Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
By
Prof Alok Kumar Singh
Defining Quality
Perfection
Fast Delivery
Consistency
Avoiding Wastage
Doing it right the first time
Delighting or pleasing customers
Providing a good, usable product
Total customer service and satisfaction
Compliance with policies and procedures
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI
Different Views
User-based: better
performance, more features
Manufacturing-based:
conformance to standards,
making it right the first time
Product-based: specific and
measurable attributes of the
product
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI
Performance
Features
Reliability
Conformance
Durability
Serviceability
Aesthetics
Perceived quality
Value
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI
Costs of Quality
Prevention costs - reducing the
potential for defects
Appraisal costs - evaluating
products, parts, and services
Internal failure - producing
defective parts or service before
delivery
External costs - defects discovered
after delivery
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI
Costs of Quality
Total
Cost
Total Cost
External Failure
Internal Failure
Prevention
Appraisal
Quality Improvement
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI
Continuous improvement
Six Sigma
Employee empowerment
Benchmarking
Just-in-time (JIT)
Taguchi concepts
Knowledge of TQM tools
4. Act
Implement
the plan,
document
3. Check
Is the plan
working?
1. Plan
Identify the
pattern and
make a plan
2. Do
Test the
plan
Example of Quality
Today when one reads or hears about the transformation
of Japan during the last three decades from being a
cheap product seller to being the leader in quality, one
notes that the role of QC Circles is an integral part of its
journey towards excellence. This chapter describes a
series of events that led to the birth of QC Circles
brought about by the need of Japanese industries
immediately after the Second World War, to improve the
quality of their products so they could compete in the
international market. This chapter also describes how the
QC Circle concept spread to the neighbouring Asian
countries and the United States.
TQM Tools
The seven major tools are
Tools for Generating Ideas
Check Sheet
Scatter Diagram
Cause and Effect Diagram ( Fishbone Diagram)
///
//
//
///
//
///
//
////
Productivity
Absenteeism
Materials
Methods
Effect
Manpower
Machinery
Percent
Frequency
Frequency
Figure 6.6
Time
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI
Process Improvement
Process Control
(a) In statistical
control and
capable of
producing within
control limits
Frequency
(b) In statistical
control but not
capable of
producing within
control limits
(c) Out of control
Size
(weight, length, speed, etc.)
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI
Control charts
Distribution
of sample
means
=
Mean of sample means =x
Beta
Standard
deviation of
x
the sample
n
means
Normal
Uniform
|
3 x 2 x 1 x
=
x
1 x 2 x 3 x
CL x
LCL x Z *
where
Z = Level of Control
x = Mean of some sample statistic or Target Value
x = Standard deviation of sample means
UCL = Upper Control Line
CL = Centre Line
LCL = Lower Control Line
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI
16.1 ounces
in the first
9
sample
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE
HOUR
(AVG. OF 9
BOXES)
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE
HOUR
(AVG. OF 9
BOXES)
HOUR
(AVG. OF 9
BOXES)
16.1
16.5
16.3
16.8
16.4
10
14.8
15.5
15.2
11
14.2
16.5
16.4
12
17.3
=
x
Average
mean of 12
samples
12
i1
Avg of 9 boxes
12
=
16 ounces
x
n 9
z 3
1 ounce
UCL x x z x 16 3
1
16 3 17 ounces
3
9
LCL x x z x 16 3
1
16 3 15 ounces
3
9
Variation
due to
assignable
causes
Out of
control
17 = UCL
Variation due
to natural
causes
16 = Mean
15 = LCL
| | | | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sample number
Out of
control
Variation
due to
assignable
causes
Example 2
A quality control inspector at the Cocoa Fizz soft drink
company has taken three samples with four
observations each of the volume of bottles filled. If the
standard deviation of the bottling operation is .2 ounces,
use the data below to develop control charts with limits of 3
standard deviations for the 16 oz. bottling operation.
