/shadow (umbra)
Design for Specific Temperature with Constant Heat Flux
@ Sun-Earth Lagrange (L2) point:
Stationary position relative to Earth.

Summary/Questions

13

Orbit Geometry Considerations (GEO)


Simple Case: Zero Degree Inclination (2D Planar Orbit)
Earth Radius: RE = 6.378 x103 km
Altitude (GEO)
= 35.785 x103 km
Rorbit = RE + GEO = 42.163 x103 km
4.8% of the 2D GEO orbit
sweeps through the Umbra
Umbra boundary

Sunlight
Umbra boundary

Earth Surface
Orbit

Top-down (North facing South) view of Earth

14

Orbit Geometry Considerations (LEO)


Simple Case: Zero Degree Inclination (2D Planar Orbit)
Earth Radius:
RE = 6.378 x103 km
Altitude = 150 n.mi. = 0.278 x103 km
Rorbit = RE + Altitude = 6.656 x103 km

Earth Surface
Orbit
Umbra boundary

Sunlight

40% of the equatorial orbit


sweeps through the Umbra
(Order of magnitude higher
than GEO!!)

Umbra boundary

Top-down (North facing South) view of Earth

15

LEO Inclination Concerns (more significant than GEO)


The 2D-planar orbit is a rough approximation of the sunlight geometry. Seasons (axis tilt)
and inclination will change the percent of orbit that sweeps through the umbra.
Orbit sweeping through
Umbra << 40%
Umbra

Sunlight

0% of orbit sweeps
through Umbra
(constant sunlight
on one side)

60o Inclined Orbit

An extreme case: 60o Inclination


dT/dt lower than equatorial case

90o Polar Orbit


The Most Benign Case Possible
dT/dt = 0

From these cases, one can see that the zero degree case (at solstice) for LEO has the
highest dT/dt possible, and represents the worst thermal transient condition.

16

Thermal Radiation Trade-offs Overview

Thermal Radiation Basics


Properties and Relations: View Factor, absorptivity, emissivity, Stefan-Boltzmann, thin-plate ODE
Radiation Geometries: Parallel Plates, Convex Object in Large Cavity
Sources: Solar Radiation, Earth Radiation, Albedo

Materials
Radiative Comparison
Long Term Exposure Degradation
Multi-Layer Insulation (Thermal Blanket / Shroud)

Orbit Considerations
GEO, LEO, Lagrange points, Inclination

Design Examples
Design for Stabilization of Oscillating Heat Flux
@ LEO
Oscillation due to orbit: sun/shadow (umbra)
Design for Specific Temperature with Constant Heat Flux
@ Sun-Earth Lagrange (L2) point:
Stationary position relative to Earth.

Summary/Questions

17

Design for Stabilization of Oscillating Heat Flux


(Typical for LEO orbit)

Given
90 minute orbit, LEO altitude, 0 degree inclination

Orbit is around earth, satellite sweeps through earths shadow (Umbra)


periodically.

Consider Solar, Earth, and Albedo radiation flux.


Satellite is always pointed at Nadir (angular rotation rate is orbit rate)
Temperature fluctuates due to Umbra sweep but eventually achieves an
average steady state. (nominal temperature, To)

Find

Thermal blanket MLI material specification and number of layers to keep


satellite structural members at nominal delta T < 0.5 K to prevent large
thermal expansion in members.

Strategy

Model MLI blanket as a thin plate


Use simple ODE
18

Multi Layer Insulation (MLI) Design Overview

Assumption:
Shroud modeled as
thin circular plate.

B
A

Heat leaking through


MLI can not be more
than heat between
surfaces A and B,
limited by design
requirement: T = 1 K.

qAB = f (T)
Required:

q leak q AB

External Heat flux ()


Sun + Albedo + Earth
A

qleak

qAB
B

MLI

Spacecraft structural members


modeled as small convex object
in a large cavity.

Heat qAB is omnidirectional throughout shroud (assumption).

