Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Frame with
STAAD.Pro &
ETABS
Presented by
Rahul Leslie
Assistant Director,
Buildings Design,
DRIQ, Kerala PWD
Trivandrum, India
Ground Floor
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
3
3
Presented by Rahul Leslie
First Floor
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
4
4
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Second Floor
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
5
5
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Terrace
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
6
6
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Depth:
Fix an initial size between (span/12) and (span/15).
Choose sizes such as 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 75, 80 cm or more
This may have to be increased depending on Ast required (from
analysis) at a later stage.
Depth:
This is usually done from experience. For beginners, the following may be
taken as a starting point:
Fix an arbitrary (and reasonably small) size for columns.
From the axial force, find area required for each column based on short column
design formula, for 2% reinforcement.
Increase this area requirement by 25% for all internal columns and by 50% for
all periphery columns. For the decided width, find depth for the area required.
Based on above, choose depth such as 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 75, 80 cm or
more.
The dimension may be suitably re-sized later based on the Asc required
from analysis.
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
A
1
5
10
10
Presented by Rahul Leslie
A
1
5
11
11
Presented by Rahul Leslie
A
1
5
12
12
Presented by Rahul Leslie
A
1
5
13
13
Presented by Rahul Leslie
14
14
Presented by Rahul Leslie
15
15
Presented by Rahul Leslie
16
16
Presented by Rahul Leslie
17
17
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Column positions
18
18
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Centre of columns
as modeled
Actual centre of
columns
Position of column centre lines
19
19
Presented by Rahul Leslie
20
20
Presented by Rahul Leslie
21
21
Presented by Rahul Leslie
22
22
Presented by Rahul Leslie
23
23
Presented by Rahul Leslie
24
24
Presented by Rahul Leslie
25
25
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Window on FL beam
26
26
Presented by Rahul Leslie
27
28
Column positions
Bending moment
released at these
points
29
30
30
Presented by Rahul Leslie
31
31
Presented by Rahul Leslie
One floor in
STAAD.Pro & ETABS
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
32
33
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
34
Supports:
For Shallow Footings and Pile Foundations
Footing
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
Pile
35
35
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Supports:
For Shallow Footings and Pile Foundations
Footing
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
36
36
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Supports:
For Shallow Footings and Pile Foundations
Pile
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
37
37
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Supports:
For Shallow Footings and Pile Foundations
For shallow foundation, plinth beams will be at plinth
level above ground (GL), while support point is located
at founding level below GL.
For pile foundation, the support point is located at top
of pile cap, which is at a level 30 cm below GL.
The grade beams will also be at the pile cap level (connecting
support points in the model).
Thus the GF columns will have a ht. = storey ht. + plinth ht. +
depth of pile cap below GL
38
38
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Supports:
For Shallow Footings and Pile Foundations
Footing
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
Pile
39
39
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Whole structure
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
40
Whole structure
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
41
42
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
43
Coordinate System
Global system
GY
GX
GZ
44
Coordinate System
Local system for beams
GY
X
Y
X
Z
GZ
GX
Coordinate System
Local system for plates
Direction Y is
perpendicular to X
direction, and directed
from j end to k end.
Z
Y
j
i
Direction X is parallel to
i-j, and directed from i
end to j end.
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
Direction Z is towards
that side from which the
nodes i, j, k, l in order
appear anti-clockwise
47
48
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
49
Loading
STAAD.Pro and ETABS have facilities for: Self-weight (Gravity load of elements)
Nodal loads (eg. Loads of Trusses)
Beam loading for Uni. Distr. loads, Uni. Vary. loads,
Concentrated loads, etc.
50
Beam Loading
Along local X, Y, Z
(-ve Y shown)
51
52
53
54
55
55
Presented by Rahul Leslie
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
56
57
57
Presented by Rahul Leslie
58
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
59
60
60
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Material Properties
Concrete
fck = 20 N/mm2
E = 5000 (fck) = 22360.68 N/mm2
Poissons ratio = 0.2
Density = 25 kN/m3
61
Loads
Dead Load (IS:875 part 1):
Slabs (10 cm) :
STAAD: 0.1x25+1.25 = 3.75 kN/m2 (SelfWt: 0.1x25=2.5 kN/m2)
ETABS : 1.25 kN/m2
Toilet slabs :
Indian closet: 0.45x20 = 9 kN/m2 , + SelfWt (for STAAD)
Euro. closet: 0.3x20 = 6 kN/m2, + SelfWt (for STAAD)
62
Loads
Dead Load:
Stairs
63
Loads
Dead Load (IS:875 part 1):
Stairs
Slab wt (concrete) :
Steps (brick work):
Finish:
2
2
0
.
