Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Systematic review
Meta analysis
Integrative Literature
Bastian, Glasziou, Chalmers (2010) 75 Trials and 11Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? PLoS Med 7(9)
5,000?
per day
55 per
day
1,500
per day
sumber
informasi
IDENTIFIKASI
SELEKSI
ABSTRAKSI
METODOLOGI
PENELITIAN
MEMINIMALKAN
ERROR & BIAS
ANALISA
LANGKAH-LANGKAH DALAM MELAKUKAN META ANALISA ( Okin, 1996 )
Potentially relevant
RCTs (n= ..)
n RCTs excluded with reason
RCTs retrieved for more
detailed information (n= ..)
n RCTs excluded with reason
Potentially appropriate
RCTs (n= ..)
n RCTs excluded with reason
RCTs in meta-analysis (n=..)
Study I
Study II
Study III
Study IV
Study V
Study VI
Study VII1
Study VIII
1992
1994
1995
1995
1996
1997
1999
2000
Combined
0.1
Favor drug
10
OR = 1
Favor placebo
+0.3
Xe-xc=0
Favor drug
Favor placebo
FOREST PLOT
FOREST PLOT
Each study has an ID
FOREST PLOT
The data for each trial are here, divided into
experimental and control groups
FOREST PLOT
This is the % weight given to each study in the pooled analysis
FOREST PLOT
Results from each trial are also given numerically
FOREST PLOT
The size of the block for each study is proportional to the % weight.
The horizontal line represents the confidence interval.
FOREST PLOT
The label above the graph tells you which statistic has been used
FOREST PLOT
Take care to read the labels
things to the left do not always mean the treatment
is better than the control
FOREST PLOT
The pooled analysis is given a diamond shape
The widest bit is located on the point estimate
and the horizontal width in the confidence interval.
Does the confidence interval cross the line of no effect?
FOREST PLOT
Results of the pooled analysis are also given numerically
FOREST PLOT
Test for heterogeneity
The result of a Z test with a p value are also given
for the overall effect