Time 1
Time 2
Time 3
Observation 1
15.8
16.1
16.0
Observation 2
16.0
16.0
15.9
Observation 3
15.8
15.8
15.9
Observation 4
15.9
15.9
15.8
Time 2
Time 3
Observation 1
15.8
16.1
16.0
Observation 2
16.0
16.0
15.9
Observation 3
15.8
15.8
15.9
Observation 4
15.9
15.9
15.8
15.875
15.975
15.9
.2
.1
n
4
UCL x x A2 R
=
LCL x x A2 R
n
where
i1
n
samples
A2
MEAN FACTOR,
A2
UPPER RANGE,
D4
LOWER RANGE,
D3
1.880
3.268
1.023
2.574
.729
2.282
.577
2.115
.483
2.004
.419
1.924
0.076
.373
1.864
0.136
.337
1.816
0.184
10
.308
1.777
0.223
12
.266
1.716
0.284
Time 2
Time 3
Observation 1
15.8
16.1
16.0
Observation 2
16.0
16.0
15.9
Observation 3
15.8
15.8
15.9
Observation 4
15.9
15.9
15.8
Sample
ranges (R)
0.2
0.3
0.2
Center line:
R Chart
CL R
Sample Size
(n)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
A2
1.88
1.02
0.73
0.58
0.48
0.42
0.37
0.34
0.31
0.29
0.27
0.25
0.24
0.22
D3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.14
0.18
0.22
0.26
0.28
0.31
0.33
0.35
D4
3.27
2.57
2.28
2.11
2.00
1.92
1.86
1.82
1.78
1.74
1.72
1.69
1.67
1.65
UCL p p z p
LCL p p z p
p 1 p
n
Example: p-Chart:
A Production manager for a tire company has
inspected the number of defective tires in five
random samples with 20 tires in each sample.
The table below shows the number of defective
tires in each sample of 20 tires.
Sample
Sample
Size (n)
Number
Defective
20
20
20
20
20
Number
Defective
Sample Size
Percent
Defective
20
3/20
20
2/20
20
1/20
20
2/20
20
1/20
Total
100
.09
p(1-p) (.09)(.91)
p=
=
=0.064
n
20
CL p .09
UCL p z
p z
.09
3(.064) .282
LCL
.09
3(.064) .102
Control limits c Z c
Constructing a C-Chart:
The number of
weekly customer
complaints are
monitored in a
large hotel.
Develop a three
sigma control
limits For a CChart using the
data table On
the right.
Week
Number of
Complaints
10
Total
22
#complaints
22
CL
2.2
# of samples
10
Process Capability
A process in statistical control does
not necessarily meet the design
specifications
Process capability is the ability
of the process to meet the design
specifications or customer
requirements for a service or
product.
x =Lower specification
3
Upper specification = x
3
Red (Bad)
Yellow (OK)
Green (Good)
Cp
Cpk
< 1.00
< 1.00
1.00 - 1.33
1.00 - 1.33
> 1.33
> 1.33
Example
The intensive care unit lab process has an
average turnaround time of 26.2 minutes
and a standard deviation of 1.35 minutes.
The nominal value for this service is 25
minutes with an upper specification limit of
30 minutes and a lower specification limit
of 20 minutes. The administrator of the lab
wants to have three-sigma performance for
her lab. Is the lab process capable of this
level of performance?
A.K.SINGH, IMI, NEW DELHI
Solution
Upper specification = 30 minutes, Lower specification
= 20 minutes
Average service = 26.2 minutes, = 1.35 minutes
Cp =
Cpk =
30 - 20
6(1.35)
Minimum of
= 1.23
26.2 20.0
3(1.35)
30.0 26.2
3(1.35)
Errors
Two types of error are possible with control
charts
A type I error occurs when a process is
thought to be out of control when in fact it is
not
A type II error occurs when a process is
thought to be in control when it is actually
out of statistical control
Probability
of
Acceptance
= 0.10
Consumers
risk for LTPD
|
0
|
1
Good
lots
|
2
AQL
|
3
|
4
|
5
Indifference
zone
|
6
|
7
LTPD
|
8
Percent
defectiv
e
Bad lots