19

LEO Geometric Considerations (revisited)


Simple Case: Zero Degree Inclination (2D-Planar Orbit)
Earth Radius:
RE = 6.378 x103 km
Altitude = 150 n.mi. = 0.278 x103 km
Rorbit = RE + Altitude = 6.656 x103 km

Earth Surface
Orbit

Umbra boundary

40% of the equatorial orbit


sweeps through the Umbra

Sunlight

Umbra boundary

Top-down (North facing South) view of Earth

20

f lu x (W /m ^ 2 )

Thermal Radiation Flux Profile for One Equatorial Orbit


Based on view factor and satellite-earth angle
External Source Radiated Heat Flux
1500

1000

Umbra Region:
(~40% of orbit)
500

50

Total
Albedo
Solar
Earth

100

150
200
Planar Orbit (deg)

250

300

350

21

f lu x ( W /m ^ 2 )

Thermal Radiation Flux Profile Explained:


Change Due to Orbit/Sun Angle

2D plate model

Ex ternal Sourc e Radiated Heat Flux


1500

1000

Umbra Region:
(~40% of orbit)

500

50

To tal
A lbed o
So lar
Earth

100

150
200
Planar Orbit (deg)

250

300

350

22

Temperature Response Showing Steady State


(Time ODE calculation for Thin Plate)

Temperature (K)

400

300

200

100

10
Time (hours)

15

20

Temperature (K)

400

To ~ 340 K

350

300

15

16

17

18
Time (hours)

19

20

21
23

Multi-Layer Insulation Design Computation (Droopy Eyes!)

From previous, nominal temperature for 2D orbit: TO = 340 K


Worst case for objects inside emissivity = 1:

MLI (material dependent) emissivity: leak


Stefan-Boltzman Constant:

MLI (Gold coat)


kg

3 4

s K

Unit heat flow between two surfaces of emissivity: q AB


(Small convex object in a large cavity depends only
on small objects emissivity)
Linearizing the above:

.04

5.67 10

From design requirement: T

Shroud, A

Truss/Interior

(see NASA contractor report 3800)


Solving for surface to surface heat flux: q AB

1 K

( 0.5 K)

B T2 T1

q AB
4 B To

4 T B To

3
24

MLI Design Computation Concluded

From before, surface-surface heat flux:


(known)
Worst case thermal radiation from external sources:
(known)
heat leaking through MLI:
(unknown due to n)
To find n, relate qleak <= qAB:
(solve for n)

max q external

q leak

4 T B To

2 leak
n1
2 leak

4 T B To

= f (outer material, geometry)

qAB = f (T)
Required:

q leak q AB

q AB

qleak

leak = MLI material dependent

qAB
B

B = always 1 (worst case)

25

MLI Design Tradeoffs (LEO, equatorial)

Shroud Exterior Solar


Spectrum Absorptivity

Shroud Exterior Earth


Spectrum Absorptivity

Emissivity
between MLI
and Interior

Emissivity
between layers of
MLI

Steady State
Temp. (K) (T
= 1 K)

Number of
MLI layers

Worst Case

367

322

Graphite Epoxy
Exterior /

0.85

0.6

0.08

340

25

0.85

0.6

0.05

340

15

Graphite Epoxy / Gold


MLI

0.85

0.6

0.04

340

12

Gold Coat Ext. /

0.04

0.04

0.04

163

Nickel Coat Ext. / Gold


MLI

0.08

0.08

0.04

194

Anodized Aluminum
Ext. /

0.15

0.8

0.04

290

Nickel MLI
Graphite Epoxy
Exterior /
Silver MLI

Gold MLI

Gold MLI

INPUT

OUTPUT

26

Design for Constant Heat Flux

Given

Spacecraft at Sun-Earth Lagrange L2 point

Consider Solar heat flux only, since View Factor for Earth is negligible.
Maneuver time is about four hours, (angular rotation rate is very slow)
Temperature is constant once at desired rotated position

Find

No orbit about Earth, only about the sun. No shadow sweeps.

Thermal blanket MLI material specification and number of layers to keep satellite
structural members at nominal temperature of 200K.

Strategy

Model MLI blanket as a thin plate

Specify number of layers, material specs to get steady state temp. to 200K

Use simple ODE to achieve settling time within 4 hours and discover steady state
temperature
27

Constant Radiation: Large Lissajous orbit about S-E L2

z
y

L2 lies 1.5 million km from Earth,


1% farther from the sun than the earth

300,000 km Lissajous Orbit


Avoids a ~13,000 km-radius Earth shadow

Conclusion: Thermal Environment is stable.


