21 years. The contents of the vessels were flammable, mildly toxic and contained 500 ppm of chlorides. The vessels were operated from full vacuum up to 15 psi for 20 cycles per day. They contained an agitator which was used in part of the process. Both vessels had been hydraulically tested to 70 psi when new but had not been
Company thought that stainless steel would
not break. Hence, no leak detection
equipment had been installed and reliance was placed on plant operators noticing the smell or observing drips. A competent Person from a large insurance
company prescribed external visual examination supplemented by a hammer test every 2 years. Was this suitable?
The
combination of stainless steel and
chlorides immediately raises concerns regarding the possibility of stress corrosion cracking. While the cracks were likely to initiate on the inner surface, an external examination could detect the presence of through wall cracks only. However, stress corrosion cracks can be very tight and difficult to see with the naked eye. The hammer test offers no benefit - who knows what a good vessel should sound like!
During a thorough examination, it was
found that vessel developed leaks at 40
psi. Further investigation of the vessel found thousands of through wall cracks. The vessel had not leaked in service because the contents were too viscous to pass through the tight stress corrosion cracks. Finally it was decided to go for NDT with Dye Penetrant Inspection using fluorescent dyes, which give a higher sensitivity and much better results in the confined, dark space of the vessel.
Conclusion
NDT techniques provide cost-effective and
reliable analysis under realistic conditions.
Each NDT technique has certain capabilities
and limitations and often more than one
technique is used to cover various parts. Increasing availability of robotic scanners