15
0
.
3
0.2
25 5.59kN/m 2
0
.
3
0.15
20 1.5kN/m 2
2
0.3 0.15
0.5 0.75kN/m 2
0 .3
64
Loads
Dead Load (IS:875 part 1):
Stairs
Total = 5.59 + 1.5 + 0.75 = 7.84 kN/m2
Load on beams (4.57 m span) = 4.57x7.84/2 = 17.92
kN/m
65
Loads
Live Load (IS:875 part 2):
BUSINESS AND OFFICE BUILDINGS: Office/Conference: 2.5 kN/m2
Stores: 5 kN/m2
Dinning:
3 kN/m2
Toilet: 2 kN/m2
Corridors/Stairs: 4 kN/m2
Roof: 1.5 kN/m2
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
66
Loads
Live Load (IS:875 part 2):
Stairs
Live Load = 4 kN/m2
Load on beams (4.57 m span)
= 4x8.59/2 = 17.18 kN/m
67
67
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Loads
Live Load (IS:875 part 2):
Water tank on slab (5000 lts):
5000 lts = 5 m3 = 50 kN
Load = 50/(3.45x1.93) = 7.51 kN/m2
68
Loads
Load Combination for Design
1.5 x Dead Load + 1.5 x Live Load
69
Run Analysis
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
70
Bending Moment
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
71
Shear Force
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
72
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
73
RCC Design
Parameters specified
Load case used =
1.5 Dead Load + 1.5 Live Load
Code = IS 456 : 2000
fck = 20 N/mm2
fy(main) = 415 N/mm2
fy(shear) = 415 N/mm2
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
74
Run Analysis
and design
Check design
results
Are design
results okay?
No
Yes
Finish
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
75
Shear
Main rein.
rein.
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
76
77
============================================================================
B E A M N O.
141
D E S I G N R E S U L T S
M20
Fe415 (Main)
Fe415 (Sec.)
LENGTH: 4570.0 mm
SIZE:
230.0 mm X 400.0 mm
COVER: 25.0 mm
SUMMARY OF REINF. AREA (Sq.mm)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION
0.0 mm
1142.5 mm
2285.0 mm
3427.5 mm
4570.0 mm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------TOP
584.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
645.83
REINF.
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
BOTTOM
0.00
173.83
429.94
173.83
0.00
REINF.
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
78
78
Presented by Rahul Leslie
============================================================================
B E A M N O.
141
D E S I G N R E S U L T S
M20
Fe415 (Main)
Fe415 (Sec.)
LENGTH: 4570.0 mm
SIZE:
230.0 mm X 400.0 mm
COVER: 25.0 mm
SUMMARY OF REINF. AREA (Sq.mm)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION
0.0 mm
1142.5 mm
2285.0 mm
3427.5 mm
4570.0 mm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------TOP
584.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
645.83
REINF.
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
BOTTOM
0.00
173.83
429.94
173.83
0.00
REINF.
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------SUMMARY OF PROVIDED REINF. AREA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION
0.0 mm
1142.5 mm
2285.0 mm
3427.5 mm
4570.0 mm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------TOP
6-12
2-12
2-12
2-12
6-12
REINF.
2 layer(s)
1 layer(s)
1 layer(s)
1 layer(s)
2 layer(s)
BOTTOM
REINF.
2-12
1 layer(s)
2-12
1 layer(s)
4-12
1 layer(s)
2-12
1 layer(s)
2-12
1 layer(s)
SHEAR
2 legged 8 2 legged 8 2 legged 8 2 legged 8 2 legged 8
REINF. @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c
---------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT DISTANCE d (EFFECTIVE DEPTH) FROM FACE OF THE SUPPORT
SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT
540.0 mm AWAY FROM START SUPPORT
VY =
74.90 MX =
-0.90 LD=
3
Provide 2 Legged 8 @ 120 mm c/c
SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT
540.0 mm AWAY FROM END SUPPORT
VY =
-79.08 MX =
-0.90 LD=
3
Provide 2 Legged 8 @ 120 mm c/c
============================================================================
79
============================================================================
B E A M N O.
