Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
GLENN
HUBBARD
ANTHONY PATRICK
OBRIEN
MICROECONOMICS
FIFTH EDITION
GLOBAL EDITION
Pearson Education Limited 2015
CHAPTER
CHAPTER
Appendix: Using
Indifference Curves and
Budget Lines to Understand
Consumer Behavior
Define utility and explain how consumers choose goods and services to
maximize their utility.
Utility cannot be directly measured; but for now, suppose that it could.
What would we see?
As people consumed more of an item (say, pizza) their total utility
would change:
The amount by which it would change when consuming an
extra unit of a good or service is called the marginal utility.
Generally expect to see the first items consumed produce the most
marginal utility, so that subsequent items gave diminishing
marginal utility.
The concept of utility can help us figure out how much of each item to
purchase.
(2) (5)
(1) Marginal (4) Marginal
Slices Utility Cups Utility
of Pizza (MUPizza) of Coke (MUCoke)
1 20 10 1 20 20
2 16 8 2 15 15
3 10 5 3 10 10
4 6 3 4 5 5
5 2 1 5 3 3
6 3 1.5 6 1 1
Table 10.2 Converting marginal utility to
Pearson Education Limited 2015 marginal utility per dollar 11 of 59
Rule of Equal Marginal Utility per Dollar Spent
Suppose the marginal utility per dollar obtained from pizza was
greater than that obtained from Coke.
Then you should eat more pizza, and drink less Coke.
This implies the Rule of Equal Marginal Utility per Dollar Spent:
consumers should seek to equalize the bang for the buck.
Some combinations satisfying this rule are given below.
MU Pizza MU Coke
PPizza PCoke
For example, you could buy 4 slices of pizza and 2 cups of Coke for
$10. From Table 10.1, this would give you 52 + 35 = 87 utils, less than
the 96 utils that you get from 3 slices and 4 cups.
Marginal utility per dollar from 4th slice: 3 utils per dollar
Marginal utility per dollar from 2nd cup: 15 utils per dollar
Since you get so much more marginal utility per dollar from Coke, you
ought to drink more Cokeand indeed, that would increase utility.
1. You can afford more than before; this is like having a higher
income.
2. Pizza has become cheaper relative to Coke.
We refer to the effect from 1. as the income effect, and the effect from
2. as the substitution effect.
We know that some goods are normal (goods that we consume more
of as our income rises) and some are inferior (goods that we
consume less of as our income rises).
If pizza is a normal good, the income effect of its price decreasing will
cause you to consume more pizza.
If you had $10 before, you bought 3 slices of pizza (3 x $2.00) and 4
cups of Coke (4 x $1.00).
If pizza cost $1.50, $8.50 would allow you to purchase the same
combination of items: 3 x $1.50 + 4 x $1.00.
The marginal utility per dollar is not quite equal, but it is as close as
we can get.
Marginal Marginal
Number Utility from Number Utility from
of Slices Last Slice of Cups Last Cup
of Pizza (Mupizza) of Coke (Mucoke)
1 20 13.33 1 20 20
2 16 10.67 2 15 15
3 10 6.67 3 10 10
4 6 4 4 5 5
5 2 1.33 5 3 3
6 3 6 1
LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Suppose Dave is faced with the choice of the above two weekly
consumption bundles.
In the first situation, we would say Dave gets higher utility from B than
from F; in the third, that the utility from B and F was the same.
PPizza MU Pizza
MRS
PCoke MU Coke
Dropping the MRS term from the middle, we can rewrite this as:
MU Coke MU Pizza
PCoke PPizza
This means we have derived the Rule of Equal Marginal Utility per
Dollar Spent.