Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Electronic Enforcement
2006
Introduction
Risk
Hazard
Hazard
Probability of the
occurrence of harm and the
severity of that harm.
Definitions
Hazard
Risk
Risk Analysis
Risk Evaluation
Risk Assessment
Risk Control
Residual Risk
Risk Management
2006
2006
Regulatory
Affairs
Ex Com
SEC
21
CFR
Part 11
Management
of
Regulatory
Compliance
EPA
EPA
QA/QC
cGMP
Source: AMR Research, Compliance Webinar, Roddy Martin, Joseph Vinhais, May 2004
2006
HIPAA
FDA
Chief
Compliance
Officer
OIG
CAPA
CIO / IT
Drive Compliance
Time to Market
7
2006
2006
cGMP Compliance
1.1. Efficient
EfficientScienceScienceBased
BasedRisk
Risk
Management
Management
2.2. Patient
Patient&&
Consumer
ConsumerSafety
Safety
3.3. Better
Informed
Better Informed
Customers
Customers
4.4. Counterterrorism
Counterterrorism
5.5. AAStrong
StrongFDA
FDA
Medical Devices
ISO 14971, Application of Risk
Management to Medical Devices
2006
1.1. Quality
QualitySystem
System
2. Facilities &
2. Facilities &
Equipment
Equipmentsystem
system
3.3. Materials
System
Materials System
4.4. Production
ProductionSystem
System
5.5. Packaging
&
Packaging &Labeling
Labeling
System
System
6.6. Laboratory
LaboratoryControl
Control
System
System
1.1. Management
Management
Responsibility
Responsibility
2.2. Design
DesignControl
Control
3.3. CAPA
CAPA
4. Production and Process
4. Production and Process
Control
Control
5.5. Records/Document
Records/Document
Change
ChangeControls
Controls
6.6. Materials
MaterialsControls
Controls
7.7. Facilities
&
Facilities &Equipment
Equipment
Controls
Controls
Source: ISO13485:2003 An Overview (Bangkok, Thailand, June 2005), Gunter Frey, GHTF SG3
2006
2006
RM
Policy
An Integrated Risk
Management Process
(for all phases of the life of the product)
Culture on Risk
Communication
Training
Of
Personnel
ImplementationResidual
of
Verification
Post
Of
Risk ControlRisk
Effectiveness Production
Measures
Monitoring
2006
Risk
Hazard
Risk
Cause
Graph
Step 2
Medium impact
Identify generic
hazards
Step 3
High impact
Identify generic & specific
hazards
Assess severity &
likelihood
Assess probability of
detection
Consider risks
Step 4
Step 5
Select good IT
practice
2006
2006
2006
Risk
Assessment
Preliminary Hazard
Analysis
Fault Tree Analysis
Functional Analysis
Risk Evaluation
Tolerability of Risk
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Socio/Ethical Analysis
Risk
Management
Risk Control
Options analysis
Implementation
Residual Risk Evaluation
Overall Risk Acceptance
FMECA
HACCP
HAZOP
PAT
Post-production Information
2006
Post-production experience
Systemic Procedures
Identification of new Hazards
Change Control & Feedback Loop
Six Sigma
SPC
CAPA
Complaint Mgmt.
2006
Desired State
Product quality and performance achieved and
assured by design of effective and efficient
manufacturing processes
Product specifications based on mechanistic
understanding of how formulation and process
factors impact product performance
Continuous "real time" assurance of quality
Source: The Process Analytical Technology Initiative: PAT and the Pharmacopeias, Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science CDER, FDA
2006
Source: PDA, PAT & Risk Based Initiatives, Implementation Issues: C. Cambell
2006
Materials
Man
Methods
Process
Output
Management
Input
Measurement
Medium
Machine
Source: PDA, The Harmonized PAT Solution: Application of Risk-Based Tools & PAT Strategies in Pharmaceutical Product Manufacture: J. Priem
2006
Sources of Variability
Machine
Man - People
I
N
Machine - Equipment
P
U
Measurement
T
S
(x) Method - Process
Defects per
Spec Limit
Methods
+/- 1 sigma
+/- 2 sigma
+/- 3 sigma
+/- 4 sigma
+/- 5 sigma
Materials
Materials
Example
50 Products
30.23
X
10 Operations
69.13
X
10 Orders per Year
93.32
X
(most companies)
10 Lots/Batches/Units
per Order
X
99.379
12 Months (30
days per order)
X
10 Transactions99.97670
per Unit per Operation
=
6,000,000 Transactions per year
y = f(x)
Measure System
Prior Ops
Percent
99.9997
(top companies)
697,700
308,700
66,810
6,210
233
Output
3.4
Man
Medium - Environment
Source: Risk Reduction in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing using Process Analytical Technology, Brian Davies, Thermo Electron Corporation
2006
Value Add
Abnormal
Necessary
Unnecessary
Flow
Reduce
Eliminate
2006
Value-Stream Mapping
Identifying value added and non-value added
Value-creating tasks: Actions necessary for
making products, such as welding or
drilling.
Incidental work: Actions necessary to make
products, but that dont create value
from the customers standpoint. Such
actions include reaching for a tool or
clamping fixture.
Waste: Actions that (a) create no value from
the customers perspective and (b) can
be eliminated from a process; e.g.
walking to get tools that can be
positioned within reach of a worker.
Source: Manufactures Get Lean to Trim Waste, William Leventon, Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry, September 2004
2006
LT
Development/Optimization/Continuous Improvement
(DOE, Evolutionary optimization, Improved efficiency)
Incoming
Materials.
Specifications
Relevant to
Process-ability
Multivariate
Systems
Approach
Risk
Classification
and
Mitigation
Strategies
PAC
PAC
PCCP
PEPs
At-line
In/On-Line
Process Analytical
Chemistry Tools
CM
IT
Chemometrics (CM)
and IT Tools
for real time
control and decisions
Source: ACPS, Process Analytical Technologies (PAT) Sub-Committee Report: T. Layloff, Ph.D
2006
PAC
LT
Laboratory
or other
tests
Direct or inferential
assessment of quality
and performance (at/on-line)
PAT Example
Raw
Material
Dispensing
Granulation
Identity
__ System
__ Subsystem
__ Component
Potency
Function
Potential
Failure
Mode
Ishikawa
Q u antity
10
Cause
FMECA
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Milling
Quality
Potential
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
(Design FMEA)
Purity
FME A N umber:
Page 1 or 1
Prepared by: Lee Dawson
FME A D ate (Orig.):
Design Responsibility
Ke y Da te:
Potential
Effect(s) of
Failure
C
S L
E A
V S
S
Failure
Mode
Potential
Cause(s)/
Mechanism(s)
Of Failure
O
C
C
U
R
Current
Design
Controls
Prevention
Current
Design
Controls
Detection
D
E R. Recommended
T P.
Action(s)
E N.
C
Action Results
Actions
Taken
S O D R.
E C E P.
V C T N.
Effect
III. Marginal
II. Critical
I. Catastrophic
Criticality Matrix
B. High
C. Moderate
D. Low
E. Remote
Probability of Occurance
DOE
Multivariate Analysis
SPC
Source: ISPE-Boston, Feb. 2005
2006
Responsibility
& Target
Completion
Date
IV. Minor
A. Very High
Mixing
Strength
Model Year/Vehicle(s):
Core Team:
Item
Drying
Tabletting
Coating
Top Level
Components
Categories of
Risk Factors
Product
CD1
CD2
Process
CP1
Facility
CP2
CF1
CF1
Risk Factors
(quantitative
or qualitative
variables)
2006
Measuring; mixing;
compression; filling
Physical Risk
cGMP Impact Assessments
Systems
Direct
Indirect
Non
gep
gep
gep
Critical
Non Critical
comm.
comm.
gmp
qual.
Source: PDA, PAT & Risk Based Initiatives, Implementation Issues: C. Cambell
&
Components
2006
Functional Risk
IEC
Functional Safety: safety-related systems
Class-I
Intolerable
Risk cannot be
justified
except in
extraordinary
circumstances
Class-II
Class-III
Undesirable
Tolerable
Negligible
Tolerable if the
cost of the risk
reduction
would exceed the
improvement
gained
Tolerable if the
cost of the risk
reduction
would exceed the
improvement
gained
Tolerable only
if risk reduction is
impracticable or
the costs are grossly
disproportionate
to the improvement
gained
Source: PDA, PAT & Risk Based Initiatives, Implementation Issues: C. Cambell
2006
Class-IV
Process Risk
Risk Class
Risk Priority
Probability
Risk Class
High
Impact
Medium
Impact
Low Impact
High
Detection
Medium
Detection
Low
Detection
High
Medium
Low
Source: PDA, PAT & Risk Based Initiatives, Implementation Issues: C. Cambell
2006
Risk Integration
Standard
Components
Standard
Operations
Standard
Parameters
Physical
Risk
Functional
Risk
Process
Risk
II
III
SRP
Mitigation
Plan
Source: PDA, PAT & Risk Based Initiatives, Implementation Issues: C. Cambell
2006
IV
Risk Dividend
Physical
Risk
Functional
Risk
Process
Risk
C
N
I
II
III
H
M
L
DQ
IQ
OQ
X
X
Source: PDA, PAT & Risk Based Initiatives, Implementation Issues: C. Cambell
2006
PQ
PV
?
