PENILAIAN WALKABILITY UNTUK

WILAYAH PERKOTAAN DI INDONESIA

SENJAYA SETIANTO TRI BASUKI JOEWONO

Universitas Katolik Parahyangan Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Jln. Ciumbuleuit 94, Bandung Jln. Ciumbuleuit 94, Bandung
Telp: (022) 2032655 Telp: (022) 2032655
senjayasetianto.93@gmail.com vftribas@unpar.ac.id

The 19th International Symposium

Indonesian Inter-University Transportation Studies Forum (FSTPT)
Islamic University of Indonesia, Yogyakarta
October 11-13, 2016
LATAR BELAKANG
- Rangkaian Permasalahan

Pembangunan
jalan yang masif
Peningkatan jumlah Kemacetan;
penduduk perkotaan; Rendahnya kegiatan
Peningkatan jumlah Kepemilikan berjalan kaki;
kendaraan pribadi. kendaraan pribadi Polusi.
terfasilitasi;
Tidak terfasilitasinya
pejalan kaki.
Dependensi
Urbanisasi
pada kendaraan
LATAR BELAKANG
- Siklus Permasalahan

dependensi
pada
kendaraan

minimnya
keterbatasan
fasilitas
Lahan
pejalan kaki
LATAR BELAKANG
- Kebutuhan Mendasar
Menurunkan
dependensi pada
kendaraan

Meningkatkan
kegiatan berjalan
kaki

Pembangunan kawasan
yang walkable
KONSEP WALKABILITY

Kemudahan

Kenyamanan Walkability Keselamatan

Aksesibilitas
MANFAAT WALKABILITY

Keselamatan Kesehatan

Keadilan
& Keberlanjutan
Kesejahteraan
LANDASAN METODE
PENILAIAN WALKABILITY
Ruang
Hampa
Tempat Pipa

Fasilitas Ruang Rute

Kesehat- Pejalan Akses
an Kaki

Wadah
Pendana- Jaringan
an Ruang
Komunal
PENDEKATAN DALAM METODE
PENILAIAN WALKABILITY

Kuantitatif

Objektif

Kualitatif (?)
Metode Penilaian
Walkability

Subjektif Kualitatif
METODE PENILAIAN
WALKABILITY DI INDONESIA

Minimnya pembahasan yang dilakukan tentang konsep dan metode

penilaian walkability di Indonesia. Salah satunya adalah studi yang
dilakukan oleh Wibowo et al. (2015) di empat kawasan berbeda di
Kota Bandung;

Pada umumnya diskusi tentang walkability dikembangkan untuk

kondisi di luar Indonesia, misalnya Krambeck (2006), Hall (2007),
atau Eidmann et al. (2011).
TUJUAN PENELITIAN

Membandingkan berbagai metode penilaian walkability dan

melakukan analisis untuk mendapatkan metode penilaian walkability
yang dapat diterapkan di wilayah perkotaan di Indonesia.
METODE PENELITIAN
METODE PENELITIAN
 HASIL ANALISIS
- Klasifikasi Jenis Data

Jenis Data Yang Dinilai

No Metode Objektif Subjektif Kualitatif Kuantitatif
1 Walking Permeability Indices (Allan, 2011) X - - X
2 Grade-separated Pedestrian Systems (Bandara, 1994) X - - X
3 Walkability Index (Bradshaw, 1993) X X X X
4 Pedestrian Performance Measures (Dixon, 1996) X - X X
5 Walkability Checklist (DOT, 2003) - X X -
6 Florida Pedestrian Level of Service (FDOT, 2009) X - - X
7 Pedestrian Level of Service (Fort Collins, 1996) X X X X
8 Qualitative Level of Service (Khisty, 1944) - X X -
9 Pedestrian Infrastructure Prioritization Decision System (Moudon, 2001) X - - X
10 Pedestrian Location Identifier 1 (Moudon, 2001) X - - X
11 Pedestrian Location Identifier 2 (Moudon, 2001) X - - X
12 Pedestrian Deficiency Index (Portland, 1998) X - - X
13 Pedestrian Environmental Factors (Portland, 1993) X - X X
14 Pedestrian Potential Index (Portland, 1998) X - - X
15 Pedestrian Level of Service (Gallin WA-LOS, 2001) X X X X
 HASIL ANALISIS
- Klasifikasi Jenis Data

Jenis Data Yang Dinilai

Kuantitati
No Metode Objektif Subjektif Kualitatif
f
16 Basic Walking Security Index (Wellar, 2003) X X X X
17 Walkability Audit Tool (Dannenberg et al., 2005) X X X X
18 Level of Service (Highway Manual, 1997) X - - X
19 Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (Saelens et al., 2003) X X X X
20 Walkability Index (Frank et al., 2005) X - - X
21 Built Environment Index for Walking (Rodriguez et al., 2005) X - - X
22 Walkability Index (McCormack et al., 2006) X - - X
23 Level of Service Indicator (Kim et al., 2006) - X X -
24 Active Neighborhood Checklist (Hoehner et al., 2006) X X X X
25 Global Walkability Index (Krambeck, 2006) X X X X
26 Pedestrian Infrastructure (Shah, 2008) X X X X
Systematic Pedestrian and Cycling Environmental Scan (Pikora et al.,
27 X - X X
2002)
28 WABSA Project Walking Suitability Assessment Form (Emery et al., 2003) X X X X
29 St. Louis University Analytic Audit Tool (Brownsonet al., 2004) X - X X
30 The Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (Boarnet et al., 2006) X - X X
 HASIL ANALISIS
- Klasifikasi Jenis Data

Jenis Data Yang Dinilai

Kuantitati
No Metode Objektif Subjektif Kualitatif
f
31 Pedestrian Environmental Data Scan (Clifton et al., 2007) X - X X
32 Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities (Leather et al., 2011) X X X X
33 Walkability Assessment Tool (Philadelphia et al., 2010) - X X -
34 HPE's Walkability Index (Hall, 2010) X - X X
35 Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index (SFDPH, 2008) X X X X
36 Walkability Audit of North Adams, Massachusetts (Eidmann et al., 2011) X X X X
37 Walkability Measures for City Area in Indonesia (Wibowo et al., 2015) X - X X
38 Walkability and Bikeability (Horacek et al., 2012) X - X X
39 Walkability Checklist (WalkSanDiego, 2011) X X X X
40 Neighbourhood Walkability Checklist (Heart Foundation, 2011) X - X X
 HASIL ANALISIS
- Klasifikasi Variabel Penilaian

Rancangan Kualitas
Keragaman
Kepadatan
No Metode Pemisahan Penggunaan
Jarak Trotoar Jalan Persimpangan Kendaraan Demografik Keamanan Kenyamanan
Lateral Lahan

1 Dixon, 1996 - X X X X X - X - -
2 Portland, 1993 (PEF) - X X X - - - - - -
3 Pikora et al., 2002 - X X X X - - X X X
4 Brownsonet al., 2004 - X X X X X X X - X
5 Boarnet et al., 2006 - X X X X X - X X X
6 Clifton et al., 2007 - X X X X X - X X X
7 Hall, 2010 - X - X X - - X - -
8 Wibowo et al., 2015 X X - X X - - - X X
9 Horacek et al., 2012 - X - X - - - - X X
10 Heart Foundation, 2011 - X - X - - - - X X
SIMPULAN DAN SARAN
Konsep walkability yang telah dikembangkan dalam dua dekade
terakhir dapat dijadikan kerangka acuan dalam meningkatkan
kegiatan berjalan kaki dan memecahkan berbagai permasalahan
transportasi di Indonesia;

Sepuluh metode yang didapat dari studi ini dapat menjadi alternatif
sementara untuk diaplikasikan di wilayah perkotaan di Indonesia,
karena hanya memerlukan sedikit penyesuaian;

Di masa mendatang masih dibutuhkan metode-metode penilaian

walkability yang dikembangkan berdasarkan kondisi dan kebutuhan
di Indonesia sehingga mampu memberi dampak yang optimal.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. 2005. Kamus Besar
Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Boarnet, M. G., Kristen Day, Mariela Alfonzo, Ann Forsyth, dan Michael
Oakes. 2006. The Irvine-Minnesota Inventory to Measure Built
Environment: Reliability Tests. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine. 30 (2): 153-159.
Brownson, Ross C., Christine M. Hoehner, Laura K. Brennan, Rebeka A.
Cook, Michael B. Elliott, dan Kathleen M. Mcmullen. 2004. Reliability
of Two Instruments for Auditing the Environment for Physical Activity.
Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 1: 189-207.
City of Philadelphia. 2010. Philadelphia2035: Planning and Zoning for
a Healthier City. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Department of Public Health
City of Portland. 1993. The Pedestrian Environment Volume 4A.
Portland: 1000 Friends of Oregon Making the Land Use Transportation
Air Quality Connection.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
City of San Fransisco. 2008. Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index. San
Fransisco: San Fransisco Department of Public Health.
Clifton, K. J., A. D. Livi Smith, dan Daniel Rodriguez. 2007. The Development
and Testing of an Audit for the Pedestrian Environment. Landscape and Urban
Planning. 80 (1-2): 95-110.
Dannenberg, A. L., T. W. Cramer, dan C. J. Gibson. 2005. Assessing the
walkability of the workplace: A new audit tool. American Journal of Health
Promotion 20: 39-44.
Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Ruang. 2014, Makalah Presentasi Kebijakan
Penataan Ruang Perkotaan. Semarang, 5 Juni 2014.
Eidmann, J., Alex Long, Clara Noomah, dan Emily Ury. 2011. A Walkability Study
of North Adams, Massachusetts. Pittsfield: Berkshire Regional Planning
Commision.
Emery, J., dan Crump, C. 2003. The WABSA Project: Assessing and Improving
your Communitys Walkability and Bikeability. Chapel Hill: The University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Frank, L. D., Michael J. Greenwald, Sarah Kavage, dan Andrew
Delvin. 2011. An Assessment of Urban Form and Pedestrian and
Transit Improvements as an Integrated GHG Reduction Strategy.
Washington: Washington State Department of Transportation.
Grosvenor, Tim. 2000. Qualitative Research in the Transport Sector.
TRB Transportation Research Circular E-C008: Transport Surveys:
Raising the Standard.
Harahap, F. R.. 2013. Dampak Urbanisasi Bagi Perkembangan Kota
di Indonesia. Jurnal Society, I (1): 35-45. Bangka: Jurusan Sosiologi
Universitas Bangka Belitung.
Hall, R. A. 2010. HPEs Walkability Index Quantifying the
Pedestrian Experience. ITE 2010 Technical Conference and Exhibit
Compendium of Technical Papers.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Heart Foundation. 2011. Neighbourhood Walkability Checklist.
(Online).
(http://www.heartfoundation.org.au/images/uploads/publications/Neig
hbourhood-walkability-checklist.pdf, diakses 29 Juli 2016)
Horacek, T. M., A. A. White, G. W. Greene, M. M. Reznar, V. M.
Quick, J. S. Morrell, S. M. Colby, K. K. Kattelman, M. S. Herrick, K.
P. Shelnutt, A. Mathews, B. W. Phillips, dan C. Byrd-Bredbenner.
2012. Sneakers and Spokes: An Assessment of The Walkability and
Bikeability of US Postsecondary Institutions. Journal of
Environmental Health. 74: 8-15.
Krambeck, H. V. 2006. The Global Walkability Index. Master of City
Planning and Master of Science in Transportation Thesis. Cambridge:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Leather, J., Herbert Fabian, Sudhir Gota, dan Alvin Meija. 2011. Walkability
and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities. Metro Manilla: ADB Sustainable
Development Working Paper Series.
Litman, T. A. 2014. Economic Value of Walkability. Victoria Transport Policy
Institute.
Maghelal, P. K., dan Capp, C. J. Walkability: A Review of Existing Pedestrian
Indices. URISA Journal. 23: 5-19.
Nyagah, Peris. 2015. A Multi-~Procedural Approach to Evaluating
Walkability and Pedestrian Safety. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional
Papers, and Capstones. Paper 2568. Nevada: University of Nevada, Las
Vegas.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2007. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia
Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penataan Ruang. Jakarta.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2009. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia
Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas Angkutan Jalan. Jakarta.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2014. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan
Umum Nomor: 03/Prt/M/2014 Tentang Pedoman Perencanaan,
Penyediaan, Dan Pemanfaatan Prasarana Dan Sarana Jaringan Pejalan
Kaki Di Kawasan Perkotaan. Jakarta: Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum.
Perone, J. S. dan Tucker, Lisa. 2003. An exploration of triangulation of
methodologies: Quantitative and Qualitative methodology fusion in an
investigation of perceptions of transit safety. Tampa: Center for Urban
Transportation Research.
Phillips, D. C. 1989. Subjectivity and Objectivity: an Objective Inquiry.
Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. (19-37)
Pikora, T.J., F. C. Bull, Konrad Jamrozik, Matthew Knuiman, Billie
Giles-Corti, dan R. J. Donovan. 2002. Developing a Reliable Audit
Instrument to Measure the Physical Environment for Physical Activity.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 23 (3): 187-194.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Jalan dan Jembatan. 2011.
Penyusunan Naskah Ilmiah Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki. Bandung.
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Jalan dan Jembatan. 2013.
Rancangan Pedoman Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki.
Bandung.
PWA (Partnership for a Walkable America). 2001. Walkability
Checlist and Bikeability Checklist. (Online).
(http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/cms/downloads/walkability_checklist.pd
f, diakses 29 Juli 2016)
Tanan, N. dan Suprayoga, G. B. 2015. Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki Dalam
Mendukung Program Pengembangan Kota Hijau. Jurnal HPJI. 1: 17-
28.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Singh, K. dan Jain, P. K. 2011. Methods of Assessing Pedestrian
Quality of Service. Journal of Engineering Research and Studies. 2
(1): 116-124.
State of Florida. 2009. Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Florida:
State of Florida Department of Transportation.
Susantono, Bambang. 2013. Transportasi & Investasi. Jakarta:
Kompas Media Nusantara.
Susantono, Bambang. 2014. Revolusi Transportasi. Jakarta: Gramedia
Pustaka Utama.
Vale, D. S., Miguel Saraiva, dan Mauro Pereira. 2016. Active
Accessibility: A Review of Operational Measures of Walking and
Cycling Accessibility. The Journal of Transport and Land Use. 9 (1):
209-235.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
WalkSanDiego. 2011. Walkability Guide. (Online).
(https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/circulatesd/pages/240/attach
ments/original/1444429273/WalkabiltyGuide-
English_Revised_December_2011.pdf?1444429273, diakses 29 Juli
2016).
Wibowo, S. S., Natalia Tanan, dan Nuryani Tinumbia. 2015.
Walkability Measures for City Area in Indonesia (Case Study of
Bandung. Journal of The Eastern Asia Society for Transportation
Studies. 11: 1507-1521.
 SEKIAN DAN TERIMA KASIH

The true miracle is not walking on water or walking in air,

but simply walking on this earth.

- Thich Nhat Hanh