Source: http://astro.estec.esa.nl/GAIA/Assets/Papers/IN_L2_orbit.pdf

28

Thermally Stable Orbit


(Worst Case for Steady State Temperature)
Assumption: gold foil material exterior
Solar, Albedo and Earth Fluxes calculated to be:
Total Constant Heat Flux :

q S 405

W
2

q A 139.71

qt 658.412

W
2

q E 113.702

W
2

W
2

Using ODE for Radiantly Heated Thin Plate:

c h

4
d
T T
dt

Steady State Temp


= 583.7 K (exterior)

Stead State Temperature Calculation


600

T emp erature (K)

Note: Gold Melting


Point = 1337 K

400

200

Temp. Settling Time


= 35 hours (~580 K)

Note: Maneuver Time


29
= 4 hours max

5000

1 10

1.5 10
Time (s)

2 10

2.5 10

3 10

Two Methods for Modeling Shroud and Contents

Method 1 (previous):
Using the method the same as for the fluctuating heat: q AB
Equation above is
Transformed into: q AB
Also:
So, design
parameter is:

4 T B To

q leak

q leak q AB

Shroud, A

2 leak
n1

B TA TB

B
qleak
Text

To

qAB
T

qleak
Text

This only holds if temperatures are close to the desired nominal temperature (200 K).
See Hedgepeth, pg. 9. (NASA contractor report 3800) However, as we have seen from the
steady state computation:
Text = 580 K >> 200 K !!!!
30

This method may not hold.

Two Methods For Modeling Shroud and Contents

Method 2 ( A better
approximation?) :
Model as 2D planar surface
(contents surfaces) enclosed by
another 2D plate (shroud surface)
Equation for heat leaking across
two parallel plates with N shield
layers:
q leak

Shroud, A

B
qleak
Text

To

qleak
Text

q
N 1 12

Outside plate:
Shroud exterior, Text

N shield layers (A)


Inside plate (B), To

Where q12 is the heat flux between


plates with no shielding:

q 12

qAB

4
4
T 2 T 1

T1 = To and T2 = Text

2
31

MLI Design Method 2

Similar to method 1 except solve for N with definite T2 and T1 known:


T2 T1

q 12

1
1

1
2

q leak

q
N 1 12

q leak q AB
q AB T 4 AB To

Solving these four equations gives:


4
4
T2 T1

N 1
1
3 1
T 4 To

1
1 2

Note:

T = 1 K
To = 200 K
T1 = 200 K
T2 = 580 K
1 = 1
2 = 0.03

(Proposed sub-requirement)
(Given requirement)
(Steady state exterior temperature)
(Worst case for telescope/truss surfaces)
(Gold emissivity)

T2 and 2 depend on material selected.


T2 also depends on external heat flux () from Sun and Earth, etc.
32

Differences between Method 1 and Method 2

Method 1:
Small Convex Object
Enclosed in Large Cavity

External Temperature

T2 T1

2 leak
4 T B To

Method 2:
Two Parallel Plates

n = f (Heat Flux, Material)

T 4 To
3

N = f (External Temperature, Material)

f (Heat Flux)
33

Thermal Shroud Design Results

Shroud Exterior
Absorptivity

Emissivity between
MLI and Interior

Emissivity between
layers of MLI

Exterior Steady
State Temp. (K)

Number of MLI
layers

.035

271

(Worst case)

Method 1

0.07

Silver (Coated?)**
Method 2

(valid)*
0.07

.035

271

0.3

0.03

583

21

Silver (Coated?)
Method 1
(Gold Foil)
Method 2

(not valid)
0.3

0.03

583

107

0.15

0.06

347

21

(Gold Foil)
Method 1
(Aluminum Foil)
Method 2

(Not valid?)
0.15

0.06

347

24

(Aluminum Foil)

*Valid = steady state temperature close to nominal


**Questionable if silver can be used as coating

Conclusion: 5 Ag layers, 107 Au layers, 24 Al layers

34

Thermal Radiation Trade-offs: Summary / Questions

Space Thermal Environment Dependencies:

Orbit Altitude (GEO, LEO, L points)


Inclination
S/C Attitude

Design Issues

Materials
Modeling (geometry, assumptions)
Given requirements or desirements (delta T, etc.)
Analytical Insight (ODE, FEM)
35

Thermal Radiation Trade-offs

4. http://www.swales.com/products/therm_blank.html
5. http://setas-www.larc.nasa.gov/LDEF/index.html
6. http://www.aero.org/publications/crosslink/summer2003/07.html

36

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi