Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
IE 409/509
SIX SIGMA QUALITY PROJECT
Department of Industrial And Systems
Engineering
INTRODUCTION
Founded by three local businessmen: Allen Hamling,
Edward Read and Dr. Harvey Ott, under the auspices of
Grace Methodist Episcopal Church in 1919.
Vision: We will develop a resource base that maximizes the
services we provide in the communities we serve. Our
services will be united by a vocational emphasis and
characterized by relevance, excellence and cost
effectiveness.
Mission: We help individuals and families in our
community achieve a better life through work and
independence.
2
PROBLEMS FACED!
At Goodwill Industries, from floor planning
and material handling to inventory control, there
is no standardization.
Some of the problems were:
The process floor layout was not optimally
designed, flow of materials showed high
redundancy.
Lack of process standardization in different
departments.
4
D M A I C
As per the Six Sigma method, we followed the
D Define
M Measure
A Analyze
I Improve
C Control
rule. The following were our observations and actions.
DEFINE
i.
ii.
iii.
MEASURE
i.
ii.
ANALYZE
i.
ii.
iii.
Why-Why Diagram
Brainstorming
Cause and Effect Chart
IMPROVE
i.
ii.
iii.
CONTROL
i.
Guidelines
SIPOC
SIPOC is a high-level picture of the process that depicts
how the given process is servicing the customer.
Can be seen as a high-level process map.
Typically used during the define phase of a process
improvement project - helps clearly understand the
purpose and the scope of a process.
EIGHT WASTES
We could relate to the 8 diseases as follows:
Overproduction
Inventory: Due to insufficient of fixed labor force and
specialized workers
Transportation: The truck scheduling was not under our
control.
Defects: not measurable due to lack of a standard to relate to.
Motion (Operations): Material handling problems
Over-processing
Waiting: Again the problem of material handling
Non-Utilization of Resources: Real Estate wastage
WE WORK ON?
Overproduction
Inventory: Due to insufficient of fixed labor force and
specialized workers
Transportation: The truck scheduling was not under our
control.
Defects: not measurable due to lack of a standard to relate to.
Motion (Operations): Material handling problems
Over-processing
Waiting: Again the problem of material handling
Non-Utilization of Resources: Real Estate wastage
Current Layout
OptimizedFlowChart
REQUIREMENT OF NEW
LAYOUT
Relevant from the process flow diagram.
Ideal situation of automation is not possible due to budget
limitations.
The new layout provides an optimal solution within the
given constraints.
16
OBSERVATIONS
18
ADVANTAGES
Textile and wares sorting area closer to
entry and exit doors
Staging areas are closer to processing area
Material Handling reduced
Increasing speed of Flow
19
20
DEFINE
21
22
MEASURE
23
19
20
18
17
19
22.5
20
19
16
18
22
20
Sample Mean
UCL=21.841
21.0
__
X=19.4
19.5
18.0
LCL=16.959
18
20
22
23
19
17
3
Sample
UCL=10.12
17
21
21
19
20
21
21
20
23
16
19
17
Sample Range
10.0
7.5
_
R=5.05
5.0
2.5
0.0
LCL=0
1
3
Sample
SPAGHETTI DIAGRAM
OriginalSpaghetti
ANALYZE
26
Why-Why?
Rejection rate
Brainstorming
27
IMPROVE
28
REVISED LAYOUT
29
CONTROL
LABOR TRAINING ACCORDING TO
GUIDELINES FORMULATED
30
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
TO PROCESSORS:
There will be two levels of sorting, light skimming
and thorough sorting.
Stand in front of the cage and skim through the
items one by one. This level need not be thorough.
Reject most, keep aside what looks really good.
If the item looks acceptable place on the table,
otherwise, dump in the dustbin.
After the table is full, shift focus on the table to
thorough check all items on table.
What is acceptable after this stage, place in the
respective basket.
After the cage is empty, push the empty cage aside
and replace it with full cage.
31
TO HANDLERS:
There are the following primary tasks for the
handlers:
1) Replace empty cages with filled ones
2) Replace full baskets of electronics, books,
shoes and wares with empty ones.
3) Replace the full bins with empty ones.
32
CONCLUSION
Reduction of material Handling
Reduction of human effort for handler
Possibility to free up resource
Reduction of steps of process
33
34