X
X
PAT QA FDA
Electronic Enforcement
Enterprise
Plant
Line
Machine
Set points
Production
Orders
Parameters
Equipment
Controls
ERP
Execution System
Status
Data Readings
Production
Status
Product
& process
data
definitions
Shop Packet
PAT
PACPCCP
PACPCCPPEPs
CM
IT
People
Work Status
Product
& process data
definitions
PLM/EDM
Inventory
Consumption
Traceability
Picklist
Manufacturing Process
2006
Product
& process
data
definitions
QMS
Training
CAPA
Inspection
NCR
Test
(CAR, SCARs) Complaints
Statistical
Process Control
WIP Tracking
Equipment
Management
Data Collection,
Reporting, Metrics/KPIs
Auditing
AQP
Process Planning
Operational/Transactional Control
2006
CRM
Inventory
Batch
Control
Manufacturing Execution
Work Instructions & Procedures
Operator Tracking
Line
Monitoring
Weigh &
Dispense
Material Flow
& Lot Tracing
Container
Management
Order
Fulfillment
BOM
Financials
Machining
Cleaning
Assembly
Testing
Packaging
PLM
REGULATION
Reporter
Client
CRM Sys.
CORPORATE
POLICY
PROCEDURE
Acknowledgement
Letter to Customer
SOP
Issue a CAPA to
Plant
Closure Letter
To Client
Plant Complaint
Coordinator
Review
Edit/
Close
Request for
CAPA Plan
Initiate
Root Cause
Complaint
Analysis
Coordinator
Initiate
Containment
Action
Regulatory Submission
( Such as 30 day MDR
5 day MDR, Summary)
Initiate
CAPA
Process
2006
Review
CAPA
Plan
CAPA Plan
Approved?
Initiate
Implementation
Close
CAPA
Verify
Effectiveness
Implement
&
Sign-Off
Electronic Enforcement
2006
2006
Sources
GHTF, Implementation of risk management principles and activities within a Quality Management System, May 20, 2005
FDANews, Introduction to GAMP Good Practice Guide: A Risk-Based Approach to E-Record Compliance, Per Olsson
FDA, A Risk-Based Approach to Pharmaceutical Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) for the 21st Century
PAT & Risk-Based Initiatives: Implementation Issues; PDA New England - 08 Dec 2004, Cliff Campbell B.E., C.Eng
The Harmonized PAT Solution: Application of Risk-Based Tools & PAT Strategies in Pharmaceutical Product Manufacture; PDA New England 08 Dec 2004, Jeffrey A.
Priem
Process Analytical Technologies (PAT) Sub-Committee Report ACPS Meeting 21 October 2002, Tom Layloff, Ph.D.
Risk Management, From Basic to Advanced; RAPS 11 October 2004, Kevin P. Bassett; Matthias M. Buerger; Oliver P. Christ
Risk Management of Medical Devices: Implementation, ASQ Biomedical 09 December 2004, Alfred M. Dolan
Implementation of Risk Management Principles within a Quality Management System, 09 December 2004, Kimberly Trautman
ISO 14971:2000, Essentials 1st Edition, A practical handbook for implementing the ISO 14971 Standards for medical devices, Canadian Standards Association
IEE Tolerability of Risk Framework hsc36, Health and Safety Briefings - October 2000
FDA, A perspective on Risk Analysis for the GMP Initiative - April 2003, H. Gregg Claycamp, Ph.D., CHP
Risk Reduction in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing using Process Analytical Technology, Brian Davies
Risk-Based Method for Prioritizing cGMP Inspections September 2004, Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Food and Drug Administration
PAT Progress Report: 13 April 2004 ACPS Meeting, Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science CDER, FDA
Guidance for Industry, PAT - A Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Quality Assurance DRAFT GUIDANCE
Process Analytical Technology (PAT): Whats in a name? 09 April 2004, D. Christopher Watts, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA
2006
Thank You
Joseph Vinhais
Joseph.vinhais@brooks.com
978.262.7868
http://lifesciences.brookssoftware.com