Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 57

Quality Management

By
Prof Alok Kumar Singh

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Defining Quality

Perfection
Fast Delivery
Consistency
Avoiding Wastage
Doing it right the first time
Delighting or pleasing customers
Providing a good, usable product
Total customer service and satisfaction
Compliance with policies and procedures
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Different Views

User-based: better
performance, more features
Manufacturing-based:
conformance to standards,
making it right the first time
Product-based: specific and
measurable attributes of the
product
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Key Dimensions of Quality

Performance
Features
Reliability
Conformance
Durability
Serviceability
Aesthetics
Perceived quality
Value
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Costs of Quality
Prevention costs - reducing the
potential for defects
Appraisal costs - evaluating
products, parts, and services
Internal failure - producing
defective parts or service before
delivery
External costs - defects discovered
after delivery
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Costs of Quality
Total
Cost

Total Cost

External Failure

Internal Failure
Prevention
Appraisal
Quality Improvement
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Total Quality Management

Encompasses entire organization from


supplier to customer
Stresses a commitment by management
to have a continuing companywide drive
toward excellence in all aspects of
products and services that are important
to the customer

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Seven Concepts of TQM


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

Continuous improvement
Six Sigma
Employee empowerment
Benchmarking
Just-in-time (JIT)
Taguchi concepts
Knowledge of TQM tools

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Shewharts PDCA Model

4. Act
Implement
the plan,
document

3. Check
Is the plan
working?

1. Plan
Identify the
pattern and
make a plan

2. Do
Test the
plan

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

When and Where to


Inspect
1. At the suppliers plant while the supplier
is producing
2. At your facility upon receipt of goods
from the supplier
3. Before costly or irreversible processes
4. During the step-by-step production
process
5. When production or service is complete
6. Before delivery to your customer
7. At the point of customer contact
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Example of Quality
Today when one reads or hears about the transformation
of Japan during the last three decades from being a
cheap product seller to being the leader in quality, one
notes that the role of QC Circles is an integral part of its
journey towards excellence. This chapter describes a
series of events that led to the birth of QC Circles
brought about by the need of Japanese industries
immediately after the Second World War, to improve the
quality of their products so they could compete in the
international market. This chapter also describes how the
QC Circle concept spread to the neighbouring Asian
countries and the United States.

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

TQM Tools
The seven major tools are
Tools for Generating Ideas
Check Sheet
Scatter Diagram
Cause and Effect Diagram ( Fishbone Diagram)

Tools to Organize the Data


Pareto Chart
Flow chart

Tools for Identifying Problems


Control Chart
Histogram
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Seven Tools of TQM


(a) Check Sheet: An organized
method of recording data
Hour
Defect
A
B
C

///

//

//

///

//

///

//

////

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Seven Tools of TQM

Productivity

(b) Scatter Diagram: A graph of the


value of one variable vs. another
variable

Absenteeism

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Seven Tools of TQM


(c) Cause-and-Effect Diagram/ Fishbone
Diagram/ Ishikawa Diagram : A tool
that identifies process elements
(causes) that might effect an outcome
Cause

Materials

Methods
Effect

Manpower

Machinery

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Seven Tools of TQM

Percent

Frequency

(d) Pareto Chart: A graph to identify


and plot problems or defects in
descending order of frequency

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Seven Tools of TQM


(e) Flowchart (Process Diagram):
A chart that describes the steps in
a process

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Seven Tools of TQM

Frequency

(f) Histogram: A distribution showing


the frequency of occurrences of a
variable
Distribution

Repair time (minutes)


A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Figure 6.6

Seven Tools of TQM


(g) Statistical Process Control Chart:
A chart with time on the horizontal
axis to plot values of a statistic
Upper control limit
Target value
Lower control limit

Time
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Basics of Control Charts


A process that is operating with only chance
causes of variation present is said to be in
statistical control.
A process that is operating in the presence of
assignable causes is said to be out of control.
The eventual goal of SPC is the elimination of
variability in the process.
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Process Improvement

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Process Control
(a) In statistical
control and
capable of
producing within
control limits

Frequency

Upper control limit

Lower control limit

(b) In statistical
control but not
capable of
producing within
control limits
(c) Out of control
Size
(weight, length, speed, etc.)
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Control charts

Control charts are a proven technique for improving productivity.


Control charts are effective in defect prevention.
Control charts prevent unnecessary process adjustment.
Control charts provide diagnostic information.
Control charts provide information about process capability

Variables Control Charts


These charts are applied to data that follow a continuous
distribution.
Attributes Control Charts
These charts are applied to data that follow a discrete
distribution.

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Control Charts for Variables

Characteristics that can take any real


value

May be in whole or in fractional


numbers

Continuous random variables


X-bar chart tracks changes in the central
tendency of a Process

R-chart indicates a gain or loss of dispersion


These two charts must be used together

CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM

Regardless of the distribution of the


population, the distributions of means
will tend to follow a normal curve.
The mean of the sample means (x )is
equal to the mean of the population ()
from which the samples were drawn.
The Standard deviation of the distribution
(x ) is population standard deviation ()
divided by the square root of n where n is
the number of sample size.
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Population and Sampling Distributions


Population
distributions

Distribution
of sample
means
=
Mean of sample means =x

Beta

Standard
deviation of
x
the sample
n
means

Normal
Uniform
|

3 x 2 x 1 x

=
x

1 x 2 x 3 x

95.45% fall within


2 x
99.73% of allx
fall within 3 x
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Setting Control Limits (X-bar Chart)


UCL x Z *

CL x
LCL x Z *

where
Z = Level of Control
x = Mean of some sample statistic or Target Value
x = Standard deviation of sample means
UCL = Upper Control Line
CL = Centre Line
LCL = Lower Control Line
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Setting Control Limits (Example)


Randomly select and weigh nine (n = 9) boxes each
hour, Population standard deviation = 1 Ounce
Average weight 17 13 16 18 17 16 15 17 16

16.1 ounces
in the first
9
sample
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE
HOUR

(AVG. OF 9
BOXES)

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE

HOUR

(AVG. OF 9
BOXES)

HOUR

(AVG. OF 9
BOXES)

16.1

16.5

16.3

16.8

16.4

10

14.8

15.5

15.2

11

14.2

16.5

16.4

12

17.3

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Setting Control Limits (Example)

=
x

Average
mean of 12
samples

12

i1

Avg of 9 boxes

12

=
16 ounces
x
n 9
z 3
1 ounce

UCL x x z x 16 3

1
16 3 17 ounces
3
9

LCL x x z x 16 3

1
16 3 15 ounces
3
9

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Setting Control Limits


Control
Chart for
samples of
9 boxes

Variation
due to
assignable
causes

Out of
control

17 = UCL

Variation due
to natural
causes

16 = Mean
15 = LCL
| | | | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sample number

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Out of
control

Variation
due to
assignable
causes

Example 2
A quality control inspector at the Cocoa Fizz soft drink
company has taken three samples with four
observations each of the volume of bottles filled. If the
standard deviation of the bottling operation is .2 ounces,
use the data below to develop control charts with limits of 3
standard deviations for the 16 oz. bottling operation.
Time 1

Time 2

Time 3

Observation 1

15.8

16.1

16.0

Observation 2

16.0

16.0

15.9

Observation 3

15.8

15.8

15.9

Observation 4

15.9

15.9

15.8

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Calculate the Mean of Each


Sample
Time 1

Time 2

Time 3

Observation 1

15.8

16.1

16.0

Observation 2

16.0

16.0

15.9

Observation 3

15.8

15.8

15.9

Observation 4

15.9

15.9

15.8

15.875

15.975

15.9

Sample means (Xbar)

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Calculate the Standard Deviation of


the Sample Mean

.2

.1
n
4

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Step 3: Calculate CL, UCL, LCL

Center line (x-double bar):

15.875 15.975 15.9


x
15.92
3

Control limits for 3 limits (z = 3):

UCLx x z x 15.92 3 .1 16.22


LCLx x z x 15.92 3 .1 15.62
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Setting Chart Limits when Population Standard


deviation is not Known
=

UCL x x A2 R
=

LCL x x A2 R
n

where

i1

n
samples
A2

average range of the

control chart factor

mean of the sample means

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Control Chart Factors


Factors for Computing Control Chart Limits (3 sigma limits)
SAMPLE SIZE,
n

MEAN FACTOR,
A2

UPPER RANGE,
D4

LOWER RANGE,
D3

1.880

3.268

1.023

2.574

.729

2.282

.577

2.115

.483

2.004

.419

1.924

0.076

.373

1.864

0.136

.337

1.816

0.184

10

.308

1.777

0.223

12

.266

1.716

0.284

Calculate the Range of Each


Sample and Average Range
Time 1

Time 2

Time 3

Observation 1

15.8

16.1

16.0

Observation 2

16.0

16.0

15.9

Observation 3

15.8

15.8

15.9

Observation 4

15.9

15.9

15.8

Sample
ranges (R)

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.2 0.3 0.2


R
.233
3
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Step 2: Calculate CL, UCL, LCL

Center line:

15.875 15.975 15.9


CL x
15.92
3

Control limits for 3 limits:

UCLx x A2 R 15.92 0.73 .233 16.09


LCLx x A2 R 15.92 0.73 .233 15.75

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

R Chart

Type of variables control chart


Shows sample ranges over time

Difference between smallest and


largest values in sample

Monitors process variability


Independent from process
mean

Setting Chart Limits


For R-Charts
Upper control limit (UCL R ) = D4 R
Lower control limit (LCL R ) = D3 R
where

UCL R upper control chart limit for the range


LCL R lower control chart limit for the range
D4 and D3 values from Table

Control Chart for Range (R-Chart)


Center Line and Control
Limit calculations:

CL R

0.2 0.3 0.2


.233
3

UCL D4R 2.28(.233) .53


LCL D3R 0.0(.233) 0.0

Sample Size
(n)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Factor for x-Chart

A2
1.88
1.02
0.73
0.58
0.48
0.42
0.37
0.34
0.31
0.29
0.27
0.25
0.24
0.22

Factors for R-Chart

D3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.14
0.18
0.22
0.26
0.28
0.31
0.33
0.35

D4
3.27
2.57
2.28
2.11
2.00
1.92
1.86
1.82
1.78
1.74
1.72
1.69
1.67
1.65

Control Charts for Attributes: P-Charts & C-Charts

For variables that are categorical such as


Defective / non-defective, good/bad, yes/no,
acceptable/ unacceptable
Use p-Charts when the sample size is known.
Often expressed in percentage.
For e.g. : Number of broken eggs in a carton
of 240 eggs.
Valid for one type of defect
Use c-Charts for discrete defects when only
number of defects are known but not the
sample size
More number of defects could be included.
For E.g. Monitoring
the number of product
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Control Limits for p-Charts


Population will be a binomial distribution,
but applying the Central Limit Theorem
allows us to assume a normal distribution for
the sample statistics

UCL p p z p
LCL p p z p

p 1 p
n

p mean fraction (percent) defective in the samples


z number of standard deviations

p standard deviation of the sampling distribution


n number of observations in each sample

Example: p-Chart:
A Production manager for a tire company has
inspected the number of defective tires in five
random samples with 20 tires in each sample.
The table below shows the number of defective
tires in each sample of 20 tires.
Sample

Sample
Size (n)

Number
Defective

20

20

20

20

20

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Calculate the Percent defective of Each Sample


and the Overall Percent Defective (p-Bar)
Sample

Number
Defective

Sample Size

Percent
Defective

20

3/20

20

2/20

20

1/20

20

2/20

20

1/20

Total

100

.09

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Step 2: Calculate the Standard


Deviation

p(1-p) (.09)(.91)
p=
=
=0.064
n
20

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Step 3: Calculate CL, UCL, LCL

Center line (p bar):

CL p .09

Control limits for 3 limits:

UCL p z

p z

.09

3(.064) .282

LCL

.09

3(.064) .102

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Control Limits for c-Charts


Population will be a Poisson distribution, but
applying the Central Limit Theorem allows
us to assume a normal distribution for the
sample statistics
c mean number of defects per unit

c standard deviation of defects per unit

Control limits c Z c

Constructing a C-Chart:
The number of
weekly customer
complaints are
monitored in a
large hotel.
Develop a three
sigma control
limits For a CChart using the
data table On
the right.

Week

Number of
Complaints

10

Total

22

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Calculate CL, UCL, LCL

Center line (c bar):

#complaints
22
CL

2.2
# of samples
10

Control limits for 3 limits:

UCL c z c 2.2 3 2.2 6.65


LCL c z c 2.2 3 2.2 2.25 0
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Process Capability
A process in statistical control does
not necessarily meet the design
specifications
Process capability is the ability
of the process to meet the design
specifications or customer
requirements for a service or
product.

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Process Capability Ratio & Process Capability Index

Process capability ratio, Cp, is given by


Cp =

Upper specification - Lower specification


6

Process capability Index, Cpk, is the measure of


the difference between the desired and actual
dimension of goods/ services.
Cpk = Minimum of

x =Lower specification
3

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Upper specification = x
3

THUMB RULE FOR Cp and


Cpk

Red (Bad)
Yellow (OK)
Green (Good)

Cp

Cpk

< 1.00

< 1.00

1.00 - 1.33

1.00 - 1.33

> 1.33

> 1.33

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Example
The intensive care unit lab process has an
average turnaround time of 26.2 minutes
and a standard deviation of 1.35 minutes.
The nominal value for this service is 25
minutes with an upper specification limit of
30 minutes and a lower specification limit
of 20 minutes. The administrator of the lab
wants to have three-sigma performance for
her lab. Is the lab process capable of this
level of performance?
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

Solution
Upper specification = 30 minutes, Lower specification
= 20 minutes
Average service = 26.2 minutes, = 1.35 minutes
Cp =

Cpk =

30 - 20
6(1.35)

Minimum of

= 1.23

26.2 20.0
3(1.35)

= Minimum of [0.938, 1.53]


= .938
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

30.0 26.2
3(1.35)

Errors
Two types of error are possible with control
charts
A type I error occurs when a process is
thought to be out of control when in fact it is
not
A type II error occurs when a process is
thought to be in control when it is actually
out of statistical control

A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI

An Operating Characteristics Curve


= 0.05 producers risk for AQL

Probability
of
Acceptance

= 0.10
Consumers
risk for LTPD

|
0

|
1

Good
lots

|
2

AQL

|
3

|
4

|
5

Indifference
zone

|
6

|
7

LTPD

|
8

Percent
defectiv
e
Bad lots

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi