Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 17

Evaluation of Quality and Interchangeability of

Medicinal Products

Training Workshop for Evaluators


from National Medicines Regulatory
Authorities in East African
Community

Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania


Date: 10 to 14 September 2007

Slide 1 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


Evaluation of Quality and Interchangeability of
Medicinal Products
Finished Pharmaceutical Products
Manufacturing process and in-process controls
Process validation
Compliance with GMP

Presenter: Deus K. Mubangizi, pharmacist, MSc(Pharm.)

deuskm@yahoo.co.uk, dmubangizi@nda.or.ug

Chief Inspector of Drugs, National Drug Authority

WHO expert

Slide 2 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


Quality dossier / Section 3
Finished Pharmaceutical Product (FPP)
3.1. Manufacturing and marketing authorization
3.2. Pharmaceutical development
3.3. Formulation
3.4. Sites of manufacture
3.5. Manufacturing process
3.6. Manufacturing process controls of Critical steps and intermediates
3.7. Process validation and Evaluation
3.8. Specifications for excipients
3.9. Control of the FPP
3.10. Container/closure system (s) and other packaging
3.11. Stability testing

Slide 3 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


Quality dossier / Section 3
Finished Pharmaceutical Product (FPP)

3.12. Container labelling

3.13. Product information for health professionals

3.14. Patient information and package leaflet

3.15. Justification for any differences to the product in the country or


countries issuing the submitted WHO-type certificate(s)

Slide 4 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.4. Manufacturing sites
Name and street address of each facility where any aspect of
manufacture occurs including production, sterilisation,
packaging and quality control
Include any alternative manufacturers

Certificate issued by the Competent DRA according to WHO


Certification scheme for each site where a major step of
manufacturing is performed

Submit a valid GMP certificate (may not insist if inspected


by WHO)

Slide 5 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.5. Manufacturing Process
Flow chart with indication of each step showing where
materials enter the process. Indication of critical steps and
in-process controls

Description of manufacturing/packaging including


Scale
Equipment by type (e.g. tumble blender) & working capacity
Process parameters for steps, (e.g. time, temperature, pH)
Environmental conditions, e.g. relative humidity for hygroscopic
FPPs., area class for sterile FPPs

Slide 6 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.5. Manufacturing process (cont.)
Proposal for reprocessing justified with data.

Copy of master formula.

Batch manufacturing record real batch.

Sterile products sterilisation steps and/or aseptic


procedures.

Description of in-process tests including plan of sampling


and acceptance limits).

Data for 3 full scale batches to support achievement of


predetermined specifications.
Slide 7 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007
3.6. Manufacturing Process Controls of
Critical steps and Intermediates

Identification of critical steps with test methods and justified


acceptance criteria

Information on quality of isolated intermediates, test


methods and justified acceptance criteria to control them

Slide 8 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.7. Process Validation and Evaluation

WHO validation definition

The documented act of proving that any procedure, process,


equipment, material, activity, or system actually leads to the
expected results.

Slide 9 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.7. Process Validation and Evaluation

What should be validated ?

Any aspect of operation, including significant changes to the


premises, facilities, equipment or processes, which may affect
the quality of the product, directly or indirectly, should be
qualified and validated

Slide 10 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.7. Process Validation and Evaluation

Purpose of validation

Process validation is intended to establish that the proposed


manufacturing process is a suitable one and yields
consistently a product of the desired quality.

i.e. that the process is suitable and under control

Slide 11 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.7. Process Validation and Evaluation
Validation mandatory for processes including a critical step

The aim is to show that critical steps are under control and lead
continuously to the desirable quality

Examples of critical steps (list non exhaustive)


mixing,

coating,

granulation,

emulsification,

non-standard sterilisation

Slide 12 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.7. Process Validation and Evaluation
3.7. Process Validation and Evaluation (details on first 3 production batches)
Batches
batch number
batch size
place and date of manufacture
batch number of API(s)
yield
batch purpose (validation, stability, clinical trial )

Process
equipment
process parameters
validation protocol.

Results
critical steps
in process control
finished product specification

Slide 13 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.7. Process Validation and Evaluation

Concurrent validation carried out during normal production


on the first 3 production batches

OR

For well-established processes


process data, in-process controls and quality controls on a
total of 10- 25 batches to present a statistically significant
picture

Slide 14 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.7. Process Validation and Evaluation
If validation data (on production scale batches) are not available
submit

validation protocol,

commitment that validation report will be submitted later


for evaluation,

commitment that data will be available in case of


inspection,

commitment that WHO will be informed of any significant


deviation.

Slide 15 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


3.7. Process Validation and Evaluation
Validation protocol should include
brief description of the process with summary of critical steps and parameters to be
followed during validation,
specifications of the FPP at release,
details of analytical procedures and limits,
sampling plan,
unifromity of dosage units essential for FDCs,
proposed timeframe

Validation report when submitted should include


results for each batch, certificates of analysis, batch production
records, report on usual findings, modifications, observations and
conclusions

Slide 16 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007


THANK YOU

Slide 17 of 19 D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept. 2007

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi