Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Fingers
(Plan view)
Sub-Particle Scale (SPS) Turbulence Model
Spatial-filter over the governing equations (compressible):
(Favre-averaging)
D ~
.u
Dt
~
Du 1 1
2~
~ P g o u .
f f Dt
Resolution x = 0.008m
Velocity Vectors
in horizontal planes
(interpolated)
Velocity Vectors
in horizontal planes
Velocity Vectors
in horizontal planes
Velocity Vectors
in horizontal planes
Velocity Vectors
in horizontal planes
Velocity Vectors
in horizontal planes
Velocity Vectors
in horizontal planes
Slices of an ODE
1015
Density (kg/m)
1010
1005
1000
995
1010
1005
2h
Flow
Kernel Correction Methods
Open
Boundary
Deactivate?
Landslide-generated Tsunami
Test case for evaluation of numerical models
at the 3rd International Workshop on
Longwave Runup Models, 2004
0.1
free-surface (m)
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
-0.1
-0.2
experimental data
-0.3
SPH 2-D
-0.4 SPH 3-D
-0.5
time (s)
Good Experimental data available
Huge drawdown resolution is main issue
resolution is less than 2-D (x = 0.1m)
with periodic boundaries at the moment
Incorrect SPS effects of non-dynamic Cs?
Conclusions and Further Work
Described approach to capturing CTSs in
SPH
Compressible SPH-SPS scheme for better
description of viscous flows
Our model predicts reverse breaking &
downbursting in 2-D
3-D JHU SPH-SPS model captures ODEs
model is too coarse and needs much finer
resolution
Sediment transport has also been attempted
at JHU by graduate student Shan Zou
Immediate Future Work (2)
Clearly, parallel codes are paramount
Coupling with a Nonlinear SWE model is essential to save time and effort
for modelling offshore (non-breaking) waves