Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Basics
What are real options?
Limitations of DCF valuation
Option to delay
Option to expand
Option to abandon
Real options: Caveats
2
1. Basics
3. Limitations of DCF
Valuation
DCF analysis blindly believes the expected
cash flows that are likely to occur over the life
time of the asset
So the +ve or ve NPV that is calculated is
not a realistic figure
A +ve NPV project can run into losses due to
bad prospects & wrong decisions after the
investment
A ve NPV project can be made profitable if
prospects are good & by right decisions after
6
the investment
3. Limitations of DCF
Valuation
So DCF analysis does not consider the managers
discretion to influence the cash flows based on
the evolving business prospects
Assuming that managers are rational, they can
take decisions that will increase profits & cash
flows in good times OR decisions that will
minimise losses in bad times
So the DCF value of an investment understates
the value that can be created by good decision
making
Real options enable us to assess the value of
good decision making during the life of an
7
investment
3. Limitations of DCF
Valuation
NPV of an investment is calculated based on the
expected cash flows & discount rates at the time
of analysis
So the NPV computed is a measure of value &
acceptability of the investment at a point of time
But expected cash flows & discount rates
change over time & so does the NPV, due to
changes in business prospects & impact of
managers decisions
Hence NPV is a static measure that overlooks
the changes in business prospects & quality of
managerial decisions
8
3. Limitations of DCF
Valuation
So a ve NPV project now may turn out to be a
+ve NPV project in future & vice versa
This may not happen in a competitive
environment where no firm has any special
advantages over its rivals in implementing
projects
However in a non-competitive environment a
project can be implemented by only a specific firm
This can happen due to barriers to entry in the
form of legal restrictions or high capital
requirements
In such a situation a ve NPV project can become
9
+ve NPV in future
4. Option to Delay
This type of a situation arises in cases of:
(a) Product patents
(b) Natural resource licenses
Product patents provides a firm with the
right to develop & market a product
The firm might have spent an amount of
money in developing it
The firm is allowed to develop & market
the product only during a specified period
of time
10
4. Option to Delay
(b) Natural resource licenses
These provide the firm a right to exploit &
market a natural resource
The firm has to pay fees to acquire license
for this
The firm is allowed to extract the resource
& market it only during a specified period of
time
Both (a) & (b) represent option to delay
Both can be compared with European call
options
11
Current Price
of the asset
Call Option
Current Price of
the asset in the
spot market (S0)
Price at which
call can be
exercised
Strike Price of
the call option
(K)
Time to
expiration
Time to
expiration of
the call option
(t)
Option to Delay
Present value
of expected
cash inflows
(V)
Initial
investment
required in the
project (X)
Period for
which firm has
exclusive rights
for the project
(n)
13
14
15
16
4B(b): Practical
Considerations
The limitations of using option pricing models to
value real options are:
1. The underlying asset is not traded in a market.
So it is difficult to estimate its value / price &
volatility (variance) of price
The approach of estimating the price / value on
the basis of cash flows and a discount rate can
be highly erroneous due to wrong estimation of
cash flows & wrong discount rate used
Estimation of volatility depends on the
distribution of prices which is not known for
projects
22
4B(b): Practical
Considerations
2. The period for which firm may have
exclusive rights may not be clear
Competitive advantages of a firm over its
rivals are like exclusive rights to the
project as long as the rivals are not able
to emulate them
The time for which firm will be able to
maintain its competitive advantages
cannot be clearly stated
23
4B(b): Practical
Considerations
3. The behaviour of prices of the asset may
not fit with the price behaviour assumed by
option pricing models.
As BSM assumes, the prices change by
small amounts continuously & the variance
in value remains constant over time, may
not apply to real investments (projects)
A sudden technological change /
emergence of a substitute will significantly
increase / decrease the value of project
24
Eg. 1: Sol.
26
c S0e
yT
pKe
N (d1 ) K e
rT
rT
N (d 2 ) S 0 e
N (d 2 )
yT
N (d1 )
2
ln(S 0 / K ) (r y / 2)T
where d1
T
2
ln(S 0 / K ) (r y / 2)T
d2
d1 T
T
27
Eg. 1: Sol.
BSM value of option to delay = 906.86 m
This is the value of waiting up to the time
just before the patent expires &
implementing the project
NPV = 3422 m 2875 m = 547 m
Hence the co. likely to gain substantially
by delaying the investment in the
expansion project
The difference = 906.86 547 = 359.86 m
is called time value of the option
28
5. Option to Expand
Sometimes firms may have to make an
investment although it might lose money on that
This would be the situation when such an
investment would allow the firm to expand
business starting from that point or to enter into
new markets
In such conditions the firm may be willing to lose
funds on the initial investment in order to exploit
the option to expand in future
The option to expand is expected to have
sufficient value to cover the loss on initial
30
investment
5. Option to Expand
PV(Cash Flows from expansion / new market)
=V
Total investment required to expand / enter
new market = X
Firm has a fixed time horizon (t) at the end of
which it has to decide on whether to
expand / not
The firm cannot make the investment related
with expansion / entry into new market if
does not make the initial investment
31
5. Option to Expand
This situation is like a call option with:
Spot price of asset (S) = PV(Expected Cash
Flows)
Strike price (K) = Cost of expansion
Volatility () = SD in value of the
expansion
Time to expiration (t) = Time horizon for
decision
Risk-free rate of interest (r) = As
applicable
32
6. Option to Abandon
Often it is important in capital budgeting
decisions to maximise the value created either
by continuing with a project or exiting it
The option to abandon refers to the value that
can be unlocked by exiting or abandoning a
project when the cash flows are below
expectations
Option pricing approach provides a
methodology for estimating and incorporating
this value in capital budgeting decisions
38
6. Option to Abandon
Let V be the PV of cash flows during the
remaining life of a project
L the liquidation or abandonment value of
the project at the same point of time
The project has remaining life of n years
Payoff from the abandonment option:
= 0 if V > L
= L V if V < or = L
This is equivalent to that of a Put option
39
6: Eg. 3
ABC Ltd. Is considering partnership in a
real estate project with a life of 25 years
Initial outlay required: $ 100 m
PV(Expected Cash Flows) = $ 110 m
The co. has the option to abandon the
project at any time during the next 10
years by selling its share of ownership to
the other partners for $ 50 m
Variance in the PV (Cash Flows) = 0.09
40
6: Eg. 3
Spot price of the asset (S): PV(Cash
Flows) = 110 m
Strike price (K): Liquidation value = 50 m
Variance in value of underlying asset =
0.09
Time to expiration = 10 yrs
10-year risk-free rate = 6%
This is equivalent to a put option
Estimate the value of the real option
41
6: Eg. 3: Sol.
6A: Implications
Option to abandon provides firms with
operating flexibility to scale down /
terminate projects when they fall short of
expectations
Value of this real option provides an
objective measure for assessment /
comparison
The option to abandon represents the ability
of the firm to get out of long term
investments that turn out to be bad in future
43
6A: Implications
The flexibility to abandon depends on
the nature of business
Service businesses are easier to
abandon than manufacturing
businesses
Capital intensive businesses
(infrastructure sector) are less easy
to abandon
44
47
7C: Sustainability
Excess returns attract competitors & competition
eliminates excess returns
The more sustainable the competitive advantages
are the more sustainable will be the excess
returns & the greater the value of the embedded
options in the initial investment
Competitive advantages will not be sustainable if:
a) entry into the business is easy
b) competitors are aggressive
c) if the resource controlled by the firm is abundant
d) if it results from being the 1st mover / technology
50
7. Caveats..
While assessing the value of the real option the
life of the option (time to expiration) should be
set equal to the period of competitive
advantage
Option valuation approach rests on two basic
assumptions:
a. The underlying asset is tradable in a market
b. The option is tradable
Both these are not fulfilled in real options
So although the value of the real option might
be estimated it should be monetised with
51
caution
rT
rT
N (d 2 )
N (d 2 ) S 0 N (d1 )
2
ln(S 0 / K ) (r / 2)T
where d1
T
2
ln(S 0 / K ) (r / 2)T
d2
d1 T
T
52
c S0e
yT
pKe
N (d1 ) K e
rT
rT
N (d 2 ) S 0 e
N (d 2 )
yT
N (d1 )
2
ln(S 0 / K ) (r y / 2)T
where d1
T
2
ln(S 0 / K ) (r y / 2)T
d2
d1 T
T
53