141
D E S I G N R E S U L T S
M20
Fe415 (Main)
Fe415 (Sec.)
LENGTH: 4570.0 mm
SIZE:
230.0 mm X 400.0 mm
COVER: 25.0 mm
SUMMARY OF REINF. AREA (Sq.mm)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION
0.0 mm
1142.5 mm
2285.0 mm
3427.5 mm
4570.0 mm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------TOP
584.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
645.83
REINF.
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
BOTTOM
0.00
173.83
429.94
173.83
0.00
REINF.
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
(Sq. mm)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continued...
80
...Continued
SUMMARY OF PROVIDED REINF. AREA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION
0.0 mm
1142.5 mm
2285.0 mm
3427.5 mm
4570.0 mm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------TOP
6-12
2-12
2-12
2-12
6-12
REINF.
2 layer(s)
1 layer(s)
1 layer(s)
1 layer(s)
2 layer(s)
BOTTOM
REINF.
2-12
1 layer(s)
2-12
1 layer(s)
4-12
1 layer(s)
2-12
1 layer(s)
2-12
1 layer(s)
SHEAR
2 legged 8 2 legged 8 2 legged 8 2 legged 8 2 legged 8
REINF. @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c
---------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT DISTANCE d (EFFECTIVE DEPTH) FROM FACE OF THE SUPPORT
SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT
540.0 mm AWAY FROM START SUPPORT
VY =
74.90 MX =
-0.90 LD=
3
Provide 2 Legged 8 @ 120 mm c/c
SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT
540.0 mm AWAY FROM END SUPPORT
VY =
-79.08 MX =
-0.90 LD=
3
Provide 2 Legged 8 @ 120 mm c/c
============================================================================
81
82
Asv/Sv = 0.356
Asv
= 2Leg, #8 = 100.53
.:Sv
= 100.53 / 0.356 = 282 mm c/c
Provide 2L#8@180 mm c/c
83
84
Detailing as per SP 34
(Sample beam)
85
86
87
Column Groups:
88
Column Schedule:
89
Support Reactions
STAAD.Pro
ETABS
90
91
92
Footing Design
Further adjust size of footing considering
support moments
1.1 P Mx Mz
p
A
Zx
Zz
p SBC
93
93
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Provide combined
footing for these
columns
94
95
96
96
Presented by Rahul Leslie
97
97
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Pile Design
Further check no. of piles, considering support
moments
dzi
dxi
1.2 P
pi
Mx
Mz
n
Ix
Iz
Ix dz 2
Iz dx 2
pi PileCap.
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
98
98
Presented by Rahul Leslie
99
99
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Concluding remarks
100
100
Concluding remarks
To use a software package, one has to know it
More importantly, one has to know its limitations,
Still more important, one has to know its pitfalls.
Software Demonstrators/Instructors may tell you the
limitations, but not the pitfalls. Mostly it can be learned
only through experience.
They are also fond of promoting the idea that The
software does everything; You dont have to know
anything!. Please dont take the software for granted.
Analysis & Design of an RC Building in STAAD.Pro & ETABS
101
101
Presented by Rahul Leslie
Concluding remarks
A basic understanding of FEM is desirable (but not
necessary), especially when flat-slabs, shear walls or shell
roofs are included.
Also one has to know the code provisions, and have them
ready reference (IS:456, SP-34, IS:875 Part-I & II,
IS:1904, IS:2911)
For seismic design, refer to IS:1893 & IS:13920 and to
include wind forces, refer to IS:875 Part-III.
102
102
Presented by Rahul Leslie
To be continued with
Seismic Analysis/Design of Multi-s
toried RC Buildings using
STAAD.Pro
& ETABSaccording to IS:1893-2
002
*
Rahul Leslie
rahul.leslie@gmail.com
* http://www.slideshare.net/rahulleslie/seismic-analysisdesign-of-multistoried-rc-buildings-usingstaadpro-etabs-according-to-is18932002-rahul-leslie
103
103